div class=ts-pagebuttonPage 1button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 1: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails1jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 2button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 2: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails2jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 3button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 3: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails3jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 4button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 4: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails4jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 5button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 5: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails5jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 6button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 6: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails6jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 7button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 7: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails7jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 8button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 8: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails8jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 9button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 9: KM C364e-20170309070352 · disputes were referred to adjudication in terms of the JBCC Contract The respondent in its opposing affidavit and in argument contends src=https:reader030vdocumentssitereader030viewer20220204125b2eb6a47f8b9a91438c22a0html5thumbnails9jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdiv