implementation of rnp ar approach in japan implementation of rnp ar... · 2 mandate rnp2 above...

1

IMPLEMENTATION OF RNP AR APPROACH IN JAPAN

JAPAN CIVIL AVIATION BUREAU

NTT DATA i CORPORATION

For Introduction of RNP AR APCH Procedure at Tokyo Int’l Airport, HANEDA

2

Mandate RNP2

above FL290

RNP2RNAV5En-route RNAV in 1992

FMS Arrivals in 1999

Segregate RNAV5and VOR routes

RNAV1 SID/STARsat radar airports

RNAV (GNSS) Approach

with Baro-VNAV

En-route

Terminal Area

Approaches

RNP1 SID/STARsat non-radar airports

FY2007 FY2011 FY2018 2020

Kansai New RWY Haneda New RWY

Short term Mid term Long term

RNAV Roadmap for JAPAN (Ver.2)

Transition fromRNAV1 to RNP1

Mandate RNP1 at mid-highdensity airports

RNP AR ApproachesExpect to mandate RNP ARApproaches at selected airports

3

CONTENTS

1. Overview of RNP AR APCH at Haneda Airport

2. Data Acquisition and Obstacle Survey

3. Quality Assurance for RNP AR Approach

4. Training

5. Flight Procedure Design Software

6. Procedure Design (Construction)

7. Flight Operational Safety Assessment (FOSA)

8. Summary

4

1. OVERVIEW OF RNP AR APCH AT HANEDA AIRPORT

5

2. DATA ACQUISITION ANDOBSTACLE SURVEY

Accurate & Reliable terrain /obstacle data is essential for RNP-AR APCH Design.

eTOD from Digital Aviation Photography images will be basically utilized in Japan.

Benefit

� Accuracy (Std deviation 0.5m vertical, 0.7m horizontal)

� Covering Area

� Cost, and more.

Over lap

Course C1

Course C2

Side lap

Processing All Pixels

LEFT RIGHT

Digital Surface Model

6

2. DATA ACQUISITION ANDOBSTACLE SURVEY

eTOD Haneda Airport (45km x 45km)Obstacle Data Collection Surface

Penetrated

Surface

Penetrated Stick-

Shaped Objects

Searched Object

Obstacle Search Window3D View of Digital Surface

Model

7

3. QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR RNP AR APPROACH

States must establish a quality system for the entire IFP process. (ICAO’s Doc. 9906 Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design Vol.1 - Flight Procedure Design Quality Assurance System)

There is no QA system for RNP AR Flight Procedure in JAPAN.

Study to develop QA system for RNP AR is on-going.

Study Output

System Requirement of Ground Validation Tools for RNAV route (DRAFT)

Standard Procedure of Flight Validation for RNAV route (DRAFT)

8

4. TRAINING

Training is one of the most important elements of quality assurance. (Doc 9906 Vol.2 – Flight Procedure Designer Training)

Training is conducted to train competent designers for RNP AR APCH Procedure Design.

Outline of RNP/AR Training (Advanced Training)

Duration: 2 weeks

Trainee: 10 Active procedure designers(trained in Basic Training Program)

GOAL: To identify basic facts and terms of ICAO RNP/AR principles and definitions, and RNP/AR approach can be designed in accordance with PANS-OPS criteria.

9

• 4 days practical exercises to develop and draw procedures

• 7 days lectures to cover overview, and Procedure Construction with progress test

4. TRAINING

10

5. FLIGHT PROCEDURE DESIGN SOFTWAE

States are encouraged to use software packages to design instrument flight procedures. (Doc 9906 Vol.2)

Procedure Design Automation Tools are expected to improve not only speed and efficiency of design process, but also accuracy and quality of design output.

An Automation Tool complied with Doc.9905 (RNP AR Procedure Design Manual) is selected for RNP AR APCH Procedure Design.

There is a significant need to define a validation process for such Automation Tools. (Doc. 9906 Vol.3 –Flight Procedure Design Software Validation)

11

6. PROCEDURE DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION)

Movie 1

Movie 2

12

7. FLIGHT OPERATIONAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT (FOSA)

ICAO’s Doc. 9613 PBN Manual (Vol-2, Part C, 6.4.1.1) states the requirement of FOSA.

PBN Manual does not provide a complete method or process for conducting a FOSA.

FOSA document is being prepared in JAPAN.

TF Meeting (Oct. 2009)

#1 Workshop (Nov. 2009): Hazard Identification & Risk Analysis

FOSA Seminar (Nov. 2009)

#2 Workshop (Feb. 2010): Mitigation

Final FOSA Document will be prepared by March 2010.

13

8. SUMMARY

Importance Acknowledged:

Terrain & Obstacle Data – Accuracy and Reliability

Quality Assurance – Flight & Ground Validation Procedure for RNAV Route

Training – Advanced Program for RNP AR

Automation Tools – Compliance with Design Criteria

FOSA – Assessment and Mitigation by stakeholder’s discussions

Some issues are remain, but possible to resolve side by side with relevant organizations.

Further effort to be made for successful implementation.

14

IMPLEMENTATION OF RNP AR APPROACH IN JAPAN

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

QUESTION?