lab 3
Post on 26-Oct-2014
125 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TABLE OF CONTENT
Abstract 2
Introduction and Objectives 3
Theory 4
Description of the Experimental Apparatus 6
Procedure 8
Data and Observations 10
Analysis and Results 12
Discussions 16
Conclusions 19
References 20
Appendix 20
ABSTRACT
1
An experiment was conducted to perform and demonstrate how the intensity of radiation
varies. This following experiment outlines the proper procedure for verifying the Inverse Square
Law for Heat and the Stefan-Boltzmann Law as well as to study Area Factors. Consequently the
student will then demonstrate them graphically by doing the analysis based on the all the data
and readings obtained.
As commonly known heat is transferred due to a temperature difference. Heat can be
transferred in three different ways, which are known as conduction, convection and radiation.
Any object that is hot gives off light known as Thermal Radiation. The hotter an object is
the more light it emits. And, as the temperature of the object increase, it emits most of its light at
higher and higher energies. (Higher energy light means shorter wavelength light.) In general, the
net rate of energy transfer by thermal radiation between two surfaces involves complicated
relationships among the properties of the surface, their orientations with respect to each other,
the extent to which the intervening medium scatters, emits and absorbs thermal radiation and
other factors. In these experiments, we will prove some fundamental law relating to radiation
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
2
In this particular laboratory session, the experiment has been divided to three parts. In
experiment 1, students are required to show that the intensity of radiation varies as the fourth
power of the source temperature.
Besides that, experiment 2 is conducted to show the tile intensity of radiation on a surface
is inversely proportional to the square of distance of the surface from the radiation source. On the
other hand, experiment 3 required the students to demonstrate that the exchange of radiant
energy from one surface to another is dependent upon their interconnecting geometry, i.e. a
function of the amount that each surface can ‘see’ of the other.
In addition to that, this experiment is also useful in such a way that it helps to provide
some exposure to the students so that they are able to interpret the obtained test data and at the
same time are able to apply the theory they have learned in class.
THEORY
3
The Stefan-Boltzmann Law
The Stefan-Boltzmann Law states that:
qb= (Ts4 –Ta
4)
Where qb = energy emitted by unit area of a black body surface (Wm-2)
(Note: Energy emitted by surface = 3.040 × reading from radiometer R – refer to
Radiometer Data sheet for explanation)
= Stefan-Boltzmann constant equal to 5.67 x 10-8 (Wm-2K-4)
Ts = Source temperature and surrounding = black plate temp. (K)
Ta = Temperature of radiometer and surrounding = room temp. (K)
The Inverse Square Law
The total energy dQ from an element dA can be imagined to flow through a hemisphere of radius
r. A surface element on this hemisphere dA1 lies on a line making an angle with the normal and
the solid angle subtended by dA1 at dA is dw = dA1/r2
If the rate of flow of energy through dA1 is dQthen dQ= idwdA where iis the intensity of radiation in the direction.
Figure 3.1 Radiation Heat Transfer: Solid Angle
Radiation Heat Transfer: Area Factor
4
Figure 3.2 Radiation Heat Transfer: Area Factor
The heat transfer rate from one radiating black surface to another is dependent on the amount
that each surface can see of the other surface. In order to solve radiant heat transfer problems an
area factor F is introduced where F is defined by the fraction of energy emitted per unit time by
one surface that is intercepted by the other surface.
Thus the time rate of radiant heat transfer (Q12) between two black surfaces of area A1and A2 at
temperature T1 and T 2 respectively is given by:
Q12= A1 F12 (T14 –T2
4)
Area factors are found by analysis, numerical approximation and analogy and results for
common configurations have been published in graphical form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL
APPARATUS
5
Description of the experimental rig
The Radiation Heat Transfer Rig consists of a pair of electrically heated radiant heat and
light sources, together with a comprehensive range of targets and measuring instrumentation.
The unit consists of a horizontal bench mounted track fitted with a heat radiation source
end and a light source at the other. Between the two sources may be placed either a heat radiation
detector or a light meter. In addition, a number of accessories can be fitted for experimental
purposes. These include metal plates with thermocouples attached, two vertically oriented metal
plates to form an aperture, and a number of acrylic filters. The radiation detectors and
accessories are all clamped to stands which enable them to be positioned at different distances
from the appropriate source. Distances are measured with a scale mounted on the front track.
Electrical power for the two radiation sources is supplied from control panel and a
variable transformer. Temperatures of the two metal plates used in conjunction with the heat
radiation source are displayed on a digital read-out, either reading being selected by switching
the connectors. Output from heat radiation detector and light meter are displayed on digital read
out.
Figure 3.3: View of the Radiation Heat Transfer Unit
6
Figure 3.4: Experiment I Set-up the Stefan-Boltzmann Law
Figure 3.5: Experiment II Set-up the Inverse Square Law
Figure 3.6: Experiment III Set-up Radiation Heat Transfer: Area Factor
7
PROCEDURE
Experiment I
1. Turn on the power source is switched on.
2. Connect black plate cable terminal is connected to the panel and measure the room
temperature is measured using the black plate
3. Install the black plate is installed on the horizontal rig with a distance of 50mm from the
heat source.
4. Position the radiometer is positioned at x=110 mm from the heat source, the radiometer
must be aligned such that the sensing surface is parallel to the heater surface.
5. Switch on the radiometer knob is adjusted to no. 2. The front surface of the radiometer is
closed with a black surface object and the knob is adjusted to get 0 reading.
6. Set the heater power input is set to maximum level.
7. When the black plate temperature (Ts) reaches 600C, all the corresponding radiometer
reading (R)* for black plate temperature from 600C to 1000C with the temperature
increment of 50C is recorded.
8. The black plate is dissembled with care.
Experiment II
1. Set the power input is set to maximum.
2. Position the radiometer is positioned at x=100 mm from the heat source. The radiometer
must be aligned such that the sensing surface is parallel to the heater surface.
3. After the heater is heated to a considerable constant rate, the radiometer reading can now
be observed to be almost constant.
4. The radiometer reading (R )* and its distance (x) from the heat source is recorded.
5. The above procedure is repeated for different radiometer to heat source distance (x), from
100 mm to 1000 mm with the increment of 100 mm.
8
Experiment III
1. The black plate is installed on the horizontal rig with a distance of 50 mm from the heat
source.
2. The aperture, which is formed by two aluminium-coated plates, is installed on the rig
with a distance of 200 mm from the heat source. The aluminium-coated surface is
positioned facing the heat source.
3. The radiometer is positioned at 300 mm from the heat source. The radiometer must be
aligned such that the sensing surface is parallel to the heater surface.
4. The heater power input is set to maximum level.
5. The aperture opening is set to 60 mm.
6. When the temperature of the black plate (Ts)has reached a steady value, the radiometer
reading (R)*for the aperture-opening from 60 mm down to zero in step of 5 mm is
recorded.
7. The black plate and aperture is disassembled, the heat source power is set to minimum
and the power source is turned off.
9
DATA AND OBSERVATIONS
Experiment I: Stefan-Boltzmann Law
= 5.67 X 10-8 (Wm-2K-4)
Room temperature (T∞) = 28°C
Black plate,
Ts (C)
Radiometer
Reading, R
(W/m2)
Ts
(K)
T∞
(K)
qb = 3.040 R
(W/m2) exp.
qb = (Ts4 - T∞
4)
(W/m2) theo.
Percentage
Error (%)
60 69 333 297 209.76 256.03 18.07
65 81 338 297 246.24 298.86 17.60
70 93 343 297 282.72 343.63 17.73
75 107 348 297 325.28 390.40 16.70
80 122 353 297 370.88 439.23 15.60
85 134 358 297 407.36 490.18 16.90
90 151 363 297 459.04 543.31 15.50
95 170 368 297 516.8 598.69 13.70
Table 3.1: Result for Experiment III
10
Experiment II: Inverse Square Law
Heat Sources
Distance, X (mm)
Radiometer
Reading, R
(mW/cm2)
log 10 X log 10 R
100 174.5 2 2.24171
200 93.0 2.30103 1.96848
300 50.2 2.47712 1.70070
400 31.0 2.60206 1.49136
500 21.2 2.69897 1.32634
600 15.8 2.77815 1.19866
700 11.7 2.84510 1.06819
800 9.4 2.90309 0.97313
900 7.5 2.95424 0.87506
1000 5.6 3 0.74819
Table 3.2: Result for Experiment II
Experiment III: Area Factors
Aperture (mm) 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Radiometer Reading
(mW/cm2)2.2 3.0 4.4 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.5 0.1
Table 3.3: Result for Experiment III
11
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
All the required graphs are shown on the following pages:
For Experiment II
Graph 1: Graph of Radiometer Reading (Intensity of Radiation) vs. Distance
Graph 2: Graph of log10 R versus log10 x
For Experiment III
Graph 3: Graph of Radiometer Reading against Aperture Opening
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Radiometer Reading vs. Distance
DISTANCE, X (mm)
RADI
OM
ETER
REA
DIN
G, R
(mW
/cm
2)
Graph 1: Graph of Radiometer Reading (Intensity of Radiation) vs. Distance
13
1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.20
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
f(x) = − 1.52339323075501 x + 5.40528629591971
log 10 R vs. log 10 X
log 10 X
log
10 R
Graph 2: Graph of log 10 R vs. log 10 X
14
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Radiometer Reading vs. Aperture Opening
APERTURE OPENING (mm)
RADI
OM
ETER
MET
ER (m
W/c
m2)
Graph 3: Graph of Radiometer Reading vs. Aperture Opening
15
DISCUSSIONS
Experiment I
The comparison of the emissivity of the black plate and Stefan Boltzmann Law, as well as the trend and the discrepancy between both results.
The first calculation is made according to the Stefan – Boltzmann Law and the other one is according to emissivity of the black plate, which is the experimental value. By comparison both results, generally we can say that the percentage error is quite small. Thus the experimental results agree closely with the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which is the theoretical value.
The uncertainty, in percent, of qb, if the measurement of the temperature is uncertain by 2%? Calculation is shown.
Consider the data at Ts = 60 C and the corresponding radiometer reading R = 69 W/m2. Thus the
emissivity of the black plate is qb = 3.040 x 69 = 209.76 W/m2.
Ts = 60 + 273 = 333 K
T∞ = 24 + 273 = 297 K
qb = (Ts4 - T∞
4) = 5.67 x 10-8 (3334 – 2974) = 256.03 W/m2 .
% Error = (256.03 – 209.76) x 100 / 256.03 = 18.07 %
16
Experiment II
The Radiation Heat transfer Rig set-up
The gradient of the slope for the graph of log10 R versus log10 x and what does it indicates?
From the best fit line equation, Y = -1.523X + 5.405 the gradient of the slope for the graph of log10 R vs. log10 X is equal to -1.523.
In theory, the intensity of radiation on a surface should be proportional to the square of distance of the surface from the radiation source. That is,
R= k
X 2where k is aconstant
log10 R=log10k−log10 X2
log10 R=−2 log10X+ log10k
From the derivation above, the theoretical gradient value is found to be -2. Thus, the
experimental gradient value calculated seems to lie within good tolerance from the theoretical
one.
What can your verified from the graphs?
17
From both Graph 1 and Graph 2, the negative slope shows the inversely proportional relationship
between the intensity of radiation on a surface and the square of distance of the surface from the
radiation source. The gradient actually the rate of heat generated, qgen.
Experiment III
The Radiation Heat transfer Rig set-up
Analysis of Graph 3
From the data recorded and also from Graph of Radiometer Reading against Aperture Opening,
we can say that generally the radiometer reading increases linearly with increasing aperture
opening. However, the radiometer readings for distance 55 mm and 60 mm show another story,
probably due to some errors. Errors may rise from numerous sources such as equipment faulty
and parallax error. Therefore, despite the errors, we can conclude that the exchange of radiant
energy from one surface to another is dependent upon their interconnecting geometry.
Why the radiometer is not showing zero reading when the aperture opening is 0mm?
In this experiment, we could not obtain radiometer reading equals to zero when the aperture
opening is zero because of fraction of the incident radiation from the heat source. Thus, the
radiometer will still give a small reading although the aperture opening is zero.
18
CONCLUSIONS
Experiment I
In Experiment I, it proven that the intensity of radiation varies as the fourth power of the source
temperature. Comparing the emissivity of the black plate and Stefan Boltzmann Law, generally
we can say that the percentage error is small. Thus the experimental results agree closely with
the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which is the theoretical value.
Experiment II
From best fit line of Graph 2, the experimental gradient obtained is equal to -1.523. The inverse
square law says that the theoretical slope of graph log10R vs. log10X has a value of -2. Thus, the
experimental gradient value calculated seems to lie within good tolerance from the theoretical
one. Besides, the negative slope shows the inversely proportional relationship between the
intensity of radiation on a surface and the square of distance of the surface from the radiation
source.
Experiment III
From the data recorded and also from Graph of Radiometer Reading against Aperture Opening,
we can say that generally the radiometer reading increases linearly with increasing aperture
opening. Despite the errors, we can conclude that the exchange of radiant energy from one
surface to another is dependent upon their interconnecting geometry. It is also found out that we
could not obtain radiometer reading equals to zero when the aperture opening is zero because of
fraction of the incident radiation from the heat source.
19
REFERENCES
Instruction manual from the Heat Transfer & Applied Thermodynamics Lab
2012, Radiation Heat Transfer, http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/radiation-heat-transfer-d_431.html
2012, Wikipedia, Inverse Square Lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law
2012, Wikipedia, Heat Transferhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_transfer
2012, The overview behind heat radiationhttp://www.efunda.com/formulae/heat_transfer/radiation/overview_rad.cfm
Incropera, DeWitt, Bergmann, Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 7 th Edition, Wiley Asia Student Edition
Yunus A. Cengel, Michael A. Boles, Thermodynamics An Engineering Approach, 7 th Edition, Mc Graw Hill
APPENDIX
20
Figure 3.7: Heat Transfer Mode
21
top related