jcpenney: embrace
Post on 07-Mar-2016
236 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Ron Johnson’s 6 P’s – First Principles of a Great
Millennial Retail Strategy Misplaced
Many commentators of the JCPenney turnaround saga led by ex-CEO Ron Johnson confuse themselves by mixing two types of business failures: (a) failures resulted from a lack of long-term business vision, and (b) failures resulted from radical, wholesale disruptions of operating platforms. Although both categories can put a firm’s economic viability in jeopardy, Johnson erred mainly on miscalculating the operating risks JCPenney would be exposed to from his complete overhauling of the firm’s merchan-dise pricing structure. Specifically, in introducing his revolutionary change, Johnson neglected to first understand what his target customer wanted, to test his strategy before actually implement-ing it, and to realize “the power of markdown price”. His mistakes ultimately caused devastating financial stress on the company, leading to a premature termination of an otherwise visionary transformatory experiment.
From January 25-26, 2012, JCPenney announced its plans to become “America’s favorite store”. As of February 1, it introduced a new pricing and promotional strategy, as well as a new personality for its overall company image. Then began the implementation of the remaining three pillars (product, presentation, and place) of the overarching JCP transformational strategy, which used the six P’s of retail to serve as the foundation for seamlessly repositioning the brand.
Indeed, Johnson’s critics are not few in numbers: articles which ran throughout his controversial reign, such as Business Insider’s “How Ex-CEO Ron Johnson Made JCPenney Even Worse”, and MSN Mon-ey’s “Ron Johnson's 5 biggest mistakes at J.C. Penney”, were not forgiving in assessing his brief stint at JCPenney. But post Johnson’s departure, JCPenney’s financial predicament continues to deterio-rate: despite a recent 0.9% surge in its October sales, the company still faces the threat of liquidation, a result of poor gross margins and excessive borrowing. Ivan Kenneally writes: “Much of Ullman’s turn-around strategy for JCP amounts to a grand undoing of the damage wrought by former CEO Ron Johnson’s disastrous tenure.” But “a failure so epic that experts and critics now question whether the 111-year-old retail chain will survive at all”, in my view, is not an ac-curate way to describe Johnson’s ambitious plans for JCPenney. In fact, rather than be completely discarded, his strategy, if revised and crafted to better capitalize on JCP’s existing strengths - such as its real estate and familiarity with managing successful private labels like Arizona® jeans - has significant potential. Had his new approach been implemented gradually and first aimed specifically at the Millennial segment of the current and future customer base, JCPen-ney may have been more successful at becoming “America’s favor-ite store”.
JCPenney’s current financial situation is undoubtedly grieve, but there is still room for a theoretical business proposal. In this case study, I seek to create a Millennial retail strategy built upon Johnson’s six P’s, advancing them as the embodiment of the first guiding princi-ples for any business wishing to remain relevant in today’s Omni Channel world. My specific proposal - that is, the creation of a new and exclusive JCPenney private labels targeted at a distinct age group within the Millennial segment - is supported by a detailed profil-ing of this consumer, an analysis of the private label strategy and current retail industry trends, and a reexamination of some of John-son’s more promising strategies.
“[Ron Johnson’s] was a great idea. But you have this massive structure that you need to support. Revenue supports your structure. You’ve got to make sure that the new model
works before you destroy the old one.”
-David Cush, Virgin America CEO
1
Anne Chen
Parsons the New School for Design
YMA FSF Scholarshipo Case Study: Embrace by JCP
2
3
4
5
6
7
i
Table of Contents
Introduction i
The Millennials: The “First Truly Digital” Generation 1
SWOT Analysis for the Millennial Customer 2
Marketing Plan and the 6 P’s of Retail Product 3 Personality 4 Promotion, Place, and Presentation 5 Pricing 6
Competitive Analysis Macy’s 9 Target 10
6-Month Sales Plan 12
Advertising Campaign 13
Visual Presentation 13
Appendix Appendix A 14 Appendix F 15 Appendix M 18 Appendix P 19 Appendix S 25 Appendix U 27 Appendix V 28 Appendix W 29 Appendix X 30 Appendix Z 31
Endnotes & Bibliography 32
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………..
….…………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
..……………………………..…………………………..…………………………………….
.…………………………..…………………………………..
……………..…………………………..…………………………..…….………………………….
………………….…………………………..…………………………..…………………………..
…………………………..…………………………..…………………………..………………….
……………………………..…………………………..………………………………….
…………………………..…………………………..……………………………….
………………………………..…………………………..………………………………
…………………………..…………………………..……………………………………...
…………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…………..
…………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…………
...………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…………..
…………………………..…………………………..…………………………………..…
…………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…………
……………...…..…………………………..…………………………..…………………
..……….…………………………..…………………………..………………………….. ..
..………………………………..…………………………..…………………………..…..
………..…………………………..…………………………..……………………………
……..………...………………..……………………………..…………………..
1
The Millennials: The “First Truly Digital”8 Generation
Demographic Profile
An appropriate Millennials characteristics study needs to be based on comparative
analysis between the Millennials and other generation cohorts. This is because only
Millennials characteristics that represent deviations from trends in other generations
should be of interest to a retailer – similar trends among generations indicate cross-
generational homogeneity and thus don’t help in formulating a distinct retail strategy for
Millennials.
Appendix X provides a quick comparison of generational demographics. Not
surprisingly, the ethnicity, education attainment, and life priority categories do not set the
Millennial customer apart from other cohorts as a new trend setter. “For the most part, the
priorities of being a good parent and having a successful marriage are most important to
Millennials, similar to those held by Gen X-ers at a similar stage of life. Similarly,
helping others in need is as important to the youth of both generations.”9 This is because
such factors obey their respective natural and social laws that lead to intergenerational
stability and continuity.
What does set the Millennials apart, as an April Barron’s magazine article noted,
are its sheer size (“Eighty-six million strong, [...] 7% larger than the baby-boom
generation”10); its growth rate (“...the Millennial population could keep growing to 88.5
million people by 2020, owing to immigration”11); and its influence in consumer
spending (“The Millennials already account for an annual $1.3 trillion of consumer
spending, or 21% of the total”12).
Appendix Z looks closer at specific characteristics within the Millennial cohort –
including gender make-up, common occupational groups, and average income and
personal spending amounts – based on a recent study conducted by Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company. But again, the key trend, for a retailer, from all these findings is the
Millennial customer’s expected spending potential relative to other generations.
Psychographic Profile and Attitudes
The critical overarching behavioral trend of this consumer segment which
retailers must acknowledge is their demand for a “seamless retail experience”13, and this
2
phenomenon only further accentuates the increasing focus on omnichannel retailing.
According to a retail CEO survey conducted by Berglass + Associates and Women’s
Wear Daily, “only 36% of respondents from companies with both physical stores and e-
commerce sites offer a seamless customer experience, yet Millennials expect the channels
to be integrated.”14 Other overarching Millennial trends which are especially important
include the need for instant gratification; social consciousness; and interest in curating
content and collaborating with others. But this segment’s most unique and important,
especially to JCPenney, quality is its connectedness – with their peers, the ongoings of
the world, and brands themselves – which is a phenomenon manifested through the
Millennials’ heavy use of technology and social media platforms (Appendix W).
When it comes to a product’s company retailer, Millennials value transparency
and honesty; fair pricing; respectful employee treatment; and assurance of safe
merchandise.15 When it comes to products themselves, the top five attributes the
Millennial consumer considers are value, familiarity, quality, function, and durability16.
The priority of “value” to the customer can be effectively realized through the
launching of the exclusive new JCP private label line discussed in the marketing plan
section of this case.
SWOT Analysis for the Millennial Customer
A summary of JCPenney’s current SWOT situation is summarized in Appendix
V, but in this section I discuss the table’s most important elements that are especially
applicable to my particular private label strategy. As evident from the “Introduction”,
JCPenney’s current weaknesses include leadership shifts, a confusing brand image that is
losing relevancy, loss of old clientele, and the threat of future liquidation thanks to poor
gross margins and excessive borrowing. Important threats include overarching industry
trends – such as rising labor costs and human rights concerns and a still unstable
economy – as well as the business strategies that the firm’s competitors are pursuing,
which will be explored in Part II’s “Competitive Analysis”. But now as I turn to the
remaining two SWOT components, I open by emphasizing their complementary
interrelationship: the most significant opportunity, I believe, lies in pursuing a Millennial
private label, and this strategy effectively leverages JCPenney’s strengths.
3
Logistically, JCPenney’s current strengths in (1) vertical integration (i.e. its well-
developed production, manufacturing, supply and distribution base, as well as its agility
in inventory management thanks to controls in real-time sales data, store networks, and
customer loyalty programs); (2) real estate (i.e. its 1,100 store locations17 and substantial
presence in shopping malls); and (3) private-label experience (i.e. its portfolio of
trademark brands such as Liz Claiborne®, Worthington®, St. John’s Bay®, The Original
Arizona Jean Company®, and Decree®) will provides the structural business-system
support a new private label requires. Branding-wise, a private label offers a more
affordable alternative to budget-conscious Millennials who, in their pursuit of personal
style, are favoring “B-branded clothes from stores like Wal-Mart, JCPenney, and Target”
over “A-branded clothes like Abercrombie & Fitch”18. Moreover, private labels open
opportunities to personalize and “shape the shopper’s in-store experience”19, which is a
fundamental element of both the Millennial customer’s value set and my marketing plan.
Marketing Plan and the 6 P’s of Retail
To unleash the emerging purchasing power commanded by the Millennials,
JCPenney should pursue a private-label strategy that is anchored in the aforementioned
six P’s of retail (product, personality, promotions, place, presentation, and price).
Product
“Adding a seasoned retailer veteran to assist its turnaround efforts, department
store J.C. Penney (JCP) announced on Wednesday it has recruited Saks (SKS)
CEO Stephen Sandove to join its board of directors.”20
- Matt Egan, October 9, 2013
The addition of Saks’ Stephen Sandove to JCPenney’s team demonstrates the
company’s heightened interest in revitalizing its outdated brand image by injecting
fashion and luxury into the JCPenney persona, and the more fashion-oriented strategy I
propose focuses on an exclusive private label aimed at enticing Millennials to first simply
enter the company’s stores, fall in love with the brand, and then become loyal customers.
As the gender ratio of the Millennial consumer is relatively evenly split21, both a
4
menswear and womenswear line should be introduced, but in this case study, I will focus
on developing a Spring/Summer 2014 collection for the latter.
“The modern-day woman knows how to be a chameleon - transitioning from
corporate professional to night-time party girl.”22
- Rosaline Hsieh
As the exact age range into which the Millennial customer falls is often disputed
upon, the ambiguity in defining this consumer segment requires a further breakdown of
the cohort itself in order to better define a target customer for JCPenney’s new private
label. My proposed womenswear collection is aimed at the 24- to 30-year old working
woman, an individual who has just entered or is adjusting to two major phases of her life:
career advancement and family development. The line will thus consist of business-
casual attire, unified by an underlying “wardrobe essentials” theme as well as the private
label’s unique logo described in the “Personality” section of this marketing plan.
One of the biggest wardrobe challenges a woman in this age group faces – thanks
to the more lax attire policies of the office environment – is dressing “down without
crossing the threshold of revealing, beachy, or just plain inappropriate”23. The pieces in
this collection include light jackets and blazers, well-tailored pants and pencil skirts,
classic button-downs, and silk short-sleeve blouses. To address the Millennial female’s
desire to personalize her style and inject some drama into closet stables, accessories –
such as pumps, handbags, and scarves – will also be offered. The collection will combine
muted, solid hues with more vibrant prints and patterns; elegance with modernity; and
quality with affordability in order to provide the creative playground in which the
customer can experiment with separates and accessories such that she can communicate
professionalism and elegance as well as individuality and taste through her work attire.
Personality
The new JCPenney logo (Appendix U) for the company’s Millennial initiative is
designed to not only capture the attributes of the product line described above, but also to
(1) project the firm’s century-old American legacy (through the use of patriotic colors);
(2) redefine Johnson’s “Fair and Square” pricing strategy and continue along the lines of
his one-stop “Town Square”-style shopping experience (through the encompassing red
5
square); and (3) illustrate the worldly values of the Millennial consumer (through the blue
half-circle).
The collection will initially carry the label of “Embrace”, which communicates
JCPenney’s strong interest in “embracing” Millennials as a core client group as well as
the Millennials’ mutual “embracing” of the company. Moreover, as Generation Y’s social
concerns need to be utilized and fashioned into branding strategy, if the “Embrace” name
does successfully take hold in the marketplace, the private label’s logo can then be
simplified to an “e”, a letter which will be explained in future promotions and advertising
to reflect words such as “environmentalism”, “exclusivity”, “economical”, “esteem”,
“expression”, “experience”, etc.
Promotion, Place, and Presentation
“In 2011, JC Penney ran 590 promotions that only brought a customer in an
average of four times a year. Each promotion cost around $2 million. And 99
percent of JC Penney's potential customer base was flat-out ignoring them.”24
-Meredith Galante
Johnson thus nixed the number of promotions down to twelve, gambling on his
“Everyday Low Pricing” model to be incentive enough to draw in customers. The merits
of his new three-tier pricing structure will be expanded upon in the “Pricing” section of
the marketing plan, but I will first explain why active promotioning will be necessary in
the early stages of introducing the “Embrace” brand to the marketplace.
As mentioned in “Psychographic Profile and Attitudes”, Millennial consumers
are addicted to their smartphones (please refer to Appendix S for summarizing
infographics) and are experienced social networkers (please refer to Appendix T).
Moreover, “Millennial women are a segment leading the trends around mobile devices as
the ubiquitous shopping companion to inform every step along her [shopping] journey”25,
and, according to ten surveys conducted by Pew Research Center from December 2009 to
December 2012, “the proportion of women who used social media sites was 10
percentage points higher than men on average”26 (please refer to Appendix M). To
harness these trends in its private label promotional endeavors, JCPenney should employ
omnichannel retailing techniques in first reaching the Millennial consumer where they
6
already are (on their mobile phones and social networking sites) and then offering them
the exclusivity they crave in the company’s brick-and-mortar locations. Although
Mercedes Benz’s recent Fashion Week proved that social media is actually not as
powerful as once assumed by the fashion industry27, the digital platform can still be
employed in JCPenney’s marketing plan.
As the overarching goal for JCPenney is to get the Millennial consumer into their
stores, promotional tactics will focus on advertisements - featured on fashion blogs and
news sites as well as social networking Web sites such as Facebook and Youtube - of the
Spring/Summer 2014 line’s premiere at the firm’s physical locations. To account for
JCPenney’s current financial situation, capital can be saved by avoiding expensive
television commercial airtime and print advertising, and by setting an exclusive floor
(rather than an entirely new, separate boutique) within JCPenney’s existing mall real
estate as the site of the lavish collection release. An individual can sign up for a special
“VIP” pass which is required for entry and must be presented in order to gain elevator
access to the floor. This strategy provides the Millennial customer the privilege he or she
desires - that is, the feeling of being a “celebrity” and receiving the intimate attention of a
company. Celebrities – Hollywood starlets, musical artists, etc. – will be invited to the
event, as “Millennials get starstruck like the rest of us”28.
Presentation-wise, merchandising and displays will draw upon Johnson’s well-
crafted and distinctly branded “stores within the store” concept (which markedly outsold
the rest of the store’s areas by 20%)29, such as the “fresh, edgy”30 Joe Fresh boutiques
(see Appendix F for images). And if this first Spring/Summer 2014 collection foments
into a successful private label, the release of lines for succeeding seasons can follow this
“premiere night” model, as this will result in the Millennial consumer eagerly
anticipating such grand and opulent evenings of mingling with peers and celebrities
figures alike in a beautiful “gala-” and “cocktail-esque” environment.
This strategy of first testing this Millennial retail strategy by creating and
instituting an exclusive private-label floor as the new platform from which to build more
long-term Millennial customer loyalty thus captures the promotion, place, and
presentation elements of Johnson’s six P’s.
Pricing
7
During his brief stint as CEO, Johnson introduced a three-tier pricing structure to
JCPenney: (1) prices were reduced an average of 40% to offer consumers an “Everyday
Fair and Square” price; (2) twelve times a year, JCPenney ran a “Month Long Values
Event”, during which seasonal items were marked down an additional 20-29%; and (3)
on every first and third Friday of a month, or “Best Price Fridays”, items the company
was seeking to liquidate were lowered to about one-third of the everyday price.31 The
“EDLP” approach was thus combined with two strategies that still maintained some
flavor of high-low pricing.
The economics of pricing strategy from a retailer’s perspective depend on the
volume and the realized average price: volume may have different elasticity to different
pricing regimes. From a shopper’s perspective, one either does better or worse with
respect to the average price under high-low pricing; on the other hand, under EDLP,
everyone transacts at the average price. The utility value of EDLP to a shopper is
therefore predictability and stability of cost, both of which facilitate the connection
between price and the intrinsic value of merchandise. Few commercial activities outside
retail utilize the high-low pricing scheme, because pricing games generally reduce the
economic wellbeing of both parties of a transaction.
In my view, the problems encountered in the implementation of “Fair and Square”
were less driven by customers choosing high-low over EDLP than by overall customer
confusion caused by a lack of clear comparison between the two pricing regimes.
In fact, EDLP seems to align with J.C. Penney’s interests well. In Ron Johnson’s
first report to shareholders, he spoke about the detrimental long-term effects of excessive
price promotions: “Plagued by the ‘games’ of the industry over the last several decades,
retailers – including J.C. Penney – barraged customers with a constant stream of
promotions that proved to be ineffective. Each time we participate in this pricing war, we
were discounting our brand and eroding the trust and loyalty of our customers.”32
Economically, notwithstanding the overall poor performance of JCPenney since
the implementation of this new strategy, the company reported that it “sold more items at
its everyday prices at higher average unit retail during 2012” and realized “higher gross
margins on ‘everyday value’ priced merchandise sales”33. High volume and high margin
indicate high marginal ROI contribution.
8
Fundamentally, pricing strategies are dictated by products: pricing wars reflect a
lack of product differentiation in terms of fashion quality and costs amongst retailers. A
firm that focuses on managing these factors in its branding strategy may become more
price competitive and rely less on high-low pricing.
It is also important to mention that during the last few years, retailers have
realized that having only national brands in their merchandise assortment is not enough to
draw in new customers and maintain the loyalty of their old ones; national brands, thanks
to their economies of scale, have the ability to transcend geographic locations and to thus
create a pervasive presence in the marketplace for themselves. This phenomenon,
combined with the diminished need for consumers to enter physical retail stores in order
to have access to products and the ease at which consumers can compare competing
brands thanks to mobile technology, makes including new private labels - those which are
exclusively only available at their locations - in their brand portfolio especially lucrative
for retailers.
But brand portfolio management involves more than the careful selection of
labels. To support the “Fair and Square” pricing platform, JCPenney needs to also focus
on the cost and quality of its private labels. This requires strategic and collaborative
category management, which is instrumental for a retailer to realize its “own” brand goals
and aspirations. It requires the development of a symbiotic relationship with
manufacturers as well as suppliers to elevate relationships and to further a mutual
mentality of partnership.
By including high-quality private labels in a global brand portfolio, JCPenney can
offer products that are comparable to national brands, but at a significantly lower price
point. This would undermine the high-low pricing scheme inherent in the retail business
and provide an opportunity for the “Fair and Square” pricing approach to truly take hold.
Therefore, the long-term purpose of my proposed private label strategy is to serve
as the “springboard” for a distinct and unique brand proposition for the overall JCPenney
company. This transformation process needs to be gradual and incremental in order to
allow for the Millennial customer to adjust and adapt to it. Part II’s “Assortment Plan”
and “6-Month Sales Plan” will have more specific information on the pricing (i.e.
wholesale price and retail price for individual collection pieces).
9
Competitive Analysis
As my proposal for JCPenney is based on the company creating a new exclusive
private label line, it will be most effective to look at two retailers who have been
successful in courting the Millennial consumer through the private label strategy. I chose
to analyze Macy’s and Target, as the former is a middle-market department store and the
latter falls within the discount department store category.
Macy’s
"Throughout 2013, Macy's has continued to invest in exclusive brands to engage
Millennial shoppers who are looking for diverse, current and trend-forward
fashion. With the introduction of two new Impulse brands this fall, Maison Jules
and QMack, we are continuing to deliver on our promise of newness and
excitement. Both collections are unique, contemporary and affordable, and
further elevate Macy's position as the Millennial shopping destination."34
- Molly Langenstein, Macy's EVP/GMM
Macy’s has recently devoted much capital and promotional energy into attracting
the Millennial consumer. The company has since launched new private, “Impulse” brands
– such as Maison Jules and QMack – and worked on improving existing ones in order to
achieve this goal. Pieces are trend-focused, contemporary, and seek to communicate the
“newness and excitement”35 Macy’s infuses in its overarching brand personality.
The company has been keen to dedicate product design as well as in-store
experience to cater to the specific desires (discussed in Part I’s “The Millennials: The
‘First Truly Digital’ Generation”) of this particular consumer segment. Macy’s thus has
acknowledged the seamless nature of omnichannel retailing – that is, combining
attractive product assortments with exceptional service, entertaining and engaging store
formatting, and online technological platforms in order to maintain relevancy in the
marketplace. The result is substantial revenue generation and competitive advantage:
“…unlike many other retailers, Macy’s also has been able to turn a profit. In the third
quarter [of 2010], Macy’s posted net income of $139 million. Sears and JC Penney had
losses of and $421 million and $143 million, respectively”35.
10
Macy’s three major strategies in enticing Millennials are (1) My Macy’s; (2)
“Omnichannel”; and (3) “Magic Selling”. The first, which was introduced back in 2009,
aims to truly understand the customer – via data mining – such that the company can
more effectively design its products, appropriate them to particular locations, and
maintain general control over all operations that are part of the sketch-to-store process.
The second, “a strategy that allows customers to shop seamlessly in stores, online or with
mobile devices”36, acknowledges the Millennial customer’s reliance on digital technology
in his or her shopping activities. Writes Tom Demeropolis of BizJournals.com: “One
Omnichannel effort is ‘Search & Send.’ Initially, every Macy’s store register could find
products that are out of stock in a particular location by accessing the macys.com
inventory.”37
The key lesson, then, that JCPenney should learn from Macy’s success is the
importance of first listening to your target customer, something that ex-CEO Johnson
failed to do. His reasoning to why he chose to so quickly implement all the changes he’d
introduced during his tenure at JCPenney – “we didn’t test Apple”38 – rather than test
them first is not applicable to running a fashion company.
In Appendix P, I provide photographs I took during my visits to the Macy’s
location at Herald Square and JCPenney’s location in Manhattan Mall such that
differences and/or similarities of store design and merchandising display decisions can be
seen.
Target
Although this section focuses on Target and its competitive advantages, it is
important to mention Wal-Mart’s recent interest in “dominating the apparel industry”39 as
well. Writes Ivan Kenneally: “Wal-Mart has been crafting a comprehensive strategy for
apparel merchandise as part of its vision for overall growth over the next five years. […]
[Carol Spieckerman, CEO of new Market Builders] hypothesized that Wal-Mart could
radically improve its sales if it targeted millennial shoppers who are increasingly
enthralled with wearable technology, or fashion that has a prominent technical aspect.”40
As the retail giant already has substantial experience in omnichannel retailing as
well as a wide distribution network at its disposal41, the news of Wal-Mart’s plans should
be taken seriously by JCPenney.
11
“Target stores have managed to maintain a hip, trendy image with a strong value
message with whimsical advertising; strong, almost pop art in-store
merchandising and a roster of high profile designers for everything from
housewares (Michael Graves) to bedding (Todd Oldham) to women’s fashion
(Mossimo) to cosmetics (Sonia Kashuk).”42
- Aisling Balfe, retail analyst with London-based PlanetRetail
Back in 2002, Target Corporation managed to earn the title of second-largest
discount store retailer, trailing behind only the formidable retail giant Wal-Mart.43
Somehow, “[Target] was able to thrive and coexist profitably with”44 the world’s biggest
corporation and employer. And just as Target could never hope to ever really compete
head-to-head with the massive Wal-Mart, neither can JCPenney – thus, investigating how
Target was able to grow side-by-side with Wal-Mart is applicable to this case study.
Target’s main strengths, besides its effective location monitoring and
management and its offering of financial services to customers, stem from its ability to
differentiate itself as a brand through the company’s expertise in product design,
merchandising, and promotions. When it comes to the products within its private-label
portfolio, “Target has found a successful niche by focusing on the intersection of design
and value. […] The emphasis at Target is that ‘great design doesn’t have to cost a lot of
money.”45 JCPenney should similarly strike a healthy balance between high-quality and
affordable price when creating the pieces for its new “Embrace” collection.
But perhaps it is through Target’s innovative advertising campaigns and other
promotional activities that we can truly see how the company has so successfully
changed its image from mere “discount retailer” to hub of fashion and entertainment.
“Target's success was attributable to two key factors: the right kind of differentiation and
distinctive marketing communications”46, which is exactly what I believe JCPenney
should be pursuing.
12
13
Advertising Campaign
As discussed in the “Promotions” section of Part I’s “Marketing Plan”, the main
advertising tool to be used in the introduction of the embrace line is the “VIP” pass which is
required to attend the premiere of the new S/S 14 collection. An individual who is interested in
getting a pass must sign up for the JCPenney newsletter; this allows JCPenney to obtain the
email addresses of new Millennial consumers who show interest in both the new private line as
well as the overall company.
In “6-Month Sales Plan”, reasonable numbers was set as the budget for branding
expenses ($120,000) and total marketing communications expenses ($180,000). However, as
promotions is key to my proposed Millennial retail strategy for JCPenney, of all the 6-month
operating costs, most money should be put into these activities. Other fixed and variable costs
(such as logistics and distribution; employee wages; production and supply control; etc.) can
leverage JCPenney’s existing strengths (please refer to Part I’s “SWOT” section).
Visual Presentation
The “Advertising Campaign” focuses on creating a new customer base – the Millennial
cohort group – for JCPenney, but in this section, I comment on future and overall JCPenney
brand maintenance. As embrace is only one private-label brand in JCPenney’s portfolio, the
company should make sure to communicate to consumers that the whole JCPenney brand is
evolving with the times, a change which is best captured by its release of a new and fashion-
focused private label.
Thus, after embrace’s initial S/S 2014 release, promotional and presentational activities
can be given even more attention. Capital can potentially be now poured into more expensive
advertising forms – such as television commercials and print advertisements. Important as well is
the continuation of the exclusive floor concept. The embrace collection’s floor should be
constantly refreshed and redesigned in order to welcome new lines as the seasons change. The
design – merchandising displays, lighting and fixtures, etc. – of other areas of JCPenney real
estate should also reflect this new focus on style, luxury, and convenience.
Appendix
14
Appendix F
Joe Fresh boutiques
Appendix F.1 Joe Fresh Fifth Avenue Flagship | Source: Courtesy photo
Appendix F.1
Bloomberg. “J.C. Penney to Challenge Zara and Uniqlo WIth Joe Fresh Shops. Bloomberg. 15
March, 2013. Web. 10, Nov. 2013. <http://www.businessoffashion.com/2013/03/j-c-pen
ney-to-challenge-zara-and-uniqlo-with-joe-fresh-shops.html>.
15
Appendix F.2
Appendix F.3
16
Appendix F.4
Appendix F.5
Appendix F.2 - F.5
The Thread Affect. “Product Review: Joe Fresh for JCP.” The Thread Affect. 13, June. 2013. Web. 9, Nov. 2013. <http://thethreadaffect.com/2013/06/13/product-review-joe-fresh
-for-jcp/>.
17
Appendix M
Women and Social Media
Appendix M.1
Appendix M.2
Appendix M.1 - M.2
Duggan, Maeve. “It’s a woman’s (social media) world.” Pew Research Center. 12, Sept.
2013. Web. 9, Nov. 2013. <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/12/its-
a-womans-social-media-world/>.
18
Appendix P
Photos Taken on 11/14/2013
Macy’s Herald Square
151 W 34th St, New York, NY 10001
Entrance: Lower Level Sign
19
Lower Level Festive Displays
20
Prominent Brands: Designated Areas, Designed to Reflect the Respective Brand’s Persona
21
Photos Taken on 11/14/2013
JCPenney, Manhattan Mall
901 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10001
At the Entrance: First Things I Saw
22
23
Remnants of Ron Johnson..? “Store-in-Store” displays and Familiar “Square” JCP Logo
24
Appendix S
Mobile Influence on Retailing
Appendix S.1
Appendix S.1 Brinker, Mike, Kasey Lobaugh and Alison Paul. “The dawn of mobile influence.” Deloitte
Digital. 2012. Web. 31, Oct. 2013. p. 6. <https://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Uni
tedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/RetailDistribution/us_retail_Mobile-Influence-Factor_062712.pdf>.
25
Appendix S.2
Appendix S.3
Appendix S.2 - S.3 Brinker, Mike, Kasey Lobaugh and Alison Paul. “The dawn of mobile influence.” Deloitte
Digital. 2012. Web. 31, Oct. 2013. p. 7. <https://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Uni tedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/RetailDistribution/us_retail_Mobile-Influence-Factor_062712.pdf>.
26
Appendix U
embrace by JCP logo design
27
Appendix V
JCPenney SWOT Analysis
Strengths
• widely distributed real estate
• vertical integration
• familiarity with private label
management
• legacy
• supplier/manufacturer relationships
Weaknesses
• constant leadership changes
• losing relevancy
• loss of old customers
• struggles to attract new customers
• confusing brand image
Opportunities
• Millennial consumers
• private label focus
• more ethnic customers
• high-quality, fashion-focused lines• better real estate design/utilization
Threats
• economic trends (rising raw
material prices)
• political/social trends (human rights
issues and labor laws)
• Wal-Mart looking to focus on
apparel
• Zara, H&M, etc. introducing
private-labels
28
Appendix W
Millennials & Technology Use
Appendix W
Millennials: A Portrait of Generation Next, Pew Research Center, Feb. 2010 http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/10/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-
change.pdf. p. 25.
29
Appendix X
Millennials v. Other Generational Cohorts
Appendix X (Data Source)
The Millennial Generation Research Review, US Chamber of Commerce Foundation, http://emerging.uschamber.com/MillennialsReport
(Nov. 14, 2012).
30
Appendix Z
Gen Y Demographics
Appendix Z
Demographic Profile: America’s Gen Y, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Mature Market
Institute, 2013, https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/Profiles/mmi-gen- y-demographic-profile.pdf. p. 1.
31
Endnotes & Bibliography
1. Steve Denning, “J.C. Penney: Was Ron Johnson’s Strategy Wrong?” Forbes, April 9, 2013(http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/04/09/j-c-penney-was-ron-johnsons-strategy-wrong/). para. 22.
2. Dena, “Psychology of coupon codes and store sales,” BHP Mag, May 31, 2012(http://www.blackhairplanet.com/blog/psychology-of-coupon-codes-and-store-sales/). para. 2.
3. On Marketing, “Can J,C, Penney Become ‘America’s Favorite Store’?” Forbes, Feb. 27, 2012(http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2012/02/27/can-j-c-penney-become-americas-favorite-store/). para. 5.
4. Jim Edwards and Charlie Minato, “How Ex-Ceo Ron Johnson Made J.C. Penney EvenWorse,” Business Insider, April 8, 2013 (http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-johnson-disaster-timeline-apple-guru-failed-at-jcpenney-2013-4).
5. Kim Peterson, “Ron Johnson’s 5 biggest mistakes at J.C. Penney,” MSN Money, April 10,2013 (http://money.msn.com/now/post.aspx?post=dc1ced82-ae44-4001-9bf2-95c6efc80c0b)
6. Ivan Kenneally, “JCP October Sales Surge; Serious Troubles Remain,” Sourcing OnlineJournal, Nov 7., 2013 (https://www.sourcingjournalonline.com/jcp-october-sales-surge-serious-troubles-remain/).
7. Steve Rosa, “Ron Johnson's Attempt To Fix JCPenney's Brand Was Completely Backwards,”Business Insider, April 15, 2013 (http://www.businessinsider.com/why-ron-johnson-failed-at-branding-jcp-2013-4). para. 2.
8. Christopher Donnelly and Renato Scaff, “Who are the Millennial shoppes? And what do theyreally want?” Accenture, Outlook Online Journal, June 2013 (http://www.accenture.com/us-en/outlook/Pages/outlook-journal-2013-who-are-millennial-shoppers-what-do-they-really-want-retail.aspx). para. 1.
9. The Millennial Generation Research Review, US Chamber of Commerce Foundation,http://emerging.uschamber.com/MillennialsReport (Nov. 14, 2012). p. 5
10. Jacqueline Doherty, “Onn the Rise,” Barron’s, April 29, 2013(http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052748703889404578440972842742076.html#art icleTabs_article%3D1). para. 5
11. Barons, April 29, 2013. para. 5.
12. Barons, April 29, 2013. para. 7.
13. Accenture, June 2013. para. 24.
32
14. Reuters, “Millennials Are About to Outspend the Baby Boomer, Catching the Retail IndustryOff Guard,” Reuters, Oct. 24, 2013 (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/24/ny-berglassassociates-idUSnBw246116a+100+BSW20131024). para. 2.
15. Cherr Aira, “What Motivates Purchase Decisions of Young Adults Today,” Silicon Angle,Nov. 8, 2013 (http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/11/08/what-motivates-purchase-decisions-of-young-adults-today. para. 5.
16. Silicon Angle, Nov. 8, 2013. para. 6.
17. JCPenney Investors: About Us, JCPenney, 2013,http://ir.jcpenney.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70528&p=irol-homeprofile.
18. Pieter-Jan Gheyser, “Gen-Y Trends: The end of conspicuous branding,” How Cool BrandsStay Hot, Sept. 17, 2013 (http://www.howcoolbrandsstayhot.com/2013/09/17/gen-y-trends-the-end-of-conspicuous-branding/). para. 5.
19. Vanessa Cross, “The Advantages of Private-Label Branding,” Chron, 2013(http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-private-label-branding-20163.html). para. 4
20. Matt Egan, “Saks CEO Set to Join J.C.Penney Board to Help Turnaround Effort,” FoxBusiness, Oct. 9, 2013 (http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2013/10/09/jc-penney-says-saks-ceo-to-join-board/). para. 1.
21. Demographic Profile: America’s Gen Y, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MatureMarket Institute, 2013, https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/Profiles/mmi-gen-y-demographic-profile.pdf. p. 1.
22. Rosaline Hsieh, “Build the Perfect Career Wardrobe,” Urbanette Magazine, 2013(http://www.urbanette.com/career-fashion/). para. 5.
23. Urbanette Magazine, 2013. para 1.
24. Meredith Galante, “The 6 Ways Ron Johnson Plans to Transform JC Penney into America’sFavorite Store,” Business Insider, Jan. 26, 2012 (http://www.businessinsider.com/the-6-ways-ron-johnson-plans-to-transform-jc-penney-into-americas-favorite-store-2012-1#ixzz2kqrD5T3N). para. 7.
25. Ethelbert Williams, “Millennials Consider Mobile the Must-Have Shopping Companion,”MediaPost, June 21, 2012 (http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/177250/millennials-consider-mobile-the-must-have-shopping.html#reply). para. 1.
26. Maeve Duggan, “It’s a woman’s (social media) world,: Pew Research Center, Sept. 12, 2013(http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/12/its-a-womans-social-media-world/). para. 2.
27. Rachel Strugatz, “Social Media Flood Fails for Fashion,” WWD, Oct. 7, 2013.
33
28. Craig Atkinson, “The Marketer’s Guide to Reaching Millennials, AdWeek, June 10, 2013(http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/marketer-s-guide-reaching-millennials- 150131). para. 6.
29. Brad Tuttle, “JCPenney Would Be Doing Great if the STores Were Less like JCPenney,”Time, Sept. 21, 2012 (http://business.time.com/2012/09/21/jcpenney-would-be-doing-great-if-the-stores-were-less-like-jcpenney/). para. 1.
30. Dale Buss, “For JCP’S Ron Johnson, Joe Fresh Looks Like a Rescue by CanadianMounties,”BrandChannel, March 18, 2013 (http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2013/03/18/JC-Penny-Joe-Fresh-Rescue- 031813.aspx). para. 2.
31. Mariane Wilson, “J.C. Penney pins future on new, three-tier pricing strategy and storeshops,” Chain Store Age, Jan. 25, 2012 (http://www.chainstoreage.com/article/jc-penney-pins-future-new-three-tiered-pricing-strategy-and-store-shops).
32. Ron Johnson, Annual Report, JCPenney Company, 2012http://www.jcpmediaroom.com/assets/annual-report/JC_Penney-AR2011-letter.pdf. para. 8
33. 2012 Form 10-K, JCPenney Companyhttp://ir.jcpenney.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70528&p=irol-reportsannual. p. 24-25.
34. “Macy’s Continues Focus on Millennials in Fall 2013”, Market Watch, July 31, 2013(http://www.marketwatch.com/story/macys-continues-focus-on-millennials-in-fall-2013-2013- 07-31). para. 2.
35. Tom Demeropolis, “How Macy’s latest moves are paying off,” Biz Journals, Nov. 25, 2011(http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/print-edition/2011/11/25/how-macys-latest-moves-are-paying-off.html?page=all). para. 11.
36. Biz Journals, Nov. 25, 2011. para. 25.
37. Biz Journals, Nov. 25, 2011. para. 26.
38. Steven Snyder, “What J.C. Penney’s Ron Johnson just do now,” Fortune, March 5, 2013(http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2013/03/05/jc-penney-ron-johnson-2/). para. 8.
39. Ivan Kenneally, “Wal-Mart Set Sights on Apparel Industry,” Sourcing Journal Online, Oct.29, 2013 (https://www.sourcingjournalonline.com/wal-mart-sets-sights-apparel-industry-ik/).
40. Sourcing Journal Online, Oct. 29, 2013. para. 2. and para. 6.
41. Sourcing Journal Online, Oct. 29, 2013. para. 5.
34
42. Lynn Celmer, “The ABCs of Reaching Gen X and Gen Y with Private Label,” PL Buyer,April 13, 2011 (http://www.privatelabelbuyer.com/articles/84237-). para. 9.
43. Patrick Barwise and Sean Meehan, “Bullseye: Target’s Cheap Chic Strategy,” HarvardBusiness School, Aug. 16, 2004 (http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4319.html). para. 1.
44. Harvard Business School, Aug. 16, 2004. para. 1.
45. “Target: Shifting a Retail Paradigm,” Kellogg School of Business Management, Feb. 14,2012. Print. pg. 13.
46. Harvard Business School, Aug. 16, 2004. para. 1
35
top related