key benchmarks - nacubo

Post on 14-Nov-2021

5 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

NACUBO 2013 Planning and Budgeting Forum September 17, 2013

Key Benchmarks

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Purpose of ratios and benchmarking Important key performance measures – definitions and

calculations Analyzing the results and taking action Examples and discussion Conclusion

Source material: In this presentation, McGladrey, LLP is summarizing information on ratios for higher education institutions made popular by the publication, “Ratio Analysis in Higher Education: Measuring Past Performance to Chart Future Direction (Fourth Edition),” developed by KPMG LLP and Prager, McCarthy & Sealy, LLC.

1

Agenda

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Introduction

2

Brian J. Guastella Director - Assurance Services

McGladrey LLP One South Wacker Drive

Suite 800 Chicago, Illinois 60606

brian.guastella@mcgladrey.com (312) 634-4403

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Hands-on experience regarding key performance measures

Explain financial measures that provide meaning to financial data and help determine an institution’s level of success

3

Objectives

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Measurement of the use of financial resources to achieve the institution’s mission

A way to focus planning activities on those steps necessary to improve financial performance

4

Purpose of Ratios and Benchmarking

What is the institution’s mission?

What is the institution’s

overall financial health?

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

What is the institution’s mission?

All decisions should be made knowing you and others in your organization are stewards of the resources available to accomplish the Institution’s mission

A mission is best accomplished through a strategic plan

5

Your Institution’s Mission

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Current - Capacity to carry out current programs

Future - Continuing expected capacity to carry out future programs

Also trend analysis (improving vs. deteriorating)

6

Financial Health

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Are resources sufficient and flexible enough to support the mission?

Do operating results indicate the institution is living with available resources?

Does financial asset performance support the strategic direction?

Is debt managed strategically to advance the mission?

7

Financial Health Questions

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Composite Financial Index – combination of four core ratios to produce a single measurement of financial performance

Four steps: - Four core ratios calculated - Converted to strength factors - Weighting of strength factors - Total to reach CFI

Remember this only measures financial performance. CFI can be too high if resources are not being utilized to fulfill the Institution’s mission

8

CFI

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Overall Financial Health CFI

9

Resources: Primary

Reserve Ratio

Operating results:

Net Income Ratio

Financial Asset

Performance: Return on Net Assets Ratio

Debt management: Viability Ratio

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

-1 to 1 – Assess viability to survive

0 to 3 – Reengineer

3 to 5 – Direct resources to allow transformation

5 to 7 – Focus resources to compete in the future

7 to 9 – Opportunities to experiment with new initiatives

8 to 10 – Deploy resources to achieve a robust mission

10

CFI Ranges

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Primary Reserve Ratio – measures financial strength, higher ratio is better

Expendable net assets = Total net assets – Permanently restricted net assets – Property, Plant & Equipment, net + Long-term Debt

Recommended that this be ratio be at least 0.40X

11

Resources Sufficient and Flexible

Expendable net assets

Total expenses

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Operating Results – Operating Indicator

Net Income Ratio – measures operating performance (living within available resources)

Both numbers from statement of activities

Recommended that goal be 2 – 4% return over the long-term

12

Excess (deficiency) of unrestricted operating revenue over unrestricted operating expense

Total unrestricted operating income

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Net Income Ratio – measures operating performance (living within available resources)

Both numbers from statement of activities

Recommended that goal be 2 – 4% return over the long-term

13

Operating Results – Change in UR Net Assets

Change in unrestricted net assets

Total unrestricted income

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Return on Net Assets – measures total economic return, higher ratio is better

Recommended that goal be 3 – 4% return over the long-term

14

Financial Asset Performance

Change in net assets

Total net assets

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Viability Ratio – availability of expendable net assets to cover debt

Same numerator as Primary Reserve Ratio Recommended that this be ratio be between 1.25X and 2.00X

but could vary based on institution’s debt policies

15

Debt Management

Expendable net assets

Long-term debt

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Conversion to Strength Factors

16

Ratio Conversion Factor

Primary Reserve Ratio 0.133

Net Income Ratio - Operating 0.70%

Net Income Ratio - Change 1.3%

Return on Net Assets 2.0%

Viability Ratio 0.417

Ratio divided by conversion factor equals strength factor

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Weighting Pattern

17

Ratio Institution with Long-term Debt

Institution with no Long-term Debt

Primary Reserve Ratio 35% 55%

Net Income Ratio 10% 15%

Return on Net Assets 20% 30%

Viability Ratio 35% -

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

CFI Calculation – Example 1

18

Ratio Value Strength Factor

Weighting Factor Score

Primary Reserve Ratio 1.839 10 35% 3.5

Net Income Ratio 33.85% 10 10% 1.0

Return on Net Assets 17.20% 8.6 20% 1.7

Viability Ratio 1.927 4.6 35% 1.6

Total CFI 7.8

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Graphic Profile of Strength Factors

19

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

CFI Calculation – Example 2

20

Ratio Value Strength Factor

Weighting Factor Score

Primary Reserve Ratio 0.248 1.86 35% .65

Net Income Ratio (operating) 2.68% 3.82 10% .38

Return on Net Assets 3.09% 1.55 20% .31

Viability Ratio 0.442 1.06 35% .37

Total CFI 1.7

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Graphic Profile of Strength Factors

21

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Graphic – Higher Investment in PPE

22

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Graphic – Thinly Capitalized, Good Returns

23

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Resource Allocation to Mission

24

Important Critical to Future

Less Important to Future Very Important

Mission

Fina

ncia

l Per

form

ance

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Secondary Reserve ratio – assessment of significance of permanently restricted net assets

Nonexpendable Net Assets = Permanently restricted net assets

No recommended level but higher is better

25

Other Key Performance Measures

Nonexpendable net assets

Total expenses

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Net Tuition by student FTE – This ratio measures average tuition and fees actually received per student

When compared to prior years and to published rates, this measure reflects the institution’s success in retaining its annual tuition and fee increases

26

Other Key Performance Measures

Net tuition and fees

FTE students

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Net Education by Student FTE – This ratio measures average educational expenses incurred per student

When compared to prior years and net tuition per FTE, this measure reflects the institution’s success limiting cost increases and living within its means

Caution should be exercised in making institutional comparisons since entities serving different missions are likely to have substantially different educational cost bases

27

Other Key Performance Measures

Education and general expense

FTE students

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Debt Coverage ratio – income available to service debt service payments

Adjusted Change in Net Assets = Change in unrestricted net assets + depreciation expense + interest expense

Debt service = Principal payments + interest expense

No recommended level but higher is better

28

Other Key Performance Measures

Adjusted change in net assets

Debt service

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Tuition Discount Rate - This ratio measures the amount of tuition revenue funded by unrestricted institutional resources as well as external resources

29

Other Key Performance Measures

Scholarships and grants

Gross tuition and fees

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Fundraising expense to contribution ratio - This ratio measures the percentage of fundraising costs compared to contribution revenues – Institutions should remember that fundraising costs incurred in one period may result in contributions that will be received in future periods so consider a three year average

Recommended that not-for-profit organizations spend no more than 35% of related contributions on fund raising

30

Other Key Performance Measures

Fundraising expense

Contribution revenue

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Different than ratios we are discussing today

Purpose of CFI is to help institutions understand the affordability of their strategies and monitor financial results (long-term)

Purpose of ED ratios is short-term to identify risks related to SFA funding

31

ED Financial Responsibility Ratios

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Questions??

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

For additional information contact:

Brian J. Guastella Director McGladrey, LLP One South Wacker Drive, Suite 800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 brian.guastella@mcgladrey.com Direct (312) 634-4403

Michelle Horaney Partner McGladrey, LLP 201 N Harrison Street, Suite 300 Davenport, Iowa 52801 michelle.horaney@mcgladrey.com Direct (563) 888-4038 Cell (563) 343-4522

33

For more information on McGladrey’s Higher Education practice visit www.mcgladrey.com

© 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

This document contains general information, may be based on authorities that are subject to change, and is not a substitute for professional advice or services. This document does not constitute assurance, tax, consulting, business, financial, investment, legal or other professional advice, and you should consult a qualified professional advisor before taking any action based on the information herein. McGladrey LLP, its affiliates and related entities are not responsible for any loss resulting from or relating to reliance on this document by any person. McGladrey LLP is an Iowa limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent accounting, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. McGladrey®, the McGladrey logo, the McGladrey Classic logo, The power of being understood®, Power comes from being understood®, and Experience the power of being understood® are registered trademarks of McGladrey LLP. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.

McGladrey LLP

One South Wacker Drive Suite 800

Chicago, Illinois 60606 312.384.6000

www.mcgladrey.com

top related