geological survey covering montcalm #2 group · 2017. 1. 17. · montcalm township is contained in...
Post on 14-Mar-2021
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
42B09SE0003 2.2543 MONTCALM 010
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
covering
MONTCALM #2 GROUP
Hollinger Mines Limited
Timmins, Ontario November 14, 1977
D. R. Alexander
Area Mines Ltd.
2 mi. .- '.'v.. '-.
MONTCALM #2
C. C. Hu&i'on .j8 Assoc
Area Mines Ltd.MONTCALM TWP.
STRACHAN TWP
Scale l" "'2640' or O, (1:31,680)
8 kit
CLAIM SKETCH
SOUTHWESTERN MONTCALM TOWNSHIP showing
MONTCALM #2 GROUP and
Properties Discussed Under 'Previous Worki
- l -
INTRODUCTION:
During the period July 26-29, 1977, a geological
survey was carried out across the Montcalm #2 property in
Montcalm Township. The writer was ably assisted during the
course of the survey, as well as during subsequent compilation
and interpretation by P. J. Bateman.
The Montcalm #2 property consists of fifteen, con
tiguous, unpatented mining claims in southwestern Montcalm
Township, approximately 65 kilometers (40 miles) west-northwest
of Timmins. The claims covered by the survey include:
P.492012-016 inclusive; P.492022-025 inclusive
and P.451078-083 inclusive.
The property is effectively only accessible by helicopter
- an area around the outcrop in the west-central part of the group
being the most suitable for landing. '
TOPOGRAPHY:
Characteristic to most areas north of Timmins, the
southeastern portion of the property is covered by spruce, alder-
spruce and alder swamps. The more western areas of the property, however, support thick growths of spruce, poplar, birch and alders
with tangles of cedar and alders adjacent to the creek margins.
The variance in relief across the property amounts to
some 20 metres, from the spruce-poplar ridges to the clay banks
of the creek bed.
PREVIOUS WORK:
Upon the discovery of a copper-nickel deposit by
Teck Corporation in September, 1976, a large area was staked,
covering parts of Montcalm, Strachan, Nova, Belford, Watson
and Poulett Townships. Most of the work initiated by that
staking, however, is still pending.
At any rate, a few companies have previously explored
the area, with the work of Area Mines Limited and C.C. Ruston
and Associates being most pertinent to the Hollinger group.
The earliest recorded assessment work was completed
by C.C. Ruston and Associates. In 1956, their property
encompassed 173 claims around the Montcalm-Strachan-Nova-Belford
Township corner. Based on geophysical results, four holes were drilled in Belford Township encountering a mixed sequence of
medium to coarse grained andesitic flows and metasediments
{arkose and greywacke members).
Circa 1964, Area Mines Limited held several claim groups
in Montcalm and Belford Townships. Subsequent to completing
magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, several holes were drilled.
North of the present Montcalm #2 property, one hole
was drilled into a quartz-chlorite schist in contact with
porphyritic to chloritized rhyolite. No expression of an electro^
magnetic anomaly was noted in the drill hole, although the depth
of overburden (205' vertical), suggests that any response was
probably not related to bedrock.West of Montcalm #2, in Belford Township, Area Mines
Limited drilled four holes into a zone of graphitic-rhyolitic
tuffs in contact with fine to medium grained andesitic flows
and pillow lavas. Traces of pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite
and sphalerite were encountered across the rhyolitic-graphitic
zone - sulphides being more erratically distributed in the
andesitic volcanics.
- 4 -
Intruding the volcanic complex is an extensive zone
of mafic to ultramafic intrusives. The intrusive body forms
a rather crude ring shape, extending southwest from the Teck
deposit in Montcalm Township into Strachan and Nova Townships before swinging northwest in Belford Township (see plan following).
Data available suggest that the body ranges from diorite to serpentinite in composition.
The portion of this unit outcropping on Montcalm #2, is best described as a gabbro. Megascopically, the rock is composed of feldspar, hornblende and chlorite with minute grains of magnetite and the odd speck of biotite. The gabbro is dark grey green to dark green in colour, granular in texture, and locally carbonatized. Grain size varies from fine to coarse - the intrusive being crudely zoned into coarse, medium and fine grained sections. The coarser grained phases are generally more magnetic. Rare traces of pyrite and pyrrhotite were seen in surface exposures.
A second intrusive event, in this case felsic intrusives, is commonly recognized across the Montcalm-Belford area. Without
regard for the Kapuskasing sequence of granulite gneisses, exposures of felsic intrusives are presumed to be part of the Algoman Orogenic period.
The sequence includes rocks of granitic and monzonitic
composition with occasional pegmatitic, gneissic and migmatitic
phases.
All of the aforementioned units are cut by a series of
tension related(?) diabase dykes - the youngest intrusive event
noted. These intrusives are profuse throughout the Timmins area,
occurring in narrow, north to northwesterly trending dykes.
The diabase varies from fine to coarse grained andis typically ophitic textured. These dykes' characteristic strike
and high magnetic susceptibility allow fairly easy recognition in
most magnetic surveys.
Geology of the Montcalm Township copper nickel discovery, showing previous surveys which just missed the anomaly, and the Dighem survey which revealed It
x ^ location of Montcalm #2
after Canadian Mining Journal, April 1977; p.24
- 5 -
STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY:
Since the geological history in the area is long and complex, it is difficult to sort out the sequence of structural events in more than a generalized sense. As an
aid, those structural features (basically faults), shown on the government publications for the area, have been adopted -
modified only by interpretations on the regional magnetics,
and projections of existing structures onto the property.
Using this method, three phases of faulting have been recognized:
an fi trending north to northwesterly
±2 trending northeasterly
and f3 trending east to east-southeasterly
In several instances, the f2 system traverses the
edge of the mafic intrusive while having little or no effect
on the Algoman granites. This roughly suggests a period in
which the f2 system takes place. Further, the f3 system
clearly offsets both gabbro and granite.
Without continuity of surface outcrop or diamond
drilling, conclusions regarding the mechanics of folding are
extremely tenuous. Thus, from the information at hand, the
structural-depositional history appears to proceed as:
- 6 -
l Erosion and Glacial Deposition —— Large Unconformity ———
PRECAMBRIAN
Proterozoic
faulting and folding (?)
Archean
late Archean diabasic intrusives- Intrusive contact -
Algoman:i
faulting(?) and associated folding(?)felsic intrusives - granite to monzonite
- faulting ( ±2 ? )- Intrusive contact -
mafic intrusives - diorite to serpentinite faulting
- Intrusive contact -
Keewatin:felsic volcanics - flows, pyroclastics and metasediments
mafic volcanics - flows, pyroclastics and metasediments
- 7 -
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY:
The property was acquired to investigate the' Cu-Ni potential of the mafic to ultramafic intrusive, in view of the Teck Corporation discovery. Exploration by Teck, up to March 1977, led to the following preliminary working hypotheses:
" In the drilling to date, two different types of mafic rock have been recognized. One of these is a medium to coarse-grained, equigranular rock of dioritic composition containing about 75 per cent plagioclase, 25 per cent uralitized pyroxene and from O to 5 per cent free quartz. This rock does not contain more than traces of sulphides. The other group is a suite of medium to fine-grained, commonly porphyritic rocks of pyroxenitic to gabbroic composition. They contain all the known sulphide mineralization. Banding is pronounced, with individual bands between l and 10 m thick. Each band has a mafic, sulphide-rich base and grades upward to a more felsic rock with lesser amounts of sulphide. Up to 10 such bands have been identified in individual drill holes.
,,, ,, Principal sulphides in order of decreasing abundance, are pyrrhotite, pentlandite and chalco pyrite. Small amounts of pyrite are present and trace amounts of violarite and valleriite have been identified in polished sections. Sulphides range in abundance from massive to disseminated. Primary
{1) CMJ, April 1977, p.28.
- 8 -
features such as brecciation and filling of skeletal plagioclase phenocrysts by sulphides have been observed. Chalcopyrite has in part been remobilized forming wisps and stringers that cross-cut earlier textures.
The sulphide body as outlined by drilling is about 325 m in length, extends to at least 300 m below surface, is open at depth and averages 25 m in thickness (both zones combined). The maximum true thickness intersected is 75 m. The sulphide body strikes N-S and dips from 80OE to 800W. A number of late, gouge filled faults have been observed in drill core, but no major offsets are indicated. '
The Montcalm #2 property lies on the same flank of the mafic intrusive as the Teck discovery, although ground magnetics suggest that the dyke may be fingering out here - a possible undesirable effect. At any rate, the similar geological environment suggests that follow up should proceed on most potential targets.
CONCLUSIONS:
Considering that the geophysical surveys have not, as yet, been completed, any attempt to summarize the potential of the property would be precipitous.
HOLLINGER EXPLORATION
- 9 -
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHYl
Bennett, G. (1969) - Geology of the Belford-Strachan Area, Dist, of Cochrane; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Geol. Kept. 78, ace, by maps 2181, 2182.
Blecha, M., Thalenhorst, H, and Komura, A. (1977) -
Teck's Montcalm copper nickel deposit : AEM survey brings major discovery; Cdn. Mng. Jour. April, 1977 pp. 21-28.
Graham, A.R. (1931) - Groundhog-Kamiscotia Area,Dist, of Cochrane; Ont. Dept. of Mines, Vol. 40,
pt 3. pp. 23-37., ace. by map 40c.
i Ont. Dept. of Mines and Geol. Survey of Can. (1963) -
Elf Lake Sheet, Dist, of Cochrane; Aeromagnetic Series Map 2265G, Scale: l" = i mile.
Assessment files - Resident Geologist's Office, Timmins.
• II m l m m m ; — .-- - -- --
42B09SE0003 2 .2543 MONTCALM 020
REPORT
on a
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
MONTCALM No. 2 GROUP
Hollinger Mines Limited Montcalm Township, Ontario
Timmins, Ontario November 20, 1977
H.Z. Tittley, P.Eng.
Oi //t 31 VOS
mvno
808*1 0*608*.
.l..L-rf.... . *! 19908*!" *9908," | "908^ , " ~S "J
! L .
f/OSOIC* t SiOIS* SiOlS*
- fqze* SIOZ6* i *ioza* " tiozs*C
r——s,....:-;--——"J——-21- ——--
81608* i iieoeW/'^oe*
. —— -- " - - - ——— --t- - ——•-
J 100*6* J900Z6* i V
l l I.W
'di 'd ^ ___
looze* Tzooze* coozs* f*ooz6*
INTRODUCTION^
A ground electromagnetic survey was conducted over a small group of claims west of Timmins, Ontario.
Several conductive zones were mapped by the horizontal loop electromagnetic method but most of these appear to lie within a conductive overburden that appears to be present.
Three anomalous zones are selected for further geophysical investigations.
PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS
The Montcalm No. 2 Group was ̂ staked by Hollinger Mines Limited during October 1977 and consisted of 15 claims numbered P-451078 to P-451083, P-492012 to P-492016 and P-492022 to P-492025, all inclusive. During August 1977, claims P-500644 to P-500646 inclusive were added to bring the total to 18 claims
The property lies between the Groundhog and Ivanhoe Rivers near the southwest corner of Montcalm Township, Porcupine Mining Division. Timmins is 42 miles to the east.
Access to the property was provided by helicopters from Timmins to widenings of the creek bed in the west part of the group.
On the more recently staked claims, near the south- east corner, there are old logging roads that lead to the Groundhog River near an old logging camp. From here along the poorly maintained Spruce Falls road it is 31 miles to Highway 101,
- 2 -
HISTORY and GEOLOGY
The only evidence of previous mineral exploration work on the property is the presence of older grid lines in the easterly and westerly claims.
A summary of previous work in the area of southwest Montcalm Township is contained in a separate report on the geology of the group recently submitted by Hollinger Mines Limited. This report is by D.R. Alexander and entitled "Geological Survey covering Montcalm 12 Group".
SURVEY METHODS
Linecutting:
i From a campsite along the creek, a line approximately
normal to the long axis of the creek was measured westerly for 175 feet. At a right angle a line was extended north for 1100 feet and to the south for 1200 feet. At this latter point, the 00 Base Line was turned off, again at a right angle, and extended westerly for 1600 feet to a point called 20W and easterly to 48E. The north tie line at 23N became sub-parallel but was extended easterly and westerly approximately the same distances.
Along the 00 B.L., lines 400 feet apart were extended grid north and south to cover all the claims. Stations were established at intervals of 100 feet.
H.E.M. Survey:
On the existing grid of lines, the H.E.M. survey was conducted using an EM-17 electromagnetic unit manufactured by
- 3 -
Geonics Limited of Toronto. Readings were taken at every 100 feet or less with the coi^.s in the horizontal co-planar mode and 400 feet apart.
RESULTS
The results of the survey are plotted and interpreted on the accompanying plan entitled H.E.M. Survey at a scale of l inch to 200 feet.
Although many conductive zones are interpreted, most of these display such poorly conductive characteristics or such low amplitudes that they cannot be reliably attributed to bedrock features.
Anomalies A, B, and C should be selected for further examination, especially anomaly C where it crosses line 4W. At this point, a higher conductivity is displayed that may suggest a bedrock source.
RECOMMENDATIONS and CONCLUSIONS
Anomalies A and B should be reviewed against future magnetic and vertical loop electromagnetic results.
A grid of lines 200 feet apart, oriented to thesouth east, should cover anomaly C prior to combined geophysical examinations consisting initially of vertical and horizontal loop electromagnetic and magnetic surveys.
- 4 -
The electromagnetic survey successfully detected a conductive zone in the northwest corner of the property that may be due to a concentration of economic sulphide mineralization. Further work is warranted.
Respectfully submitted,
H. Z. Tittley, P.Eng.
42B09SE0C03 2.2543 MONTCALM 030
REPORT
on a
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
MONTCALM No. 2 GROUP
Hollinger Mines Limited Montcalm Township, Ontario
Timmins, Ontario November 20, 1977
H.Z. Tittley, P.Eng,
(
MONTCALM
480944 j 492742 J 452741 J | 4BOT2""""
480975:1? )) F* IJL S,*" Jj 480972480700 480709 .|4807I3
480977 l 480978 l
if. I P.46098I
-v:-^-,.-v. -i--;----- 4- — -^-
480704 t 480709 480669- — - - —l- - — — — T* ~ — ——-
^ .J i 4606 J9p! 480640
STRACHAN
CLAIM MAP
SCALE 1" TO 2640'
INTRODUCTION
A ground electromagnetic survey was conducted over a small group of claims west of Timmins, Ontario.
Several conductive zones were mapped by the horizontal loop electromagnetic method but most of these appear to lie within a conductive overburden that appears to be present.
Three anomalous zones are selected for further geophysical investigations.
PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS
The Montcalm No. 2 Group was staked by Hollinger Mines Limited during October 1977 and consisted of 15 claims numbered P-451078 to P-451083, P-492012 to P-492016 and P-492022 to P-492025, all inclusive. During August 1977, claims P-500644 to P-500646 inclusive were added to bring the total to 18 claims
The property lies between the Groundhog and Ivanhoe Rivers near the southwest corner of Montcalm Township, Porcupine Mining Division. Timmins is 42 miles to the east.
Access to the property was provided by helicopters from Timmins to widenings of the creek bed in the west part of the group.
On the more recently staked claims, near the south- east corner, there are old logging roads that lead to the Groundhog River near an old logging camp. From here along the poorly maintained Spruce Falls road it is 31 miles to Highway 101.
- 2 -
HISTORY and GEOLOGY
The only evidence of previous mineral exploration work on the property is the presence of older grid lines in the easterly and westerly claims.
A summary of previous work in the area of southwest Montcalm Township is contained in a separate report on the geology of the group recently submitted by Hollinger Mines Limited. This report is by D.R. Alexander and entitled "Geological Survey covering Montcalm #2 Group".
SURVEY METHODS
Linecutting:
i From a campsite along the creek, a line approximately
normal to the long axis of the creek was measured westerly for 175 feet. At a right angle a line was extended north for 1100 feet and to the south for 1200 feet. At this latter point, the 00 Base Line was turned off, again at a right angle, and extended westerly for 1600 feet to a point called 20W and easterly to 48E. The north tie line at 23N became sub-parallel but was extended easterly and westerly approximately the same distances.
Along the 00 B.L., lines 400 feet apart were extended grid north and south to cover all the claims. Stations were established at intervals of 100 feet.
H.E.M. Survey:
On the existing grid of lines, the H.E.M. survey was conducted using an EM-17 electromagnetic unit manufactured by
- 3 -
Geonics Limited of Toronto. Readings were taken at every 100 feet or less with the coils^ in the horizontal co-planar mode and 400 feet apart.
RESULTS
The results of the survey are plotted and interpreted on the accompanying plan entitled H.E.M. Survey at a scale of l inch to 200 feet.
Although many conductive zones are interpreted, most of these display such poorly conductive characteristics or such low amplitudes that they cannot be reliably attributed to bedrock features.
Anomalies A, B, and C should be selected for further examination, especially anomaly C where it crosses line 4W. At this point, a higher conductivity is displayed that may suggest a bedrock source.
RECOMMENDATIONS and CONCLUSIONS
Anomalies A and B should be reviewed against future magnetic and vertical loop electromagnetic results.
A grid of lines 200 feet apart, oriented to the
south east, should cover anomaly C prior to combined geophysical examinations consisting initially of vertical and horizontal loop electromagnetic and magnetic surveys.
- 4 -
The electromagnetic survey successfully detected a conductive zone in the northwest corner of the property that may be due to a concentration of economic sulphide mineralization. Further work is warranted.
Respectfully submitted,
H. Z. Tittley, P.Eng.
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey (s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—
GeologicalMontcalm Township
Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins , Ont. P4N 7E2
Hollinger Mines Limited ____Author of Report Dale R. AlexanderAddress of Author c/o Hollinger Mines LimitedCovering Dates of Survey. July 26-29, 1977
Total Miles of Line(linecutting to office)
12.51 miles
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer.-—Radiometric———Other-—————
DAYSper claim
Geological. 20
Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne turveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per ci;
HATE.. NOV. 23 f 1 977 SIGNATURE:
Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
ix) (number)
P ,- 451078
451079
451080
451081
451082
451083
492012
492013
492014
4^2015.
492016
492022,
492023
.492024.
492025
l
TOTAL CLAIMS. 15
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations —————————————————————————.Number of Readings Station interval ___________________________JLine spacing-^--^. Profile scale_______________________________ ,._____,
U
O
Contour interval.
Instrument —
W J W
so
Accuracy — Scale constant.Z Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———.
U Instrument ———HW Coil configurationZ*
Coil separation —Accuracy.s Method: D Fixed transmitter d Shoot back CD In line O Parallel line;Frequency-
Specify V.L.F. nation)Parameters measured.
InstrumentScale constant.Corrections made.
Z
H
wuQ Z
Base station value and location
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument ————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters — On time __________________________ Frequency ^———
- Off time ___________________________ Range ————————
— Delay time ————————————————————————— Integration time.
Power.Electrode array.Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
m.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—
Geophysical-Electromagnetic ———-—Montcalm Township———— Hollinger Mines Limited______Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2
Survey Company. Hollinger Mines Limited H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report -
Address of A..thnr 1 47 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.
Covering Dates of Survey June 10 - November 23, 1977(linecutting to office)
12.3 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer-™—Radiometric———Other______
DAYS per claim
40
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne turveyt)
Magnetometer____Electromagnetic _____ Radiometric(enter days per claim)
. Nov. 23, 1977 SIGNATURE:.Author of/Report or Agent
L- P
Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lilt numerically
(number)
- 451078*****tt***t*************4
451079
451080
451081
451082
451083
492012
492013
492014
492015
492016
492022
492023
492024
492025
TOTAL CLAIMS——15.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations. Station interval ——— Profile scale .———Contour interval.
685 589100 feet or less
.Number of Readings —JLine spacing______400 feet
u Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value -—-——
SSy
InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —— Accuracy ———^— Method: Frequency————.
Geonics EM*-17Horizontal Co-Planar
400 feetReal Component ± 2* f Imaginary Component t3l
Q Fixed transmitter 1600 Hertz
D Shoot back S3 In line D Parallel line;
Parameters measured.(specify V.L.F. station)
Real or In*-Phase and Imaginary or Out~0f-Phase
O
Instrument
Scale constant.
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
H S
Q bi U
01
Instrument ————————— Method Q Time Domain Parameters — On time ——.
- Off time —^— Delay time ———— Integration time.
D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ̂ _____ Range.—.——.-—.
Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—
Geophysical^-Electromagnetic ____Montcalm Township-———^ Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins, Ont, P4N 7E2
Survey company Hollinger Mines LimitedH. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report —
Address of Ai.ri.nr 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey Sept. l to Nov. 2 3, 1 977
(linecutting to office)2.67 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer...—Radiometric———Other—————,
DAYS per claim
40
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit, do not apply to airborne turveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic iometnc(enter day* per claim)
. Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:S f Author of
L-DRes. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(number)
500645
500646
l
TOTAL CLAIMS.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations ______181________________Number of Readings _____159Station interval 100 feet or less___________Line spacing_______400 feet
Profile scale_______________________________________,,————.,.—..—.,^.^^Contour interval.
Instrument —
u
lJ w
Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———
Instrument Geonics EM-17Coil configuration Horizontal-Co-PlanarCoil separation ________4QO feetAccuracy____Real Component ± 2*, Imaginary Component ±3%__________^
Method: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back 03 In line Q Parallel lineFrequency_____1600 Hertz_______________________________________'———
(specify V.L.F, station)Parameters measured Real (In-Phase) and Imaginary (Out-Of-Phase)________^
Instrument —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————hScale constant ——Corrections made.
>
o
N
S*
Base station value and location .
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument _____________________________________,————————S Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainO :H Parameters — On time __________________________ Frequency -
- Off time _________________:________ Range.— Delay time ————————————————————————— Integration time.
Power ——^^—-——.-——^——.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
NOTES
400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.
DATE OR ISSUE
DEC - 81977
SURVEYS AND MAPPING
POULETT Tp. M.I063
8M4
7 M -f
6 M -H
Is-
IOto 5M -h
Q.I-
Q (TOLL.-l LU CD
4M -L
2 M 4
BM 7M 6 M 5M 4M 3 M 2 M l Mi R
499287 l 499268
499290
499293
\
499294' ~ ~" ~ ~ t''
499309
Isl UmK ^
0346
9289
9295— — —
93.0
— — -
479659
P ^
460345D
48034T
p
480570U*-p.L 4805711 Pi r111 499302l
i 11l
47966O| 479661P"-"^."*-"1
460344 480343-^.-- .-^-..HP. P
480348 460339-----*------ R P.
480569 480568 .....t------P. P.480372 480373
l P11l1 499303l
46 C 342V" ^
4B034I-------P.
48UJ40
IP.11] 460567! pT ~~~~
J 480374
ii
491146 '-----JP 1
1
491130v—460563
V-^ — - -.
P.
^ 480566
P.
1 460575
491147 J— — —
IP i P i j P i p IP |p IP i1 149114/9 "li l ! 'VI l 491148 l -A 1499301,499298,480747 l 480746 |N
.U - - ̂ - 'I. 4- -l———J-——-J----^----!---J
OS'10"a p p r d i
48 0 42'49'
p Vi" '49M53^ 499300|499299
T
491154 j 491155 1491156 \ g~"~~491157 ! 491158 | 491159 [ O ! 4B0749 1480741 1480740 1480739 l- — -!——i——* L i____-J--.--,1
, ft |P IP L- —l— - — — i , p l P l-l- 8 M
491160 l 491161 i 491.62 U-L - — —teMT ifl
451069 ' 480738] 499722 | 499723'
499312
P
499311 j/'
479939 1479940 l 479944 '479945' 479947 '1 'li _^___ — — -u ———i~7~T p l P ~I
l 494701 j 494702 |4952I8^ l 495 * 1̂ !
494704 .494703 V 495220
i R r-1479938 |479941i s _ _,— _ — — l—— — — l— —
P [P IPl l
479934 i 479937 j 479942W52679
IPl ' l ' 'l 479948 |498744 498743 1498742] 496741 jl———-l--.-^4-^^^L — .l ——___ .IP i P T p r- p -j p—t l i li
301479949 |4985S9 498560 ] 49856 l [496740 j
——— -U--i-___J____ \----\a l p l p . p ,• 4-p479950
\V
491224 |49I225 l4SI226' i
--- — _ j __ _ ,- .x.,— __ .JP i P l P l
452683 l 4 " 632 I452667T1-^i~-i.-H--'-'l l 1452691 1437992 f 437993 ( l 479951
'3933951 437999 , L.____—l———s—-l— ———-r,— r s~~ t" 1 r
I498558J498557 J498562 J498T39 |
i i j__L---IlV""'r"p~i p T p l* i i i480122 ',498556 4ge563 ' 496738
1496555 |498564
4-7 M
P Pi ' l
491237 .491238 447977 (447978 J447979
' l ' ' ' j ' ,498893 |4479B3 1447982 1447981 1447960
l l l l.----L l L i
3597 j,,.,.. 438000 ! "7,94 | Wn. l""",.7"" , 4 a™ ; ____ J^ 1C J_i _ _ — —J — — — — ' — " ~ — . T ! ! y*
. . "^~ P 1i p
r
P u j p. JP IR
l 452684 j 452685 j 452686 ]4526B9 ] 479953 ! 4 79964 | 479959 j 479958
P~ l
U52688 j 452687 l 4 5829B j 458299 j 458300 147996314799601479957593405
-—-—,--.- L——J. — — .J —- —P. Tp Ip Ip jl l l l393407 ! 393406 \ 4 58305 j 458304 j 458303
---l—---r — ~-r
45830E .458301
P l R
479962 l 479961 '.4799S
l P
'5/04516 504517/1
y
/~^-
\j80395
80402
S
- — f —— - — ̂ ^——^^^-^
P, [p. P
( i
430396 '480397 4BO398
P. 'P. 1 P. l 1
480401 l 48O4OO 480399
480021 480020
P P.
u-fSOOli, 4B0023~" - - ---|------P. P.
480025 480024•p--" -p
480026 460027
393411 ! 3934.2 ] 393413 | 393414 |479977 , 479978 ( 479963 j 479984 l 479989 j 479990^ \ 479955— — — — — j. — — -p-^- — - j-- — — |- — ~ ~Tp~~^~~~~1"p~~ Tp H?1 ' i i
479976 l 479979 j 479982 1479985 J47998B ,479991479954
l 393420 l 393421479B74 l 479975 | 479980 j 479981
j-™, —- ; - ! ..1^__L —— -l——-*-~-Ir—-!r--~Tp:——p. : p- i p- : p ! R479986 1479987 j
———— -l————-f- P IP IP
'P. IP^X^XSP. '. P-
JX.
480120 ' 480111-l- - - - - -
P. P.
480049 i 480.19 480112
l
48OIIO j 460.01 i 460100
479965 ' 480148 l
, 480404 l 4804051 480406^*^80033 i 480032 i 460031 j 460030 i 480049 | 480119- -i- - ~~-i---~ - i--~--- r ---— -4 — _ ___^-._^_-_|______ H ______r._____IP IP. i P. IP. ip IP. ]p. i p, TP.
p. If*.lll
480109 l 480102P.
\
\
4B04IO i; 48O409 1480408 480407 480034 l 4BOO35 480036 480037------H-----T------~----l-----"------t-----------P. \l P l P P P P P. P.
i , i ' ' ' ; 4604M 1480412 ^60413 480^.4 4B004I 480040 480039 460038 i 480047 i 4801.T J 4601 14 l .480107
.---...-....-...-...L.. ---,-.-., r -....,-----4-.,-... (^,. ————j-..-..,.,....^.....
. 4BOI08 , 480103tR——— "Jp"
! , - -^-^J480I04
ip. L ate
1480418 ;460417 J 480416 j 480415 | 480042 | 480043 | 480044 | 480045^-,. JL - --.i..,..^.,- -^..--,
(80105
l Ny 1480I48J479966 1480147
T
479967
479966 ! 480151 l 480152
480046 460116
ip. P.
' 480419 !480420\! 460421 l 460422 l 4600M i 460079 i 4800,8 j 480077 j 48007, J 479913^-----^-----ji-r----^----^---^.--"^----^----^—--?---?"""?7 ""
(P. \
l '479914!! 4799.3
480106 (-p----1p
479923 !
! 479970
P. i 479933
479969 480154 ' 48CM53
479924 480140 i 4600g5
IP.
! j ^-n - ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~ -*-\- ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ' ~ ~IP.
492004' 492003 i 492002!492001
1452738
i P.lv 480942 480943 4B0944
P,
452742 , 452741 '-----r---~
l 480727 | v . ..!- - - - J -li-.'P
l: p-
4920O5 148O726 L,
it 48O425
i l
i 480436 i 480437
480440 i 4B0411
480428 l 480129 J 480430 J 4B043I [ 460072 l 480073 l 480074 4800_75_ 4799J2
P. P.4799H /|4Y99I6
479922
IP
i 4804)6 ' 480435V" " " " ~
l 480443
480442
•60435 J j , 4a0433 i 4a0432 l 480071 \ 480070 J 480069 [ 480068 i----rPv--rp-----|R —-i5----rp:"~"r?."""Tp"""""^^" l p.U79921
. J . ---IP.-
i 480097
*
\i 'l 492006'492007
.480992
-.492011
pp.
460946 480946 1480945 j 452743 | 452740 '452739)! f (\4907Z9 '
/•" -460444! 480445 l 48O446 ', 4 8OO64 460065 \ 4BOO66 \ 48O067 !4799.oJXl479.t7 i 47.9M. .. ̂i--L----i-----4------4- — ----t-----r~~~~~ ~'~^" - Tp '"P '^-479928 l r-? ! p ! P ^ i p - P | P ' ! P ;47..09y.-, j . ^ ̂
^•48O952
^— --. i 4607.4 480722 [N^ ^
P ip
"P.
I48O7I5/^80730| 480454 'J46045S l 480452 j 480451
l l 480449 l 480448
4B0447 ' 480063 ! 480062' 460061 i 480060 479918 i 479919
l -. J48O4S5
480 975:i , 480972 \480689
/7 ' ' /0' i ^ i (480976j7 430977^4809/6 i M (9^ ^ : z 1480688 i " "
L--&t:"~ i L480700 \ 48C709 .480713 460724
ir -l 480464 l 480465J.----.L---~-t P. IP.l'460463
"^480466
'l fl
/480143 1480098
480.44 i 480099u- - - --J-----~-
460210 l
^..-1^480484 ; 480485 480494 4fl0 2l9 480218 480217 480216— — H ^S-,- -—(- — — ~-— --^^^- .-..-.--- — - — - .*..---- r ------ 41- - - -
IR. ""^-'P. P- P. P. P- 'P ' ;p ''P. l P.
460486 ' 480493
4BOZ14- - — ~- - ~ - ~ ~~f" ~ ~ ~
480205, * P
480211
. rf*
480201 ' 460202 l 480203l 460208
^ M ^ ^ .!?48098I Ip.AeOSW,. 1. -K48069I 480698 \IR Tp AP. ""!P AT------.------I
480708 O '480717 1480723 '*/ — ^---1-- i---- —J^-* .p. ;p X--TP"^
i i4804571
^ l ii 'l 4B0467 ' 480472l R
r"---F-"--i-^M-"tp""'ip.'"' Jip.""""iv""""jp""; ? j\p. : p480477; P ' ! ' ' i ' ' !
' ' i , ' i - ' t - - — '
, 480209
i
l 480462 l 480487*~?~~~~^~~~~480195 480192480492' 480199 i48O.9B 'ivuiSf >-•^ou'fl^• i.---..i.---.-L----L-----,,- h ------ r -----^---Vr-,--- r -H----
'P. "P. \ P. S l P. l P. iP. \\ t P. -x 1 P.1 ! \i
480191
l M -h
.48 0985 J
" ' S ' \\ l ^ '460481 i 4ROIB4 \ S \ l^., 4804861 480491 460183 "HUI0 * ^ 4 80.83 460186 480.87 480188^' 480.89 480190 .
^. -,-r - rp: - ——— v ;x---. ———----- v --- p----Av .- ———--,
l S ' l"'" ' - a an in 3 J i \\i llA^aarvn
48O086 i 480083, 480703^80460': 480470 OQ 480460 480469
480.8. 460.80..^ . . . . . . . -
P P
479903 479902 47990. A-— -- - , -- - - - - - - - - - - V* '
480087p- ----T,
48O094
460540
480088 1 *' " y ' 4BCO?6 ' 451083 ! 4STI08* ' 4M08I yH 480704- - --4-\J-.- -A. . ' ^— -^--1.--- - J.---- - i- --- -*fc -l - - - - -j- ]* r pt i p ,p ^ ip. | R
tt ! 480BH3 l 480093 t?^ i^J^S 1492812 500(
i| 480640Tp~ ~ ~ " " •160 c 4 9 7
K IC/ r,^'i
1 480703 M80665 I48O666 f . i^ .-- -./-----4- ~ - -t- ~-\~l'p -"p P P- ' '-'•'T ' j^80659 *80664 460667 *• p' ~!p~ ~ ' ~'"p * p
(79&6I'.479577
1480678
1.4B0679
479569 479576 479585 . 452919TP" ' ' '
1452918
480256 [480257l 4B025B
J P.
i 479854 i 479855 ]
i P.
M 479567 l 479570 J 479575 | 479578 l 47958^S 479566^^ ^ j -- j/8^ .1 .-t------,----- ----l--- -^ rp- J- i^
480840,480841 '49281^
l 480638
480637 ' 480642 ' 460647
4B065. •'l 48O658 '480663 '4806681i,. .--J — -----i--ip 'P ip
1 46O675/\479566
\479565'P
479571 i 479574 i.,..--J.----
479579 i 479582 479587 l P.""~~t"H"
480233 480254
P.
480253 ' 460252 i 48025.
/.——— . 460244 ! 480?45 ] 480246- --- !- - - ---L -^ - - r ,^----,^ .
P , P. ' P.
480247 480249
480657 i 480662 '480669 .460681 i l 479S641
2M Ti 479572 I 479573 ' 479580 ' 479381
S-^. l l i i479588 1479589 V l 480243 1480242 \ 4 60241 l 480240 [480239 , 480238
4 M 5 M 6 M 7 M
6 M
5 M
fO
GO
4M
UJ
Z)I- a:o u.
-f Z M
4- l M
STRACHAN Tp. M. 114242B09SE00C3 2.2543 MONTCALM B00
LEGEND
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS
SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. LOTS. MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.
UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY
UTILITY LINES
NON-PERENNIAL STREAM
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION
ORIGINAL SHORELINE
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PATENT, SURFACE S MINING RIGHTS
SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
MINING RIGHTS ONLY
LEASE, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS
SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
MINING RIGHTS ONLY
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION
CROWN LAND SALE
ORDER-IN-COUNCIL
RESERVATION
CANCELLED
SAND 4 GRAVEL
SYMBOL
eQBB
• BT
c.s. oc
SCALE : 1 INCH -- 40 CHAINSO 5OO IOOO ZOOO
FEETMETRES
O 200 4OO 600 BOO l KM
ACRES HECTARES
TOWNSHIP
MONTCALMDISTRICT
COCHRANEMINING DIVISION
PORCUPINE
Ministry of Natural Resources
Ontario Surveys and Mapping BranchDate
Whitney Block Queen's Par k.Tor on to
Plan No.
M.872
-'"Vi
x- x
" X
"^"T
a4
9 if
(J!
54
92
O!
4
Spr
uce,
Pop
lar,
Birc
h
Q
som
e A
lder
s
Tit'x
ed S
pruc
e .B
irch
Popl
ar,
\4 5
l O
79
08
0
mix
ed S
pruc
e, P
opla
r, B
irch!
som
e A
lder
s Q
Ce
dar
mix
ed
Spru
ce,
Bir&
h,
with
som
e P
opla
r S
\A f t
iers
mix
ed
Spru
ce
Pop
lar
Q A
lder
s
5-4-
O-
8
Spr
ue*
with
ra
re P
ine
Quo
riz
Dia
base
- 2
)sys
tem
F -
l) sy
stem
Geo
logi
cal
Con
'ac'
(in
terp
rete
d)
Slo
sh
AS
T
HO
LL
ING
ER
M
INE
S
LT
D.
MO
NT
CA
LM
N
O.
2
GE
OL
OG
ICA
L
PL
AN
To
po
gra
ph
ica
l C
onto
ur-
Rid
ge
Pos
t
Mon
tcal
m
Twp.
O
n t.
SC
AL
E :
l"
- 2
00
2400
26
40
HOLL
INGE
R IT
XFLO
RATI
OT!
\
Sca
le;
1 in.
to
16
mi.
L E
GE
ND
--v.
____
LT
D.
NO
. 2
RV
EY
Mon
tcal
m
Twp.
O
n t.
SC
AL
E:
l"-2
0
Z6
4O
' N
ort
h
Tw
p.
L.n
e
42B09SEae03
2.2543 MONTCALM
Ministry of Natural Resources File.
OntarioGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOC
TECHNICAL DA]
2 2543 MONTCALMTO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPE] FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NC
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC, j300
Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—-
GeologicalMontcalm Township
Hollinger Mines LimitedBox 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2
Survey Company Hollinger Mines Limited_____ Author of Report Dale R. Alexander________Address of Author c/o Hollinger Mines LimitedCovering Dates of Snrvey July 2 6-29, 1977
(bnecutting to office)Total Miles of Line r..t 12.51 miles
J SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other—————
DAYS pcTcUim
Geological. 20
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magne tometer. .Electromagnetic .(enter days per
- Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:
. Radiometric
I-'**^^TL ^ *- "^— Author of Report or Agent
Res. Geo I.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
P - 451078
451079
451080
451081
451082
451083
492012
492013
492014
492015
492016
492022
492023
492024
492025
TOTAL CLAIMS 15
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations.
Station interval ——
Profile scale^—^—
Contour interval.
.Number of Readings
.Line spacing ̂ ——^-—
Z•o
Instrument
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value —-—
Z•o
Instrument
Coil configuration
Coil separation ——
Accuracy —
Method:
Frequency-
Parameters measured.
CH Fixed transmitter d Shoot back EH In line d Parallel line
(specify V.L.F. station)
Instrument
Scale constant ——
Corrections made.
Base station value and location
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument ^———————^.—
Method l~~l Time Domain
Parameters — On time ^—^—
- O ff time ——
l l Frequency Domain
— Frequency ————
__ Range ________
Delav time.
— Integration time.
Power.
Electrode array —
Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
-X 3
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Geophysical-ElectromagneticType of Survey(s) — Township or Area — Claim HnlHer(s) Hollinger Mines Limited
Montcalm Township
Survey
Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2 Hollinger Mines Limited^^
H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report .Address of Author 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.
Covering Dates of Survey June 10 - November 23, 1977(linecutting to office)
12.3 milesTotal Miles of Line Cut.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
—Electromagnetic.
—Magnetometer——
—Radiometric——
—Other-—————
DAYS per claim
40
Geological.
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.(enter days per claim)
. Radiometric
HATE- NOV, 23, 1977 ^r.MATTTPF. s -Author ofJlept)rt""or"Agent
L O
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
P - 451078
451079
451080
451081
451082
451083
492012
492013
492014
492015
492016
492022
492023
492024
492025
TOTAL CLAIMS——15.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GRQL'.ND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
589Number of Stations ____________________________Number of Readings _ Station interval ______100 feet or less_________Line spacing_______400 feet
Profile scale_________________________________________________________
Contour interval__________________________________________________________
Instrument ^-^^——^^^
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ____
'-J 1
Coil configuration Horizontal Co-Planar
~\ :
Instrument Geonics EM-17
Coil separation __________400 feetAccuracv_______Real Component ±2% > Imaginary Component ±3%__________
Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back S In line CD Parallel line
Frequency_______1600 Hertz__________________________________________________(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters me^nreH Real or In-Phase and Imaginary or Out-Of-Phase______
Instrument ____________________________________________________________________
Scale constant
Corrections made.
Base station value and location .
Elevation accuracv.
Instrument ^^^^^^—^^^^^—..—^^^—^^.^^^^^-.—.^—-—.^^——.— Method l i Time Domain l l Frequency Domain Parameters — On time ____________________________ Frequency ^^-^^
— O ff time ____________________________ Range ————^^^
— Delay time .^^^^^^^^.^^^^^.^^———-—.^————..
— Integration time ^^.^^-—-—^———^^^^^^^^^^—
Power ——^-^——^^^^^^^^^^^^^—^^-————.^—^^^^^^^^^^———^^^-^^————
Electrode array ———————————————————————————————————————————————————
Electrode spacing ______________________________________________
Type of electrode _____________________________________________
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s).
Township or Area.
Claim Holder(s)__
Geophysical-Electromagnetic _____Montcalm Township^^^^^ Hollinger Mines Limited
Survey
Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2 Hollinger Mines Limited^^^^^^
H. Z. TittleyAuthor of Report _Address of Amhm- 147 Hemlock Street, Timmins, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey Sept. l to Nov. 23, 1977
(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut. 2.67 miles
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
—Electromagnetic.
—Magnetometer_
—Radiometric——
—Other_______
DAYS per claim
40
Geological.
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATF- Nov. 23,1977 SIGNATURE:.^/ f Author ̂ TRejiorf" orient
L ORes. Geol.. .Qualifications.
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
P - 500644
500645
500646.s
lM
i
ya
TOTAL CLAIMS.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations ——————.181__________________Number of Readings _____159Station interval 100 feet or less____________Line spacing________400 feet
Profile scale-^—--^^^—-..^—^—.^—.^—^——————..^—^-^^—^—^———^^^——-^^^-——
Contour interval.
x'
s 1 to
Instrument ^——^—^^-——
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ^___
Instrument ___________GeonJCS EM-17
Coil configuration Horizontal-Co-Planar
Coil separation _________40Q feetAccuracv_____Real Component t2%, Imaginary Component ±31_____________
Method: d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Cxl In line d Parallel line
Frequency_____1600 Hertz_______________________________________________(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters immured Real (In-Phase) and Imaginary (Out-Of-Phase)————————
Instrument ____________________________________________________________________
Scale constant
Corrections made.
Base station value and location
Elevation accuracv.
Instrument _____________________________________________________ Method di Time Domain d Frequency Domain
Parameters — On time ___________________________ Frequency ^—^—
- Off time ______________________________ Range .
— Delav time ___________________________
— Integration time .
Power ________________
Electrode arrav
Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
top related