j. kevin shane, arm, cpcu, csp denver environmental impairment liability insurance emerging trends...
Post on 25-Dec-2015
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
J. Kevin Shane, ARM, CPCU, CSPDenver
Environmental Impairment Liability InsuranceEmerging Trends and Coverage Issues
September 26, 2006
Marsh 2
Overview
Using Environmental Insurance to Solve Business
Problems
Environmental Market and Product Update
Coverage Trends & Emerging Trends
Do Pollution Policies Pay Claims
Marsh 3
Using Environmental Insurance to Solve Business Problems: Creative Solutions
Marsh 4
Typical Calls From Attorneys...
“My client is going through a merger. They want insurance, but many of the 400 locations they are acquiring don’t have any environmental information. Can you get us quote by tomorrow?”
“My client is trying to settle litigation over cleanup, and is looking for a way to insure property values of home-owners if claims arise in the future. Is there anything off-the-shelf?”
“My client is selling its property(ies) and wants to dissolve. We’re looking for a way to back up reps and warranties without using an escrow. Can environmental insurance do that?”
Marsh 5
Typical Calls from Attorneys...
“My client is buying a relatively old apartment building and is concerned about asbestos and lead-based paint. Oh, and what about mold?”
“My client is dissolving its company, but it has two on-going cleanups, one of them for 30 years. How can we wrap up these liabilities?”
“My client is getting an indemnity from the seller, but we want more. Can you back it up?”
“My client wants to build high-end homes on a State Superfund site. If I can’t talk him out of it…, can you get us coverage for toxic tort and property damage claims?”
Marsh 6
Who Is Using Environmental Insurance?
REITS, Real Estate Firms, State Pension Funds
Developers and Homebuilders
Private Equity firms
Technology Companies
Public Entities, Cities, Transit Authorities, Port Authorities
Oil Companies, Pulp & Paper companies, Chemical companies
Utilities, Mining companies
Manufacturers, Consumer Products companies,
Aerospace manufacturers / Defense contractors
The Department of Defense (Army -- $300M in 2003)
Environmental Consulting Firms, Environmental Contractors and General Contractors
Marsh 7
Uses of Environmental Insurance
To facilitate transactions:– Acquisition, divestiture, merger– Single site, several sites
To facilitate redevelopments
To provide a safety net for operations, part of EMS
To address historical environmental liabilities, e.g., nonperforming assets, divested properties, Superfund sites
And yes, there are solutions to all of the questions previously posed…
Marsh 8
Market and Product Update:Insurers and Coverage Types
Marsh 9
Environmental Insurance Market is Thriving: $2.1B Industry Premiums
ACE Environmental
AIG Environmental
Arch
Chubb Environmental Solutions
Liberty
XL Environmental
Zurich Environmental
Several smaller players
Great competition among insurers
Different appetites for risk
Varies from insurer-to-insurer and day-to-day
Quotes may vary greatly
But often are surprisingly close
Insurer capacity:
Ranges from $25M to $50M
Total market capacity:
Upwards of $200M
Marsh 10
Market and Product Update:Insurers and Coverage Types
Note that all insurers are “non-admitted” or provide coverage on a surplus lines basis:
– Surplus lines fees/taxes are due with each placement
Does the insurer rating matter and in what situations?
Parent Company Affiliate Insurer Admitted / Non-Admitted
AM BestRating
ACE Environmental Illinois Union Insurance Comp. Non-Admitted A+ / XV
AIG Environmental American Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Comp.
Non-Admitted A+ / XV
Chubb Environmental Chubb Group of Ins. Comps. Non-Admitted A++ / XV
XL Environmental Indian Harbor Insurance Comp. Non-Admitted A+ / XV
Zurich Environmental Steadfast Insurance Comp. Non-Admitted A / XV
Marsh 11
Market and Product Update:Does Insurer Rating Matter?
Quick Answer:– Quanta Insurance Company– Kemper Insurance Company– Reliance Insurance Company
Marsh can only structure and place coverage with insurers that meet or exceed a specific rating
Short-term policies– Not as big a concern
Long-term policies– Insurer rating should be a serious consideration– An occurrence-based policy is long-term - CPL
Marsh 12
Pollution Legal Liability Covers “Unknowns” and Certain “Knowns”
PLL Covers Scheduled “Insured Sites” Provides the following “standard” coverages:
– Cleanup costs (onsite and offsite)– Toxic tort liability (3rd party BI and PD / onsite and offsite)– Defense expenses
Pollution Conditions Covered: – New– Pre-Existing > Unknown and Known/Insurable Conditions
Numerous other PLL coverage types are available Coverage term:
– Preexisting Pollution Conditions: Up to 10 years– New Pollution Conditions: Up to 5 years
Regulatory re-openers
Natural resources damage claims
Marsh 13
Pollution Legal Liability:Covers Scheduled Locations
Insured Site #1
Insured Site #2
Insured Site #3
Insured owns and/or operates from each of the fixed sites
which are scheduled locations
Marsh 14
Project Site #1
Project Site #2
Project Site #3
Insured Contractor performs work at each of the project sites, which are
typically covered on a “blanket” basis
New Project #4 New Project #5
Contractors Pollution Liability:Covers Project Sites
Marsh 15
Policy used to manage finance risks associated with remediation cost overruns
Policy pays for costs in excess of estimates contained in the underwritten remedial plan (RAP)
RAP cost estimates might be exceeded because:– Greater amount of volume to be excavated– GW must be treated as opposed to monitored– Change in applicable regulations– Change in lead agency’s perception of project– Ineffective RAP . . .
Does not cover bodily injury/property damage claims Does not cover defense costs
Remediation Stop Loss:Covers Scheduled Projects
Marsh 16
Options/Programs:Remediation Stop Loss
Remediation Stop Loss (RSL) coverage introduced in the mid 90s
Poor Overall Loss Experience – UWers review agency-approved RAP, associated costs and
regulatory standards
– Retentions: ~25 - 50% of expected remediation
– Policy limits: typically 100% to 200% of est remediation costs Sound reasoning behind this . . .
– Policy can cover a single project or multiple projects
– Policy terms usually run up to 10 years, but typically follow expected project length
Marsh 17
Remediation Stop Loss
KnownRemediation Costs
Deductible or“Buffer”
Limit of Liability /Risk Transfer Layer
2) Cap remediation expenses actually incurred
3) Accelerate funding of known remediation expenses1) Transfer
historical & future environmental exposures
Pollution Legal Liability
Known/UninsurableCondition
Unknown/CurrentCondition
FutureCondition
Known/InsurableCondition
Insured Property
Onsite Offsite
Treating Environmental Exposures/Losses
Marsh 18
Insurability of “Known” Conditions
New Condition?
Covered by Pollution Legal Liability Policy
(Cannot be excluded as it does not yet exist.)
Preexisting Condition?
KnownCondition?
UnknownCondition?
Covered by Pollution Legal Liability Policy(What is not known
to exist cannot be excluded)
Unlikely to Cause Loss: Covered by Pollution Legal
Liability Policy
Has Caused / Likely to Cause Loss:Cannot be covered by Pollution Legal
Liability Policy
Marsh 19
Analogy: Can Property Insurance bePlaced on this Building???
Marsh 20
Summary of Recent PlacementsCoverage
TypeExposure
DescriptionLimits SIR Policy
TermTerm
Premium
PLL Construction of townhome on remediated land
$5M $100K 10 Years $120K
PLL Large lot of land with significant contamination; future use is high-density housing
$15M $100K 10 Years $420K
PLL Divestment of 500 acre property with product pipelines
$5M $100K 5 Years $165K
PLL Purchase of PLL to use as sales marketing tool
$10M $250K 10 Years $240K
PLL Mining Operation; ongoing ops; S&A only
$100M $1M 1 Year $4M
PLL Operating O&G plant $10M $100K 5 Years $75K
PLL Purchase of policy to support purchase and redev of contaminated site – 2 acres
$5M $100K 10 Years $96K
PLL Purchase of policy to support purchase and redev of contaminated site – 45 acres
$5M $100K 10 Years $120K
PLL Purchase of policy to support purchase and redev of contaminated site – 500 acres
$10M $100K 10 Years $180K
Marsh 21
Coverage Trends & Emerging Issues
Marsh 22
Emerging Issues and Coverage Trends
Market Is Quite Stable at This Time
PLL Policy Terms Getting Shorter:– Preexisting Pollution Conditions: 10 Years– New Pollution Conditions: 1 – 5 Years (depending on insurer)– Also True for RSL and Finite Structures Placements
New Policies & Underwriting Approaches– ACE has a new PPL (PLL) policy – “PPL II”– XL now provides coverage via two policies
Very Limited Market for:– Remediation Stop Loss
Very strict underwriting guidelines– Secured Creditor / Lender Liability
Marsh 23
Emerging Issues and Coverage Trends
Natural Resources Damages– Growing concern / Not covered in all PLL policies
Vapor Intrusion– Growing concern / Currently covered in most PLL policies
Asbestos Exposures– More stringent underwriting– Used to be able to readily obtain coverage for remediation of
soil/GW (as opposed to abatement) but that is more difficult today
Redefining “Bodily Injury”– Some insurers are redefining to require physical
manifestation as a component of an emotional distress claim
Marsh 24
Emerging Issues and Coverage Trends
Capital Improvements Exclusions:– More underwriters are trying to include these exclusions– Eliminate coverage for any pollution condition discovered as
part of a redevelopment
Mold Coverage Grants and Restrictions– PLL Policies > available on a greater basis than in the past– CPL Policies > available depending on operations performed
Negatives Aside, Market As a Whole Is Large And Competitive
Marsh 25
Do Pollution Policies Pay Claims?... And Words to the Wise
Marsh 26
Are We Seeing Claims? Are They Being Paid?
Short answer: Yes (to both)
Environmental insurers don’t want the reputation of being unwilling to pay claims
How many claims? – Insurers deem this information confidential and refuse
to share
Recent history: Some significant losses
Carrier retrenchment in:– Remediation stop loss policies– Lenders policies
Marsh 27
Claims You May Not Have Heard About – Redevelopment
Redevelopment on former aerospace manufacturer“…the policy that keeps on paying…”
– Mixed use, residential, condos
– 10-yr PLL policy placed providing $20M limits
– More contamination found than anticipated; hotspots of VOCs, TPH, methane…AND
– During construction, contractor’s that was dragging equipment damaged buried petroleum pipeline
– $5M claimed; $2M paid to date
– Other claims…other settlements…more to come
Marsh 28
Claims You May Not Have Heard About – Redevelopment
Excavating and Moving Landfill
– Several closed landfills had to be moved
– Combination Stop Loss/PLL policy placed for 10 yrs providing $20M limits
– Excavation went well…until an unexpected contaminant was found that required special handling and disposal
– Claim is partially paid and expected to reach nearly $10M
Marsh 29
Claims You May Not Have Heard About – Real Estate Transaction
Insurance Needed to Make Transaction Possible– Strip mall containing a dry cleaner was to be sold and
insurance was placed to support the transaction
– A PLL policy was procured providing a 5 yr term and $5M limits
– Underwriter asked the specific question:“Is any additional engineering planned at the site?”
– The answer: “No.”
– Within one week after close the buyer installed additional monitoring wells
– PCE was discovered at actionable levels
– When NFA was obtained over $800K was paid
– Suffice it to say there was a big fight over certain representations
Marsh 30
Claims You May Not Have Heard About – Redevelopment
Large redevelopment - former chemical mfg. facility
– Policy was structured with certain known conditions not excluded
– A PLL policy was procured providing a 5 yr term and $5M limits including “Soft Costs Coverage”
– During the redevelopment higher than expected levels of contamination were encountered
– When NFA was obtained over $1.5M had been paid
Marsh 31
Claims You May Not Have Heard About – Plume Containment Project
Large industrial area with significant contamination
– Migrating contaminants threatened to shut down more public drinking water wells
– Responsible parties agreed to EPA settlement, but only if Stop Loss/PLL coverage could be obtained
– A policy was procured providing a 15 yr term and $100M limits
– Treatment train worked well on bench scale, but has largely failed to date
– Too early to tell what the loss will be, but is expected to be in the $10Ms
Marsh 32
Do All Claims Get Settled Promptly?Claims Drawing National Attention
“LA Schools in a Legal Mess With Insurer”
-- Los Angeles Times
“AIG Unit Denies $100 M Pollution Claim”
-- BusinessInsurance.com
“Insurance Firm Files Suit Against the Cards”
-- St. Louis Post Dispatch
Note also that some claims are appropriately declined
Marsh 33
Preventing Claim Disputes
Marsh 34
Preventing Claims DisputesWords to the Wise & Other Good Things to Know
Know Your Deal– You have a lot more leverage with the underwriter before the deal is
bound than after– Plans to flip properties– Implications of a very large portfolio – divestiture– Any Additional Insureds? Mortgagees?
Eliminate Policy Administration – No reporting of specific events– Auto Removal of exclusion when Insured receives NFA
Known/Undisclosed Environmental Conditions– Has full disclosure been made– In a merger, is knowledge of “seller” imputed to “buyer” if key
employees remain the same?– What if entire workforce comes with the acquisition
Buyer and Seller on Same Policy?– Have you considered the Insured vs. Insured Exclusion?
Marsh 35
Cancellation Condition– Most are quite restrictive but can usually be amended– Include: limits on cancellation, “cure” language, applicability only to
specific locations Material Change in Use
– Write directly into the policy a broadly worded description of the future intended use of the property
Material Misrepresentation– What happens with the policy: deny claim or void policy?
Choice of Law, Venue, and Jurisdiction– These almost always stipulate New York– Can almost always amend to more favorable jurisdiction or “silent”
Types of Insureds and Impact on Coverage– First Named Insured– Named Insured– Additional Insured
Preventing Claims DisputesWords to the Wise & Other Good Things to Know
Marsh 36
Reporting Requirements– Reporting of claims– Providing project update reports (stop loss policies)
Subrogation Rights– Recovering Your SIR > does the recovery fund your SIR?
Other Insurance Condition– Is it primary? – Do you want it primary?
Divested Property Exclusion– It is essential that the exclusion not void historical coverage for
divested properties Assignment Condition vs. Additional Insureds Policy Terms
– Claims made– Pollution incident– Disclosure issues– Deductible/SIR
Preventing Claims DisputesWords to the Wise & Other Good Things to Know
Marsh 37
Other Good Things to KnowEnvironmental Risk Mgmt Consultants & Brokers
Marsh is a risk management consultant and broker:– Not to be confused with the “insurer”
Similarly, Marsh is a risk management consultant and broker:– Not to be confused with an “agent”– Marsh represents the insured, not the insurer
Use an experienced risk management consultant/broker:– General insurance experience– Technical environmental experience– 75 professionals worldwide: engineers, geologists, attorneys,
consultants, MBAs– Must know the difference between a “ppm” and a “ppb”– Have ability to argue in preserving coverage
Limit the exclusion of “known” pollution conditions Limit application of exclusions
Marsh 38
Continuing Legal Education
Would a CLE program tailored to this topic beneficial and of interest either to:
– Obtain necessary CLE credits
– Learn more about how EIL insurance is being used
Created a five-section program in CA
– Was approved by CA Bar Assoc for CLE credits
– One hour per section / Sections can be taken in any combination
Have not pursued such a program as yet in CO
If interested, feel free to contact me:
– Dir: 303 308 4596
– Email: kevin.shane@marsh.com
top related