flat track commission...the second definition is much more prominent, which ... fuel tank thermal...
Post on 17-Mar-2020
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2
Meeting Agenda
1. Opening of the meeting
Comments by the AMA Track Racing Manager – Ken Saillant
2. Brief Review of Commission Progress since December 2019
Conference Call 2/26/2019
Draft A 4/20/2019
Draft B 7/20/2019
Draft C
3. Current Status of Commission
December 2018 Proposals and These Proposals are for 2020 rule book
December 2019 Meeting will kick off 2021 rule book
4. Rule Proposals #FT-0919-01 thru Rule Proposal #FT-0919-20, for inclusion in the
2020 AMA Rule Book.
5. New Discussion Items
6. Preliminary Info Concerning the December 6-8, 2019 On-Site Meeting in Columbus
7. Closing of the meeting
3
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-01 Page: 128 Section: 3.1 Chapter: B Paragraph: 2
CURRENT:
The AMA, on the basis of participation and achievement in District-level competition, shall classify riders unless otherwise provided by AMA rules.
PROPOSED:
The AMA does not classify racers for Flat Track, TT, or Ice Race competition at the National
level. Racer classification is established at the recognized district level on the basis of
participation and achievement in competition. All recognized District Organizations and
competition partners are empowered and encouraged to implement a Racer Advancement
System.
REASON:
This is a redefined version of FT-1218-5, which was tabled at the December 2018 meeting, and
later approved, albeit not through a formal vote. The AMA does not classify riders for track
racing competition at the National level, so our rule book should not say that they do.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
4
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-02 Page: 131 Section: 3.2 Chapter: B
PROPOSED:
Replace all references to “DTX” with “Production”.
REASON:
For clarity.
This was tabled as Agenda #6 in the December 2018 meeting. A Working Group was formed,
who concluded on the name change to “Production”.
“DTX” currently has two different meanings. In some cases, “DTX” means “motorcycles with
minimal modifications beyond stock form”. In other cases, “DTX” means “a motocross machine
that has been modified for dirt track use”. The second definition is much more prominent, which
leads to confusion when a promoter offers a “DTX” class. Renaming the “stock” classes to
“Production” will alleviate this confusion.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
5
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-03 Page: 131 Section: 3.2 Chapter: B Paragraph:
CURRENT:
DTX Class Standards
PROPOSED
The following changes/modifications are NOT PERMITTED on Flat Track, TT and Ice
Race Production Class machines:
a) Air Box
b) Air Box Vent Tube
c) Air Filter Screen
d) Air Intake Boot
e) Axles
f) Brake Rotor Size (thickness/diameter)
g) Brake Master Cylinder
h) Carburetor (including any parts with exception to jets)
i) Clutch (any part including clutch cover) 2
j) Crankshaft Stroke Length
k) Cylinder Bore Size 1
l) EFI Throttle Body 5
m) Electronics 5
n) Exhaust Control Valve (ECV)
o) Exhaust Pipe (any part)
p) Frame 3
q) Front Forks 4
r) Front Fork Caps
s) Intake Diameter
t) Intake Spacer
u) Internal Engine Components (blue printing is not permitted) 2
v) Lower Triple Clamp
w) Oil Injection System (only oil may be in system) 6
x) Rear Shock 4
y) Reed Valve Assembly (any part)
z) Shaft Drive ring and pinion [3.2.B.10]
6
aa) Silencer (tip may be modified to accept spark arrestor)
bb) Subframe 3
cc) Swing arm 3
dd) Transmission (any internal part)
ee) Yamaha PW50 Start/Run/Off Switch
ff) Water Pump Assembly (any part except the cover)
b. Clarifications:
a) 1 Cylinder re-plating is allowed. The original manufacturer’s bore must be
retained.
b) 2 Clutch plates, pistons, and piston rings may be aftermarket as long as they
maintain the stock shape, design, and material of the OEM parts. High
compression pistons are not permitted.
c) 3 Material may be added to the production frame or swing arm for strength,
including welding. These changes shall not affect frame geometry.
d) 4 OEM front and rear suspension can be altered with internal modifications
only. Shock linkage and suspension spring rates may be changed to any
commercially available part.
e) 5 Programming or mapping changes to the stock OEM ECU unit are allowed.
f) 6 For engines with oil injection systems, the system must be fully functional and
only oil may be put in the reservoir. Pre-mix gasoline is not permitted in the oil-
injection system. [3.2.B.9]
c. The following additions are NOT PERMITTED on Flat Track, TT, and Ice Race
Production Class machines:
a) Adjustable Leak Jet
b) Bark Busters (closed end or wrap-around metal hand guards)
c) Fork Brace
d) Radiator Fan
d. The following additions, changes, or modifications ARE ALLOWED on Flat Track,
TT, and Ice Race Production Class machines:
a) Air Filter
b) Anodizing (may be added to any external aluminum part)
c) Brake Lever and Perch
d) Brake Line
e) Brake Pads
f) Brake Pedal (Mini bikes that are only equipped with hand brakes may not add
a foot brake)
g) Brake Snake
h) Chain, Chain Rollers, and Chain Guard
i) Clutch Lever and Perch
j) Cosmetic Items (provide that there is no performance advantage)
7
k) Counter Shaft Cover (may be removed)
l) Foam (may be added to any part)
m) Foot Pegs
n) Fork Bleeders
o) Frame Guard
p) Fuel Screw (adjustable)
q) Fuel Tank (Carbon Fiber or carbon composite fuel tanks are not permitted
unless homologated)
r) Fuel Tank Thermal Cover (including heat tape)
s) Gripper Tape
t) Hand Guard (plastic open ended only)
u) Holeshot Device
v) In-line Water Cooler
w) Ignition Cover
x) Number Plates
y) Oil Cooler
z) Power Valve Actuator Hose Kit
aa) Radiator Side Shrouds
bb) Radiator and Radiator Hoses
cc) Radiator Guard and/or Brace
dd) Rims
ee) Rim Locks (may add, remove, or change)
ff) Seat (cover or foam)
gg) Shifter Lever
hh) Shock Linkage (commercially available parts)
ii) Skid Plate
jj) Spokes
kk) Sprockets
ll) Steering Stabilizer / Damper [3.2.C.10.d] [3.3.H.4.c]
mm) Throttle Tube
nn) Triple Clamp upper/top
oo) Water Pump Cover
pp) Wheel hubs
REASON:
Harmonize with MX Standards. The MX Limited Class Quick reference charts will also be
adopted and incorporated, although wheel size, and wheel hubs shall be allowed to be modified
in Production classes.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
8
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-04 Page: 132 Section: 3.2 Chapter: C Paragraph: 1.c
CURRENT:
The frame used by a rider to qualify may not be changed, though engines may be.
PROPOSED:
Delete.
REASON:
This rule is not universally enforced, so it should not be in the rule book as a requirement.
The commission approved FT-1218-11 at the December 2018 meeting to delete this language
from 3.2.C.1.c and 3.2.C.8.d.4. At the same meeting, the Commission approved FT-1218-18 to
remove similar language from 3.3.C.2.
The AMA Board of Directors rejected the Commission recommendations without explanation.
The Commission hereby states that these rules discourage racers from participating in AMA
Events. Most racers travel hundreds – maybe thousands – of miles to participate in the nearest
AMA Flat Track event(s). To be turned away due to a machine failure will encourage that racer
to avoid AMA events in the future.
Furthermore, transponder scoring is growing in prominence, which means that “qualifying” takes
place during “practice” at those events. But not all events are scored by transponders. Which
means at some AMA events, a rider may change bikes after practice with no penalty, while at
other events, a rider may not change bikes after practice.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
9
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-05 Page: 138 Section: 3.2 Chapter: E Paragraph: 1
CURRENT:
On tracks one half mile and larger, abrasion resistant outer gear is required. Abrasion resistant
equals leather, Cordura, air mesh, or stretch Kevlar.
PROPOSED:
On tracks one half mile and larger, abrasion resistant outer gear is strongly encouraged.
REASON:
This rule is not universally enforced, so it should not be in the rule book as a requirement.
RDO’s and Competition Partners are encouraged to add this rule to their supplemental rules,
but only if they intend to enforce it.
Youth racers, women racers, and part-time racers frequently object to this requirement.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
10
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-06 Page: 138 Section: 3.2 Chapter: E Paragraph: 3
CURRENT:
Boots must be at least 8 inches high.
PROPOSED:
Boots must extend above the ankle.
REASON:
Small boots worn by youth racers and very small adults usually do not extend 8 inches above
the ankle and yet offer adequate protection.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
11
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-07 Page: 138 Section: 3.2 Chapter: E Paragraph: 4
CURRENT:
A steel skid shoe must have a curved front that extends at least 2” over the toe of the boot.
PROPOSED:
A steel skid shoe must have a curved front that extends over the toe of the boot.
REASON:
Steel shoes worn by youth racers and very small adults usually do not extend 2” over the toe of
the boot.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
12
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-08 Page: 139 Section: 3.2 Chapter: E
CURRENT:
NEW
PROPOSED:
Most AMA sanctioned meets do not offer racer medical insurance. All racers are strongly
discouraged from participating in any AMA sanctioned meet if they do not have their own
medical insurance.
All racers and other personnel must assess for themselves the track, the facilities, the existing
track conditions, the anticipated future track conditions, their choice of protective equipment,
their skill level, the skill level of the other competitors with whom they will be racing with, their
comfort level on their machines, their comfort level on the course, and all other matters relating
to safety.
It is the sole responsibility of each racer – or the parents of legal guardians of minor racers – to
select the apparel that will provide the appropriate level of protection for the risks from
participating in AMA competition.
There are several other forms of personal protection that exist in the marketplace. Each racer
must choose which additional forms of protection are appropriate for them, based on their
personal risk assessment of their anticipated racing activities.
Studies by the Flat Track Safety Group (http://www.flattracksafetygroup.org/) have determined
that a large percentage of critical injuries sustained during Flat Track, TT, and Ice Race
competition result from blunt force trauma to the thoracic area. The side rib cage – the area
between the arm pits and the hips - are particularly susceptible to severe injury from side
impact, commonly resulting in broken ribs, punctured lungs, or other internal injuries.
Note: Roost protectors do not offer significant protection to the rib cage, thoracic region, or
internal organs in the event of a crash. They are designed to deflect rocks kicked up by other
racers.
Motorcycle protective vests, motorcycle safety vests, and 360-degree thoracic vests may
provide additional protection to the thoracic area, thoracic spine, and the side rib cage area in
particular.
Body armor, impact armor, and leathers with built-in armor may provide additional protection
against broken limbs or damaged shoulder/elbow/knee joints.
13
Leathers with inflatable air bags may offer additional protection against chest and neck injuries,
and may stabilize the cervical spine and/or head during a crash.
Neck braces may offer additional protection to the cervical spine area and the base of the skull.
Back protector, vertebrae protector and spine protectors may offer increased protection to the
spine and vertebrae against blunt force trauma.
REASON:
To provide improved guidance to racers and parents of youth racers about the importance of
selecting appropriate protective equipment.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
14
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-09 Page: 142 Section: 3.3 Chapter: C Paragraph: 6
CURRENT:
To participate in a Main event, the rider must start all heat and semi events, as required, for that
class.
PROPOSED:
Delete.
REASON:
This rule is not universally enforced, so it should not be in the rule book as a requirement.
RDO’s and Competition Partners are encouraged to add this rule to their supplemental rules,
but only if they intend to enforce it.
Submitted By: Levi Mayer
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
15
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-10 Page: 144 Section: 3.3 Chapter: C Paragraph: 11
CURRENT:
11. A rider whose machine is disabled before reaching the finish line may, under his/her own
physical power, push or carry his/her machine (in the direction of the track) across the finish line
to receive the checkered flag. Provided he/she completes at least 50 percent of the number of
laps as the winner, a rider who finishes in this manner will be considered as having completed
the event.
PROPOSED:
Delete.
REASON:
This rule is not universally enforced, so it should not be in the rule book as a requirement.
RDO’s and Competition Partners are encouraged to add this rule to their supplemental rules,
but only if they intend to enforce it.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
16
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-11 Page: 145 Section: 3.3 Chapter: C Paragraph: 18
APPROVED (FT-1218-25 from December 2018 meeting):
At all events, the number of riders allowed to start any race should take into account the width
and length of the course, run-off room available, the ability of all riders to negotiate the first
corner without incident, and the speed and skill level of the class(es) being run. Allowing more
than 12 riders on any flat track course for any race is not recommended, due to the lack of run-
off room and the amount of clear track available to each rider.
PROPOSED (addition):
When a class has 13 or 14 participants, and the referee has no safety concerns, the referee is
empowered to start all competitors in that class final so as to eliminate the need to run a semi in
that class or to eliminate one or two racers from that class final.
REASON:
Added an exception that is currently used.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
17
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-12 Page: 147 Section: 3.3 Chapter: G
CURRENT:
NEW
PROPOSED:
Two-Stroke Displacement
Youth Racer Age
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0-51cc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No
52cc-65cc No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
66cc-85cc No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
86cc-250cc No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
251cc-Up No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes
Four-Stroke Displacement
Youth Racer Age
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0-51cc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No
52cc-90cc No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
91cc-125cc No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
126cc-150cc No No No No No Y** Y** Y** Yes Yes Yes Yes
151cc-250cc No No No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
251cc-Up No No No No No No No No No No Yes Yes
Y** = Yes for air-cooled, No for water-cooled
REASON:
Provide a quick-reference guide to allow parents and promoters alike to quickly identify which
size machines a youth of a certain age is eligible to compete on.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
18
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-13 Page: 147 Section: 3.3 Chapter: G
CURRENT:
Class Age Requirement Engine Size Engine Type
1. 50cc DTX Jr,. 4-6 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Single-speed automatic. Maximum wheelbase 36 inches. Maximum wheel size 10 inches. Maximum seat height 24 inches.
Class Age Requirement Engine Size Engine Type
2. 50cc DTX Sr. 7-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Single-speed automatic. Maximum wheelbase 41 inches. Maximum wheel size 12 inches. Retrofitted 12 inch wheels are permitted. OEM parts must be used.
Class Age Requirement Engine Size Engine Type
3. 50cc DTX PeeWee Shaft 4-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
Single-speed automatic oil-injected. Maximum wheelbase 36 inches. Maximum wheel size 10 inches. Maximum seat height 22 inches.
Class Age Requirement Engine Size Engine Type
4. 50cc DTX Peewee 4-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Single or multi-speed automatic. Maximum wheelbase 38 inches. Maximum wheel size 10 inches. Maximum seat height 22 inches.
PROPOSED:
Class Age Requirement
Engine Size Engine Type
1. 50cc Production Chain Drive Jr. 4-6 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, with chain drive. Wheelbase: 36 inches maximum. Wheel size: 10 inches maximum. Typical entries in this class include machines from KTM, Cobra, LEM, etc.
19
Class Age Requirement
Engine Size Engine Type
2. 50cc Production Chain Drive Sr. 7-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, with chain drive. Wheelbase: 41 inches maximum. Wheel size: 12 inches maximum. Typical entries in this class include machines from KTM, Cobra, LEM, etc.
Class Age Requirement
Engine Size Engine Type
3. 50cc Production PW Shaft Drive 4-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke oil-injected
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, with shaft drive. Wheelbase: 36 inches maximum. Wheel size: 10 inches maximum. Typical entries in this class are the Yamaha PW50.
Class Age Requirement
Engine Size Engine Type
4. 50cc Production Chain Drive Shifter 4-8 years 0-51cc 2-stroke
0-51cc 4-stroke
Transmission: Single speed automatic or multi-speed automatic, with chain drive. Wheelbase: 38 inches maximum. Wheel size: 10 inches maximum. Typical entries in this class are the Honda XR50 and CRF50F, and Yamaha TTR50.
REASON:
This was tabled as Agenda #4 in the December 2018 meeting. A Working Group was formed,
who recommended the modifications listed above. Most notable changes:
- Updated the title of each class for clarity
- Removed seat heights
The models listed in each class are an attempt to clarify to parents and promoters which bike
belongs into which 50cc class.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
20
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-14 Page: 150 Section: 3.3 Chapter: H Paragraph: 5
APPROVED (Agenda #3 from December 2018):
PROPOSED
Class Engine Size
1. 200cc 86cc-200cc
2. 250cc 201cc-250cc
3. 450cc 251cc-450cc
4. 451cc-Open 451cc – Open
5. Veteran 30+ 201cc - Open
6. Senior 40+ 201cc – Open
7. Super Senior 50+ 201cc - Open
8. Women 12+ 201cc - Open
Production Classes
Class Engine Size
1. 200cc Production 86cc-200cc
2. 250cc Production 201cc-250cc
3. 450cc Production 251cc-450cc
Class Age Requirement Engine Size
1. 200cc 12+ years 86cc - 200cc
2. 250cc 12+ years 201cc - 250cc
3. 450cc 14+ years 251cc - 450cc
4. 505cc 14+ years 251cc - 505cc
5. Open Lightweight 12+ years 250cc minimum
6. Open Heavyweight 14+ years 450cc minimum
7. Veteran 30+ years 201cc minimum
8. Senior 40+ years 201cc minimum
9. Super Senior 50+ years 201cc minimum
10. Women 12+ years 201cc minimum
Production Classes
Class Age Requirement Engine Size
1. 200cc Production 12+ years 86cc – 200cc
2. 250cc Production 12+ years 201cc – 250cc
3. 450cc Production 14+ years 251cc – 450cc
Wheelbase: 53 inches minimum Wheel size, front: 18” minimum Wheel size, rear: 18” minimum
21
REASON:
For safety reasons, added wheelbase and wheel size limits to the amateur classes to prevent a
mini bike (example, a bored/stroked CRF150R) from running against full sized machines.
The 53” wheelbase came from the MX Section 1.3.L.
Also expanded the Class list to reflect more accurately the amateur classes that are offered at
various RDO’s across the country.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
22
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-15 Page: 150 Section: 3.3 Chapter: H Paragraph: 5
CURRENT:
Class Class Name Engine Size
9 Vintage Pre-1975 201cc – Open
10 Modern Vintage Pre-1980
Exclusion – 4-valve 500cc
PROPOSED:
REASON:
To better align the Amateur Vintage classes with Section 3.9. This was Tabled as FT-1218-27
at the December 2018 meeting. A Working Group was formed and suggested the above.
Submitted By: Bert Sumner
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
Class Notes
9. 1913-1932 Era Vintage (brake-less) See 3.9
10. 1933-1951 Era Vintage (brake-less**) See 3.9
11. 1952-1968 Era Vintage (brake-less**) See 3.9
12. 1969-1976 Era Vintage (with brakes) See 3.9
13. 1977-1988 Era Vintage (with brakes) See3.9
** 1933-1951 and 1952-1968 Era Vintage must run brakes at TT meets.
23
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-16 Page: 208 Section: 3.8
CURRENT:
NEW
PROPOSED:
The maximum opening between spokes on all wheels shall not exceed 3”. A cover must be
fitted to the right side of the rear wheel that covers the spokes from rim to hub. If the maximum
of 3” between spokes is exceeded on the front wheel then a wheel cover that covers the spokes
from rim to hub on the left side is required
.
REASON:
Safety. This was tabled as FT-1218-32 at the December 2018 meeting, but reintroduced here
with refined language.
Submitted By: Kelly Inman
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
24
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-17 Page: 214 Section: 3.9 Chapter: C
CURRENT:
NEW
PROPOSED:
Add a comprehensive list of motorcycles that were approved for AMA Class C competition from
1949-1989.
REASON:
This was originally submitted as FT-1218-33, which was rejected at the December 2018
meeting due to the information being on a non-AMA web site. This new proposal is to include
the list within the AMA Rulebook to inform Vintage racers (and promoters) of this great resource
for knowing exactly when each motorcycle was approved for competition.
Submitted By: Bill Milburn
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
25
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-18 Page: 227 Section: 3.9 Chapter: G
CURRENT:
1970s Vintage 750cc
Era: 1969-1976
Configurations: 361cc-750cc
PROPOSED:
1970s Vintage 750cc
Era: 1969-1976
Configurations: 251cc-750cc two-stroke multis, 361cc-750cc two-stroke singles, 361cc-750cc
four-stroke singles, or 361cc-750cc four-stroke multis.
REASON:
To more accurately reflect the rules of the era.
Submitted By: Bill Millburn
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
26
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-19 Page: 230 Section: 3.9 Chapter: G
CURRENT:
1980s Vintage 500cc
Era: 1977-1988
Configurations: 0-504cc four-stroke singles
PROPOSED:
1980s Vintage 500cc
Era: 1977-1988
Configurations: 251cc-500cc two-stroke singles, or 251cc-504cc four-stroke singles.
REASON:
To more accurately reflect the rules of the era.
Submitted By: Bill Millburn
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
27
American Motorcyclist Association Proposal for Rule Book Revision
Flat Track Commission
Proposal: FT-0919-20 Page: 231 Section: 3.9 Chapter: G
CURRENT:
CLASS: 1980s Vintage 750cc
Era: 1977-1988
Acceptable Configurations: 375cc-500cc two-stroke single, 504cc-750cc four-stroke singles, or
501cc-750cc four-stroke twins
APPROVED (FT-1218-35 at December 2018 meeting):
CLASS: 1980s Vintage 750cc
Era: 1977-1988
Acceptable Configurations: 504cc-750cc four-stroke singles, or 501cc-750cc four-stroke twins
PROPOSED:
CLASS: 1980s Vintage 750cc
Era: 1977-1988
Acceptable Configurations: 505cc-750cc four-stroke singles, 251cc-750cc two-stroke twins, or
251cc-750cc four-stroke twins
REASON:
To more accurately reflect the rules of the era.
Submitted By: Bill Millburn
Decision: _____ Yes _____ No _____ Amended
top related