evaluation of starter pack 2 technical background statistical services centre university of reading...

Post on 28-Mar-2015

231 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Evaluation of Starter Pack 2Technical background

Statistical Services Centre

University of ReadingMalawi

23 August 2000

Background

• Objectives of Starter Pack

• Difficulty in measuring the net impact of Starter Pack

Objectives of Starter Pack

• To increase food production, in particular for maize

• To combat household food insecurity, particularly in the most vulnerable farm families

• Provision of legume crops to help improve soil fertility and diet

Difficulty in measuring the net impact of Starter Pack

• Difficulty in finding a baseline for comparison

• Year to year changes affected by weather• “All farmers” were eligible• Variation in size of effects depending on

farmer characteristics such as wealth, sex, location, etc

How to assess the impact of SP?

• Looking at the multi-dimensional aspects of the impact of Starter Pack

• Triangulating the estimates of production and months of food produced through– Year to year comparisons

– Recipients versus non-recipients

– Farmers’ perceptions and experience

– Independent measures of ‘impact’ from each module in the evaluation.

Modular approach

• Module 1: Agronomic Survey• Module 2: Microeconomic Impact and Willingness

to Pay • Module 3: Gender and Intra-household Distribution• Module 4: Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity• Module 5: Ground Truth Study for SP Logistics

Unit Starter Pack Register•

Selection of sites

• Random selection of villages and households within villages

• Stratification by FEWS poverty and food security indices (M2), food security index (M3) and sphere of influence clusters (M4)

• An optimal number of sites has been selected within the resources available

• These elements will make it possible to reach generalisable conclusions and capture variability

Module 1: Agronomic Survey

• Consultant: National Statistical Office

• Coverage: National

• 200 Enumeration Areas covering all RDPs in the country

• 2992 households visited

• 3527 individuals interviewed

• Methodology: household survey and field visits

Module 2: Microeconomic Impact and Willingness to Pay• Consultant: Mzuzu ADD, Ministry of Agriculture. Team

leader: Mr Francis Nyirenda

• participatory preliminary study followed by a household survey

• The study visited 120 villages distributed in 30 EPAs. Stratification by Poverty Index and Sphere of influence (VAM 1996). 1,200 households visited

• Quantitative and qualitative methodsof research were combined

Module 2Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited

Module 3: Gender and Intra-household Distribution• Consultant: Chancellor College. Gender Studies and

Outreach Unit. Team Leader: Dr Lucy Binauli

• Preliminary phase based on participatory workshops

• Main phase based on restricted participatory methods combined with a short questionnaire

• Visited 48 villages in 24 EPAs throughout the country

• Consistent methodology and structured information recording used in all sites to allow integration of results

Module 3Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited

Module 4: Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity

• Consultants: Elizabeth Cromwell (ODI), Patrick Kambewa (Chancellor College), Richard Mwanza (Concern Universal), Rowland Chirwa (Chitedze Research Station) and Kwera (NGO)

• Participatory study of 30 villages randomly selected in the whole of Malawi using the VAM (1996) classification of EPAs by Sphere of Influence

Module 4Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited

Module 5: Ground Truth Study for SPLU

• Consultants: McNewman Msowoya, Mzuzu ADD, Peter Wingfield-Digby, Ian Wilson

• Census of 54 villages

• Comparison with the registration data for Starter Pack 2

• Comparison with the census 1998 results

• Assessment of the registration process in those villages.

Module 5Map of EPAs covered

top related