fpirc 2016 mfpm presentation · 2018-10-24 · microsoft powerpoint - fpirc 2016 mfpm...
Post on 06-Aug-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Georgia Institute of Technology | Marquette University | Milwaukee School of Engineering | North Carolina A&T State University | Purdue University | University of California, Merced | University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign | University of Minnesota | Vanderbilt University
Fluid Power Innovation & Research ConferenceMinneapolis, MN | October 10 - 12, 2016
Four-Quadrant Multi-Fluid Pump/Motor
John Lumkes, PhDPurdue University
FPIRC16 2
Project Overview / Title Major Objectives/Deliverables
Next Steps
• What are your research goals?• Design, Simulate, and Evaluate the
Feasibility of Mechanically Actuated Multi-fluid Pump/Motors
• How does this project fit into the CCEFP’s overall research strategy?
• Efficiency, Effectiveness, Environment • What is the original contribution of this
project?• Novel mechanical control of digital
pump/motors• What is the competing research or
methods? Why / what makes this technology better than the competition? What has been done in the past?
• Improvement of conventional units, other digital pump/motors (DPM)
• Efficiency, Controllability, Fluids• Electrical valve control for DPM
• What is planned for the next six months to one year?
• Develop the simulation and analyze test data for pump prototype
• How can industry help / contribute? • Component support/sponsorship
• Analyze test results from mechanically actuated pump
• Modify current digital pump/motor model and validate model using pump
• Simulate and design mechanical control four-quadrant pump/motor
• Experimentally test
FPIRC16 3
MotivationMotivation
• In the United States– 2-3% of the energy transferred by fluid power– More than $50B/year, 7-8% of total CO2– Mobile systems average 22% in efficiency
• Pump improvement impacts systems– Pumps are ubiquitous in fluid power systems– Max system efficiency ~ pump efficiency– Smarter systems and configurations require better
pumps to maximize effectiveness
FPIRC16 4
Research Outline
Cam Types
Valve Configuration
Implementation
Valve Improvement (Testing valves and incorporating 1E.6)
Control Algorithms(Mode Switching and Valve Timing)
Sensor Reduction
Four-QuadrantMulti-Fluid Pump/Motor
FPIRC16 5
AdvantagesAdvantages
• Advantages over state-of-the-art units◦ Eliminate valve plate losses◦ Leakage scales closely with
displacement◦ Pumping of non-conventional fluids
(water)
• Advantages over other digital units in literature
◦ On/Off valves can open against high pressure Freedom in operating strategies Four quadrant operation
◦ Self starting in motoring Digital displacement control
FPIRC16 6
AdvantagesDisadvantages
• Disadvantages(Electrically Actuated Valves)
◦ Additional electrical power consumption for valves
◦ Flow area of valves is less than traditional port plates
◦ Valve timing is critical for efficiency◦ Requires additional sensors and
embedded controls
Digital displacement control
FPIRC16 7
Operating Strategies
Digital displacement control
◦ Flow Diverting Excess flow taken into the
chamber is diverted back to the low pressure port
◦ Flow Limiting Amount of flow taken into the
chamber is limited to the desired flow
◦ Sequential (Diverting or Limiting)
Individual cylinders are operated at full or zero displacement
4
20 BarInlet
320 BarOutlet
Valve 1 Valve 2
FPIRC16 8
Operating Strategies
Digital displacement control
◦ Flow Diverting Excess flow taken into the
chamber is diverted back to the low pressure port
◦ Flow Limiting Amount of flow taken into the
chamber is limited to the desired flow
◦ Sequential (Diverting or Limiting)
Individual cylinders are operated at full or zero displacement
4
20 BarInlet
320 BarOutlet
Valve 1 Valve 2
FPIRC16 9
Simulation Model• Matlab Simscape
– Physics Based Modeling
• Piston, cylinder, valve– Includes compressibility– Considers effect of valve losses– Considers leakage between piston
and cylinder– Includes valve throttling losses– Includes valve electrical
consumption
Simulation Model
FPIRC16 10
Simulation Model
Simulation Results
Errors in valve delay, 1ms transition Effect of valve transition, 1ms delay
FPIRC16 11
Experimental Test StandMulti-piston digital pump/motor test stand
• 3-piston digital pump/motor
• Two on/off valves per piston
• Three 2,000 Hz pressure transducers
• Check valve
• Two accumulators
FPIRC16 12
Research Outline
Cam Types
Valve Configuration
Implementation
Valve Improvement (Testing valves and incorporating 1E.6)
Control Algorithms(Mode Switching and Valve Timing)
Sensor Reduction
FPIRC16 13
Operating Strategy State Analysis
FPIRC16 14
Mechanically Actuated Valves(MAV)
Advantages of cam driven valves:o Fast actuationo Consistento No electrical energy neededo Less complex controls and data
acquisitiono Most spring energy will be
recovered in closing
FPIRC16 15
Cam Types
Simulation
FPIRC16 16
Cam TypesSimulation Key Variables
Compression Angle: amount of shaft rotation needed to decompress the fluid
Transition Angle: amount of degrees to transition from closed to open valve state or vice versa
o Affects cam pressure angle
FPIRC16 17
Cam ProfilesSimulation Results
1000
psi
2000
psi
FPIRC16 18
Cam Phasing
Planetary
FPIRC16 19
ImplementationRadial Piston Pump
FPIRC16 20
Implementation
Inline Piston Pump
FPIRC16 21
Prototype (+video)
FPIRC16 22
• Prototype Pump Mechanism ready to test on existing digital pump/motor test stand
• Simulation study continuing (PumpLinx)• Next steps flow out of this intersection of test
data and simulation study
Summary
top related