influence of loan disbursement by microfinance and non ... · pdf fileinfluence of loan...
Post on 07-Feb-2018
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 198
INFLUENCE OF LOAN DISBURSEMENT BY MICROFINANCE AND NON MICROFINANCE
INSTITUTIONS ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION IN NIGERIA
Jegede, Charles.A. Lecturer I
Department of Accounting and Finance,
Lagos State University, Ojo, Lagos, Nigeria.
E-mail: Qreatieaus@yahoo.com
Akinlabi, Babatunde Hamed
Associate Lecturer
Department of Business Administration and Management,
Lagos State University External System, Ojo, Lagos, Nigeria.
E-mail: hakinlabitunde@yahoo.co.uk
ABSTRACT
The empirical relationship between microfinance loan disbursement and poverty alleviation was tested among 80 members of microfinance and non microfinance institutions in Lagos. Purposeful sampling method was employed to select the sample. Three research hypotheses guided the study. A well structured questionnaire that was tested for reliability and validated was used as the instrument for the study. The results obtained were analyzed using percentages, chi-square test, F-test and T-test. The findings revealed that there was a significant difference between those people who used microfinance institutions and those who do not use them. There is a significant effect of microfinance institutions in alleviating poverty by increasing income and changing economic status of those who patronized them. The study concluded that microfinance institution is indeed a potent strategy of poverty reduction
and a viable tool for purveying credit to the poor. However, microfinance can be a more viable tool for sustainable poverty alleviation if more is done on programme outreach and depth than the present outreach.
INTRODUCTION
Throughout the world, poor people are excluded from formal financial system. Exclusion
ranges from partial exclusion in developed countries to full or nearly full exclusion in Less Developed Countries (LDCs). Absent access to formal financial services, the poor have
developed a wide variety of informal community based financial arrangement to meet their
financial needs. Microfinance is created to fill this gap (Irobi, 2008).
Microfinance pertain to the lending of small amount of capital to poor entrepreneurs in
order to create a mechanism to alleviate poverty by providing the poor and destitute with resources that are available to the wealthy and alert at a small scale. According to Anyanwu
(2004), microfinance bank is not just providing capital to the poor, but to also combat
poverty at an individual level, it also has a role at institutional level. It seeks to create
institutions that deliver financial services to the poor, who are continuously ignored by the
formal banking sector.
In Africa and other developing regions, microfinance institutions (MFIs) are regarded as the
main source of funding micro enterprises (Anyanwu, 2004). Formal credit and savings
institutions for the poor are also available around the globe providing customers who were
traditionally neglected by commercial banks a way to obtain financial services through
cooperative and development finance institutions. Suffice it to say that the unwillingness or
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 199
inability of the formal financial institutions to provide financial services to the urban and rural poor, coupled with the unsustainability of government sponsored development
financial schemes contributed to the growth of private sector-led microfinance in Nigeria.
The gap filled by microfinance institution has become part of the formal financial system of
a country and so can access capital market to fund their lending portfolios, allowing them
to dramatically increase the number of poor people they can reach.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
In Africa there are many community-oriented policies and programmes which incorporate
different objectives related to economic development, national development, nation building
or simply development. For example, the operation feed yourself in Ghana, the special rural development programme in Kenya, the agricultural development projects (integrated rural
development projects), and the green revolution in Nigeria are well known inside and
outside Africa. Most of these policies and programmes were or are designed to improve the
socio-economic conditions of the rural population. Microfinance programme has been
viewed as a unique programme for the reduction of vulnerability, and hence the
achievement of the Millennium Developmental Goals (Adamu, 2007). Microfinance allows poor people to diversify and increase income sources, the essential path out of hunger.
Diversification makes people more resilient to external shocks.
The study of poverty and its alleviation are not new. Rather what are revisited are the
spatial differences in levels of poverty among real units. Poverty is a global phenomenon, which affects continents, nations and peoples differently. It afflicts people in various depths
and levels, at different times and phases of existence (Oyeyomi, 2003). The most common
way to measure poverty is based on income or consumption line. A person is considered
poor if his or her consumption level falls below 1USD per day, a level necessary to meet
basic needs. This minimum level is called the poverty line (The World Bank, 2002). The
Central Bank of Nigeria (1999) viewed poverty as “a state where an individual is not able to cater adequately for his or her basic needs of food, clothing and shelter; is unable to meet
social and economic obligations, lacks gainful employment, skills, assets and self-esteem;
and has limited access to social and economic infrastructure such as education, health,
portable water, and sanitation; and consequently, has limited chance of advancing his or
her welfare to the limit of his or her capabilities”. Narayan, Lont, and Otto (2000) systematically defined poverty when he said that “do not ask me what poverty is because
you have met it outside my house. Look at the house and count the number of holes. Look
at my utensils and the clothes that I am wearing. Look at everything and write what you
see. What you see is poverty”.
Micro-finance is a term used to refer to different methods for giving poor people access to financial services. Irobi (2008) defined microfinance as the provision of financial services
such credits (loans), savings, micro-leasing, micro-insurance, and payment transfers to
economically active poor and low income household to enable them engage in income
generating activities or expand/grow the small businesses. Microfinance is sectionally
defined as a financial intervention that focuses on the low-income group of a given society. The intervention primarily involves credit services and may also include savings, insurance
on credits and savings.
Furthermore, Robinson (2001) defined microfinance as the supply of loans, savings and
other basic financial services to the poor. Microfinance evolved as an economic development
approach intended to benefit the low-income part of a given society, both men and women (Irobi, 2008). According to World Bank (2007), the term refers to provision of financial
services (including saving and credit) to the poor. Micro-finance banks therefore are
institutions that are established to provide financial services to the poor. Microfinance
institutions can be non-governmental organizations, savings and loan cooperatives, loan
unions, government banks, commercial banks, or non-bank financial institutions
(Ledgerwood, 1997). The policy seeks to make financial services available on a sustainable basis to the economically active poor, low-income earners and micro, small and medium
enterprises through privately owned enterprises.
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 200
The objective of microfinance according to Otero (1999) is not providing capital to the poor to combat poverty rather it seeks to create an institution that delivers financial services to
the poor who are ignored by the formal banking sector.
Earlier studies about micro-financing have evaluated whether micro-credit programs such
as popular in Nigeria reach the relatively poor and vulnerable in their operations. Recent
studies have shown evidence of positive impact as it relates to first six out of seven Millennium Goals. Adamu (2007), Irobi (2008), Wrigth (2000), Zaman (2000), McCulloch
and Baulch (2000), all subscribed to the believe that microfinance is an effective and
powerful tool for poverty reduction. For example, Amin, Rai, and Topai (2003) focus on the
ability of microfinance to reach the poor and affirmed that microfinance has served people
below and above the poverty line. Also, Hossain (1988), in his study on “Credit for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in Bangladesh found that Grameen members who are poor and
landless have average household of 43 percent higher than marginal landowners.
The results of empirical evidence indicates that the poorest can benefit from microfinance
from both an economic and socio-economic well-being point-of-view, and that this can be
done without jeopardizing the financial sustainability of the Micro-financial institutions (Zaman, 2000; Robinson, 2001; Dahiru and Zubair,2008). For instance, Khandker (1998),
in several related studies using statistical method on assessment of impact of microfinance
among three Bangladesi programs found that every additional takas lend to a woman add
additional of 0.18 taka to annual household expenditure. Similarly, in an updated study
using panel data in Bangladesh, Khandker (2005), found that each additional 100 taka of credit to women increased total annual household expenditures by more than 20 taka.
These studies showed overwhelming benefit of increase in income and reduction of
vulnerability to poverty.
On the other hand, some authors have challenged the positive effects of microfinance on
poverty alleviation. For instance, Hulme and Mosley (1996) while acknowledging the role microfinance can play in helping to reduce poverty, concluded from their research on
microfinance that “most contemporary schemes are less effective than they might be”. They
stated that microfinance is not a panacea for poverty – alleviation and that in some cases
the poorest people have been made worse-off by microfinance. Also, Adamu (2007) observed
that microfinance institutions Nigeria have grown phenomenally, driven largely by expanding informal sector activities and the reluctance of commercial banks to fund
emerging microenterprises. However, the number of beneficiaries of microfinance
institutions is an insignificant proportion of the people in need of microfinance services. It
has been estimated that formal microfinance institutions only service less than one million
clients, in a country where over 70% of the country‟s population live below the poverty line
(Dahiru and Zubair, 2008). The results also suggested that micro-financing is unsuccessful at reaching the group most prone to destitution, the vulnerable poor.
The major challenges of microfinance in Nigeria include: communication gaps and
Inadequate awareness; insufficient support from governments; inadequate donor funding;
less attention on financial sustainability of MFIs; lack of adequate loan or equity capital to increase loan-able funds; high turnover of MFI staff; limited support for human and
institutional capacity building; illegal government and NGO operations that spoil the
market; and lack of standardized reporting and performance monitoring system for MFIs
(Irobi, 2008).
The theoretical frameworks for this study are economic and psychological theories. The economic theory argued that the success in any business venture, including microfinance,
is determined by the entrepreneurs‟ ability to deliver appropriate services and profitability
(Remenyi, 2006). The psychological theory on the other hand, argued that a species of
profit-making private venture that cares about the welfare of its customers can be
conceived. In other words, it is possible to develop capitalist enterprises that maximize
private profits subject to the fair interests of their customers (Mohammed, 1998).
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 201
The importance of microfinance is to eradicate poverty which made the Federal Government of Nigeria to adopt it as the main source of poverty reduction in Nigeria and mandated the
CBN to develop appropriate policy and framework for the operations of MFIs. Despite this,
however, the number of beneficiaries of microfinance banks is an insignificant proportion of
the people in need of microfinance services. It has been estimated that formal microfinance
banks only service less than one million clients in a country where over 70% of the country
population of 140 million lives below poverty line (Irobi, 2008). It is therefore necessary to undertake an assessment of the extent to which microfinance has impacted on poverty
reduction in Nigeria. That is the overall objective of this paper.
Objectives of the study
(i) To examine the roles of Microfinance Institutions in reducing poverty;
(ii) To assess the level of Microfinance Bank operations in nation building through poverty
alleviation;
(iii) To recommend the effective and efficient ways of realization of the scheme objectives.
Research Questions
In order to achieve the above stated objectives, the following research questions are
advanced:
(i) Does microfinance significantly contribute to poverty reduction and improved standard
of living of people in Nigeria? (ii) Do the poor have access to microfinance funds and loans for the development of micro
enterprises in Nigeria as expected?
(iii) What are the prospects of microfinance in the reduction of poverty in Nigeria?
(iv) Does poverty reduction has any implication on sustainable development in Nigeria?
Formulation of hypothesis
The following null hypotheses are proposed and tested in the course of this study.
(i) There is no significance difference between people who use microfinance and those who
do not.
(ii) There is no significant effect of microfinance in poverty alleviation in the country, Nigeria.
(iii) There is no significant effect of microfinance activities on sustainable development.
METHODOLOGY
The method employed in this study is the descriptive survey method. The method is ideal because the study involved collecting data from rural communities members of
microfinance institutions (MFIs) with a view to determine whether or not microfinance
contribute to poverty reduction by increasing their income and welfare. The population
comprised 320 rural communities member of MFIs and non-members in Lagos State.
A preliminary investigation was carried out on the MFIs in the state. The investigation
revealed that Integrated Micro Finance Bank, Susu Micro Finance Bank and MIC
Microfinance Bank are the three topmost MFIs in term of outreach and spatial location.
Data were collected from a sample member of these MFIs to determine the relationship
between poverty (dependent variable) and microfinance (independent variable). For effective
coverage and lower cost, purposeful sampling technique was used to select a sample of 80 members that constituted our sample size.
The major tool of this study was a questionnaire titled “Strategic Impact of Microfinance on
Poverty Reduction in Nigeria” (SIMPRNQ). The terms and statements embodied in the
questionnaire were related to the objectives and hypothesis of the study. The questionnaire
had two sections: Section A contained background information of the respondents while Section B was to measure perception of respondent on effectiveness of microfinance on
poverty reduction in Nigeria, rating Strongly Agree 4; Agree 3; Disagree 2; Strongly Disagree 1.
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 202
A reliability test was carried out on respondents in other microfinance banks which were not part of the study using test-retest methods. The scores obtained from the
administration of the questionnaire were corrected, using Pearson product moment
correlation coefficient was 0.78. The high correlation value attested to the reliability of the
instrument.
Out of the 80 copies the questionnaire administered, 68 were returned and used for analysis.
Data collected from questionnaire were a analyzed. Summarized, and interpreted
accordingly with the aid of descriptive statistical techniques such as total score and simple
percentage. Chi-square was used to measure the discrepancies exiting between the observed and expected frequency and to proof the level of significance in testing stated
hypotheses. Regression analysis and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) were computed with the
help of statistical package for social science (SPSS). The trend, and pattern and relationship
among data were identifies and interpreted.
TESTING OF HYPOTHESES AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The results were compiled based on the hypotheses that guided the study. The three
hypotheses stated for the study were tested at 0.05 significant levels.
Hypothesis 1: There is no significant difference in the number of entrepreneurs who used microfinance institutions and those who do not.
Table 1: X2 summary of adoption and non-adoption of Microfinance Institutions
Source: field survey, 2011.
Chi-square allows testing the statistical significance of differences in a classification system
(one-way classification) or the relationship between two classification systems (two-way). To
perform this chi-square test, one must already have the data classified in a frequency table
(this test is not performed on the raw data). A frequency table shows the number of cases
that belong simultaneously to two or more distinct categories as presented under “N”
column. In this study, adoption and non-adoption of microfinance institutions classification of participants revealed a significant difference among the entrepreneurs that used
microfinance and those who do not use microfinance at X2 =31.117 with 1 degree of
freedom and 0.05 significant level. It implies that most people chose microfinance
institutions (48) 83.8% and non-adoption of microfinance institutions (11) 16.2%.
Hypothesis one is rejected.
Hypothesis 2: There is no significant effect of microfinance institutions on poverty
alleviation.
Table 2: Model summary of the simple Regression for Poverty Alleviation
Model R R Square Adjusted R
Square
Std error of the
estimate
1 .812 .69 .57 157.4336
a) Predictions: (Constant microfinance institutions)
To test the second hypothesis, simple regression analysis was used to regress the independent variable against dependent variable used in determining dependent variable.
Table 2 above indicates the model summary of the simple regression equation that
Variable N Df X2 p-value
Adoption of microfinance
institution
57 1 31.117 <0.05
Non adoption of microfinance institution 11
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 203
predicted poverty alleviation. The explanation of the values presented is given in the table below.
Table 3: summary of Analysis of Variance for Poverty Alleviation
a) Predictors : ( constant microfinance institutions activities)
Source: field survey, 2011.
The model summary table provides useful information about regression analysis. First, the
„simple R‟ column is the correlation between the actually observed independent variable and the predicted dependent variable (i.e. predicted by the regression equation). „R square‟ is the
square of R and is also known as the „coefficient of determination‟. It states the proportion
(percentage) of the (sample) variable in the dependent variable that can be attributed to the
independent variable(s). In this study 69% of the variations in poverty alleviation among
members could be accounted for by the microfinance institutions. The adjusted R square
refers to the best estimate of R square for the population from which the sample was drawn. Finally, the „standard error of estimate‟ indicates that, on average, observed
entrepreneurial productivity deviate from the predicted regression line by a score of
177.4436. The hypothesis two which stated that” there is no significant effect of
microfinance institutions poverty alleviation was rejected at R=.819, R2=.69, F (1.48)
=.26.34; ρ<.05. This implies that there is a significant effect of microfinance institutions on poverty alleviation.
Hypothesis 3: There is no significant effect of microfinance institutions on sustainable
development.
Table 4: Model Summary of this Simple Regression for Sustainable Development
Model R R Square Adjusted R
square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1 .513 .406 .369 4.1327
a) Predictor : ( constant microfinance institutions activities)
Source: Field Survey, 2011.
To test the third hypothesis, simple regression analysis was used to regress the
independent variable against dependent variable used in determining dependent variable.
Table 4 above indicates the model summary of the simple regression equation that predicted sustainable development. The explanation of the value presented is given in table
5 below.
Table 5: Summary of Analysis of Variance for Sustainable Development
Model. Variations Sum of Df. ,Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
1 Regression 1728.18 1 1728.18 20.13 0.02
Residual 2842 57 46 I
Total 4570.18 68
b) Predictors: (Constant microfinance institutions activities)
Source: Field Survey, 2011
Model variations Sum of
square
Df Mean
square
F Sig.
1 Regression 762 1 762 26.34 0.05
Residual 1946 56 38
total 2708 57
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 204
The model summary table provides useful information about the regression analysis. First, the 'simple R' column is the correlation between the actually observed independent
variables and the predicted dependent variable (i.e., predicted by the regression equation).
'R square' is the square of R and is also known as the 'coefficient of determination'. It states
the proportion (percentage) of the (sample) variation in the dependent variable that can be
attributed to the independent variable(s). In this study, 40.6 % of the variations in,
sustainable development could be accounted for by the microfinance institutions. The 'adjusted R square' refers to the best estimate of R square for the population from which the
sample was drawn. Finally, the 'standard error of estimate' indicates that, on average,
observed sustainable development deviate from the predicted regression line by a score of
4.1327. The hypothesis three which stated that" there is no significant effect of
microfinance institutions activities in predicting sustainable development was rejected at R=.516, R²= .406, F (1, 66) =20.13; p<.05. This implies that there is a significant effect of
microfinance institutions on sustainable development.
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
The findings of the study showed that a significant difference among the entrepreneurs that used microfinance and those who do not use microfinance. It implies that most people
chose microfinance institutions (48) 83.8% and non-adoption of microfinance institutions.
This study shows that there is a significant effect of microfinance institutions on poverty
alleviation. In fact, the study shows that microfinance has affected the life of the poor in a
positive ways such as significant improvement in employment status, increased incomes, ability to invest more capital into the business by the entrepreneurs and ability to expand
their enterprise. These agree with the findings of Remenyi and Quinones (2000), Khandker
(2001) and Robinson (2001).
Also, it was discovered that there is a significant effect of microfinance institutions activities
in predicting sustainable development in Nigeria. The results of effect of microfinance institutions activities in predicting sustainable development was significant at R=.516, R²=
.406, F (1, 66) =20.13; p<.05. This means that the more microfinance institutions activities
the greater the level of development and consequent economic growth.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion this study show that microfinance programmes have the potential to alleviate
poverty especially in increasing level of income and reducing vulnerability. This will promote
people economic capacity and bring sustainable development.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of this study the following recommendations are made possible.
(a) Microfinance can be a more viable strategy for sustainable poverty alleviation if more is
to be done on programme outreach and depth. The programme needs to accommodate
the poor in the country. (b) The government should provide enabling environment for the microfinance programme
by ensuring political stability, a stable macro-economic environment and low inflation
rates.
(c) In order to have a sustainable microfinance intervention, the government should also
keep infrastructures in place that link more remote areas to market.
(d) Finally, erring staff of microfinance banks should be prosecuted in the court of law and penalized.
REFERENCES
Adamu, G. (2007), Role of Microfinance Institutions in Actualization of MDGs. Paper delivered
at the induction ceremony of Institute of Chartered Economists of Nigeria (ICEN) in Port Harcourt. September 24th.
Amin, S., Rai, A.S., and Topa, G. (2003), “Does Microcredit Reach the Poor and Vulnerable?
www.ajbms.org Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences
ISSN: 2047-2528 Vol. 1 No. 4 [198-205]
©Society for Business Research Promotion | 205
Evidence from Northern Bangladesh”. Journal of Development Economics, 70 (1), 59-82
Anyanwu, C.M. (2004), Microfinance Institutions in Nigeria: Policy, Practice and Potential. Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria Research Paper1-31
Dahiru, M.A. and Zubair, H. (2008), Microfinance in Nigeria and the prospects of
introducing its Islamic version there in the light of the selected Muslim countries experience. Munich Personal REPEC Archive. Paper 8287 68-86.
Hossain, M. (1988), “Credit for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty: The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh”. Washington, D.C.: IFPRI, Research Report 65 43-59.
Hulme, D. & Mosley, P. (1996), Finance Against Poverty. London: Routledge. Vol.2 1-12. Irobi, N.C. (2008), Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation: A case study of Obazu Progressive
Women Association Mbieri, Imo State- Nigeria. Uppsala: Department of Economics
Khandker, S. (1998) Fighting Poverty Microcredit. Dhaka, Bangladesh: University Press
Limited
Khandker, S. (2005),” Micro-finance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh”. World Bank Economic Review.
Ledgerwood, J. (1999), Sustainable Banking for the Poor Project. (World Bank) South Asia. Littlefield, Daouda, D., and James, C. (2005), “CGAP focus Note 24: Is Microfinance an
Effective Strategy to Reach the Millenium Development Goals?” Washington, D.C.:
Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
McCulloch, N. and Baulch, B. (2000), Stimulating the impact of policy upon Chronic and Transitory Poverty in Rural Pakistan. Journal of Development Studies. 36(6) 23-38.
Mohammed, Y. (1998), “Poverty Alleviation: Is Economic Any Help? Lessons from the Grameen Bank Experience. Journal of International Affairs 52, 47-65.
Narayan, R. Lont, H., and Otto, Hopes (2000), “Microfinance Impact Report”. Trihcirappalli,
India: The Activists for Social Alternatives. Otero, M. (2000), Bringing Development Back into Microfinance. Journal of Microfinance,
Vol. 1 No.1, 8-19 Oyeyomi, O.E. (2003), An Assessment of Poverty Reduction Strategies in Nigeria (1983-
2002). A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of
the doctor of philosophy of the St Clement University
Remeny, J. (2000), “ Is there a State of the Art in Microfinance?” In Joe Remeny and
Benjamin-Quinones Jr(eds), Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation- Case Studies from
Asia and the Pacific. London: Printer. Robinson, M. (2001). The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor. World
Bank, Washington
Simanowitz, A. (2003), Client Exist Surveys: A Tool for Understanding Client Drop-out.
Journal of Microfinance. 2(1).
World Bank (2002), Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive world Economy. World Bank Policy Research Report, New York: Oxford University Press
Wright, G.A.N. (2000), Microfinance Systems: Design Quality Financial Services for the
Poor. Zeb Books Ltd, London & New York, and The University Press Limited, Dhaka.
Zaman, H. (2000), Assessing the Poverty and Vulnerability Impact of Microcredit in
Bangladesh: A case study of BRAC. World Bank
top related