environmental monitoring report - sudip...environmental monitoring report bi-annual report...
Post on 29-Mar-2021
8 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Monitoring Report
Bi-Annual Report
July-December 2017
L3293-ARM: Sustainable Urban Development
Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared by the Yerevan Municipality for the Asian Development Bank.
2
This Environmental Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Environmental Monitoring Report
Bi-annual Report
July-December 2017
ARM: Sustainable Urban Development Investment
Program, Tranche 2
Project Number: 42417-033
Loan Number: L3293-ARM
Prepared: January 2018
Prepared by the Yerevan Municipality
Yerevan Project Implementation Unit
2
2
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
AP affected people
EARF environmental assessment and review framework
EIA environmental impact assessment
EMP environmental management plan
EMR environmental monitoring report
ES environmental specialist
GRM grievance redress mechanism
H&S health and safety
IEE initial environmental examination
PIU project implementation unit
PPMS project performance monitoring system
REA rapid environmental assessment
RA Republic of Armenia
RE resident engineer
SEMP site-specific environmental management plan
SPS (2009) Safeguards Policy Statement (2009)
SUDIP Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program
YM Yerevan Municipality
3
3
Contents
I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4
A. Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 4
B. Implementation Progress ........................................................................................................................... 5
a. Construction Implementation Progress for Argavand-Shirak street road link, Tender 3 ........................... 5
b. Construction Implementation Progress for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 ............................... 5
c. Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link Tender 5 .................................................................................................... 6
C. Institutional Arrangements of the Project .................................................................................................. 6
II. Environmental Management .......................................................................................................................... 7
A. Environmental Safeguards Program ........................................................................................................... 7
a. ADB mission ................................................................................................................................................ 7
b. Archaeological Works Program, Tender 3 .................................................................................................. 9
c. Grievance Redress Mechanism and Public Consultation ............................................................................ 9
d. Meetings and Communication.................................................................................................................. 11
e. Awareness Raising and Environmental Training ....................................................................................... 11
f. Health & Safety Accident/Incident Report ............................................................................................... 12
III. Environmental Monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 12
A. Environmental Monitoring Program ......................................................................................................... 12
a. Environmental Monitoring for Tender 4 ................................................................................................... 13
B. Non-compliance Notices ........................................................................................................................... 17
C. Corrective Action Plans ............................................................................................................................. 17
IV. Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 18
V. Future program ............................................................................................................................................. 18
VI. Annexes ........................................................................................................................................................ 19
A. Annex 1: List of training participants for Tender 4 conducted by Contractor .............................................. 19
B. Annex 2: Status of the action from previous environmental monitoring report ......................................... 21
C. Annex 3: Corrective action plan for Tender 4 ............................................................................................... 22
D. Annex 4: Status of the summery of corrective actions for the reporting period for Tender 4 ................... 27
E. Annex 5: The results of air quality, noise and vibration monitoring for Tender 4 ....................................... 28
F. Annex 6: Example of weekly environmental monitoring checklist for Tender 4 ........................................ 29
4
4
I. Introduction
1. This bi-annual environmental monitoring report covers the time period of July-December 2017. The
report was prepared by PIU ES.
A. Project Description
2. The Government of Armenia received a loan in October of 2015 from ADB to finance SUDIP,
Tranche 2. The main objective of the Project is to complete the missing links of Yerevan bypass:
Argavand - Shirak road link Tender 3, Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 and Babajanyan –
Ashtarak road link Tender 5. The two captioned road projects will help to divert through-traffic around
the city center.
Figure 1: Map showing the Tranche 2 location
5
5
B. Implementation Progress
a. Construction Implementation Progress for Argavand-Shirak street road link, Tender 3
3. The bidding documents including EIA for Argavand-Shirak street road link Tender 3 are in the
evaluation process and for this project no construction activity has occurred yet.
Figure 2: Map showing Tender 3 for the Argavand-Shirak street road link location
b. Construction Implementation Progress for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4
4. YM gave access to and possession of all construction sites to JV “Black Sea Group” and “Vahagn
and Samvel” LLC for from Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 on 18 July 2017.
Figure 4: Map showing Tender 4 for the Davitashen-Ashtarak road link location
6
6
c. Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link Tender 5
5. On 11 December 2017 SUDIP signed the contract with TIRRENA SCAVI S.p.A. (Italy) Contractor
for Babajanyan-Ashtarak highway Tender 5. The total length of the road is 9.4 km and the average
width of 24 meters. The duration of the construction will be 24 months. The commencement of the
construction works for the Babajanyan-Ashtarak highway Tender 5 will be granted in the beginning of
the next reporting period.
Figure 5: Map showing Tender 5 for the Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link location
C. Institutional Arrangements of the Project
6. The major tasks of the PIU ES are to carry out the overall environmental management ensuring full
compliance of the Project implementation with Armenian legislation and ADB SPS (2009). The ES
serves as a liaison between the safeguard team of Egis International Company, YM, the executing
agency, MNP of the RA and Ministry of Culture of the RA, project affected people, ADB and develops
and maintains direct relationships with government authorities, with the help of Engineer ES
organizes and conducts public consultations, etc. PIU ES Ruzanna Voskanyan manages all
construction site activities related to the environmental issues and PIU land acquisition and
resettlement specialist Sirak Gyulbudaghyan manages all resettlement and social aspects issues.
7. Engineer environmental management team is responsible for the preparation of environmental
assessment of Tranche 2 documents and is responsible for environmental supervision of construction
works for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4. Marta Lazarska international ES and Edita
7
7
Vardgesyan national ES are implementing supervision of the construction works of Davitashen-
Ashtarak road link Tender 4. Hasmik Alexanyan, social specialist of the supervision company, is
responsible for all aspects of the social issues.
8. Contractor’s ES David Harutyunyan is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the
SEMP in accordance with IEE/EMP, monitoring of the construction activities for Tender 4.
Contractor’s ES reports to Engineer ES after which the Engineer ES reports to PIU ES. Sona
Poghosyan, social specialist and Nona Davtyan, assistant to social specialist are responsible for all
aspects of the social issues during the construction.
II. Environmental Management
A. Environmental Safeguards Program
9. The implementation of the environmental safeguards program started in October 2015 and was in
progress during the reporting period.
10. The third updated version of SEMP for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 was submitted by
Contractor on 20 December 2017. The submitted version contained general environmental
management as well as key management plans, such as for the handling of asbestos-contaminated
waste which shall be generated as a result of demolition works. The SEMP was returned for revision
because many required receptor specific plans were not included, like Tree management plan,
updated Traffic Management Plan, YM permission for garbage disposal. The revision of SEMP is in
process and shall be re-submitted by Contractor in the beginning of the next reporting period in 2018.
11. In addition to the above, a contract was signed with Egis international for additional noise and
vibrations modeling to be completed to ensure the all sub-projects in Tranche 2 are in compliance
with ADB safeguard requirements during construction (vibration and operation). The finalizations of
results are in process and should be provided during next reporting period in 2018.
a. ADB mission
12. An ADB mission to check compliance of Tender 4 activities to the ADB SPS (2009) safeguard
requirements took place on 13 July, 18 August, 16 and 17 November 2017; and 14 December 2017.
The mission was implemented by ADB international and national ESs, PIU ES, Engineer’s ES and
Contractor’s representatives also joined the mission. The mission visited the construction site at
8
8
Davitashen-Ashtarak road link. The recommendations of the mission audit on further actions were
related to:
Community access across the construction zone. A Safety Stand-Down and Toolbox Talk for all
site staff were requested to be completed immediately by the Contractor following an incident
where children were seen on the construction site. The Stand-Down was to make sure that all
members of staff know that children are not allowed on site and should be escorted off site when
they are seen.
The Engineer and Contractor were informed and the mitigation measures were implemented.
Contractor tried to contact the family of the girl detected on-site but this was not possible
because they moved to another district in Yerevan by the end of December 2017. Contractor
will be performed an additional training of the foremen and instructed to hinder the presence
of children and other non-authorized people on-site and increased the number of prohibiting
posters. The implementation of the instruction should be checked daily by Engineer's site
inspectors and by the PIU/Engineer's ESs during upcoming site visit.
Asbestos management plan has not been approved by Engineer and PIU. After Engineer’s
approval it should be added to the SEMP.
Procedure on handling asbestos-containing waste was included in the SEMP and submitted to
Engineer and PIU. The SEMP is under review.
ADB has not received the updated methodology of pre-construction survey. However Contractor
practically has finished the survey of the properties based on the methodology (only small section
is unfinished). Supervision Consultant has invited a meeting with Contractor to discuss this issue.
Final methodology should be finalized as soon as possible and submitted for ADB’s review.
Based on approved methodology by Engineer on 20 April 2017 the survey is in progress: pre-
construction stage is completed and the post construction stage should be completed after of
completion of construction work.
Full commencement and access to all construction sites, except of two land plots was issued on
18 July 2017. Upon receiving complaint from Mesrop Poghosyan it was agreed that construction
works will not be started within 200 meters parameter around his house. However, during site visit
it was noticed old gas pipes removal as well as the new pipes installation works near AP’s house.
However, it does not matter if such types of works are under main Contractor’s scope and
responsibilities or different type of utility owners. All types of works related to the project should be
stopped near the AP’s house.
The Gas Company was not carrying out project related work and was doing operational
maintenance of its system which is within the scope of company's responsibility. Neither
Contractor nor PIU are authorised to stop such kind of works. The re-location of utilities and/or
9
9
any other Project related civil works have not been implemented by Contractor within the
above mentioned footprint.
Construction mud is penetrating to streets and roads. Proper mitigations provided in the EMP
should be implemented.
Contractor was instructed by PIU/Engineer to strictly follow the mud spread preventive
measures envisaged in IEE/EMP (Table 1 9. Traffic and access management plan, para
12.Vehicle movements on and off construction site and SEMP (Risk assessment table, Earth
works, digging-loading works and heavy machinery operation). The Contractor responded that
the measures are underway. The implementation of the Engineer's instruction should be
checked daily by Engineer's site inspectors and by the PIU/Engineer's ESs during upcoming
site visit.
On the bridge construction work sites Contractor does not follow health and safety
requirements. Occupational health and safety mitigation measures should be in place.
The Notice on Safety Violation was issued to Contractor. The mitigation measures are under
implementation and shall be checked daily by the site inspectors.
Mainly the trucks carrying excavated materials are using covers, but several trucks were
mentioned without them. All trucks should use covers.
The Contractor was requested to strictly follow the mitigation measures envisaged in IEE/EMP
(Table 1 9. Traffic and access management plan, para 12.Vehicle movements on and off
construction site and SEMP (Risk assessment table, Earth works, digging-loading works and
heavy machinery operation). The Contractor responded that the measures are underway. The
implementation of the Engineer's instruction should be checked daily by Engineer's site
inspectors and by the PIU/Engineer's ESs during upcoming site visit.
b. Archaeological Works Program, Tender 3
13. N/A for the reporting period
c. Grievance Redress Mechanism and Public Consultation
14. For feedback, concerns and complaints from the APs, a GRM, inspired by the problem solving
function of ADB’s guidelines and policies should be maintained for the duration of the Project. The
GRM is intended to assist aggrieved persons in lodging their complaints and to describe the
mechanism designed to redress their grievances in a timely and effective manner. The parties
10
10
potentially involved are: the complainants, Contractor, Engineer, PIU, EA, NGOs, and the courts. The
details of the GRM operation could be found in EIA for Tender 3 and in IEEs of Tender 4 and 51.
15. A proper GRM has been established to meet environmental related concerns of affected people in
Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4. The availability of the logbook and registered complaints in
the Contractor’s field office was regularly checked during the monitoring site visits.
16. During the reporting period a second public hearing was organized by the Contractor’s EHSS
under the Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 held on 31 July 2017 in Davitashen community.
General social and environmental issues, GRM had been discussed with APs. APs were informed
that the grievance redress mechanism to address the complaints/suggestions of APs on excessive
dust, noise, improper waste dumping and on other construction related issues is established by the
Contractor. Also special posters with contact information are posted at highly visible places next to
residential area (Please see below pictures). The posters are informing that in order to ensure
permanent communication with APs the complaints register log-books are kept available at the
Contractor's mobile on- site offices. No environment related concerns were raised by the participants
of the pre-construction public hearing.
17. During this reporting period there were some verbal complaints from the affected people such as
dust and noise, unpleasant odour and road design (access and overpass issues) which were
effectively treated according to the adopted procedure. Contractor was insistently requested to take
measures to control dust and to implement mitigation measures to reduce dust emissions during the
construction process. The corrections were suggested by the PIU/DESC ES during the monitoring
1 EIA/EMP for Tender 3 H.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism, page 47 of 62, in IEE/EMP for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 H.2.
Grievance Redress Mechanism, page 45 of 61 and in IEE/EMP for Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link Tender 5 H.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism, page 68 of 85.
11
11
visits. More intensive measures are taken to reduce the dust emissions (frequent water spraying),
noisy works were scheduled to the time when the AP was not at home, the unpleasant odour was
resulting from the opened sewage pipe, and the issue was solved. The design related issues were
discussed with Engineer and resolution provided to AP. No further complaints related to dust or noise
were registered in GRM log-book or expressed verbally from impacted population after the measures
were implemented by the Contractor.
18. During the reporting period complaint for tender 4 (see below table 1) regarding cracks were
addressed by the Contractor’s, Supervision Engineer’s social specialists coordinated by Sirak
Gyulbudaghyan - PIU land acquisition and resettlement specialist.
Table 1 – Status of complaints during the reporting period
d. Meetings and Communication
19. During the reporting period environmental safeguards issues were regularly discussed during the
joint meetings between the PIU and Engineer.
10. Regular meetings and discussions within PIU, Engineer and the Contractor’s environmental team
during the reporting period took place via joint meetings, official correspondence and emails, phone
calls and personal contacts. Particularly the issues on SEMP and instrumental measurements of
environmental parameters were discussed.
e. Awareness Raising and Environmental Training
21. The awareness raising and environmental orientation program was developed in the scope of
capacity building in the EIAs/IEEs and EMPs for Tender 3 and Davitashen-Ashtarak road link road
links. According to the program the Contractor should be responsible to arrange general orientation
session about project activities and environmental awareness. During this session, all the people
working on the site should focus their efforts to protect environment and insure the safe handling of
the social issues during construction period in accordance with ADB SPS (2009), Armenian
AP Address Complain PIU's feedback/actions
1 Mesrop Poghosyan
Davitashen 2nd street house 6
Request for resettlement due to noise and vibration (the request was submitted before construction commencement)
Pending, construction in the area not started yet. AP will get response based on the noise and vibration modeling results.
12
12
environmental legislation, EIA/IEE and EMP. Further details about the awareness raising and
environmental orientation program could be found in final EIA/EMP for Argavand Junction Tender 3,
in IEE/EMP for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 and in IEE/EMP for Babajanyan-Ashtarak
road link Tender 5 2.
22. According to IEE, Annex 7 EMP and SEMP for Tender 4 the Contractor organized trainings on
environmental, health and safety safeguards for the Contractor's and sub-contractor's staff on 03
October 2017, as well as regular trainings during all next months for newly hired staff during this
reporting period to use PPE and safety of works on the overpass structures, as well as dust control,
waste disposal issues and trucks using covers. During the session Contractor’s doctor provided the
lecture on regular appropriate orientation on HIV/AIDS/STI prevention and treatment, to reduce the
risk factors of and vulnerability to HIV/STI infections (see Annex 1: list of training participants for
Tender 4). The following topics had been discussed in detail during sessions and stressing the
significance of strict implementation of the points.
Occupational Health and Safety plan;
Emergency response plan;
Vegetation clearing plan and;
Environmental Protection plan.
f. Health & Safety Accident/Incident Report
23. Based on Engineer and Contractor weekly/monthly reports there were no accidents or other
incidents during the reporting period for Tender 4.
III. Environmental Monitoring
A. Environmental Monitoring Program
24. Environmental monitoring program with a view to ensure compliance with the ADB’s
environmental requirements and all applicable environmental laws, regulations and standards for
environmental protection of RA has been developed in the scope of IEEs/EIA and EMPs for Tranche
2. The IEEs/EIA and EMPs contain monitoring activities to be considered during project
implementation: management during engineering design phase, preconstruction, construction through
the operation and maintenance periods. Details of monitoring activities and reporting requirements
2 EIA/EMP for Tender 3, I.3. Implementation arrangement, c) Awareness raising and environmental training, page 58 of 60; Annex 4, Table
1, para 7, page 7 of 36, IEE/EMP for Davitashen-Ashtarak road link road link Tender 4 I.3. Implementation arrangement, c) Awareness raising and environmental Training, page 55 of 61; Annex 3, Table 1, para 6, page 5 of 31 and IEE/EMP for Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link road link Tender 5 I.3. Implementation arrangement, c) Awareness raising and environmental Training, page 80 of 85; Annex 3, Table 1, para 6.
13
13
are presented in approved final EIA and EMP for Argavand junction Tender 3, IEE and EMP for
Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 and IEE and EMP for Babajanyan-Ashtarak road link Tender
53.
a. Environmental Monitoring for Tender 4
25. During the reporting period construction work site monitoring visits (see Annex 7: Example of
weekly environmental monitoring checklist) were organized jointly with PIU, Contractor’s and
Engineer’s ESs. RE and other responsible representatives of the Contractor participated in some of
the monitoring visits.
26. Relationship with Contractors, Owners, Lenders, etc. PIU's relationships with Contractor are
implemented through the Engineer/RE who is implementing the supervision (including environmental
and health & safety) of works. All the documents submitted by the Contractor are being reviewed and
approved/disapproved by RE. Communication between the PIU and Contractor’s environmental team
takes place via joint meetings, official correspondence and emails, phone calls and personal contacts.
27. The status of environmental permits and licenses submitted by the contractors/sub-contractors
are reflected in the Table 1 below:
Table 1: Status of environmental permits and licenses
Item status Comment
Tender 4
Commencement of works In place Permission to start civil works (commencement permission)
issued by PIU on 25 April 2017.
Disposal of construction
waste
Open Agreement from «X-Y» LLC for disposal of construction
wastes (excavated soil material, construction debris
generated from demolition of existing structures and from
stockpiles) into their territory is signed on 07 April 2017.
Contractor has applied to YM for assigning dump sites for
construction waste. In response received on 08 August 2017
the YM assigned the former quarry area of crushed stone
production at Spandaryan industrial link of Ajapnyak
administrative district.
Contractor considers the assigned area not suitable from
environmental and safety perspective and re-applied on
02.11.2017 to YM for "no objection" to continue using the
3 EIA/EMP for Tender 3, I. Environmental Management Plan,I.2 Monitoring page 56 of 62; Annex 4 Table 2,page 28 of 36, IEE/EMP for
Tender 4, I. Environmental Management Plan,I.2 Monitoring page 54 of 61; Annex 3 Table 2, page 23 of 31 and , IEE/EMP for Tender 5, I. Environmental Management Plan,I.2 Monitoring page 78 of 85; Annex 3 Table 2.
14
14
area in “X-Y” LLC as dump site Permission from YM is
awaited).
Permission on cutting
trees hindering
construction process
In place Trees hindering construction process were identified within
IEE/ EMP. Permission on cutting trees was issued by YM on
04 April 2017.
Construction camp In place According to SEMP as a construction camp Contractor shall
use an area which is owned by“Kamurjshin” based on the
rental contract for temporary establishment of Contractor's
camp signed between Contractor and “Kamurjshin” CJSC on
06 April 2017. The camp is not established yet since the
commencement of the construction works for this section is
not provided to the Contractor.
Currently for the permitted road section no construction
camp is established by Contractor. Both Contractor's and
Sub–contractor's facilities (mobile houses, parking) are
temporarily organized within the RoW.
Preliminary accumulation
sites
In place The Contractor has applied to “Huysi Avan” district and
“GIACONIA” Charitable Foundation’s administrations to
allocate area for temporary storage of construction material
and received permission on 20 June 2017.
Disposal of municipal
and construction waste
In place Contractor has applied to YM on 24.05.2017 for permission
for disposal of household waste and garbage.
Response from YM for waste management services
regarding the organization of waste collection, use of landfill
for disposal of household waste is pending.
Crash machine
installation
In place Service Delivery Agreement has been signed between
Contractor and «X-Y» LLC for processing services of road
construction materials on 07 April 2017.
Treatment of excavated
usable subsoil
In place Service Delivery Agreement has been signed between
Contractor and «X-Y» LLC for processing services of road
construction materials on 07 April 2017.
Borrow pits In place The parts of embankment materials used in construction are
being delivered from existing licensed quarry - «X-Y» LLC
and borrow pit “VZGO” LLC.
The Delivery Contracts with aforementioned organizations
are provided.
Usable excavated material from construction site will also be
used for embankment.
15
15
Inventory of Emissions of
hazardous substances in
to ambient air from
batching plant.
Not
needed
Contractor has no batching plant. In the future the Contractor
will buy concrete material from licensed subcontractor.
28. Contractor’s Environmental Monitoring Procedures and Health and Safety Management. In
accordance with the IEE/EMP, and the Contractor's SEMP, the Contractor is required to undertake
parametric instrumental measurements and observations on dust, noise, vibration and water quality,
Locations for the measurements were identified in the SEMP approved by RE on 28 April 2017.
Measurements are being implemented through the contracted specialized laboratory of
“Lernametalurgiayi Institute” company two times per month. Frequency can be re-considered
depending on necessity.
29. The measurements are being implemented according to approved SEMP at the points specified
and agreed with Engineer before starting measurements (see the location of points at the map
included in Annex 5). Baseline dust, noise & vibration measurements were performed by the certified
noise and vibration specialized consultant at 5 locations which are recognized to be sensitive receptor
(hospital, residential private houses and buildings) found along Project corridor. According to the
contract the specialized monitoring company implemented the measurements in accordance with the
approved measurement of environmental parameters: air pollution, noise, vibration plan during the
reporting period July-December 2017. For the operational measurements performed by
“Lernametalurgiayi Institute” company the same points were selected from the 5 baseline points: the
measurement points were determined prior starting each measurement based on the principle of on-
going civil works and complaint of APs if any (but not less than 4 points). The results were compared
with Armenian legislative standards and with the baseline level of the same point
30. During the reporting period the measurements were implemented on 12 and 23 of July, 07 and 29
of August, 15 of September, 09 of October, 27 of November and 08 of December 2017. The reports
containing data on the measurements are provided to PIU/Engineer and are available at
PIU/Engineer's office. The levels of dust, noise, vibration and emitting pollutants (SO2, NO2 and NO)
have been tested using the following equipment’s:
Ассистент-TOTAL №168613 noise meter-vibro meter equipment,
Dust level has been measured by aspirator ПУ-4Э №5839 and АФА В-10 filter papers
gravimetrical method,
Emission gases have been measured by MRU Optima 7 №306732 equipment.
16
16
31. The summary of the measurements can be presented as follows: Noise levels recorded during
daytime periods were generally above the average equivalent levels taken during baseline collection.
Although in a number of cases the noise levels are above project standards (3dB above baseline),
impacts are not evaluated significant as works at each location were short-term and no complaints
were received from local residents. Nevertheless, to further reduce noise impacts Contractor was
instructed to follow the mitigation measures set in the IEE/EMP which are mostly being implemented
by the contractor:
I. Noisier activities are located away from sensitive receptors where practicable.
II. The operation of noisy equipment is scheduled to daylight hours in the areas of presence of
sensitive receptors.
III. The movement of heavy vehicles through residential areas is restricted, the common public
roads are mostly being used.
IV. Technical state of machinery and availability of effective exhaust silencing systems on
vehicles is being regularly inspected.
V. The installation of the temporary hoarding around noise sources was not needed. The
measure shall be applied if other mitigation measures are not sufficient or practicable.
32. Measurement is not implemented during night time as no construction is implemented during
night time. Noise measurements are conducted for closest sensitive receptors located near the
construction sites. The locations of measurement points are selected from the 5 baseline points
before every monitoring measurement based on the criteria of on-going civil works (at least 4 points)
during the reporting period.
33. According to the results instrumental measurements the vibration acceleration exposures were
mostly equal or slightly exceeded the baseline level and were far below the legislative norms at the all
measurement locations. Data has been compared with Maximum Permissible Level (MPL) (Հ Ն N
2.2.4-009-06) Armenian standard. Instrumental measurement, analysis and evaluation of results are
carried out in accordance with the national regulations, the most relevant of which being:
Hygienic Norms №2-III-11.3 “Vibration in the workplaces, in residential and public buildings”.
The results of vibration instrumental measurements are being compared with the Armenian legislative
sanitary health norms and impacts were not significant during the reporting period. With regards to
structures, impacts are being assessed against pre-construction condition (as surveyed) and no
significant issues have been identified to date.
34. Operational dust emissions were also measured for closest sensitive receptors located near the
construction sites at the locations selected from 5 baseline points.. Although being mostly within the
17
17
permitted standards the dust level in some cases exceeded (for the point Dust 3 at Km 0+350 for up
to 3 times) Armenian legislative standards required for residential areas. Contractor was required and
was implementing intensive water spraying at the exposed areas. The subsequent monitoring
showed that the dust emissions were not excessive and dust suppression measures were effective.
35. Detailed information on the results of regular monitoring measurements are available at
Contractor’s and Engineer's offices being attached to the Contractor’s monthly progress reports and
are summarized in Annex 5 of the present report.
B. Non-compliance Notices
36. One formal non-compliance notice was issued to Contractor regarding the violation of safety
during the reporting period. All the non-conformances which were detected during the upcoming
monitoring visits are treated according to the adopted procedure. Contractor was being requested via
PIU/Engineer’s monitoring report to correct the non-conformances within the deadline set for
correction and was warned that otherwise the non-compliance notice shall be issued. Correction was
checked during the PIU/Engineer's ESs upcoming site visits.
C. Corrective Action Plans
37. During the reporting period construction site monitoring visits were held by Engineer ES once a
week and by PIU ES on 29.07.2017, 16.08.2017, 28.09.2017, 12.10.2017, 15.11.2017 and
14.12.2017 in Davitashen-Ashtarak road link Tender 4 (see Annex 2: Status of the previous weekly
environmental site monitoring report). Site monitoring visits were conducted with ADB, PIU, Engineer
and Contractor ESs on 13 July, 18 August, 12 October, 16 and 17 November and on 14 December
2017.
38. Corrective actions were requested from Contractor to address each non-conformance found
during monitoring (see Annex 3: Corrective action plan for Tender 4). Improvement of the detected
non-conformances was checked during the next site visit. The summary of the corrective actions
addressed/ not addressed by Contractor during the reporting month were presented in Engineer's
monthly reports.
39. By the end of 2017 the following status of corrections/ non- corrections was recorded: Contractor
was fully compliant on 48.8%, partially complaint on 19.5% and non- conformant on 31.7% to all
applicable areas. Contractor was requested correct all the non- conformances within the deadline set
for correction (before December 26). The implementation should be checked by PIU/ Engineer's ESs
during the next monitoring visit in January 2018 and reported accordingly.
18
18
IV. Findings and Recommendations
40. During the reporting period Engineer and Contractor addressed the issues raised by ADB
consultant during the joined site monitoring visited mission with PIU, Engineer and Contractor ESs
conducted on 14 December 2017 at Tender 4 the findings and recommendations issue raised to
provide mitigation measures of some: to conduct staff safety training one more time, open holes were
fenced with visible safety tape fencing, the traffic management plan is finalized and currently is in the
process of approval, the issue of coverage of all trucks is underway.
V. Future program
N Action Time frame Responsible
1. Review and approval of the construction SEMP
for Tender 3 and Tender 5
During next reporting period PIU, Engineer,
Contractor
2. Review and approval of the construction
updated SEMP for Tender 4
During next reporting period PIU, Engineer,
Contractor
3. Action for pending permissions During next reporting period PIU, Engineer,
Contractor
4. Action for noise and vibration modeling results During next reporting period PIU/ Engineer
5. Regular monitoring visits of construction works
according to the SEMP for Tender 3, 4 and 5
Once a month/once a week PIU/ Engineer
6. Review of the environmental monitoring data on
dust, noise, vibration and NO/NO2/SO2 for
Tender 3, 4 and 5
Every month /twice a month PIU/ Engineer
7. Contractors staff safeguard training for Tender
3,4 and 5
During next reporting period PIU/ Engineer,
Contractor
8. Review and addressing the GRM for Tender 3,
4 and 5
End of every month/ every
week
PIU/ Engineer
9. Other routine issues Upon the need PIU, Engineer,
Contractor
10. Reporting on environmental safeguards Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly,
Bi-annual
PIU, Engineer,
Contractor
19
19
VI. Annexes
A. Annex 1: List of training participants for Tender 4 conducted by Contractor
20
20
21
21
B. Annex 2: Status of the action from previous environmental monitoring report
N Action Time frame Status of the action
from previous EMR
1. Review and approval of the construction updated
SEMP for Tender 4
Next reporting period
2017
Implemented
2. Regular monitoring visits of construction works
according to the SEMP for Tender 4
Once a month/once a
week
Implemented
3. Review of the environmental monitoring data on
dust, noise, vibration and NO/NO2/SO2 for
Tender 4
Every month /twice a
month
Implemented
4. Contractors staff safeguard training for Tender 4 During reporting
period 2017
Implemented
5. Review and addressing the GRM for Tender 4 End of every month/
every week
Implemented
6. Other routine issues Upon the need Implemented
7. Reporting on environmental safeguards Weekly, Monthly,
Quarterly, Bi-annual
Implemented
22
22
C. Annex 3: Corrective action plan for Tender 4
Corrective action plan for Tender 4 the construction period from July to December 2017:
N Deadline
for request
Corrective action request Date of
corrective action
Corrective
action status
1 13.07.2017
29.07.2017
Person in charge on H&S management is appointed and is present on-site
29.07.2017 Corrected
2 13.07.2017
29.07.2017
Workers are provided with and are
using proper uniform and PPE
29.07.2017 Corrected partly
3 13.07.2017
29.07.2017
Unprotected and unsafe open pits were detected during the last visit
29.07.2017 Corrected partly
4 13.07.2017
29.07.2017
Unauthorised people are entering the work site
29.07.2017 Corrected partly
5 13.07.2017
29.07.2017
Unsafe practices on-site are excluded 29.07.2017 Corrected partly
6 13.07.2017
Job-specific environmental and safety training for workers provided
13.07.2017
Corrected
7 13.07.2017 The work site is kept clean from debris,
garbage, etc. 13.07.2017 Corrected
8 13.07.2017
Previously detected spillages are cleaned
13.07.2017 Corrected
9 6.07.2017
13.07.2017
Register of complaints maintained and is available on- site for inspection
13.07.2017
Corrected
10 6.07.2017
13.07.2017
Exclusion barriers and at least tape fencing around work site areas next to residential area are needed.
29.07.2017 Corrected partly
N Deadline
for request
Corrective action request Date of
corrective action
Corrective
action status
1 16.08.2017
The medical observation of Contractor's staff was implemented by medical worker and the records for inspection were available.
16.08.2017
Corrected
2 16.08.2017 The warning signs are made more visible.
16.08.2017 Corrected partly
3 16.08.2017
Workers are provided with and are
using proper uniform and PPE
Almost all the staff is provided with and is using uniform.
16.08.2017
Corrected partly
4 16.08.2017 Sub- contractor "Kamurdjshin" has
provided the workers with safety belts
16.08.2017 Corrected
23
23
for working on the height
5 16.08.2017 Unauthorised people are entering the work site
16.08.2017 Corrected partly
6 16.08.2017
29.08.2017
Mud spread preventive measures are needed at the entrances to the site.
- Not corrected
7 16.08.2017
29.08.2017
Traces of waste water discharge have been detected in many new places. Drivers were not aware on any designated site for discharge of concrete waste wash water.
- Not corrected
8 16.08.2017
29.08.2017
The trucks transporting the rocks and stones are not provided with and are not using covers and back doors preventing any scattering on the public roads.
- Not corrected
N Deadline
for request
Corrective action request Date of
corrective action
Corrective
action status
1 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Access of strangers and outsiders is
excluded.
Unauthorised people are not entering
the work site
28.09.2017 Corrected
2 20.09.2017
28.09.2017
The work site is kept clean from debris,
garbage, etc
28.09.2017 Corrected
3 20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Bins for garbage collection are installed
in sufficient amount
28.09.2017 Corrected
4 14.09.2017
Worker’s health checks implemented
The records of medical observation
were available for inspection
14.09.2017
Corrected
5 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Fire extinguisher is provided in missing
sections
28.09.2017 Corrected
6 14.09.2017
Register log- book for complaints is
maintained and is available for
inspection
14.09.2017
Corrected
7 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
The warning signs and exclusion
barriers are properly installed at all
the entrances to the construction site
28.09.2017 Corrected partly
8 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
All the workers are provided with and
are using proper uniform and PPE.
28.09.2017 Corrected partly
9 14.09.2017
The black oil preparation works are not
implemented safely to prevent spillages
and pollution.
14.09.2017
Corrected partly
10 14.09.2017 Proper mealtime facilities and other 28.09.2017 Corrected partly
24
24
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
sanitary- hygienic conditions for workers
are provided in all road sections
11 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Many dismantled utility pipes were not
accumulated in regular heaps at the
preliminary accumulation site but are
dangerously left and scattered all over
construction site.
- Not corrected
12 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Mud spread preventive measures are
needed at the entrances to the site.
- Not corrected
13 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
Traces of waste water discharge have
been detected in many new places.
Drivers were not aware on any
designated site for discharge of
concrete waste wash water.
- Not corrected
14 14.09.2017
20.09.2017
28.09.2017
The trucks transporting rocks and
stones are not provided with, and are
not using, covers and back doors
preventing any scattering on the public
roads.
- Not corrected
N Deadline
for request
Corrective action request Date of
corrective action
Corrective
action status
1 20.10.2017
27.10.2017
Communication with the APs re-
established, posters withy project
contacts attached in many visible
places
31.10.2017 Corrected
2 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20.10.2017
27.10.2017
The trucks transporting the rocks and
stones are not provided with and are
not using covers and back doors
preventing any scattering on the public
roads.
31.10.2017 Mostly corrected
3 20.10.2017
27.10.2017
All the workers are provided with and
are using proper uniform and PPE
31.10.2017 Corrected partly
4 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20.10.2017
The previously generated waste as a
result of demolition of houses is
removed
20.10.2017
Mostly corrected
5 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20. 10.2017
31.10.2017
Access of strangers into the
construction site is restricted
31.10.2017 Mostly corrected
25
25
6 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20. 10.2017
31.10.2017
The warning signs and exclusion
barriers are properly installed at all the
entrances to the construction site
31.10.2017 Mostly corrected
7 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
Workers briefed on SEMP at time of
starting employment. Training
implemented
12.10.2017
Corrected
8 6.10.2017
Copy of ERP and emergency contact
list are available, updated and posted in
a visible place at all work sites.
6.10.2017
Corrected
9 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20. 10.2017
31.10.2017
Many dismantled utility pipes were not
accumulated in regular heaps at the
preliminary accumulation site but are
dangerously left and scattered all over
construction site.
- Not corrected
10 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20. 10.2017
31.10.2017
Mud spread preventive measures are
needed at the entrances to the site.
- Not corrected
11 6.10.2017
12.10.2017
20. 10.2017
31.10.2017
Traces of waste water discharge have
been detected in many new places.
Drivers were not aware on any
designated site for discharge of
concrete waste wash water.
- Not corrected
N Deadline
for request
Corrective action request Date of
corrective action
Corrective
action status
1 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
Worker's health check implemented 15.11.2017
Corrected
2 9.11.2017 Person in charge on H&S and
emergency is appointed and is present
on-site
9.11.2017 Corrected
3 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
Traces of waste water discharge have
been detected in many new places.
15.11.2017 Corrected partly
4 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
The previously generated waste is
removed
24.11.2017 Mostly corrected
5 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Non-hazardous waste (excavation
material, rocks, concrete and metallic
parts, etc.) is managed in accordance
with SEMP.
24.11.2017 Mostly corrected
6 9.11.2017 The warning signs and exclusion 9.11.2017 Mostly corrected
26
26
barriers are properly installed at all the
entrances to the construction site
7 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
Machinery is parked in approved area 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
Corrected partly
8 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
Many dismantled utility pipes were not
accumulated in regular heaps at the
preliminary accumulation site but are
dangerously left and scattered all over
construction site.
15.11.2017 Corrected partly
9 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Safety on the wall structures is not properly ensured. Proper scaffoldings for the works on wall structures and proper site access bridges are still missing
- Not corrected
10 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Mud spread preventive measures are
needed at the entrances to the site.
- Not corrected
11 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Sanitary-hygienic conditions for workers
are not satisfactory.
- Not corrected
12 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Garbage collection and removal is not
organized properly
- Not corrected
13 9.11.2017
15.11.2017
24.11.2017
Contractor is being reminded that the
re- planting of the tree of AP is awaited.
- Not corrected
N Deadline for
request
Corrective action request Date of corrective
action
Corrective action
status
1 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Warning signs and exclusion barriers
erected around work site areas.
22.12.2017 Mostly corrected
2 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Dismantled pipes are heaped in regular
heaps
22.12.2017 Mostly corrected
3 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
The previously generated waste is
removed
22.12.2017
Mostly corrected
4 5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Trucks are operating using covers 22.12.2017 Corrected partly
5 1.12.2017 Safety on the wall structures is not - Not corrected
27
27
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
properly ensured. Proper scaffoldings for the works on wall structures and proper site access bridges are still missing
6 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Mud spread preventive measures are
needed at the entrances to the site.
- Not corrected
7 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Sanitary-hygienic conditions for workers
are not satisfactory.
- Not corrected
8 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Garbage collection and removal is not
organized properly
- Not corrected
9 1.12.2017
5.12.2017
14.12.2017
22.12.2017
Contractor is being reminded that the
re-planting of the tree of AP is awaited.
- Not corrected
D. Annex 4: Status of the summery of corrective actions for the reporting period for Tender 4
The summary of corrective actions for the reporting period from July to December 2017 by the end of
each month is presented in the Matrix below:
Monitoring
visit
Fully
compliant
Partly
compliant
Non-
conformity
Non- conformities
detected during the
last visits corrected
(Fully/ Partly)
Non- conformities
detected during the
last visits not
corrected
July 27 10 1 2/5 0
August 17 18 7 1/0 7
September 22 10 7 4/1 8
October 17 14 11 1/4 8
November 19 20 3 1/3 1
December 20 8 13 2/1 8
28
28
E. Annex 5: The results of air quality, noise and vibration monitoring for Tender 4
Map showing the beasline measurment points
F. Annex 6: Example of weekly environmental monitoring checklist for Tender 4 MITIGATION COMPLIANCE & INSPECTION MONITORING Report № 27
Project:SUDIP – Tranche_2 Tender 4________________________________________________________________________________
Implementing Agency: PIU
Scope of Inspection:Davtashen- Artashat Highway road link Date: December 14, 2017 Weather Condition: sunny
Attendees Name&Position:
Mrs Ruzanna Voskanyan, PIU EO Mrs Armine Yedigaryan, ADB NC Mrs EditaVardgesyan, EGIS HSE Monitoring visit was carried out with the presence of: Mr. David Harutyunyan, Contractor's EHSS
Karen Mirzoyan, Contractor’s H&S specialist
WORK SITE:General
Environmental management: environmental team, health& safety, emergency, trainings, grievance redress mechanism
Construction Activity Mitigation Measure (as per EMP/SEMP) Mitigation Implement
ed
Yes/No/NA
Mitigation Effective*
1 to 5
Corrective Action Request (CAR)
including deadline for effective CA.
Resolution Status of
previous CAR
(resolved/outstanding actions
required)
Environmental team
All activities 1. Person in charge on environmental
management is appointed and is present
on-site.
Y 1
All activities 2. Person in charge on H&S management is
appointed and is present on-site
Y 1
A new safety responsible
person, Mr. Karen
Mirzoyan was on- site
Health& safety
30
30
All activities 3. Warning signs and exclusion barriers
erected around work site areas.
Y 2
Mostly
corrected
All activities 4. Access of strangers and outsiders is
excluded.
N 3 Contractor is
being requested
increase the
number of
prohibiting
posters also on
other entrances
(not only Huysi
Avan) and
prevent the
constant present
of unauthorized
people on- site
Implement
before December
25, 2017
31
31
All activities 5. Workers are provided with and are using
the uniform and applicable
safety/protection equipment for site
conditions
N 5
The proper safety PPE for
working on height and in
the deep tranches is
missing.
Contractor is
being requested
ensure that safety
PPE is being used
while working on
height. Correct
immediately
Non-
conformance
repeated
All activities 6. Unsafe practices on-site are excluded N 5
Safety on the wall
structures is not properly
ensured.
Proper scaffoldings with
safety back rails for the
works on wall structures
and bridges , as well as
proper site access bridges
are still missing
The Contractor
is requested to
provide back
railed
scaffoldings. The
sub- contractor is
requested to
remove the
unsafe bridges
and staircases
and provide
proper ones.
Correct before
immediately
Non-
conformance
repeated
32
32
Works on bridge 7. Safety on the bridge is ensured N 5
See 5 and 6
Non-
conformance
repeated
33
33
All activities 8. Worker’s health checks implemented Y 1
All activities 9. Sanitary-hygienic conditions for workers
are provided: drinking and washing water
supply, mealtime utilities, toilets, rest
time, etc.
N 5
Proper winter time break
warming conditions for
workers are not provided.
Only 1 toilet is available
for all the road sections.
The mealtime facilities are
not available.
The Contractor
is requested to
improve before
December
25, 2017 and
provide proper
(21th century fit)
sanitary facilities
Non-
conformance
repeated
All activities 10. First aid kit is available on-site and is
accessible to all workers.
Y 1
Both Contractor and sub-
contractor are OK
All activities 11. Fire extinguisher available Y 1
All activities 12. Safety of the public is ensured N 3
Unauthorized people are
present on- site.
Contractor is
being requested
increase the
number of
prohibiting
posters also on
other entrances
(not only
HuysiAvan) and
prevent the
constant present
of unauthorized
people on- site
Implement
before December
25, 2017
Emergency Response Plan
34
34
All activities 13. Person in charge on emergency is
appointed and is present on-site
Y 1
A newly
appointed safety
responsible was
on- site
All activities 14. Copy of ERP and emergency contact list
are available, updated and posted in a
visible place at all work sites.
Y 1
All activities 15. Accident report maintained N/A -
All activities 16. Damage of utilities and/or other
structures managed.
N/A -
Trainings and orientation courses
All activities 17. Workers briefed on SEMP at time of
starting employment.
Y 1
All activities 18. Workers briefed on ERP at time of
starting employment.
Y 1
All activities 19. Job-specific environmental and safety
training for workers provided
Y 1
Work site cleanliness
All activities 20. The work site kept clean from debris,
garbage, etc.
N 3
The previously detected
heaps of garbage are not
removed.
Contractor is
once again
reminded on the
responsibility to
obtain the
garbage disposal
permission from
YM clean the
sites before
December 25,
2017.
Non-
conformance
repeated
All activities 21. Bins for garbage collection are installed N 3
The bins for garbage
collection were available
but overloaded
Contractor is
being requested
timely empty the
bins and ensure
Non-
conformance
repeated
35
35
the cleanliness of
the site. Correct
before December
25, 2017
All activities using
machinery
22. Tires of trucks are cleaned before
entering city roads and roads are not
dirtied by mud and other construction
related dirt
N 3
The traces of machinery
outgoing from the site are
evident. this became more
actual especially in rainy
and muddy weather. All
the mud from working area
is being spread and turns
into the thick layer of dust
very close to the residential
buildings and houses.
The Contractor
is requested
implement and
report on mud
spread
preventive
measures and on
the cleaning of
dirtied public
roads.
Correct before
December 25,
2017
Non-
conformance
repeated
All activities using
liquid materials
23. Spillages are managed properly N 3
The traces of spillages of
concrete wash water
detected during the last
visit were removed but
measures on prevention in
the future were not
implemented
Contractor is
being requested
allocate the pool
for waste water
collection and
train the staff
accordingly
before December
26, 2017
Corrected partly
Public communication and grievance redress mechanism: environmental issues
All activities 24. Meeting with community members on
construction activities, environmental
impacts and mitigation measures held
Y 1
All activities 25. Register of complaints maintained,
Complains observed during the last visit
addressed
Y
N/A
1
All activities 26. People are notified on inconveniences:
water, electricity breaks, etc. N/A -
Environmental parameters: Dust control
36
36
Earth works, material
delivery, removal of
existing pavement,
asphalt pavement
27. Trucks are operating using covers N 4
Many trucks were detected
entering the public roads
without covers
Contractor is
being requested
ensure that all
the trucks are
using covers
Correct
immediately
28. Dust control measures are effective N 5
Contractor is not
implementing dust control
measures
see 22
29. Equipment and haul vehicles are fitted
with effective emission control
equipment
Y 1
Effectiveness of
emission control
equipment is
assessed by
visually
monitoring the
level of gas
emissions which
were not
excessive.
Noise control
Operation of machinery
while earth works,
material delivery,
removal of existing
pavement, asphalt
pavement
30. Construction noise levels are acceptable
at closest sensitive receptor
Y 1
The noise level
was not
excessive.
31. Equipment fitted with effective silencers Y 1 Effectiveness of
silencers is
assessed by
monitoring of the
noise level which
37
37
was not
excessive. 32. Managed by restricting operating hours Y 1
33. Managed by portable noise barrier panels N/A -
Vibration control
Operation of machinery
while removal of
existing pavement,
asphalt pavement
34. Managed by reducing time exposed to
vibration
Y 1
Erosion control:
Earth works 35. excavated slopes stabilised Y 2
Contractor is excavating in
the areas where the topsoil
is available.
Contractor is
requested
implement
stripping and
preservation of
topsoil and
properly report
on the location of
the temporary
accumulation site
within WMR and
MPR
before December
25, 2017
Water control
Earth works 36. Sediment laden runoff is prevented
entering water course
N/A -
Water course is not
impacted by current works
The mitigation measures
according to SEMP shall
be implemented when
needed.
Earth works 37. Water course is kept open and is not
blocked by sediment.
N/A -
Earth works and
pavement
38. Storm water flows from construction site
are treated before entering water bodies
N/A -
Tree planting
All activities 39. Proper maintenance of re-planted trees N 5 Contractor is Non-
38
38
and shrubs, protection of existing
vegetation and lawns.
The excavated rocky
subsoil is just pushed onto
the trees.
Contractor is requested to
document the tree cutting
and vegetation clearing
process whenever
implemented and report
being requested
remove all the
subsoil and
release the trees.
Also he is
reminded that the
re- planting of the
pine tree of AP is
awaited. The date
and mode of task
performance are
requested before
December 25,
2017
Contractor is
requested to
provide a
landscaping and
tree management
plan and update
SEMP
respectively.
conformance
repeated
Construction waste management
Earth works 40. Materials and newly generated
construction waste is retained in spoil
dumps at temporary accumulation sites
agreed with Engineer.
Y 1
Contractor is
being requested
remove the newly
generated waste
before December
25, 2017
39
39
Earth works 41. Remains of materials and previously
detected construction waste is hauled
from work site
Y 2
The previously detected
waste is mostly removed.
Only a small limited
amount is left.
Removal of existing
asphalt pavement
42. Hazardous waste is managed in
accordance with SEMP N 3
see 23
Earth works,
demolition of
structures,
43. Non-hazardous waste (excavation
material, rocks, concrete and metallic
parts, etc.) is managed in accordance with
SEMP.
Y 2
Dismantling of utilities 44. Utilities are dismantled and managed in
accordance with SEMP
Y 2 Corrected partly
Use of chemicals, fuel,
lubricants, etc. while
all activities
45. Leakages and liquid waste is managed in
accordance with SEMP.
N/A -
40
40
Contractor’s facilities and equipment
Contractor’s facility
area establishment
46. Site Management Plan for the
Contractor’s facility area is available.
N/A -
Contractor did not
establish a construction
camp. All facilities are
installed temporarily
within the RoW
Parking of machinery 47. Machinery is parked in approved area Y 2
Mobile house 48. Mobile house is installed in approved
area
Y 1
Storage of materials 49. Materials are stored in regular heaps and
in approved areas
Y 1
Compliance with
SEMP
50.
Contractor’s facilities are established
according to SEMP
Y 2
The Contractor provided
draft updated SEMP. The
final SEMP is awaited
Contractor is
being requested
submit the
updated SEMP
before December
30, 2017
Blasting operations
General operation of
the site
51 SEMP available N/A -
General operation of
the site
52 Blasting is implemented in accordance
with SEMP
N/A -
* Mitigation Effectiveness Rating Criteria
1. Very Good 20 2. Good 6 3. Fair 7 4. Poor 1 5. Very Poor 6
top related