image resolution chapter 10. definitions resolution – ability to record and display detail spatial...

Image ResolutionChapter 10

Definitions• Resolution – ability to record and

display detail• Spatial• Spectral• Radiometric

Definitions• Spatial resolution – the amount of

geometric detail• How close can two points be before you

can’t distinguish them

Spatial Resolution• High spatial resolution: 0.6 - 4 m

• » GeoEye-1• » WorldView-2• » WorldView-1• » QuickBird• » IKONOS• » FORMOSAT-2• » ALOS• » CARTOSAT-1• » SPOT-5

• Medium spatial resolution: 4 - 30 m• » ASTER• » LANDSAT 7• » CBERS-2

• Low spatial resolution: 30 - > 1000 m• SeaWiFS• GOES

Radiometric Resolution• Radiometric resolution – the amount

of brightness detail• Is the image black and white, shades of

grey• How many bits – 4, 8, 12, 16, etc.

Radiometric Resolution

8 bit6 bit

2 bit 1 bit

2-bit

8-bit

Spectral Resolution• Spectral resolution – the amount of

detail in wavelength• 2 bands, 4, 6, 200 or more

Temporal Resolution• Temporal resolution – the amount of

detail in time• High altitude aerial photos every 10

years, Landsat 16 days, NOAA 4 hrs • High resolution: < 24 hours - 3 days• Medium resolution: 4 - 16 days• Low resolution: > 16 days

Tradeoffs

Tradeoffs• There are trade-offs between spatial,

spectral, and radiometric resolution • Taken into consideration when engineers

design a sensor.

• For high spatial resolution, the sensor has to have a small IFOV (Instantaneous Field of View).

• However, this reduces the amount of energy that can be detected as the area of the ground resolution cell within the IFOV becomes smaller.

• This leads to reduced radiometric resolution - the ability to detect fine energy differences.

Tradeoffs• To increase the amount of energy

detected (and the radiometric resolution) without reducing spatial resolution, we have to broaden the wavelength range detected for a particular channel or band. • Unfortunately, this reduces the spectral

resolution of the sensor. • Conversely, coarser spatial resolution would

allow improved radiometric and/or spectral resolution.

• Thus, these three types of resolution must be balanced against the desired capabilities and objectives of the sensor.

Target Variables• Contrast – the brightness difference

between an object and the background• High contrast improves spatial detail

Contrast versus spatial frequency

Sinusoidal target with varying contrast in % and varying spatial frequency left to right

Obvious resolution decrease from left to right. If your eyes are too good squint to see effect

Picture from www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html

Target Variables• Shape is also a significant factor

• Aspect ratio is how long the object is compared to its width• Long thin features can be seen even if

they are narrower than the spatial resolution

• Regularity of shape makes for better detail• Agricultural fields

Target Variables• Number of objects favor higher detail

• Orchard versus single tree

• Extent and uniformity of background also helps distinguish things

Aerial view of Olympic Peninsula facing west from Port Orchard Bay

System Variables• Design of sensor and its operation

are important too• Air photo – have to consider quality of

camera and lens, choice of film, altitude, scale,

Operating conditions• Altitude

• Ground speed

• Atmospheric conditions

Measuring resolution• Ground Resolved Distance (GRD) the

dimensions of the smallest objects recorded

• Line pairs per millimeter (LPM) is derived from targets• Target is placed on the ground and

imaged

• If two obejcts are are visually separated, they are considered “spatially resolved”

Measuring resolution• Using the target you measure the

smallest pair of lines (black line plus adjacent white space)

Modulation Transfer Function• The Modulation Transfer Function

(MTF) is response of a system to an array of elements with varying spaces

Modulation Transfer Function• For low spatial frequencies, the

modulation transfer function is close to 1 (or 100%) • generally falls as the spatial frequency

increases until it reaches zero.

• The contrast values are lower for higher spatial frequencies .

• As spatial frequency increases, the MTF curve falls until it reaches zero. • This is the limit of resolution for a given

optical system or the so called cut off frequency (see figure below).

• When the contrast value reaches zero, the image becomes a uniform shade of grey.

Modulation Transfer Function

Modulation Transfer Function• The figure represents a sine pattern

(pure frequencies) with spatial frequencies from 2 to 200 cycles (line pairs) per mm. • The top half of the sine pattern has

uniform contrast.

Modulation Transfer Function• Perceived image sharpness (NOT

lp/mm resolution) is closely related to the spatial frequency where MTF is 50% (0.5)• i.e. where contrast has dropped by half.

Modulation Transfer Function• Contrast levels from 100% to 2% are

illustrated on the chart for a variable frequency sine pattern.

• Contrast is moderately attenuated for MTF = 50% and severely attenuated for MTF = 10%.

• The 2% pattern is visible only because viewing conditions are favorable: • it is surrounded by neutral gray, it is noiseless

(grainless), and the display contrast for CRTs and most LCD displays is relatively high.

• It could easily become invisible under less favorable conditions.

Modulation Transfer Function• How is MTF related to lines per

millimeter resolution? • The old resolution measurement—

distinguishable lp/mm— corresponds roughly to spatial frequencies where MTF is between 5% and 2% (0.05 to 0.02).

• This number varies with the observer, most of whom stretch it as far as they can.

• An MTF of 9% is implied in the definition of the Rayleigh diffraction limit.

Mixed Pixels• If the area covered by a pixel is not

uniform in composition it leads to mixed pixels.

• These often occur at the edge of large parcels, along linear features, or scattered due to small features in the landscape (ponds, buildings, vehicles, etc.)

Mixed Pixels

Mixed Pixels• The spectral responses of those

mixed pixels is not a pure signature, but rather, a composite signature

• Can you think of an advantage to having a composite signature?

• Identify areas that are too complex to resolve individually

• There have been a number of studies on the effect of resolution on mixed pixels

• As resolution becomes coarser• Mixed pixels increase• Interior pixels decrease• Background pixels decrease

Resolution and Mixed Pixels Resolution Total Mixed Interior Back-

ground

A - fine 900

%

109

1.1

143

15.9

648

72

B 225

%

59

26.2

25

11.1

141

62.7

C 100

%

34

34

6

6

60

60

D - coarse 49

%

23

46.9

1

2

25

51

Original Landsat image

Image resampled at coarser resolution

wheat (red), potatoes (green) and sugar beet (blue)

Spatial and Radiometric Resolution• Sensors are designed with specific

levels of radiometric resolution and spatial resolution• Both of these determine the ability to

portray features in the landscape

• Broad levels of resolution may be adequate for coarse-textured landscape

• Finer resolution may help to identify more features, but may also add more detail than necessary

Interactions with Landscape• In a study of field size in grain-

producing regions, Podwysocki (1976) showed how effectiveness of different resolutions could be quantified.

Interactions with Landscape• Simonett and Coiner (1971)

conducted another study to determine the effectiveness of the yet to be launched MSS sensor

• Simulated by using airphotos and overlaying a grid of 800, 400, 200, and 100 feet.• Assessed the number of land-use

categories in each cell