evolution of air pollution monitoring in ottawa · map pollution concentration spatially hour by...

Evolution of Air Pollution Evolution of Air Pollution

Natty Urquizo and Martha Robinson Environmental Sustainability & Public Health City of OttawaHamilton February 2012

Evolution of Air Pollution Monitoring in Ottawa Evolution of Air Pollution Monitoring in Ottawa

Reasons for Air Quality MonitoringReasons for Air Quality Monitoring

� Although Ottawa has good air, OMA (2008) estimates over 500/yr premature deaths

� Windsor – Quebec City Corridor is the

2

� Windsor – Quebec City Corridor is the most polluted in the country

� There was a single NAPS for 2,700 km2

up to 2007� Measuring is essential for air pollution

management

� Map pollution concentration spatially hour by hour to identify patterns (“hot spots”)� One full year of monitoring (Jul’07-Jun’08) six

major pollutants:� Nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, NOx)

Pilot Project OverviewPilot Project Overview

3

� Nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, NOx)� Ground Level ozone� Carbon Monoxide� Particulate Matter 2.5

� Three months of integrating satellite data and ground monitoring stations

Pilot Project PartnersPilot Project Partners

� GeoConnections - NRCan, main sponsor

� Transport Canada

� Environment Canada

Ontario Ministry of the Environment

4

� Ontario Ministry of the Environment

� Ottawa International Airport

� Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs – Quebec

Ground Level Monitoring LocationsGround Level Monitoring Locations

5

ValidationValidation

� Mobile labs in 8 sites across the city

6

� One road side monitor

Transportation Impact on NO2Transportation Impact on NO2

NO2 > 50ppb 2007-12-10 - 2007-12-12Percentage of time when NO2 above 50 ppb

Standard:

7

Standard:EU 79 ppb/hrUS 100 ppb/hrCAN 200 ppb/hr

Maximum PM2.5Maximum PM2.5

•Standard30 µg/m3

•NO safe level•Local

8

•Local source

September 14th 2007 Episode Montreal InfluenceSeptember 14th 2007 Episode Montreal Influence

� The impact of transboundary pollution due to a high pressure system

9

pollution due to a high pressure system

� Gradient shown by satellite data� Effects of precipitation

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Added Value of satellite dataAdded Value of satellite data

30

NO2 Ground Level (NAPS) NO2 OMI/Aura + NAPS + model NO2 Ground Level (NAPS) NO2 OMI/Aura + NAPS + model

AQHI using satellite dataAQHI using satellite data

31

Air Quality Health Index

What do Single Pollutant Maps Mean?What do Single Pollutant Maps Mean?Needed a health connection

32

Health Assessment ModelHealth Assessment Model

� Translate Air Quality maps from the pilot project (2008) into meaningful health impacts (morbidity, mortality and $$$)

33

� Use Air Quality Benefits Assessment Tool (AQBAT)

� Obtain a tool for health impact assessments of changing traffic flows

34

35

36

Health Endpoint ReportDates: 10 Mar 08 to 14 Mar 08Endpoint Cases Valuation ($)Acute Exposure Mortality 0.01 65000Acute Respiratory Symptom Days 190 3100Asthma Symptom Days 18 1200Minor Restricted Activity Days 38 1100Respiratory Emergency Room Visits 0.08 220Respiratory Hospital Admissions 0.02 110

37

Respiratory Hospital Admissions 0.02 110Adult Chronic Bronchitis 0.01 3200Cardiac Emergency Room Visits 0 4.1Cardiac Hospital Admissions 0 3.7Child Acute Bronchitis Episodes 0.03 13Chronic Exposure Mortality 0.01 40000Restricted Activity Days 9.8 600Elderly Cardiac Hospital Admissions 0 13Total Valuation $110,000

Immediate or possible uses of the Health Assessment modelImmediate or possible uses of the Health Assessment model� Assess Health Impacts of OC-Transpo

Depot Expansion� Community demanded monitoring

Challenges using roadside monitors

38

� Challenges using roadside monitors make this tool ideal

� Assess Health impacts of areas with over 10,000 car/day

3-D street level modeling3-D street level modeling

� Six blocks of Albert Street were modelled and validated using two road side monitors

� Measurements were at:

39

� Measurements were at:� 7 m above road� 45 m above road

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

FindingsFindings

� Pollution at sidewalk level are 90% higher than the one reported by MOE

� Demonstrates the canyon effect of high density buildings

52

density buildingsUSESUSES� Demonstrates the value of a step back

approach in designing high buildings� Useful for urban design

Climate Change & Air Quality ForecastClimate Change & Air Quality Forecast

53

Forecasting PM2.5Forecasting PM2.5

54

55

Need to incorporate traffic in Air Quality ForecastingNeed to incorporate traffic in Air Quality Forecasting

56

Roadside monitoringRoadside monitoring

57

Proximity to main RoadsProximity to main Roads

Facility Type

Percentage of Records within

50 m 100 m 250 m 500 m

Schools 22.02 31.19 54.13 80.73

Old agehomes

50.91 60.00 74.55 92.73

58

Day cares 53.66 63.41 80.49 87.80

Active Recreation

19.39 26.38 53.33 75.87

Active Recon schools

18.04 29.11 50.63 75.95

TOTAL 22.55 30.93 55.03 78.23

Possible Partners for MunicipalitiesPossible Partners for Municipalities

� Ontario Ministry of the Environment (LRT)

� Health Canada (UHI)

� Public Health Agency of Canada (CC & AQ, UHI)

� Environment Canada (AQHI)

� Board of Education (School curriculum)

59

� Other Municipalities (Roundabouts)

� USEPA (vegetation), local universitiesCurrent Partners:Current Partners:� HC (Airpointers)Public Health, Transportation Planners, Fire

Services, Community planning & design, Traffic Operations, Public works, etc.

ConclusionConclusion

� Developed meaningful tools for air quality management

� Continue working on AQ monitoring using both satellite and roadside data

60

using both satellite and roadside data

� Looking for partners to do research projects i.e. Roundabouts, vegetation

� Ultimate aim is to develop policies