high temperature glass seal - national energy … library/events/2007/seca/high...high temperature...
Post on 04-Apr-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
High Temperature Glass SealHigh Temperature Glass SealHigh Temperature Glass Seal
Y-S Chou, J.W. Stevenson, X. Li, G. Yang, and P. SinghK2-44, Materials Division
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Funded under the SECA Core Technology Program through US Department of Energy’s
National Energy Technology Laboratory
August 7-9, 2007, San Antonio, Texas
2
OutlineOutlineOutline
Accomplishment of FY07Mechanical strength evaluation: plain crofer, aluminized, spinel-coated Electrical stability evaluation: aging under DC loading SummaryFuture work
3
FY07 AccomplishmentFY07 AccomplishmentFY07 AccomplishmentCompleted seal strength evaluation of high-temperature glass. Evaluated pre-oxidation, aging, coating, and environmental effects on strength.Without coating, strength would degrade if a thick Cr2O3 oxide layer present or aged in air. No strength reduction if aged in reducing gas. Cause for strength degradation was SrCrO4formation.Alumina coating is effective in blocking Cr; however, the deposition process needs to be optimized to minimize overdose. Spinel coating showed best results with minimum strength reduction even aging in air.Tested conventional and high-temperature sealing glasses in SOFC environment and 0.7 V DC loading. Conventional glass showed severe Fe diffusion and rapid increase in conductivity (830oC/~80hr), while high-temperature glass showed excellent electrical stability over ~1200hr at 850oC.
4
High-temperature sealing glass HighHigh--temperature sealing glass temperature sealing glass
800oC
850oC
950oC
1000oC
1. Increase contact bonding strength2. Increase thermal stability3. decrease interfacial reactions
Tseal
Toperation
Tseal
time
ΔT
5
Mechanical strength evaluationMechanical strength evaluationMechanical strength evaluation
1. Effect of pre-oxidation: Cr2O3 layer thickness2. Effect of different protective coating: Al2O3,
(Mn,Co)3O4
3. Effect of environment: oxidizing, reducing4. Accelerated condition:
850oC/500h in air850oC/250h in 30%H2O, 70%(2.7%H2/Ar)
6
Interfacial tensile testingInterfacial tensile testingInterfacial tensile testing P
Al grip fixture
epoxy glass crofer
R. T.0.5 mm/min cross-head speed5-7 samples tested for each conditionSelf-aligned grip fixture½”x½” sample size
7
Pre-oxidized croferPrePre--oxidized croferoxidized crofer
1000oC/2h 1200oC/2h
To mimic long-term oxidation1200oC resulted in pores underneathOutside discrete and non-uniform (Mn,Cr) oxide, inside dense and continuousCr2O3-rich oxideT<0.5μm (800oC/2h)
8
Effect of pre-oxidation on tensile strengthEffect of preEffect of pre--oxidation on tensile strengthoxidation on tensile strength
crofer/YSO75, pst/crofer, 1/2"x1/2" at RT
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
none 800C/2h 1000C/2h 1200C/2h
pre-oxidation conditions
aver
age
tens
ile s
tren
gth,
MPa
~1-2 μm ~6-10 μm
<0.5 μm
9
Load-displacement curve showed typical brittle failure
LoadLoad--displacement curve showed displacement curve showed typical brittle failuretypical brittle failure
RT YSO75 Crofer-AR @ 0.5mm/min
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
displacement (mm)
load
(N)
All showed brittle failure: coating, aging, oxide layer thickness, environment
10
As-received
1000oC/2hPre-oxidized
Mixed fracture
11
Fracture initiated mostly from edge flaws
12
Effect of aging and environmentEffect of aging and environmentEffect of aging and environment
effect of aging on strength, crofer/YSO75/crofer, 1/2"x1/2"
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
no aging 850C/500h air aged 850C/250h red.aged
aver
age
tens
ile s
tren
gth,
MPa
Air: 850oC/500hWet and reducing: 30%H2O, 70%(2.7H2/Ar) 850oC/250h
13
Fracture surface of aged sampleFracture surface of aged sampleFracture surface of aged sample
Presence of substantial amount of SrCrO4
850oC/500h air 850oC/250h reducing gas
14
Aluminized crofer showed no chromate formation
Aluminized crofer showed no Aluminized crofer showed no chromate formationchromate formation
Plain crofer Aluminized crofer
SrCrO4
15
Tensile strength of aluminized croferfrom pack cementation
Tensile strength of aluminized Tensile strength of aluminized crofercroferfrom pack cementationfrom pack cementation
RT average strength, MPa
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
none 1000C/2h 1200C/2h
oxidation condition
aver
age
stre
ngth
, MPa
Pack cementation, followed by heat-treatment in air
16
Sealing with aluminized crofer from vapor phase deposition
Sealing with aluminized Sealing with aluminized crofercrofer from vapor from vapor phase depositionphase deposition
Vapor phase deposition followed by heat-treatment at 1000oC/2h airAs-sealed coupons all fractured through glass.Glass bonded well to aluminized crofer coupons.
17
Appreciable amount of Al diffusionAppreciable amount of Al diffusionAppreciable amount of Al diffusion
Fe
Cr
Al 15%10%
5%
18
Issue of overdosing AlIssue of overdosing AlIssue of overdosing Al
as-received and aluminized crofer22APU
0.00E+00
2.00E-03
4.00E-03
6.00E-03
8.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.20E-02
1.40E-02
1.60E-02
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Temp (ºC)
Line
ar E
xpan
sion
Aluminizing by vapor phase deposition followed by heat-treatment at 1000-1100oC/2h air
19
RT seal strength of spinel-coated crofer/YSO75 glass
RT seal strength of spinelRT seal strength of spinel--coated coated crofer/YSO75 glasscrofer/YSO75 glass
RT average tensile strength (spinel coating)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
plain as-sealed coated as-sealed
coated air aged coated red. aged
aver
age
stre
ngth
, MPa
(Mn,Co)3O4 coated crofer22APU
20
Fracture surface of as-sealedMn1.5Co1.5O4-coated crofer22APU
Fracture surface ofFracture surface of asas--sealedsealedMnMn1.51.5CoCo1.51.5OO44--coated crofer22APUcoated crofer22APU
Fracture through glass, not at the interface. YSO75 not fully coverageAll 8 samples showed edge flaw
21
Fracture surface of air agedMn1.5Co1.5O4-coated crofer22APU
Fracture surface ofFracture surface of air agedair agedMnMn1.51.5CoCo1.51.5OO44--coated crofer22APUcoated crofer22APU
850oC/500 h air
Suggest 5 μm coating was not enough
22
Setup for resistivity measurementSetup for Setup for resistivityresistivity measurementmeasurement
air side
fuel sidehybridmica seal
alumina supportpipe
Inconel pressingfixture
crofer
crofer crofer
compressive loading
glass glass
VV
Power supply
+
+
-
-
resistor
sense
sense
out
out
air side
fuel sidehybridmica seal
alumina supportpipe
Inconel pressingfixture
crofer
crofer crofer
compressive loading
glass glass
VV
Power supply
+
+
-
-
resistor
sense
sense
out
out
23
Good electrical stability for HT glass on plain crofer22APU
Good electrical stability for HT glass on Good electrical stability for HT glass on plain crofer22APUplain crofer22APU
YSO75 @0.7V & 20%H2O, 2.7%H2/Ar (t<432hrs), 80%H2 (t>432hrs)power outage @ ~700 h
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
hrs at elevated temperatures
ohm
-mCrofer(as-received)/glass/crofer(as-received) @ 0.7V
G18 @830oC
YSO75 @ 850oC
24
EDS showed substantial Fe diffusionEDS showed substantial Fe diffusionEDS showed substantial Fe diffusion
G18 near air side after electrical stability test
1
2
point O% Al% Si% Ca% Cr% Fe% Ba%1 43 1 1 50 4 12 44 27 16 1 123 43 20 24 1 124 47 3 16 6 7 215 44 1 5 2 11 28 9
34
5
25
Good electrical stability for HT glass on (Mn,Co)3O4-coated crofer22APU
Good electrical stability for HT glass on Good electrical stability for HT glass on (Mn,Co)(Mn,Co)33OO44--coated crofer22APUcoated crofer22APU
YSO75 spinel coated 0.7V (30%H2O, 70% (2.7%H2/Ar))
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
1.00E+05
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
hrs @ 850C
ohm
-m
26
Materials set evaluation in 2”x2” singelcell test @ 800oC
Materials set evaluation in 2Materials set evaluation in 2””x2x2”” singelsingelcell test @ 800cell test @ 800ooCC
INDEC cell, SS441, spinel coating, LSM contact paste, aluminizing
SS441, YSO77x1, spinel, LSM, H-micax4, 97%H2 450 sccm,air 900 sccm
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
hrs @ 800C
pow
er d
ensi
ty, W
/cm
^2
27
Summary FY07Summary FY07Summary FY07
Mechanical strength tests of M/G/M coupons showed strength degradation for uncoated crofer22APU only if aged in air or started with thick Cr2O3 surface layer.Aluminizing is effective in blocking Cr; however, overdosing would increase CTE for thin samples and leads to seal failure.(Mn,Co)3O4-coated crofer showed similar initial seal strength as plain crofer or aluminized ones. Minimal strength degradation when aged in air.HT glass showed very good electrical stability in SOFC and DC loading at 850oC up to ~1200h.Successful demonstration of 2”x2” single cell test at 800oC with candidate materials set: HT glass, spinel coating, SS441, and LSM contact paste.
28
Future workFuture workFuture workMaterials set validation with single cell (2”x2”) stack testing and standardize the design:
1. Sealing glass: high-temperature, self-healing and composite.
2. Metallic interconnect: SS441 (standard or low Si), crofer22APU
3. Protective coating: (Mn,Co)3O4, aluminaShort-term (200-500h) performance test at 800-850oCShort-term thermal cycling test (800oC/24h, cool to RT)x10Collaboration with modeling workStrengthening of candidate high-temperature glass with reinforcement
top related