havana survey results-final-v2

Openstack User Committee

Havana SummitTim Bell, Ryan Lane, JC Martin

user‐committee@lists.openstack.org

Initial committee scope

• Define bylaws [1]• Define users• Present user needs• Present aggregate stats• Expand user group structures

Committee Structure

Users

Consumer

Operator

Ecosystem Partner

Distribution Provider or Application Vendor

Current status

• Initial members selected (with NDA signed)• Mailing list created [2]• Structure being defined [1]• Collecting data with foundation• Conducted an initial user survey

Strategic priorities for 2013

• Complete formation• Expand membership• Form comprehensive view of community• Set up communication pathways• Provide metrics

References1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yD8TfqUik2dt5xo_jM

VHMl7tw9oIJnEndLK8YqEToyo/edit2. user‐committee@lists.openstack.org

414 survey responses

16%

7%

8%

4%

11%17%

37%

More than 10,000 employees5,001 to 10,000 employees1,001 to 5,000 employees501 to 1,000 employees101 to 500 employees21‐100 employees1‐20 employees

Company Size

Information Technology 60%

Academic / Research 15%

Telecommunication 10%

Industries

Government / Defense 3%

CC Icons http://vathanx.deviantart.com/

175 29 28 23 18

Country

124100

77

151

ServiceProvider

EcosystemVendor

CloudConsumer

CloudOperator

Type of Involvement

Common Further Enhancements• Simplify installation and configuration process• Rolling migrations with N‐1 compatibility• Documentation–archive old content, end‐user guide, 

problem guide, …• Security such as SSL options everywhere• Horizon lacks latest feature support, admin functionality 

and more attractive theme• High availability out‐of‐the‐box for OpenStack components 

and VM restart• Active Directory integration

Foundation Priorities

• Ensure compatibility across different implementations

• Stability/Hardening of existing functionality• Establish certification program• Encourage training for different skill sets• Support user groups, especially outside U.S.

197 DeploymentsType

35HostedPrivate 15

Hybrid37

Public

106On PremisePrivate

Trunk8%

Grizzly15%

Folsom47%

Essex25%

Diablo5%

Version84

9294

Production Proof ofConcept

Dev/QA

Stage

134

94

94

89

66

46

Dashboard

Object Storage

Snapshotting to new images

Live Migration

EC2 Compatibility API

S3 Compatibility API

Features

181

171

169

153

147

121

103

20

16

Nova

Glance

Keystone

Horizon

Quantum

Cinder

Swift

Ceilometer

Heat

Components

KVM71%

ESX8%Xen8%

Xenserver5%

Lxc 5%Hyperv 3%

Other29%

Hypervisors

LVM36%

NFS19%

Ceph RBD13% Netapp

10%GlusterFS

8%SAN/HP 5%

Windows 4%EMC 3%Solidfire 2%

Other32%

Open Vswitch39%

Linux Bridge31%

Cisco11%

Hyper‐v5%

Nicira5%

Brocade 3%

Ryu 2%big switch 2%

NEC 2%

Other19%

Storage Drivers

Network Drivers

SQL55%

LDAP34% PAM

8%

KVS3%

Other 11%

Identity Drivers

150

62

33

JSON XML Both

API Format

Detailed Features

Nova Scale of 98 Non POC Deployments

1‐100 52%

101‐50018% 501‐1,000 

8%

1,001‐5,000 8%

5,000‐10,000  3%

> 10,000  6%

Unspecified 5%

Other30%

Instances

1‐50 71%

51‐100 8%

101‐500 9%

501‐1,000  2%

>1,000  4%

unspecified6%

Other29%

nodes

1‐100 51%

101‐500 21% 501‐1,000 

4%1,001‐5,000 

12%

5,001‐10,000 3%

>10,000 4%

unspecified5%

Other16%

cores

0‐10 49%

11‐100 19%

100‐500 5%

More than 500 5%

unspecified22%

Other10%

Cinder Scale of 59 Non POC Deployments

TeraBytes of block storage

Swift Scale of 47 Non POC Deployments

0‐10 43%

11‐100 15%

100‐500 8%

> 500 11%

unspecified23%

TeraBytes of object storage

1‐10,000 40%

10,001To 100,000 

13%

100,001 to1 million 

9%

1 M to 100 M4%

100M to 500 M4%

unspecified30%

Other17%

Number of objects

Survey is still opened:https://www.openstack.org/user-survey

Survey discussions on:user-committee@lists.openstack.org