group name: onem2m wg1 requirements source: phil hawkes, rapporteur “benefits of onem2m...

Group Name: oneM2M WG1 RequirementsSource: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,

phawkes@qti.qualcomm.com Meeting Date: 2012-10-25Agenda Item: 7 “Contributions”

BENEFITS OF ONEM2M TECHNOLOGIES

Scope

2

• Audience: Vertical industry segment stakeholders• Purpose: Trigger feedback from [the Audience]

on oneM2M requirements• Duration: 1 hr presentation (including questions,

but not including generating feedback) • Content: – Highlights potential benefits of oneM2M

communication technology to [the Audience]– Provides avenue for feedback on requirements

• Note: current title of presentation is a placeholder only

Outline

• Motivators: – Audience Priorities oneM2M intends to address

• Description of oneM2M Technology– Simple description– Implicit Benefits of oneM2M standardization

effort• oneM2M Capabilities and Directed Benefits• Conclusion• Feedback Template

3

Current state of affairs

4

• Fragmented market• Niche products and solutions• Custom design, custom engineering• Various industry segments reproducing effort

in order to solve their own problems• Etc.

NOTE: This slide should provide a pre-frame for the rest of the discussion. Describe what oneM2M participants see in the marketplace. This then leads to motivators. [CALL FOR VOLUNTEER(S) TO COMPLETE!]

Motivators• [Audience] priorities oneM2M aims to address– Improved Functionality-Price-Quality (FPQ)

tradeoffs• Sourcing, developing and integrating Components• “Price” CAPEX, OPEX and Time-to-market [1]

– Enhanced Scalability – Greater Choice• Range of providers for sourcing, developing and

integrating Components– Greater Opportunities• E.g. ability to share data and other resources by

partnering with other stakeholders.

5

Editor: Francois Ennesser had comments on “Choice”. Further discussion is required.

DESCRIPTION OF ONEM2M TECHNOLOGY

One sentence description of oneM2M technologyEasy-to-digest description of oneM2M technology

6

One sentence description

oneM2M aims to enable improved Functionality-Price-Quality tradeoffs of future end-to-end M2M solutions, whilst providing scalability, greater choices and opportunities for [the Audience] by standardizing a set of valuable, Generic M2M-communication Capabilities that incorporate the necessary interactions with Underlying Networks.

7

Easy-to-digest description of oneM2M

• Figure & text showing relationship between– Applications– oneM2M Technology– Underlying Networks

• Should not imply an architecture

8

Underlying Networks

Example only

9

M2M App M2M App

oneM2M Capabilities

Summary of Benefits

1. Implicit benefits– Benefits of standardizing generic

capabilities– Benefits of incorporating interactions

with underlying networks2. Directed benefits– Benefits of valuable capabilities directly

addressing the Motivators

10

Benefits of Standardizing Generic Capabilities

11

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Specifications might be used as the basis for certifying #

interoperability & quality

Specifications might be used as the basis for certifying #

interoperability & quality

Interoperable Components from multiple providers Interoperable Components from multiple providers

Economies of scaleEconomies of scale

Extensive Application Development Ecosystem

Extensive Application Development Ecosystem

# Note: at the time of writing, oneM2M has not decided what role (if any) oneM2M might play in certification. It is possible that one or more other groups may certify against part or all of the oneM2M specifications.

Editor: “Certifying” may need further discussion. See email from Eanny Bae

Benefits of Incorporating Interactions with Underlying Networks

12

Wider range of options for the [Audience] in selecting an underlying network

Wider range of options for the [Audience] in selecting an underlying network

Application developers can ignore details of usage of underlying network (simplifying development) while benefiting from integrated efficiency, reliability & scalability of communications

Application developers can ignore details of usage of underlying network (simplifying development) while benefiting from integrated efficiency, reliability & scalability of communications

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Editor: Should “Benefiting from integrated efficient, reliability& scalability” be a separate item?

ONEM2M CAPABILITIES & DIRECTED BENEFITS

oneM2M Capabilities & Their Benefits

13

Goal of this document

• Previous Section: – Implicit Benefits independent of the capabilities that

oneM2M chooses to support• This section:– Capabilities & their features being considered– Directed benefits of these

capabilities/features/requirements • Objective of document– oneM2M wants feedback on what it is considering,

to help prioritize its work

14

Sharing Capability

15

Sharing content between M2M Apps

Control via Standardized Metadata

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Content Origin Metadata

Other …

Content Delivery Guidance

Notification

Communication Control

Searchable tags

Content-Aware Processing

16

Data-Type-Aware Procedure Language

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Data-Type-Aware Description Language

Data-Type-Aware Processing

Semantics-Aware Processing Semantics-Aware

Procedure Language

Semantics-Aware Description Language

Filtering/Searching

Aggregating content

Simple Arithmetic Operations (sum, mean, max, min)

Communication Control

Editor: : I would appreciate the help of a semantics/ content-aware processing expert(s) /advocate(s) to improve this page and provide notes. Any volunteers?

Security Framework and Access Control

17

oneM2M-to-oneM2M class

App-to-oneM2M classSharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Security Framework Classes

Authentication Framework

Passphrase

High-Entropy Key

Certificate

Static root of trust

Dynamic root of trust

App-to-App class

IdentityStatic Identity

Dynamic Identity

Access Control

Communication Control

Editor: Does this go into too much detail?

Editor: Do we need to go into further detail on access control?I think not.

Remote Device Management

18

Communication Control

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Reporting Data from Devices

Controlling Data on Devices

Log Reports

Fault Reports

Performance Reports

Reporting Configuration Settings

Updating ConfigurationsManaging Software & Firmware

Adding new Software (E.g. Applications)Software/Firmware updates

Removing Software

Maintenance Reporting

Provisioning

Editor: : I would appreciate the help of a remote device management expert(s) /advocate(s) to improve this page and provide notes. Any volunteers?

Communication Control

19

Interface to M2M-specific features of the underlying network

Communication Control

Sharing

Content-Aware Processing

Remote Device Management

Security Framework and Access Control

Network selection & scheduling

Content Delivery Guidance

Delivery confirmation /Progress reporting

Robustness in presence of lossy links

Communication Scalability Features

Directed Benefits

20

Communication Control Sharing

Security Framework and Access ControlRemote Device Management

Content-Aware Processing

Improved FPQ Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunities

Ability to share data & assets with partners

Ability to share data & assets with partners

Reduced traffic

volume

Reduced traffic

volume

More value extracted from

underlying network

More value extracted from

underlying network

Improved end-product

quality

Improved end-product

quality

Better power consumptionBetter power consumption

Reduced field agent call-outs

Reduced field agent call-outs

Conclusion

• Summary– Why? FPQ tradeoff, scalability, choice, quality– How? Standardizing valuable generic M2M

capabilities integrated with underlying networks– Outline: Potential capabilities and features

• What do we want from you?– Feedback on these potential capabilities &

features in order to help oneM2M prioritize its work

21

FEEDBACK TEMPLATEProvide as mechanism for feedback to oneM2M

22

Feedback on MotivatorsMotivator Priority

(0=Low, 10 = Critical)Comments

(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

Improved Functionality, Price, Quality Tradeoffs

Enhanced Scalability

Greater Choice

Greater Opportunity

23

Feedback on Sharing (1)

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

Field-Backend Sharing

Field-Field Sharing

Backend-Backend Sharing

Sharing with multiple Apps

Sharing with partners

Notification

24

Feedback on Sharing (2)Feature Priority

(0=Low, 10 = Critical)Comments

(E.g. clarification audience requirements)<Hints provided in angle brackets – feel

free to delete hints2014 2015+

Content Origin

Content Delivery Guidance

<Note: Discussed further under “Communication Control”>

Searchable tags

Vertical-specific metadata

<what data types would be helpful to support>

Proprietary metadata <what data types would be helpful to support>

Using metadata <How would you like to use metadata?>

Metadata-aware processing

<What metadata-aware processing would you value. See examples below>

25

Feedback on Content-Aware Processing

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

26

Feedback on Content-Aware Processing

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

27

Feedback on Security Framework and Access Control

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

28

Feedback on Remote Energy Management

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

29

Feedback on Communication Control

Feature Priority (0=Low, 10 = Critical)

Comments(E.g. clarification audience requirements)

2014 2015+

30

APPENDICES

TerminologyReferences

31

TerminologyName Description

M2M Application (App) TBD

App-to-App

Capability TBD

Component Hardware, software and services comprising an M2M solution

Content Data produced or consumed by Applications

Content-Aware Aware of the data model and/or semantics of Content

Generic Common to two or more applications or vertical segments

Underlying networks Access networks, core networks, busses and other technology assisting in data transport

32

References

1. “oneM2M Standardization”, 2012-04-24. Available from ftp://ftp.onem2m.org/Primary_Deliverables/Material_for_Verticals/oneM2M Standardization_2012-04-24.zip

33

OLD SLIDES – DELETE BEFORE PUBLICATION

Saved here in case they are useful in future.

34

Figure by Farooq Bari, AT&T

35

Figure by Tim Carey, ALU

36

Summary of CapabilitiesCapability Features Sharing Sharing of content between M2M Applications.

Support for sharing with partners. Content is opaque. Standardized metadata provides control.

Possible processing of visible data includes: filtering; aggregating; simple arithmetic ops (average, sum, etc.)

Content-Aware Processing

Sharing Capability features plus processing with varying degree of “understanding” of Content data elements: e.g. data type, data value and/or semantics.

Security Framework & Access Control

Provisioning, access control, authentication and security mechanisms for protecting oneM2M capabilities. Support for enabling App-to-App security.

Remote Device Management

Provisioning. Remote reporting from Device (e.g. for maintenance) and remote configuring (e.g. settings, software and firmware management).

Communication Efficiency & Reliability

Selecting and establishing connectivity on an underlying network. Scheduling communication. Delivery confirmation/progress reporting. Robustness in the presence of lossy links. Broadcast/multicast support.

37

NOTE: Initial text to explain partitioning of features.