friday, session 6 - paper 5 regulating and standardizing...

Post on 28-Jul-2018

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

Regulating and Standardizing Directive Antenna Patterns to Improve Coexistence

Dr. Haim Mazar

RF Spectrum Management and Engineering

h.mazar@atdi.com

IEEE MTT 2018 Texas Symposium on Wireless and Microwave Circuits and Systems

Baylor University, Waco, Texas

April 5-6, 2018

Friday, Session 6 - Paper 5

2

Outline

• Regulation & standardization of ant. patterns is essential to optimize the RF spectrum re-usage

• ITU, ETSI and FCC provide the most useful reference envelopes around the world

• ETSI limits are more restrictive than FCC and the 2018 revision of ITU pattern is significant

• New theoretical evidence for the proposed revision of ITU Recommendation and amendments to restrict FCC and to loosen ETSI standards

• Future work: revision of other ITU antenna patterns such as F.758 and M.1336

3

RxA ant sidelobe gets interference from TxB signal

4

Mti-799001 (2’, 49.2 dBi, 71 GHz D/λ=154 θ3=0.50) with or without update

F. 10699- 0

0

Off-axis angle (degrees)

–80

Ant

enn

a g

ain

(dB

i)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

–40

–20

0

20

40

60

Rec. ITU-R F.699 recommends 2.1.1 MT-799001

Rec. ITU-R F.699 recommends 2.1.2

–60

5

F.699 patterns vs square and circular apertures; explaining 32- 25 log j for j < 120

6

ETSI RPEs for class 4 antennas in 71– 86 GHz

when XPD angle > 150, no difference between parallel and XPD sidelobes

7

Co-polar; 10.6 GHz; ITU, ETSI, FCC versus RFS-UXA4

RFS UXA4 is valid FCC category A and ETSI class 2, not ETSI class 4: sidelobes above 900 are higher than the class 4 limit

8

CP; 72 GHz; ITU, ETSI, FCC, MT-799001

MT799001 is valid FCC category A and ETSI class 4

9

XPD; 72 GHz; ETSI, FCC, measurement

MT799001 is valid FCC and ETSI class 4

10

Summary

• Similar to the policy of ‘laissez faire laissez passer’ for Tx

spurious emissions, for antenna patterns Europe is more

restrictive than USA and Japan

• Europe having many borders among countries (relative to USA

& Japan) & Europe being more condensed than US in

population

• In USA real antenna patterns are more restrictive than FCC

masks; Americas may aim to category A limits

• The 2018 F.699 envelope, proposed by the author, offers

improved spectrum sharing (also for 5G backhaul networks),

while maintaining system performance and implementation

feasibility

11

The IEEE text is found at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8400643/ & http://mazar.atwebpages.com/Downloads/AntennasPatterns_2018_IEEE_Texas_Mazar_8400643_2018-04-06.pdf

top related