icu delirium t homas tobinson , md associate professor, surgery august 5th, 2009

Post on 24-Feb-2016

34 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

ICU DELIRIUM T homas Tobinson , MD Associate Professor, Surgery August 5th, 2009. AGS. WHO CARES ABOUT THE BRAIN?. WHY IS DELIRIUM IMPORTANT?. Most common postoperative complication in the elderly. Closely related to adverse outcomes. DELIRIUM. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

ICU DELIRIUM

Thomas Tobinson, MDAssociate Professor, Surgery

August 5th, 2009AGS

WHO CARES ABOUT THE BRAIN?

Slide 2

WHY IS DELIRIUM IMPORTANT?

DELIRIUM

Most common postoperative complication in the elderly

Closely related to adverse outcomes

Potentially preventable, and there is room to improve treatment

Slide 3

WHAT IS DELIRIUM?

Curr Opin Crit Care (2005) 11:360.

Delirium is an acute, fluctuating change in mental status, with inattention and altered levels of consciousness

Slide 4

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR DELIRIUM

• Coexisting physiologic disturbance

• Acute onset

• Disturbance of consciousness

• Change in cognition

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders DSM IV - Fourth Edition (1994). Slide 5

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

Slide 6

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

Slide 7

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Vulnerability

Low Vulnerability

Noxious Insult

Less Noxious Insult

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

Slide 8

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Vulnerability

Low Vulnerability

Noxious Insult

Less Noxious Insult

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Slide 9

Cataract surgery1 < 5%

Medical ward2 15%Vascular operation3 36%Hip fracture4 40%VA SICU5 44%Trauma ICU6 59%Medical ICU7 72%

INCIDENCE OF DELIRIUM

1. Int Psych (2002) 14:301.

2. NEJM (1999) 340:669.

3. Gen Hosp Psych (2002) 24:28.

4. JAGS (2002) 50:850.

5. Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.

6. Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

7. JAGS (2006) 54:479.

Slide 10

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Vulnerability

Low Vulnerability

Noxious Insult

Less Noxious Insult

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Slide 11

RISK FACTORSFOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

Slide 12

Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

PREEXISTING RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

Age, years 48 ± 22 38 ± 16 P < .03

AUDIT Score (alcohol abuse) 9 ± 9 10 ± 11 P < .71

Charlson Index (comorbidities) 0.7 ± 1.3 0.4 ± 1.3 P < .35

Slide 13

↑Age

RISK FACTORSFOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

Slide 14

Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

INJURY-SPECIFIC RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

Injury Severity Score 26 ± 12 20 ± 9 P < .02

Head AIS 2.3 ± 2.0 1.7 ± 1.7 P < .20

Abdomen AIS 0.7 ± 1.4 0.9 ± 1.5 P < .48

Extremity AIS 1.5 ± 1.7 1.0 ± 1.6 P < .28

Slide 15

↑Age ↑ISS

RISK FACTORSFOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

Slide 16

Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

EMERGENCY ROOM RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUMPresent(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

Systolic blood pressure (arrival) 129 ± 35 132 ± 22 p = .60

Heart rate (arrival) 98 ± 20 90 ± 21 p = .10

Glascow Coma Score (arrival) 12 ± 4 15 ± 1 p < .01

Slide 17

↑Age ↑ISS ↓GCS

RISK FACTORSFOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

Slide 18

Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

OPERATIVE RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUMPresent(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

Number of operations 1.3 ± 1.3 0.4 ± 0.6 P < .01

Anesthesia time, minutes 267 ± 289 99 ± 178 P < .01

Slide 19

↑Age ↑ISS ↓GCS ↑Operations↑Anesthesia

RISK FACTORS FOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

Slide 20

Am J Surg (2008) 196:864.

ICU RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUMPresent(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

Max. base excess (1st 24 hours) 7.7 ± 4.7 4.8 ± 3.2 P = .11

Lowest hematocrit, % 31 ± 9 36 ± 8 P = .01

Blood transfusion total, units 2.8 ± 4.4 0.5 ± 1.5 P < .01

Multiple Organ Failure Score 1.2 ± 1.4 0.04 ± 0.2 P < .01

Required mechanical ventilation 92% 41% P < .01

Slide 21

↑Age ↑ISS ↓GCS ↑Operations↑Anesthesia

↓Hct↑Transfusion↑ MOF ScoreNeeded Vent

RISK FACTORSFOR DELIRIUM AFTER TRAUMA

Pre-existing Patient Factors

Injury- specific Factors

Emergency Room

Findings

Operative Variables

ICU Variables

TRAUMA TIMELINE

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Vulnerability

Low Vulnerability

Noxious Insult

Less Noxious Insult

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Slide 23

AGE AND POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM

0

20

40

60

80

100

5059 6069 7079 8089

Age, years

Incidence of

Delirium,%

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 24

PREOPERATIVE RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 64)

Absent(n = 80)

Age, years 69 ± 9 61 ± 6 P < .001

Albumin, g/dL 3.3 ± 0.8 3.9 ± 0.4 P < .001

Hematocrit, % 38 ± 7 44 ± 4 P < .001

Functional status 91 ± 11 99 ± 3 P < .001

Cognitive dysfunction 2.8 ± 1.6 4.6 ± 0.7 P < .001

Comorbidities 4.6 ± 2.4 1.8 ± 1.4 P < .001

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 25

INTRAOPERATIVE RISK FACTORS

DELIRIUM

Present (n = 64)

Absent (n = 80)

Blood loss, mL 752 ± 1033 655 ± 1515 P = .73

OR time, minutes 298 ± 137 282 ± 105 P = .44

Intraop hypotension (SBP < 90) 88% 27% P < .001

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 26

MULTIFACTORIAL MODEL OF DELIRIUM

JAMA (1996) 275:852.

High Vulnerability

Low Vulnerability

Noxious Insult

Less Noxious Insult

Predisposing Factors/Vulnerability

Precipitating Factors/Insults

High Risk

Low Risk

DELIRIUM

Slide 27

WHY IS DELIRIUM IMPORTANT?

DELIRIUM

Most common postoperative complication in the elderly

Closely related to adverse outcomes

Potentially preventable, and there is room to improve treatment

Slide 28

DELIRIUM AND POOR OUTCOMES

• Increased length of hospital stay

• Increased hospital cost

• Increased need for institutionalization

• Increased mortality

Slide 29

OUTCOMES AND DELIRIUM: TRAUMA ICU

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 41)

Absent(n = 28)

ICU stay, days 8 ± 1 2 ± 1 P < .01

Hospital stay, days 15 ± 2 6 ± 1 P < .01

Discharge institutionalization 85% 44% P < .01

Slide 30

OUTCOMES AND DELIRIUM: VA

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 64)

Absent(n = 80)

ICU stay, days 9.7 ± 8.0 4.6 ± 2.1 P < .001

Hospital stay, days 16.3 ± 10.9 7.9 ± 3.9 P < .001

Hospital cost, $1,000s 50.1 ± 33.6 31.6 ± 14.1 P < .001

Institutionalization 33% 1% P < .001

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 31

MORTALITY AND DELIRIUM

DELIRIUM

Present(n = 64)

Absent(n = 80)

In-hospital mortality 5% 0% P = .086

30-day mortality 9% 1% P = .045

6-month mortality 20% 3%a P = .001

a n=78 (2 patients lost to 6-month follow-up)

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 32

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM

• A spectrum of psychomotor behavior is found in delirium

• Delirium motor subtypes: Hypoactive Hyperactive Mixed type

J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci (2000) 12:51. Slide 33

RICHMOND AGITATION-SEDATION SCORE+4 Combative+3 Very agitated+2 Agitated+1 Restless 0 Alert/calm-1 Drowsy-2 Light sedation-3 Moderate sedation-4 Deep sedation-5 Unarousable

JAMA (2003) 289:2983. Am J Resp Crit Car Med (2002) 166:1228. Slide 34

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM

+4 Combative+3 +2 +1 Restless 0 Alert/calm-1 Drowsy-2 -3 -4 -5 Unarousable

JAMA (2003) 289:2983. Am J Resp Crit Car Med (2002) 166:1228.

HYPERACTIVE

HYPOACTIVE

Slide 35

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM

+4 Combative+3 +2 +1 Restless 0 Alert / Calm-1 Drowsy-2 -3 -4 -5 Unarousable

JAMA (2003) 289:2983. Am J Resp Crit Car Med (2002) 166:1228.

MIXED

Slide 36

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM: INCIDENCE

Post-Op SICU Medical ICU Trauma ICUHypoactive 66% 44% 46%

Hyperactive 1% 2% 15%

Mixed type 33% 55% 39%

JAGS (2006) 54:479.Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Am J Surg (2008) 196:864. Slide 37

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM: OUTCOMES

DVAMC

MOTOR SUBTYPE

No deliriumn = 98

Mixedn = 23

Hypoactiven = 50

Age, years 60 ± 6 65 ± 9 71 ± 9 P = .001

6-month mortality 3% 9% 32% P = .041

Slide 38

MOTOR SUBTYPES OF DELIRIUM:ADVERSE EVENTS

DVAMC

MOTOR SUBTYPE

Hypoactive(n = 8)

Mixed(n = 11)

Pulled line/tube 25% 82% P = .024

Sacral decubitus ulcer 75% 0 P = .001

Slide 39

WHY IS DELIRIUM IMPORTANT?

DELIRIUM

Most common postoperative complication in the elderly

Closely related to adverse outcomes

Potentially preventable, and there is room to improve treatment

Slide 40

PREVENTING DELIRIUM IN THE HOSPITALIZED ELDERLY

• Hypothesis: Reducing the number of risk factors for delirium will prevent delirium in hospitalized elderly patients

• Methods• 852 hospitalized medical patients• Older than 70 years• Compare effectiveness of reducing the risk

factors for delirium to standard of care

NEJM (1999) 340:669. Slide 41

NEJM (1999) 340:669.

MULTICOMPONENT INTERVENTIONSTO PREVENT DELIRIUM

Risk factors Intervention

• Cognitive impairment

• Orientation protocol

• Sleep deprivation • Sleep enhancement

• Immobility • Early mobilization

• Visual impairment • Early vision correction

• Hearing impairment • Hearing protocol

• Dehydration • Change BUN/Cr ratio

Slide 42

PREVENTING DELIRIUM IN THE HOSPITALIZED ELDERLY

NEJM (1999) 340:669.

STUDY GROUP

Intervention Usual care

Incidence of delirium 9.9% 15.0% P = .02

Total days of delirium 105 161 P = .02

Episodes of delirium 62 90 P = .03

Slide 43

PREVENTING DELIRIUM IN THE HOSPITALIZED ELDERLY

NEJM (1999) 340:669.

Conclusion

Implementing supportive protocols to patients at high risk of developing delirium can prevent the occurrences and reduce the duration of delirium

Slide 44

IDENTIFIABLE CAUSES OF DELIRIUM

DELIRIUMS (mnemonic) DEL I R I U MSS

rugs (anticholinergics, polypharmacy)motional (depression)ow PO2 states (MI, PE, anemia, CVA) nfection (sepsis)etention of urine or stoolctal states (seizure, post-ictal)ndernutrition/underhydration etabolic (electrolytes, glucose)ubdural (acute CNS processes) ensory (impaired vision or hearing)

Slide 45

MEDICAL EVALUATION OF DELIRIUM

H&P evaluation• Mental status• Neuro exam• History of substance

abuse• Vital signs• Review of medications

Laboratory tests• CBC• Glucose• Electrolytes• BUN/Cr• UA• O2 Saturation

Clin Med (2006) 6:303.Slide 46

IDENTIFIABLE CAUSES OF DELIRIUM

0

20

40

60

80

100

No identifiablecause

Identifiablecause

Delirium,%

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 47

THE BIPHASIC DISTRIBUTION OF POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 3 5 7 9 112 4 6 8 10 12

Postoperative day

No identifiable cause of delirium

Delirium due to an identifiable causeNumber of subjects

Ann Surg (2009) 249:173.Slide 48

Haloperidol 2 mg q20 min (while agitation persists)

OR

Degree of agitation Initial dose of haloperidolPO, IM or IV

Mild 0.252 mg

Moderate 24 mg

Severe 48 mg

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: ICU

Crit Care Med (2002) 30:119. Slide 49

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: ICU

• Maintenance dose 50% of total loading dose is the maintenance

dose, divided every 68 hours daily Continue maintenance dose for 2448 hours

before tapering

• Taper maintenance dose by 20%30% daily until off

Slide 50

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: ICU

Haloperidol AdministrationControl Moderate agitation

2:00 AM – 2 mg IV2:30 AM – 2 mg IV3:00 AM – 2 mg IV3:30 AM – Agitation controlled

Maintain 1 mg TID IV or PO 24 hoursKeep daily dose for 24–48 hours

Taper 0.5 mg PO BID for 24 hr, then DC

Slide 51

• General recommendation Haloperidol 12 mg q24 hr PRN May be administered PO, IM, or IV

• For elderly patients Haloperidol 0.250.5 mg q4 hr PRN

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: WARD

American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for Treatment of Patients with Delirium (1999). Slide 52

WHY IS DELIRIUM IMPORTANT?

DELIRIUM

Most common postoperative complication in the elderly

Closely related to adverse outcomes

Potentially preventable, and there is room to improve treatment

Slide 53

Visit us at:

Facebook.com/AmericanGeriatricsSociety

Twitter.com/AmerGeriatrics

www.americangeriatrics.org

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME!

linkedin.com/company/american-geriatrics-society

Slide 54

top related