key performance indicators you must monitor when buying leads

Post on 09-Jul-2015

1.400 Views

Category:

Education

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

CUnet's Steve Smith, Managing Director of Project Management, presents on the key performance indicators you need to know about. Sure, successful lead buying will ultimately be judged on the cost of each sale that is generated from the campaign, but in many cases determining the cost of each sale may take 15-60 days. During that time you may be wasting thousands of dollars on poor performing lead buying campaigns. This is unacceptable! In this session you will learn about the most important key performance indicators you MUST monitor when buying leads.

TRANSCRIPT

KPI ’S YOU CAN’T L IVE WITHOUT

Steve Smith, Managing Director February 2012

Reach, Recruit & Enroll the Right Students

Spring Training

Marketing KPIs 101 – An Example

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $10,000

Accepted leads = -

Leads contacted = -

Leads application = -

Leads enrolled = -

Leads started = -

Cost per enroll = -

Marketing KPIs 101 – Scrubbed

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $8,000

Accepted leads = 80

Leads contacted = -

Leads application = -

Leads enrolled = -

Leads started = -

Cost per enroll = -

Marketing KPIs 101 – End of Week 1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Contact Rate App Rate Enroll Rate Start Rate

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $7,800

Accepted leads = 80

Leads contacted = 24

Leads application = 1

Leads enrolled = 0

Leads started = 0

Cost per enroll = -

Marketing KPIs 101 – End of Week 2

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Contact Rate App Rate Enroll Rate Start Rate

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $7,800

Accepted leads = 78

Leads contacted = 40

Leads application = 3

Leads enrolled = 2

Leads started = 0

Cost per enroll = $3,900

Marketing KPIs 101 – End of Week 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Contact Rate App Rate Enroll Rate Start Rate

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $7,700

Accepted leads = 77

Leads contacted = 50

Leads application = 9

Leads enrolled = 4

Leads started = 0

Cost per enroll = $1,925

Marketing KPIs 101 – End of Week 10

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Contact Rate App Rate Enroll Rate Start Rate

Total Leads = 100

Cost per lead = $100

Total Lead cost = $7,600

Accepted leads = 76

Leads contacted = 52

Leads application = 12

Leads enrolled = 5

Leads started = 3

Cost per enroll = $1,520

Rookie Errors

Common Measurement Mistakes

Not measuring against a static pool

Not measuring against accepted leads

Not allowing data to season

Not assessing true lead cost

Using stale data

1

2

3

4

5

Getting to First Base:

Must Have KPIs

KPI #1: Volume, Cost and Pacing vs. Targets

• Target groupings (e.g. ground nursing programs)

• Volume and pace versus targets and vendor boast

• Cost, pacing versus target budget

• Percentage to target

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Lead

s

Day

Provider A - Cumulative Volume Provider A - Target Volume Provider A - Monthly Pace

KPI #1: Volume, Cost and Pacing vs. Targets

• Target groupings (e.g. ground nursing programs)

• Volume and pace versus targets and vendor boast

• Cost, pacing versus target budget

• Percentage to target

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Lead

s

Day

Provider A - Cumulative Volume Provider A - Target Volume Provider A - Monthly Pace

KPI #1: Volume, Cost and Pacing vs. Targets

• Target groupings (e.g. ground nursing programs)

• Volume and pace versus targets and vendor boast

• Cost, pacing versus target budget

• Percentage to target

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Lead

s

Day

Provider A - Cumulative Volume Provider A - Target Volume Provider A - Monthly Pace

KPI #2: Bad Lead Rates and Reason

DNC 3%

Q & T Call Centers

34%

Duplicates 29%

Geography 6%

Other 4%

Overcap 4%

Validation 16%

Scoring & Verification

4%

Average breakdown of bad inquiries by reason (Q3 2010-Q2 2011)

KPI #3: Conversion Rates

• Based on static pool of accepted leads

• Early and late stage conversion metrics

• E.g. Contact, Transfer, Visited, Application, Enrolled (Closed), Started (Funded), Graduated

Ground

Online

Representative EDU Metrics

Cost spent on a pool of leads divided by the number of conversions

Cost per closed loan, enrollment, start

Ground

Online

KPI #4: Acquisition Costs

Representative EDU Metrics

KPI #5: Operational Metrics

Speed to delivery

Cycle times

Volume vs. historical

Hitting a Double: Segmentation

Hitting a Double: Segmentation

Example Cost / Enrollment

TV

3rd Party Internet Leads

Paid Search – Branded

Paid Search - Unbranded

Ch

ann

el T

ype

$1733

$1325

$436

$1899

Lead source, sub affiliate

Target groups, program, campus, geography, market, level of education, degree type, team, other verticals - credit, LTV

Comparison of offline, aggregator, paid media channels

Hitting a Triple: Optimization

Hitting a Triple: Optimization

Multidimensional analysis

“Heat maps” to identify sweet spots and poor areas

Training for lower-performing teams

Reallocation of budget

Premium pricing strategies

Contact Rate

Akron

Alexandria

Allentown

Anne Arundel

Arlington

Augusta

Cam

pu

s

81.0%

73.7%

55.6%

53.3%

90.0%

60.0%

The World Series:

Marketing Measurements+

The World Series

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25

Age in Weeks

%Enrollments

Advanced volume pacing & conversion forecasting

The ever-elusive ROI number

Next Season: The Future of Data-Driven Marketing

Constraint-Based Optimization

Vendor A 118 23.9% 90 $ 74.73 $ 1,660.67 4 4.5% $ 6,711.40 90

Vendor B 2,189 34.2% 1,441 $ 32.82 $ 863.68 55 3.8% $ 47,289.80 1,580

Vendor C 225 17.6% 185 $ 117.27 $ 1,047.05 21 11.2% $ 21,738.06 200

Vendor D 305 30.3% 213 $ 96.58 $ 1,085.17 19 8.9% $ 20,544.30 230

TOTAL 2,837 26.5% 1,929 $ 49.92 $ 977.62 98 7.1% $ 96,283.57

Vendor A -74% 23 $ 1,718.79 1 30 $ 1,660.67

Vendor B 10% 1,580 $ 51,855.60 60 2,400 $ 863.68

Vendor C 3% 191 $ 22,398.57 21 232 $1,047.05

Vendor D -8% 197 $ 19,026.26 18 282 $1,085.17

TOTAL 3% 1,991 $ 94,999.22 100 2,945 $949.99

Good Lead Volume 62 3%

Total Lead Volume 108 4%

Monthly Cost -$ 1,284.35 -1%

Monthly Enrolls 2 2%

Cost/Enroll -$ 27.62 -3%

Takeaways

•Measure what matters and measure it right

•Segment and optimize for Moneyball results

•The investment will pay off

•You can do it even with a smaller budget

For additional questions:

Steve Smith steve.smith@cunet.com 416-323-1366 ext. 41224

top related