figures from chapter 3 - duck and goose distinctionsetheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21445/4/4. appendix 3 -...

324

Appendix 3~

Figures from Chapter 3 - Duck and goose distinctions

All measurements are in millimetres unless stated

Coracoid

Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2

Figure 3.3 Figure 3.4

Figure 3.5 Figure 3.6

325

Scapula

Humerus

Figure 3.7 Figure 3.8

Figure 3.9 Figure 3.10

Figure 3.11 Figure 3.12

326

Humerus

Figure 3.15

Figure 3.13 Figure 3.14

Figure 3.16

Figure 3.17 Figure 3.18

327

Figure 3.19 Figure 3.20

Figure 3.21 Figure 3.22

Figure 3.23 Figure 3.24

328

Ulna

Figure 3.25

Figure 3.26 Figure 3.27

329

Radius

Carpometacarpus

Figure 3.29 Figure 3.28

Figure 3.30 Figure 3.31

Figure 3.32 Figure 3.33

330

Figure 3.34 Figure 3.35

Figure 3.36 Figure 3.37

Figure 3.38

331

Carpometacarpus classification results summary

Original group Predicted Group Membership

Total

Duck Goose

Count Duck 368 4 372

Goose 5 144 149

% Duck 98.9 1.1 100

Goose 3.4 96.6 100

98.3% of original grouped cases correctly classified.

Measurements Cmcgl

Cmcbp

Cmcdp

Cmchp

Cmcli

Cmcdi1

Cmcbfi

Cmclfi

Cmcdid

Box’s M sig. 0.000

Wilks’ Lambda

sig.

0.000

Function 1

% of Variance

100.0

Figure 3.39

332

Femur

Figure 3.40 Figure 3.41

Figure 3.42 Figure 3.43

Figure 3.44 Figure 3.45

333

Femur classification results summary

Original group Predicted Group Membership

Total

Duck Goose

Count Duck 433 6 439

Goose 18 126 144

% Duck 98.6 1.4 100.0

Goose 12.5 87.5 100.0

95.9% of original grouped cases correctly classified.

Measurements Femurgl

Femurlm

Femursc

Femurbp

Femurdp

Femurdcap

Femurbd

Femurdd

Femurdfib

Femurdmed

Box’s M sig. 0.000

Wilks’

Lambda sig.

0.000

Function 1

% of Variance

100.0

Figure 3.46

Figure 3.47

334

Tibiotarsus

Figure 3.48 Figure 3.49

Figure 3.50 Figure 3.51

Figure 3.52 Figure 3.53

335

Tibiotarsus classification results summary

Original group Predicted Group Membership

Total

Duck Goose

Count Duck 384 10 394

Goose 1 119 120

% Duck 97.5 2.5 100.0

Goose 0.8 99.2 100.0

97.9% of original grouped cases correctly classified.

Measurements Tbtgl

Tbtla

Tbtsc

Tbtdip

Tbtbpcn

Tbtlcf

Tbtlpcf

Tbtbd

Tbtdd

Box’s M sig. 0.000

Wilks’ Lambda

sig.

0.000

Function 1

% of Variance

100.0

Figure 3.54

336

Tarsometatarsus

Figure 3.55 Figure 3.56

Figure 3.57 Figure 3.58

Figure 3.59 Figure 3.60

337

+

Measurements Tmtgl

Tmtlm

Tmtsc

Tmtbp

Tmtlhyp1

Tmtlhyp2

Tmtbd

Tmtbd34

Box’s M sig. 0.000

Wilks’ Lambda

sig.

0.000

Function 1

% of Variance

100.0

Tarsometatarsus classification results summary

Original group Predicted Group Membership

Total

Duck Goose

Count Duck 435 7 442

Goose 0 116 116

% Duck 98.4 1.6 100.0

Goose 0.0 100.0 100.0

98.7% of original grouped cases correctly classified.

Figure 3.61 Figure 3.62

Figure 3.63