lecture outline prejudice theories of prejudice measures of prejudice explicit v.s. implicit...
Post on 12-Jan-2016
226 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture Outline
Prejudice
Theories of Prejudice
Measures of Prejudice
Explicit v.s. Implicit Prejudice
Prejudice
Definition:
A positive or negative attitude, belief, or feeling about a person generalized from attitudes, beliefs, or feelings about the person’s group
Components of Prejudice
Stereotypic beliefstypical attributes
Symbolic beliefsvalues, traditions, customs
Emotionsaffective reactions (e.g., disgust)
Theories of Prejudice
Realistic Group Conflict Theory
Minimal Group Paradigm
Realistic Group Conflict Theory
Group: social unit; members inter-
dependent
In-group: group person belongs to
Out-group: group person does not belong to
Intergroup relations: when individuals from different groups interact in terms of their group identification
Realistic Group Conflict Theory
Competition between groups
causes prejudice & intergroup conflict
The Summer Camp Studies
Sherif and Colleagues
Purpose: Test whether competition causes prejudice & intergroup conflict
Summer Camp Studies
Created situations that fostered: group identityintergroup conflictgroup harmony
Four stages
Spontaneous interpersonal friendships
Group formation
Intergroup conflict
Intergroup harmony
Summer Camp Studies
Stage 1: Spontaneous Interpersonal
FriendshipsStudies 1 and 2
Boys from whole camp
interacted
Developed friendships
naturally
Listed close friends
Two groups created
Stage 2: Group Formation
Studies 1 and 2
Boys developed in-group identity
•interacted only with own group
•activities fostered liking
Listed close friends 2nd time
95% listed friends from in-group
Study 3 (Robbers’ Cave)
Began at group formation stage
Two groups - different locations
Boys developed in-group identity
•interacted only with own
•activities fostered liking
Stage 3: Intergroup Conflict
Tournament of Games: 5 dollar prizebaseballtouch football tug of wartreasure hunt
Intergroup conflict: name calling stealing flagsfights
Stage 3: Intergroup Conflict
Bean TossCollected as many beans as
they couldPut beans in sack Supposedly shown each boy’s
sackEstimated number of beans in
each sackKnew group membership only
Stage 3: Intergroup Conflict
Bean Toss
Same sack shown to each boy
Results: overestimated beans for in-group
underestimated beans for out-group
Stage 4: Intergroup Harmony
Reduce conflict & prejudice
1. Contact hypothesis
2. Superordinate goalswater supply malfunctionedbus broke down
Minimal Group Paradigm
Challenged idea that competition required for intergroup conflict
A simple distinction between
groups is sufficient to cause bias
Minimal Group Paradigm
People assigned to groups
Groups have no history, norms, or values
Members have no contact
Membership based on trivial criteria
Minimal Group Paradigm
Goal of these experiments:
Show that group membership ALONE
produces in-group bias
Minimal Group Paradigm1. Group members alone and anonymous
2. 14-15 yr. old boys
3. Boys estimated dots on a screen
4. Boys labeled as over- or underestimators
5. Boys completed series of pay off matrices where
they gave points to individual boys who would later
receive the points and trade them in for fun stuff
Minimal Group Paradigm
Payoff Matrix
#26, one of the:overestimators(in-group) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19
#17, one of the: 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
underestimators(out-group)
Boys most often selected 12:11 strategy
Fairness combined with ingroup profit
Minimal Group Paradigm
The Big Point
In-group bias occurred in absence of competition over scarce resources
Group identity was sufficient to create in-group bias
Examples of Self-Report Measures of Prejudice
Old Fashioned Racism Scale
Generally speaking, do you feel blacks are smarter, not as smart, or about as smart as whites?
If a black family with about the same income and education as you moved next door, would you mind it a lot, a little or not at all?
Examples of Self-Report Measures of Prejudice
Modern Racism Scale
Over the past few years, blacks have gotten more economically than they deserve
Blacks are getting too demanding in their push for equal rights
Self-Reported Prejudice
General pattern:
Prejudice is subsiding
Explanations
People are less prejudiced now
Social Desirability
Social Desirability
People lie about their prejudiced to appear unbiased to others
Bogus Pipeline
An experimental paradigm
Experimenter claims to have access (a pipeline) to participants’ true reactions
Participants seated in front of machine w/steering wheel attached
-3
-1
-2
0+1
+2
+3
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Completed survey about self
Rated African Americans on traits by turning wheel
-3 (very uncharacteristic)+3 (very characteristic)
-3
-1
-2
0+1
+2
+3
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Manipulation
Bogus pipeline group
Control group
If people lie on self-report measures to appear unbiased then….
Attributes Negative Positive
Bogus Pipeline > Control Control > Bogus
Pipeline
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Neg. Attributes: Bogus Pipeline Control
Happy-go-lucky .93 -.13Ignorant .60 .20Stupid .13 -1.00Physically dirty .20
-1.33Unreliable .27 -.67Lazy .60 -.73Aggressive 1.20 .67
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Pos. Attributes Bogus PipelineControl
Intelligent .00 .47Ambitious .07 .33Sensitive .87 1.60
Bogus Pipeline StudySigall & Page (1971)
Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
Explicit Measures Implicit Measures
Responses more easily
modified
Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
Explicit Measures Implicit Measures
More vulnerable to
social desirability
Taxonomy of Prejudice Measures
Maass, Castelli & Arcuri (2000)
Controlling Responses Easy Difficult
Old fashioned racism
Open discrim
ination
Racial slurs
Modern racism
Subtle prejudice scale
Seating distance
Subtle language bias
Eye contact
Non-verbal behaviors
Who-said-w
hat
Fam
ous person task
Implicit association test
Stroop-like task
RT
following prim
ing
Physiological reactions
IAT: Implicit Association Test
The IAT measures RT:how quickly people categorize stimulus words.
Faster RT = stronger association
IAT responses correlate mildly with explicit responses
Dissociation
A lack of correspondence between what
people report on explicit measures and how
they respond on implicit measures
Causes of Dissociation
Social desirability:People may lie on questionnaires to appear unbiased
This would produce dissociation
Causes of Dissociation
Internalized egalitarian values:People genuinely endorse egalitarian values, but need cognitive resources to access them
This too would produce dissociation
Internalized Egalitarian Values
Logic:
1. Some people have internalized egalitarian values about stigmatized individuals
Internalized Egalitarian Values
Logic:
2. These people harbor prejudice, but are not conscious of those feelings
i.e., prejudice is unconscious
Internalized Egalitarian Values
Logic:
3. Internalized egalitarian values are newer associations & require more cognitive resources to access than ingrained prejudice.
These resources are not available when completing implicit measures
Internalized Egalitarian Values
Logic:
4. Egalitarian values only accessible when completing explicit measures.
When completing implicit
measures, more ingrained prejudiced responses emerge
Explicit and Implicit Prejudice
Social DesirabilityInternalized
Egalitarian Values
Know they are prejudiced
Know they are lying
Do not know they are prejudiced
Believe they are telling the truth
Subliminal Priming StudyDevine (1989)
1. Measure prejudice
2. Subliminal
priming
3. Rate Donald
Manipulation:
Percent of primes presented
•80% of primes associated with AA
•20% of primes associated with AA
Subliminal Priming Study
Devine (1989)
Subliminal Priming StudyDevine (1989)
Results:
1. Donald rated more hostile in 80% than 20% prime condition
2. Low and high prejudice participants did not differ in how hostile they rated Donald
•Primes presented outside of awareness
•As such, low prejudice people not motivated to control prejudice when rating Donald
•Unconscious prejudice dominates
Subliminal Priming Study
Devine (1989)
top related