ij - arlis.org 2.-0ut/ine of the nurek reservoir and the location of soviet and american...
Post on 23-Jun-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
• .. • ~ p " ••
• ~ " ,.. I • .,__ -, . . . . . .. 1 . -··-- . .. ,_, . -... ; ....... . . ' . . -· . . t . . '--, . , • • .. . ' . " • I
iJ
T :mi..rCED SE 1 S~1 I C I T1 STL'D f ES
'·
,. ..
... ...-:uz
-. ';
........... _ .......
;; 'f : ·:t ~ -"
" '•I
~l
' . . ..
.J
f..
• • c;_: >.
CJc >'\)
"·
_,_,- .-.............. ,_._. w .....
~ .
f;~o' ~·· .
J:
.. 1\
,. ~-:,.;,_ m_:~.~·~~ .. {tf;~ t?.f.£..-ff~~ _..._ .l:.. 1"':;'f' .-ot-~~-,t~..V:S ....... ·S:.,
~-. ~} . ~:~~~< ~;· ..... ·. ~
. -.. .~ . . .. ~)-" .. :..t:'-
,.
..
·~.
Induced
Seismicity Studies • zn Soviet Central Asia
by David W. Simpson, Lanzom-Doherty Geological Observatory.
Columbia University, Palisades, N.Y., and .:.
S. Kh. Negmarullaev, Tadjik Institute of Seismoresistant
Construction and Seismology, Dushanbe. Tadjikistan, U.S.S.R.
This report is Contribudon No. 2712 of the Lamont-DohPrty Geological Observatory. Columbia T1 niversity. The research is supported by lhe National Sdence Foundation.
Articles in previous issues of the Earthquake Informadon Bu.lledn have described the seismic activity that has sometimr~ occurred when large reservoirs have been impounded. !'iot all reservoirs trigger earthquake activity. :-..bny of the world's largest res~rvoil!: have shown no ch:mge in seismicity: some relatively small reser;oirs have produced earthqua.l<es far in ex.ce-;s of th<'-;e estimated from the seismic hi,tory of the region. If dams are to be designed for ':lfl!ty. •.ve mu::1· understand what factors ..:rmtrnl \\ ht:~h\!r 1'r iOt
induced seismicity will occur. C.m '-"c! 11entify "safe" sites where there i;< Hrr:e pc•.::"iJi fa induced. st:is-..:i~h} '! It .1 .J:..r:: ·:::::-t ~.,t: .... ;•. =~ .!:' area thar may he c;ubjected to induced ,;c:,;)iJ;,.;-
Nurek Dam in Soviet Cer.t·1! -~.;.:= earth and rock fill, which s mcst earthquake 3haking.
~ ....... .:
T~.:: ~,..-:,..,... s •es;st3~"'t ·o
..
,,~
~ I
..
t. I
.. ..
;
~·I
I I
0
"'--
il
; ;
:} • I
,. I
II
I l I I ' j l ) ; ~
i l : I l I
I I I I . I . I
I I I
I I I I
I
I , I .I I ,
'•'
---
largest indu.::e..! !!ar!hquuke'? Are there pre\ entive measure!> that can be taken. such as proper m:tnipulation of the water level in the reservoir, that will reduce the possibility of a large induced earthquake'! To an~·.,er the!-e question!>. we must understand the mechunism bj which 1he rc.!.ervoir can modify seismicity.
Srudies of induced seismicity are also jmportant in terms of earthquake prediction. Current models of the earthquake process stress the importance of fluids migrating within the Earth's crust. At sizeable reservoirs, we can set up large-scale experiments where the hydrological regime within the crust can be artificially mod
ified. As part of a joint Soviet-American program
in earthquake prediction (see "Odyssey to Tadzik," by C. V. K. Wesson and R. L. Wesson, Earthquake l.riformation Bulletin, vol. 7, no. l, p. 8-15; and "The Talas-Fergana Fault," by R. E. Wallace, Earthquake Information Bulletin, vol. 8. no. 4, p. 4-13), we have had a uruque opportunity to study induced seismicity associated witll the filling of the world's deepest reservoir, the Nurek Reservoir in Soviet Central Asia {fig. 1). In a cooperative project between the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and the Tadjik Institute of Seismores-
'/
iswnt Construction and Sei~.molvg} rTI:-,.3:s we have installed a network of radiotelemct-;:rc~ 5eismograph starions around the Nurek Rc~er. voir, 60 k.Horneters southeast of the Tadjik car.. ital of Dushanbe (fig. 2). The 315-meter-h~<:L.
•eu
!\urek Dam h scheduled for completion in i9"iY Although the reservoir is only two-thirds fu::: activity during the early stages of filirlg h:..t!>
given us one of the best documented C;:tse~ Jf induced seismicity.
The exploitation of the water resources of the Vakhsh River is an integr-c1l part of the development of the resources of Tadjikistan. The use of the Nurek Reservoir to control water for irriga. tion pl)rposes will open extensive areas of land for cotton. the major export of the republic, and electricity from the dam's 2.7-milJion-hllowan generators will provide power for new alumi. num and chemical processing plants.
Tadjikistan is one of the most seismically ac. tive areas of the Soviet Union. The collision be. tween Asia and the Indian subcontinent that has taken place in the last 35 mi1lion years, and formed the Himalaya mountajn belt, continues to deform the Earth's crust, giving rise to exten
sive mountain ranges and earthquake activity in Centra] Asia. The Jesign and construction of a high dam in such an area present impressive en-
KAZAKHSTAN
----·-····, ' ., . ,., .
) . UZBEKISTAN '··:
~-
TURKMENIA
KYZYL KUM O£SERT
AFGANISTAN
0 100 200km
KIRGHIZIA TIEN SHP..~ '•\. ,:o.\OUNTAINS
•'
CHINA
60"' 66• 72" 78•
Figure 1.-Map of Soviet Central Asia showing location of Nurek Reservoir on Vakhsh River in Tadjikistan.
210
. . ...
-
......
·~
.. .. ..
,-:;:
KRA 0
Figure 2.-c.i liDOS. Th~ A ! to a centml i locations of ; the deepes< l the reservo1 1
gineering d' ble for mos· de£ign. Ext !>tl.ldies wer seismic risk! took part ir., ing out mot; LoEarth ~h:.l model tech·!
i and rock-fi 1 an earthquat
1
I
-si,_;." ~-' ,_, . .,..ri<,-~:,;,_ , . , . l -' }Eht;'ll;rlfijy·l;,:;:~·l' '';i)ittiJ:' -~-. -~I:.: .......:....., ___ ~_:_j_ _____ _:__..._ __ --'--_-~-...... -~--------:----------~-~"'----~.----} i . . . ' ' . . -~~~"~-:..:..- .. _ --~~t"'~...:.- ·_
I ' ---· ·'-~ I
I l j Seismol(lg~ tTISSS). i ori ;iioLel:::metered j )Unci Surd; Re~er-1 1e~st of the T<.:Jjik .:~ii·
""-.,...,.:J. The 315-::~el!:':-!"j~!--. i for completion in 1979. J·.S only t\\ o-rhirds ful!. ·:y stage~ of filing ha;. 'I
'~r documented ca~es of ... I~
;.: water resources of the i'ral pan of the deve]op/.Tadjik:istan. The use of i ] fi . . ,~ontro water or Imga-r i:!xtensive areas of land I• .i ort of the republic, and I•
;'··s 2. 7-million-kilowan ;i:power for new alumif~;sing plants. l•" • • pe most seJsmJcally ac~ )· nion. The collision be[11 subcontinent that has i-"~5 "}}" 1·:. mi Ion years. and :luntain belt, continues :; t: giving rise to ex ten~ earthquake activity in -, and construction of a
CO j!present impressive enll I'
H-.. '!'1"'!~~--· )1 !l r i. h1 ;11'
:':~ AJ.,M~-ATA, i.a ..... ___ ._ ..... _1" P!llf ·····-· ;~. :r #"
I< (; I~ ~· l"
·~ lh I' .~ ... 1 .. ~
L ~~CHINA '. i' i• { ~
1 . .,
.. .... ~ . .
..::,_,.;. ·;;::;···it~~·..::.::;;.i.:.:..::;;.,~~~~~':::.::7:.:::::.:~.~~;~.;~~r; .:: ~"·.:..:.;:.::.:. ~·-::., ..... -..... ~:....i. , . ., ..
KRA l':il
c
TNG ;.
0 ® 12
0 DO
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
OSGC
0
0
c;SGZ
0 station locations
0 Soviet American
A 0 10 ICJLOMETER5
o three -component 0
seismograph station o OCT 25-DEC20,1976
~--~-------------------------------------------------------------~38" 69" 69"45'
Figure 2.-0ut/ine of the Nurek Reservoir and the location of Soviet and American .'\eismograph stations. The American stations operated unattended for 1 year, cgnunuously transmiwng data by radio to a central recording station in Dushanbe, 60 km northwest of the dam site. The squares are the locations of earthquakes recorded during 1976. Most of the activity is concentrated directly beneath the deepest part of the reservoir. Earthquakes in 1971-72 began approximately 15 km southwest of the reservoir, and activity gradually migrate:i towards the presently active area.
gineering challenges. TISSS has been responsible for most of the seismic aspects of the dam's design. Extensive seismological and geological studies were started in 1955 to determine the sei!;mic risk for the dan1 site. In addition, TISSS took pan in the d~sigr of the darn itself, carry~ ing out model studies ot the response of the dam to Eartit shaking, using beth analytical and scalemodel :echniques. The Nurek Dam is an earth and roc.k~fiiJed structure designed to withstand an earthquake of at least magnitude 6.5.
.. . . .. .·
-
Uniikc most other reservoirs where seismic instruments have been installed only after induced earthquake activity began, the seismological studies carried out by TISSS before construction of the dam have provided a unique se< of data defining the seismic regime before impounding. Since the water level first exceeded 60 min 1971, there has been a tenfold increase in the number of earthquakes occurring close to the reservoir. The strongest srquence, two earthquakes of magnitude 4.5, oc~urred in No-
2ll
. •· . ..
. . ... ··
~I i
; I
,l
..
•:
ik t t *'"' (/~b...'
. ,. !
vember 1972 just after the first stage of filling to 125m.
In addition to the increase in the number of earthquakes~ other changes were seen. These included the ratio between the numbers of large and small earthquakes, changes in the types of faulting that caused the earthquakes, and a migration of epicenters toward the reservoir. None of the earthquakes at Nurek has yet been large enough to pose any threat to the safety of the dam.
The impounding of a large reservrsir modifies the stress conditions in the Earth· s ctust beneath the reservoir in two ways. First, there is an increase in elastic stress due to the dead weight of the reservoir. Second, there is an increase in pore pressure resulting from the infiltration of water into the surrounding rock. In a region of thrust faulting, such as is the case at Nurek, the natural tendency is for blocks of the Earth's crust to be thrust up and over adjacent blocks. Under such conditions, the weight of the reservoir r•·c;!-:'lg downward opposes the natural stress system, strengthening fault zones and inhibiting earthquake activity.
Increased pore pressure, however, tends to force fault zones apart, weakening faults and increasing earthquake activity. Following a change in water level, there is a delay between the effect of the load and pore pressure: the load stresses increase immediately, whereas the increased pore pressure is delayed by the time re-
!
~ • < • ••• •• : :. ; • :t· . . .
quired cor diffusion of water into fault zones. At Nurek we can actually see this time delay. When the water level increases, there is an initial decrease in seismic activity, followed by an increased level of activity as the pore pressure rises.
One of the most interesting results from Nurek has been the effect which rapid changes in water level or rate of filling have on the seismic activity. The largest earthquakes, in November 1972, appear to be related to the abrupt stop in filling when the reservoir reached a depth of 100 m. When the water level is abruptly decreased (for example, in early March 1975 when the water level dropped by more than 3 meters per day), there is a pronounced increase in seismic activity as the stabilizing load is removed and the high pore pressure remains. When the water level is decreased less rapidly (for example, the two downdraws in I 974 when the rate did not exceed. 2 mid), the pore pressure appears to have time to dissipate with the load and no increase in seismicity is observed.
Based on our interpretation of the relationship between increased seismicity and rapid changes in water level, we recommended that the second stage of filling in late I 976 be carried out as smoothly as possible without any rapid fluctua· tions in either the water level or rate of filling. As figure 3 shows, the filling and emptying of the reservoir in 1976-77 was smoother than earlier fillings, except for a rapid 3-m change in
People of Central Asta. 212
-
•
I · .
200
180
160
-1<40]: :z:
:n 120:;: ~ .... 0 "? ICO ~ 9 .... "'
'10 80 ... c( .... ~ 0.. 30- 60 ..
~20 40_,' ......... IW
' -.. > IW 10 20
... 1..- •
"' )o
i! 1!5 2 ""
_.. ..... ·; a.. .. ... ro :;
"' .!a c( ..g "' -J
"' !5 . IZ:
'Z • IZ: ... "'
1969
Figure 3.-A con water level and 1 the bottom grapl: of the earthquak largest events (f• creass in activity large earthquake
water level at a outlet tunnel was t
in water level apf level of microear in August 1976. peaked at 215m . no large earthqunl the frrst filling in to prove conclush quake may have b ulation of the war,
Induced seismit phenomenon. In o large earthquakes l ervoir impounding curred soon after f then graJually dis. ~on that. after a sr haps tens of years. and the reservoir h mic regime than "' 'iUits from :'-iurek: :;1
of the way in whi may be possible tc in a safe manuer. '
I '
t :).1
_ _,:'.:;;J.~ .:;,r;, e;- \f.~.: '
.• tl: .. --· .. .,.-_ ...... *¢±
". . ~- ~ ::_.;:~~
on of water into fault zones. At ar.tually see this time delay level increases, there is an ini::ismic activity, followed by an ·f activity as the pore pressure
1st interesting results from Nu-effect which rapid changes in
e of filling have on the seismic ~est earthquakes, in November be related to the abrupt stop in
' ;eservoir reached a depth of i 00 : ter level is abruptly decrea!'t:t.l ;: early March 1975 when the Sed by more than 3 meters per 1Jronounced increase in seismic abilizing load is removed ami ssure remains. When the water l less rapidly (for example, the
. in 1974 when the rate did not Lt1e pore pressure appears to have
with,-the load and no increase >bse( r
nterPremtion of the relationship )d seismicity and rapid changl!s 'e recommended that the second n late 1976 be carried out as ;ible without any rapid flucrua· e water level or rate of filling. vs. the filling and emptying of .976-77 was smcoth~r than ear'!pt for a rapid 3-m change in
· . ...;::-, .
-«::!... .. .. :; .2.
~ .
1969 1970 1971 1972
\ (
1973 1974 l'+.d.4 .....
197!5 1976 1977
YEARS
Figure 3.-A comparison of water-/eve! and earthquake activity. The top part of the graph shows the water level and the number of earthquake's, greater than magnitude 1.5, at each 10-day interval. In the bottom graph, showing the square root of the energy released by the earthquake activity, the size ,;f the earthquake is included, so that the peaks in the graph show the tim~ of occurrence of the fa,gest events (for example, the two magnitude 4.5 earthquakes in Novemb~r 1972). Note the increase in activity in March 1975 at the time of the rapid emptying of the reservoir and the absence of large earthquakes as the reservoir reached 215m in December 1976.
water level at a depth of 160 m when a new outlet tunnel v·as tested. This small, rapid change in water level appears to have initiated the high level of mil.roearthquake activity which began in August 1976. As the water level smoothly peaked at 215 mat the end of 1976, there were no large earthquakes such as those at the end of the ftrst filling in 1972. Althoubil. it is difficult to prove conclusively, we feel that a large earthquake may have been avoided by proper manipulation of the water level.
Induced seismicity appears to be a transient phenomenon. In other parts of the world where large earthquakes have been associated with reservoir impounding, the greatest activity has occurred soon after filling of the reservoir and has then gradually disappeared with time. We rea· son that, after a sufficient length of time, perhaps tens of years, a new equilibrium is reached and the reservoir has no more effect on the seismic regime than would a natural lake. Our results from Nurek sug2est that bv careful comrol -- .. of the way in which the rl!servoir is filled. It may be possible to reach this new equilibrium in a safe manner. We could control the rate of
stress buildup and the pore water pressure so that seismic energy is released as small earthquakes and larger, more destructive ones can be avoided.
Fu. ·~er reading Gough, D. 1., and Gough, W. I., 1970, Load-In·
duced Ea!"thquakes at Lake Kariba: Geophysical Journal of the Royal i!rtronomical Society, val. 21, p. 79-101.
Gupta, H. K .. and Rastogi, B. K., 1976, Dams and Earthquakes: Elsevier, Amsterdam. :!29 p.
Judd, W. R., editor, 1974, Seismic Effects of Reservoir Impounding: EngiMering Geology, special i~sue, vol. 8, p. 1-22.
Milne. W. G., editor. 1976. Induced Seismicit;.: Engineering Geology. special issue. val. 10, p. ~3-385.
Rothe, I. P .• 1973, A Geophy<;ics Retxm: In Man ~fad~ Lakes-Their Problems .md Environmental Effect'i: American Geophy~·ical Union. Geophysic:U ~tonograph 17, p. 41-454.
Simp~on. D. W .. 1976, S.:tsmicity Changt:s ,·\"'o· ciart:d with Reservoir Lottding: En~ineering Geolo~t.'. vol. to. p. 123-150.
. ~"·· ---· -~·.- _,.,. ·- .•.. ,._. ~·~-~--~· »~·~-··"'
' . •
r
·.1 'I ,'l 'I
;I
..
..
1 ' I
' l r i
I (
.J .;.,., . ,-:-. ~
_j!
'
top related