governor mario m. cuomo bridge · governor mario m. cuomo bridge international bridge, tunnel and...

Post on 19-Nov-2020

7 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

GOVERNOR MARIO M. CUOMO BRIDGEInternational Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association– June 25, 2018Jamey Barbas, PE – Project Director

PROJECT LOCATION

NATIONAL & REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

Critical commerce corridor in NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which generates nearly 10% of US GDP

935 km Thruway system connects 80% of State’s population of 19.5 million

Primary truck gateway for Port of NY & NJ; key bypass route around NYC connecting New England to points south & west

4

Gove

BRIDGE LOCATION: NEW YORK, US

ORIGINAL TZB CONSTRUCTION

Original construction costs totaled $80.8 million

BUOYANT CAISSONS

8 Piers Supported by Caissons

Buoyancy Supports 70% of Dead Load

Dewatering Pump Systems

WHY DO WE NEED A NEW NY BRIDGE?

Opened in 1955 with design capacity of 100,000 vehicles daily

Currently carries more than 140,000 vehicles daily

Accident rate is twice the average rate on Thruway system

NO emergency lanes or shoulders

NO mass transit, pedestrian or bicycle capability

Significant cost to structurally rehab current span over next 20 years

NEW BRIDGE BENEFITS

No major structural repairs for 100 years

Reduces congestion with 8 wider traffic lanes,

emergency lanes, and cashless tolling

Integrated bike and pedestrian path

Built ready for future bus rapid transit

CHANGING LANESTAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE

Moveable traffic barrier

Tappan Zee Bridge1 span, 7 lanes

11’ lanes with movable traffic barrier

87’

CHANGING LANESTHE TWIN-SPAN BRIDGE

2 spans, 8 general traffic lanes,4 shoulders, 2 bus lanes, shared-use path

Westbound Span96’

Westchester to Rockland

Eastbound Span87’

Rockland to Westchester

Bus Lane

Shou

lder

Shou

lder

Shared-UsePath

Shou

lder

Shou

lder

Bus Lane

THE NEW NY BRIDGE PROJECTDYNAMIC LIGHTING | ENERGY EFFICIENT LEDS

EXTREME EVENT DESIGN

EARTHQUAKE

2,500-YR EVENT WITH REPAIRABLE DAMAGE

1,000-YR EVENT WITH MINIMAL DAMAGE SCOUR AND FLOODING SHIP IMPACT WIND EVENTS

20-YR EVENT FOR TEMP CONSTRUCTION CONDITION

100-YR EVENT SERVICE CONDITION

10,000-YR EVENT STABILITY

POTENTIAL FUTURE LOADING

SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Contract Performance Requirements 100-year min. service life for “non-replaceable

components” such as towers, piles, pile caps, piers, pier caps, deck and superstructure (60-year min. for barriers) Corrosion Protection Plan (CPP) to identify exposure,

degradation mechanism, design and constructions strategies, and life-cycle costs for replaceable components Probabilistic approach to modeling

SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

• Modeling• Detailing• Material

Specification• Trial Testing

Design

• Proven Methods• Quality Control• Quality Assurance

Construction • Monitor• Inspect• Maintain• Update

Service Life

Operations

SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Classification of component into exposure zone

Design strategies for concrete durability: Strategy A : Avoidance of deterioration

approach by use of non-reactive or inert materials Strategy B : Full probabilistic approach

using performance based durability modeling Based on limit state design theory Chloride-induced reinforcement

corrosion

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Concrete

Uses fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete) Bulletin 34 –Model Code for Service Life Design Commonly used European standard Task Group formed in 2002 Bulletin 34 published in 2006 Research on-going

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Concrete

fib Bulletin 34 – cont’d1. Quantify degradation mechanisms2. Define limit states3. Define probability/reliability, β4. Determine service or ultimate limit

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Concrete

fib Bulletin 34 – cont’d Level 1: full probabilistic approach for “exceptional structures” Level 2: deterministic approach using safety factors Level 3: deemed to satisfy approach

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Concrete

Chloride-induced corrosion identified as the primary degradation mechanism Level 1 (probabilistic) approach Depassivation of reinforcement taken as the design limit state β = 1.30 or 10% probability of corrosion initiation Service limit state

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Concrete

Other degradation mechanisms use Level 3 approach Freeze-thaw (ASTM C666): min. 90% durability @ 300 cycles Scaling resistance (ASTM C672): y <= 3 @ 50 cycles Air Content (ASTM C457): spacing factor <= 0.008” W/C < 0.40 DEF: mass concrete thermal control w/ FA and GGBS AAR: selection of non-reactive aggregates Sulfate Attack: C3A <= 8%

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP

Primary Model Inputs Reliability, β Chloride threshold Concrete cover Chloride migration coefficient Aging factor specific to

cementitious content Chloride loading, expressed as % of

w/c

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Oversight Verification

Design Cores taken from existing bridge Deterministic STADIUM modeling STADIUM results converted into quasi-probabilistic analysis

CONCRETE SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Oversight Verification

Construction Mix prequalification testing Independent NT Build 492 testing Concrete cover verification

SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Steel

Weathering steel girders (specified in the contract)

NEPCOAT List B paint system

Piles with sacrificial wall thicknesses

Stay Cable Protection Corrosion inhibiting compound HDPE sheathing around each strand HDPE ducting around each cable

SERVICE LIFE DESIGN

Design-Builder’s CPP - Steel

• Provides a baseline response of the structure

• Specific structural element performance– Bearings– Joints– Cables

• Asset Management– Monitor long-term performance– Optimize inspection program– Assist Operation and Maintenance Decisions

ITS at Operation Center

32

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM

Measure wind speed and movement

Collect load demands to gauge strains on critical elements of the bridge

Capture the behavior of the bridge due to daily or seasonal temperature changes

Trigger maintenance alters to inspect particular components

Inform our command center for efficient operations of traffic

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM

3 D BRIDGE MODELING, BIM, SHMS & ASSET MANAGEMENT

BIM and ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Learn MoreFollow us @NewNYBridge

Visit us at NewNYBridge.com

Call the Project Hotline 1-855-TZBRIDGE (892-7434)

Email Info@NewNYBridge.com

top related