health workforce development in the pacific
Post on 01-Jan-2017
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TENTH PACIFIC HEALTH MINISTERS MEETING PIC10/10
17 June 2013
Apia, Samoa
2–4 July 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
HEALTH WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT IN THE PACIFIC
Several Pacific island countries and areas (PICs) have health worker-to-population ratios below the World
Health Organization (WHO) recommended minimum threshold of 2.3 per 1000 population. Many face external
labour market forces that make it difficult to balance health workforce demand, supply and affordability with existing
and emerging population health needs. The imminent return of large numbers of foreign-trained medical graduates
(FTMGs) will place further demands on workforce planning and health budgets in at least five PICs. The Human
Resources for Health Action Framework for the Western Pacific Region (2011–2015) provides clear guidance on the
issues that must be addressed by each Member State in the context of its own labour market.
Many Member States, with support from external partners, are currently undertaking a detailed program of
analytical work to update national human resources for health (HRH) profiles, review evidence-based policy options
and develop or update national HRH plans. Subregional approaches have been a particularly effective way for
countries to share and discuss their strategies for the integration of FTMGs. The formation of multisectoral task
forces to address the integration of new medical graduates, for example in Kiribati, Tuvalu and Solomon Islands and
the development of specialized clinical workforce plans through the Strengthening Specialised Clinical Services in
the Pacific (SSCSiP) programme are having a catalytic effect on broader HRH planning and decision-making.
Strengthening the capacity of medical internship programmes throughout the Pacific will be a key strategy in
integrating FTMGs. It will also be an important step towards developing competency-based regional standards for
entry-level medical practitioners, complementing similar work undertaken for registered nurses in the Pacific. The
rapid uptake of Pacific Open Learning Health Net (POLHN) courses underlines the fact that distance learning and
flexible learning are important mechanisms for initial training, continuing professional development (CPD) and
career advancement.
Coherent, informed national plans are needed to ensure both the availability of quality care and the retention
and deployment of skilled and appropriate staff where needed, particularly in rural and remote settings. A
comprehensive programme of action in line with the post-2015 development agenda should be considered. A
reinvigorated Pacific Human Resources for Health Alliance (PHRHA) technical working group is proposed as a
forum to ensure alignment of the activities of technical partners within the PIC context and as a mechanism to
maintain collaborative and coordinated interaction with and among countries—key principles in promoting change
and ensuring that investments are strategically targeted.
PIC10/10
page 2
1. BACKGROUND
Health workers are an essential part of every health care delivery system. The health
workforce influences everything from the access to and quality of health services to the costs
of delivering health care. The health workforce usually represents the largest and most
expensive component of a health system.
There is a positive correlation between health worker-to-population ratios and infant,
child and maternal survival rates. WHO regards a health worker-to-population density of 2.3
doctors, nurses and midwives per 1000 population as the minimum needed to provide 80%
coverage of basic essential services, for example skilled birth attendance and childhood
immunization. Countries below this threshold, including several Pacific islands countries and
areas (PICs), are considered to have a critical health worker shortage (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Pacific Health Workforce Density
(Doctors, Nurses, Midwives per 1000 population)
Source: Updates data from WHO Country Health Information Profiles (CHIPs 2011) and Country Human
Resources for Health (HRH) Profiles, 2012–2013, where available.
Pacific ministries of health (MOH) have identified a number of Human Resources for
Health (HRH) priority issues affecting countries in the region, including:
PIC10/10
page 3
1) shortages of specific personnel and skill sets, and recruitment, retention and an
ageing workforce;
2) lack of effective HRH policies, management and information systems, and
planning capacity;
3) access to education and training opportunities to meet current shortages and
continuing professional development (CPD) requirements;
4) public sector working conditions, institutional capacity and financial constraints to
improve; and
5) the implications of increasing mobility of health personnel, both internally and
internationally.
Other priority issues include inequitable distribution; health worker performance; the
unique requirements of small populations scattered throughout remote, rural and outer island
settings and over wide geographical distances; and the relative lack of development of other
health system components.
The WHO Human Resources for Health Action Framework for the Western Pacific
Region (2011–2015), which is summarized in Annex 1, outlines the key policy, management,
education, financing, leadership and partnership functions that need to be addressed in each
country, as well as the specific labour market context in each country, in order to build an
effective and sustainable workforce.
Many countries are about to experience a major shift in health workforce composition
as a result of increasing numbers of medical students graduating from institutions within and
outside the region. In addition to the long-established schools of medical education in the
Pacific—the Fiji School of Medicine (FSMed), now part of Fiji National University (FNU),
and the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG), two new institutions of undergraduate
medical education have been established within the last 10 years: the Oceania University of
Medicine (OUM) in Samoa and the Dr Umanand Prasad School of Medicine (UPSM), a
private institution affiliated with the University of Fiji in Lautoka.
Since 2007, candidates from PICs have also been studying medicine in Cuba at
Escuela Latino-Americana de Medicina (Latin American Medical School, or ELAM) and in
other countries outside the Pacific, including China, Georgia, Morocco and the Russian
PIC10/10
page 4
Federation. Concurrently, FNU has increased its intake and UPSM has continued to accept
significant numbers of new enrolments.
Table 1 summarizes current PIC engagement with the three medical education
institutions with the largest number of enrolments in the region, compared with current health
workforce densities. Figure 2 shows the expected year of entry into the medical workforce for
each stream of graduates from FNU, ELAM, UPSM and OUM. These numbers will more
than double the non-specialist medical workforce in six countries (those above the heavier
line in Table 1) between 2013 and 2018.
Table 1: Health worker density in selected Pacific Island countries (most recent
estimates), and current numbers of medical students training at the three largest
institutions serving the Pacific
Country
Doctors per
10 000
population
Nurses and
midwives
per 10 000
population
Current number of medical
undergraduates
Medical
students per
10 000
population FSMed ELAM UPSM
Kiribati 3.8 37.1 12 31 – 4.17
Nauru 7.1 70.7 2 7 – 9.75
Solomon
Is
2.2 20.5 38 98 11 2.85
Tuvalu 10.9 58.2 6 19 – 26.15
Vanuatu 1.2 17.0 12 25 – 1.58
Fiji 4.3 22.4 301 7 176 5.78
Palau 13.8 57.1 – 6 – 3.01
Tonga 5.6 38.8 31 6 – 3.63
Total: 402 199 187
Sources: WHO (2012), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (2011), SSCSiP (2012) and
HRH Knowledge Hub (S Lin and G Roberts, University of New South Wales; personal communication, 2013)
PIC10/10
page 5
Figure 2: Expected numbers entering internships across the Pacific, by year
Current FNU, ELAM, UPSM and OUM medical undergraduates
Flag indicates year of entry of first cohort of Cuban graduates into medical workforce;
OUM data for students from PICs only, and only to 2015
In general, this increase in medical training has not been aligned with national HRH
plans and any objective training or workforce need projections.
While the surge in the number of doctors will clearly enable some countries to fill
vacant medical officer positions in support of national primary care strategies and community
demand, others do not have sufficient staff vacancies to absorb all of the returning graduates.
Other risks include a surge in direct and indirect costs, the potential displacement of
established cadres of medical assistants and nurse practitioners, and the capacity of countries
to provide supervision and mentoring for a medical workforce that is increasingly comprised
of relatively junior doctors.
2. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROGRESS
Country-level initiatives
Several PICs have implemented, or are implementing, measures to strengthen their
national health workforce capacities across the main areas of the HRH Action Framework.
However, results and outcomes have so far been variable.
PIC10/10
page 6
Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Vanuatu have all
established national HRH task forces, either to address specific issues, such as the integration
of foreign trained medical graduates, or to support HRH more broadly.
Fifteen PICs are currently updating their country HRH profiles, using a
comprehensive WHO profiling tool, with technical assistance from the HRH knowledge Hub
at the University of New South Wales and WHO. The revised profiles will provide updated
descriptions of the current health workforce by cadre and type of health facility, gender, age,
province, urban/rural location, skills and educational attainment. The revised profiles will
also include new sections on HRH policies, including legislation on recruitment, deployment
and the role of the private sector; financing and remuneration analysis; governance; and
health workforce information systems. This updated information will support monitoring and
trend analysis of HRH, facilitate better decision-making among policy-makers and promote
information sharing and cross-country comparisons to provide a more in-depth understanding
of the dynamics of HRH in the Pacific.
The World Bank has provided analytical and technical assistance to some PICs to
inform health system performance reforms, including support for planning and management
of human resources. This includes the recently released report Papua New Guinea Health
Workforce Crisis: A Call to Action (April 2013); ongoing assistance to Solomon Islands to
explore role delineation and HRH needs at different levels of service delivery, as well as
policy and financing options for the retention of specialist doctors; and a stocktake of the
health workforce in Vanuatu in 2012.
Following vigorous discussion at the Pacific Human Resources for Health Alliance
(PHRHA) meeting in November 2012, countries agreed that better access to and
strengthening the capacity of domestic internship programs would be a crucial, practical
strategy to assist the integration of the larger-than-usual numbers of medical graduates who
will be entering the health workforce in several PICs from 2013 to 2020. Kiribati has been
the first country to implement this strategy (see the box below).
PIC10/10
page 7
Development of new medical internship programme serving the Central Pacific
Kiribati is the first PIC that will receive medical graduates from Escuela Latino-
Americana de Medicina (ELAM), with a group of 18 due to return from Cuban school in
August 2013.
Kiribati does not have its own internship programme. Historically, I-Kiribati medical
graduates have completed their internship in the country of graduation, usually Fiji.
However, access to internship positions in Fiji is now severely restricted due to an imminent
escalation in the domestic demand for places by graduates of the College of Medicine,
Nursing and Health Sciences at FNU, and Dr Umanand Prasad School of Medicine (see
Table 1).
In January 2013, the Kiribati Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS)
convened an intensive consultation involving clinicians, key health sector decision-makers,
WHO and FNU to examine the feasibility of establishing a new internship programme. The
workshop determined that such a programme would be feasible— with some ongoing
technical and clinical supervisory support from FNU—and developed a structure and format
based on careful and detailed analysis of competencies needed by junior medical officers.
The assessment would be conducted by the completion of a detailed logbook along with
structured supervisor reports, similar to other internship programmes in the region.
A peer review of the proposed internship programme was held in Tarawa, Kiribati, in
March 2013, with the participation of health and national workforce delegates from Solomon
Islands and Tuvalu and independent experts from WHO and FNU. The meeting confirmed
the proposed design of the 18-month internship programme, including supportive HRH
strategies being put in place by the MHMS and Public Service Office in Kiribati. The review
recommended a detailed pre-assessment of intern competencies on commencement of the
programme and an exit evaluation on completion of the programme by the first group of
interns. FNU will help to develop tools for these activities.
Nauru and Tuvalu have expressed strong interest in sending their own FTMGs to join
the new Kiribati internship programme from 2014 and 2015, respectively, and in hosting
community placements on rotation from Kiribati during the candidates’ second year. Such an
effort will create an innovative and truly collaborative three-country internship programme.
PIC10/10
page 8
Ongoing dialogue between the Kiribati Ministry of Health and Medical Services
(MHMS) and Public Service Office has been essential to identify and safeguard positions for
the first group of incoming graduates without displacing other categories of health workers.
Good communications and engagement with the national Cabinet and the Ministry of Finance
and Economic Development have ensured that sufficient funding will be available for these
positions.
A similar process is under way in Solomon Islands, which must assess the feasibility
of assimilating more than 90 FTMGs into its health workforce between 2014 and 2019. The
process began with a workshop convened by the Solomon Islands MHMS and the FTMG
Task Force in Honiara, with representatives from WHO, FNU, Kiribati and Vanuatu.
Kiribati shared lessons learnt from developing a new, competency-based internship
programme with multisectoral engagement and support. Critical decisions and actions from
the development of that programme are summarized in the checklist attached as Annex 2.
The new Kiribati internship programme and the strengthened programme in Solomon
Islands will be based on a detailed assessment of competencies required by entry-level
medical officers. This work can inform the development of regional, competency-based
standards for internship programmes.
Regional Initiatives
Pacific Human Resources for Health Alliance
The Pacific Human Resources for Health Alliance (PHRHA) was formed in 2008 to
address a range of HRH challenges in an integrated manner, thereby contributing to the
development of Pacific health systems. Its principal source of funding support has been the
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID).
The third meeting of the PHRHA took place in November 2012. It further
highlighted the need to focus more strongly on priority work areas, which include:
1) relevant and timely monitoring, review and trend analysis of the Pacific HRH
situation and addressing issues and challenges at regional and subregional levels;
2) maintaining and developing a platform for coordination and collaboration among
countries and partners working in HRH in managing information and resources
among PICs; and
PIC10/10
page 9
3) advancing health professions education and training by establishing regional
frameworks for core curricular standards, CPD and scopes of practice.
The shortage of clinical specialists and specialized services and the limited demand in
smaller PICs means that many PICs rely on visiting specialist medical teams and offshore
medical referral schemes to deliver tertiary and higher-order secondary care. The AusAID-
funded Strengthening Specialised Clinical Services in the Pacific programme (SSCSiP),
based at FNU, seeks to address challenges in the delivery of specialized care by supporting
PICs to plan for, access, host and evaluate specialized clinical services and by strengthening
health worker skills, capacity and capability to meet clinical service needs.1
Since SSCSiP’s inception in 2011, 14 PICs have been working with the programme to
improve human resources planning for specialized clinical services, and better coordination
and access to specialized clinical training. Some of their joint achievements include:
1) mapping the demographic profiles and highest postgraduate qualification of
clinicians employed by MOHs;
2) improving access to specialized clinical training, developing a web page that lists
postgraduate courses available to PIC health workers at the specialized level;
3) working closely with professional clinical organizations in the Pacific (for
example, the Pacific Society of Anaesthetists and the Pacific Islands Surgeons
Association) to enhance access to quality CPD activities;
4) securing funding for selected postgraduate clinical scholarships as a response to a
genuine shortage of scholarships for postgraduate clinical studies,; and
5) addressing the lack of qualified biomedical technicians and engineers in the
Pacific and working with training institutions to establish a Pacific Biomedical
Training Programme.2
Selected findings of the mapping exercise are included in Annex 3. Each national
profile reflected the HR capacity to deliver core and specialized clinical services and
provided a sound baseline against which to compile specialized workforce development
1 The SSCiP programme covers 14 PICs: Cook Islands, Fiji, Federated States of Micronesia, Kiribati, Marshall Islands,
Nauru, Niue, Palau, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. 2 The Pacific Health Ministers Meeting has previously identified biomedical engineering as a high priority for the Pacific; it
is envisaged that the Biomedical Training Program will commence in 2014.
PIC10/10
page 10
plans. In some cases, these plans are now acting as a catalyst for broader national HRH
planning.
HRH Knowledge Hub
The HRH Knowledge Hub undertakes strategic analyses of HRH issues in the Asia
Pacific region to inform the development of innovative evidence-based policy options and
solutions for strengthening HRH planning and workforce management. It has been funded by
AusAID through June 2013. The Hub has developed a series of analytic papers entitled
Evidence and Policy Options for Healthcare Education and Training in Pacific Island
Countries. Condensed versions of the analytic papers are currently in press in Pacific Health
Dialogue, and a range of policy briefs has been extracted from the analytic papers and will be
available at the Tenth Pacific Health Ministers Meeting.3
Pacific Open Learning Health Net
Following a successful pilot in 2002–2003, the Pacific Open Learning Health Net
(POLHN) was established in 2004 by WHO and ministries of health in the PICs. Initial
funding was provided by the Government of Japan (2003–2008), followed by New Zealand
(2009–2012). As Internet connectivity and bandwidth have improved in the Pacific, the
number of POLHN learning centres, courses and students has also increased (see Figure 3),
providing much improved access to continuing education through distance learning and
flexible learning. The network currently operates through 37 learning centres in 12 countries.
3 The Hub analytic papers and policy briefs address the following topic areas: a) Commissioning of health
worker education and training; b) Medical education; c) Nursing and midwifery education; d) Accreditation of
healthcare professional education programmes; e) Expanded and extended health practitioner roles; f) Medical
Internship programs; and g) Regulation and licensing of healthcare professionals.
PIC10/10
page 11
Figure 3: Growth in POLHN capacity and enrolments, 2007–2011
Fiji, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu have achieved a dramatic expansion in coverage
and activities by establishing additional learning centres and/or increasing the student intakes.
Accredited courses are available through POLHN on behalf of FNU (diploma and Masters in
Public Health and Health Services Management), the Pacific Paramedical Training Centre
(diploma in laboratory sciences) and the Penn Foster Career School in the United States of
America (dental assistant programme piloted in American Samoa and the Marshall Islands).
The needs of ancillary support staff, for example clerical and administrative workers, have
also been addressed through POLHN by providing three levels of computer-literacy training.
POLHN now represents an increasingly important resource for CPD in the Pacific,
providing health professionals with access to both online and “hybrid” courses and with
access to telephone- and video-conferencing facilities for CPD.
Other partners are engaged in providing technical and analytic support in the Pacific,
working in areas like HRH policy and management, standards and quality of education and
training, competencies, and professional conduct and practice. They include the medical,
nursing and allied health professional associations; the Pacific Senior Health Officials
Network (PSHON); the Pacific Islands Health Officers Association (PIHOA); health training
institutions; and WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health
Development at the University of Technology in Sydney and WHO Collaborating Centre for
PIC10/10
page 12
Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Capacity-Building at the James Cook
University Australia in Townsville.
3. CHALLENGES AND ISSUES
Ongoing country-level analytic work in support of HRH planning
All countries need accurate health workforce data to support HRH planning and
policy development. These data have not always been available. The challenge then will be
to gather, analyse and ensure that the data become “live” through the establishment constant
updating of efficient national information systems.
Similarly, there is also a need for the health workforce distribution and need
projections to be based on the priorities identified in national health strategic plans and on a
sound analysis of epidemiology, burden of disease, models of care, patterns of referral and
role delineation. While some initial work has been undertaken in Solomon Islands and
Vanuatu, other countries will need more data to provide objective evidence on which to base
updated HRH plans.
Multisectoral engagement in national HRH planning
Pacific leadership on HRH and related service delivery challenges has tended to be
concentrated within the health sector. However, in most PICs, responsibility for pre-service
training may rest with either the education or health sector and may differ for different groups
of health workers. The ministry of health may remain the employer, but overall public sector
job creation and management fall under the national labour or public service administration,
and workforce financing is ultimately determined by the finance sector or, in some countries,
directly by Cabinet.
There is currently minimal engagement from relevant sectors in the government to
increase country commitments to prioritize domestic resources and create the fiscal space to
train and retain the right number and mix of health-care professionals.
The emergence of multisectoral task forces to address the assimilation of FTMGs into
the workforce, for example in Tuvalu, and the direct engagement with the public service
sector and Cabinet, for example in Kiribati, clearly demonstrates the importance for such
participation. Such high-level, multisectoral strategic approaches need to be maintained if
PIC10/10
page 13
Pacific health systems are to provide sustainable services to meet present and future
population needs.
Quality assurance for new or expanded internship programs
There is a need for new and expanded internship programmes to support the
integration of new FTMGs. The demands on these programmes are significant—especially
for quality of supervision, which determines not only the overall credibility of an internship
programme but also the future career prospects of medical graduates. Sound quality-
assurance mechanisms will contribute to the evolution of regional standards as a prerequisite
for general registration and eligibility to apply for future training in clinical specialties.
The thorough preparation and analysis undertaken by the Kiribati MHMS, the Tuvalu
Ministry of Health, the Solomon Islands MHMS and partners to develop and implement a
relevant internship programme validates the importance of this step towards developing
agreed competencies for new medical graduates.
An accredited forum for consideration and approval of standards and competencies
for pre-service and in-service education and training in the health sector does not yet exist in
the Pacific.
Continuing professional development
Continuing professional development (CPD) has an important place in ensuring that
health professionals are competent and their practices are aligned with advances in medicine
and health technologies for quality care and patient safety. Some of the issues and challenges
that need to be addressed include undertaking CPD-oriented training needs assessments to
develop and implement CPD programmes; adopting policy and regulations that include
mandatory participation in CPD activities as prerequisites for renewal of licensing and
registration to practice; improving the availability of accessible, flexible and diverse CPD
options; and performance-based incentives for CPD and for career advancements.
PIC10/10
page 14
4. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Country focus: enhanced quality of national HRH planning
In line with the recommendations of the November 2012 PHRHA meeting, the
establishment and/or strengthening of national HRH task forces to include multisectoral
representation will be prioritized.
The task forces are intended to provide a point of reference at the national level for
technical and analytic input on national workforce planning and systems, as well as a robust,
authoritative, national- level forum for discussions and the development of policies, strategies
and plans. They would have responsibility for developing or strengthening national HRH
plans to reflect current needs and address current and future HRH challenges affecting each
country and the Pacific region.
Intercountry collaboration at the subregional level
A heads of health meeting and directors of clinical services meeting were held in
Nadi, Fiji in May 2013 and examined a number of options related to the organization of the
Pacific regional “architecture” in the health sector.
Multi-country participation in the FTMG workshops in Tarawa, Kiribati, and Honiara,
Solomon Islands, and breakout groups with directors of clinical services in Nadi both
demonstrated the efficiency and effectiveness of subregional approaches where a number of
neighbouring countries are faced with similar challenges. Participants can work together to
find collaborative solutions to shared issues, and, as with the example of the Kiribati
internship programme, those solutions may involve an ongoing joint programming response.
Although the focus of the Tarawa and Honiara meetings was on the integration of
FTMGs, strategic discussions included the broader HRH situation in participating countries.
The meetings also proved to be an effective way of engaging with non-health sectors, such as
national workforce agencies.
Maintaining balance within the clinical workforce
In the context of current debate about the regional health architecture in the Pacific,
the meetings of heads of health and clinical directors also noted that SSCSiP is able to
provide advice on effective options and solutions at the national, subregional and regional
PIC10/10
page 15
levels that are appropriate for the current needs of countries. The SSCSiP Stakeholder
Reference Group, with the participation of permanent secretaries of health and clinical
directors, identified the following HR priorities for specialized clinical services in their
countries and the region:
1) support countries with their HR development plans for specialized clinical
services;
2) support PICs with the implementation of their HR plans for specialized clinical
services; and
3) strong advocacy to national scholarship offices and development partners to
allocate, or reserve, more scholarships for short- and longer-term postgraduate
clinical training.
The return of large numbers of FTMGs to several countries will also add to the
supervision requirements for an increasingly junior medical workforce and create a wide gulf
within the clinical workforce between specialist supervisors and interns. Increasing the
number of registrar-level supervisors with postgraduate diploma qualifications as soon as
possible would quickly contribute to achieving a better balance within the medical workforce.
Maintaining momentum for regional standards
More focus will be given to the improvement of quality, standards and opportunities
in the education, training and employment of health-care professionals. This should take
place within the context of the countries’ health systems and defined national health
priorities.
Some evolving initiatives in the region provide an excellent platform for further
development. For example, the South Pacific Board of Educational Assessment (SPBEA)
has already embarked on an ambitious programme to map tertiary and vocational
qualifications in the Pacific, and to develop criteria and mechanisms for cross-accreditation.
The end result would be health-care professionals that are “fit for purpose” and “fit to
practise” in a mobile, cross-border labour market. This effort would include clear definitions
of the unique standards and competencies required for doctors, midwives and nurses to
practise in the Pacific. It could be developed to meet current and future population needs
specific to the region while drawing on the international trends and evidence on health
PIC10/10
page 16
workforce education, licensing and CPD standards, as well as the need for compatibility with
future career choices and vocational training.
Collaboration, coordination and partnerships
Engagement of several partners in broader HRH analytic work, policy development
and planning will be further promoted. These mechanisms will also interface with a number
of other Pacific regional strategies and programmes. Consideration will be given to
promoting the most effective use of resources, reducing administrative and transactional
burdens on countries, and generating a coherent and compatible set of evidence for national
decision-making and regional policy dialogue—in keeping with the Cairns Compact on
Strengthening Development Coordination in the Pacific.
The current platform available with PHRHA could be effective, based on the initial
outcomes of collaborative activities on the integration of FTMGs. The PHRHA Technical
Working Group could be reinvigorated to undertake regular reviews of partner activities and
country progress. This will provide a useful, small group forum for technical partners to
share plans and results, examine emerging evidence, review the PIC context and overall
directions, and maintain collaborative communication with and between countries.
The current review of the Pacific Plan for Regional Integration and Cooperation
represents a timely opportunity for countries and development partners to re-examine
solutions to the region’s long-standing HRH challenges in a way that transcends national
borders and can catalyse multisectoral actions. In this way, it also can promote change,
providing additional investment that is strategically targeted to outputs, outcomes and results.
PIC10/10
page 18
ANNEX 1
Summary of the WHO HRH Action Framework for the Western Pacific (2011–2015)
Critical Success FactorsResults-focused planning and practices
System-linked alignment
Knowledge-based decision-making
Learning-oriented perspectives
Innovative solutions
Comprehensive and integrated approaches
BETTER
HEALTH
OUTCOMES
Improved Health
Workforce Outcomes
Critical Success Factors Country-led initiatives
Government-supported actions
Multi-sector engagement
Multi-stakeholder involvement
Donor alignment
Gender sensitivity
Equity
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Accessibility
Responsiveness
BETTER
HEALTH
SERVICES
Preparation & Planning
Situ
atio
n A
naly
sis Im
ple
me
nta
tion
Monitoring & Evaluation
Service DeliveryHealth Care Financing
Medical Products and Technologies
Health InformationGovernance
Policy
Leadership
Partnership Education
FinanceHuman
Resources
for Health
Systems
Country specific context
Including labour market
PIC10/10
page 19
ANNEX 2
Integration of foreign-trained medical graduates
DRAFT CHECKLIST OF PRIORITY DECISION POINTS AND ACTIONS
Key:
Red = decision points or actions specifically related to the integration of foreign-trained medical graduates FTMG into the health workforce
Black = steps related to wider HRH policy framework and enabling environment, which will broadly support FTMG integration
HRH ACTION AREA
and key outputs and outcomes
1. Leadership
Core National Task Force on FTMG Integration formed (MOH, Public Service, technical partners and donors)
TORs and secretariat functions for Core Task Force agreed
Core Task Force meeting approximately 1–2 monthly during establishment phase of internship program and until completion of evaluation of first cohort
(may be extended as needed)
Core FTMG Task Force engaging support from other key multisectoral stakeholders (Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance and Economic
Development, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration; other development partners) as required
Once first two cohorts have entered workforce, decision made on whether Task Force to continue or to integrate its role into routine functions of
participating agencies
2. Policy Frameworks
National Health Strategic Plan in place, providing overarching context for prioritisation of HRH development within health sector
Policy decision made about whether graduates from different medical undergraduate programmes will have common or separate pathways into health
workforce and for future career options
Internship Programme endorsed as a key strategy in integration of FTMGs
National Health Workforce Plan developed – linked to public health priorities, burden of disease, models of care and referral pathways, and establishing role
delineation for different cadres of health worker at different levels of service delivery
PIC10/10
page 20
Annex 2
National Health Workforce Plan costed and approved
3. Human Resources Management and Information Systems
3a. Management
Lead HRH officer identified / confirmed at MOH
National HRH working group established
Begin development of HRH functions
National Health Workforce Plan guiding HRH development (including undergraduate and postgraduate medical training) over medium to longer term
National Health Workforce Plan review meeting (aligned with annual sectoral review meeting and pre-budget planning and negotiations)
3b. Information systems
Computerised national HRH information base established (incorporating all health worker categories / the whole health workforce)
4. Finance
4a. Funding for Internship Programme
Government funding identified for internship programme
Dialogue initiated with development partners / donors about any necessary supplementary funding
Fund management mechanism identified and agreed, appropriate to source(s) / streams of funding
Funds for internship programme costs disbursed in a timely and efficient manner
4b. Funding for Intern Positions
Internship positions confirmed within staff establishment in advance of arrival back in-country of each cohort of medical graduates
Cost analysis and forward projections of absorption of interns into health workforce
Internship positions funded within health budget
5. Education and Training
5a. Pathways to practice
Internship programme designed, peer reviewed and endorsed
Terms of Reference developed for programme coordination mechanism and expatriate specialists
PIC10/10
page 21
Annex 2
Programme Coordinator(s) and expatriate specialists (as needed) recruited and mobilised
MOE keeping students studying overseas informed about preparations and arrangements for internship and entry into workforce (e.g. via periodic newsletter)
Orientation and induction programme designed and delivered
Teaching and learning programme (including medical English course, as necessary) designed and initiated
Teaching and learning programme maintained
Teaching and training activities included in terms of reference for visiting medical teams
CPD programme for medical graduates developed and endorsed, based on internship programme
5b. Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation
Pre-assessment for first cohort of returning FTMGs conducted during orientation and induction programme
Training Committee established, active and meeting at least three-monthly; mentoring and counselling provided to interns as relevant to performance
Post-assessment conducted on completion of first cohort of returning FTMGs
Independent evaluation of internship programme
5c. Accreditation for postgraduate training
Ongoing dialogue with FNU about accreditation of internship programme
Accreditation of FTMGs to apply for postgraduate clinical training at FNU on completion of internship programme
5d. Commissioning
Recruitment of medical students aligned exclusively with National Health Workforce Plan
Postgraduate (specialty) training awards aligned exclusively with National Health Workforce Plan
5e. Infrastructure
On-call facilities for interns identified
Access to POLHN facilities confirmed for participants in internship programme; enrolment in distance education programmes as per teaching and learning
programme
In-country education and training facilities being used for delivery of education and training programme
PIC10/10
page 22
Annex 2
5f. Licensing and Registration
Provisional medical practitioner registration category established for participants in internship programme
Eligibility for full registration on successful completion of internship programme confirmed
Policy decision made about whether a non-practising category of medical registration is needed under the national Medical Board (or equivalent)
Dialogue initiated with SPBEA after completion of Pacific Plan review regarding status of internship programme in relation to evolving regional registration
6. Partnerships
Dialogue initiated and maintained with Cuban Medical Brigade about role of in-country doctors in internship programme and teaching and learning activities
Dialogue initiated and maintained with RACS and NZMTS (with SSCSiP assistance, as necessary) about role of visiting teams in internship programme and
teaching and learning activities
Dialogue initiated and maintained between the Governments of the Pacific island countries and the International Cooperation and Development Fund
(Taiwan, China) about role of in-country doctors and visiting teams in internship programme and teaching and learning activities
Dialogue initiated and maintained with key bilateral donors about potential support for internship programme, teaching and learning activities or related
facilities (aligned with annual partnership talks on bilateral agreements)
PIC10/10
page 23
ANNEX 3
Strengthening Specialised Clinical Services in the Pacific (SSCSiP) Programme
MAPPING OF CLINICAL WORKFORCE CAPACITY IN PICs
Table 1. Number of local and expatriate clinicians in each country
Fij
i
So
lom
on
Is
Van
uat
u
Sam
oa
FS
M
Kir
ibat
i
To
ng
a
RM
I
Pal
au
Co
ok
Is
Tu
val
u
Nau
ru
To
kel
au
Niu
e
Total
Number of local clinicians
employed by the MOH 355 79 27 55 46 18 44 2 7 15 7 2 4 2 663
Number of expatriate
clinicians employed by the
MOH
38 2 8 10 18 7 0 8 8 10 2 7 0 2 120
Total number of clinicians
(Local + expatriates) 393 81 35 65 64 25 44 10 15 25 9 9 4 4 783
Number of clinicians (local
+ expatriate) per 10 000
population
4.7 1.6 1.4 3.5 6.0 2.4 4.3 1.5 6.0 17.6 8.5 9.7 28.3 30.8
Figure 1. Proportion (%) of clinicians classified as local compared with expatriate
Table 2. Highest qualification for local clinicians
Countries →
Highest clinical
qualification↓
Fij
i
So
lom
on
Is
Van
uat
u
Sam
oa
FS
M
Kir
ibat
i
To
ng
a
RM
I
Pal
au
Co
ok
Is
Tu
val
u
Nau
ru
To
kel
au
Niu
e
Total
MBBS 354 43 12 32 30 9 23 2 2 9 2 2 3 1 424
PG Diploma 65 15 11 19 11 8 10 0 1 5 3 0 1 1 150
Masters 34 20 4 2 5 1 8 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 81
Fellowship/PHD 2 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Total no. of local Drs
with clinical PG
qualifications
101
36
15
23
16
9
21
0
5
6
5
0
1
1
239
% of local clinicians
with a PG qualification
28.5
45.6
55.6
41.8
34.8
50
47.7
0
71.4
40
71.4
0
25
50
36
top related