enhancing fso link performance in adverse …personal.utulsa.edu/~nathan-hutchins/performance in...

Post on 30-Mar-2018

220 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Enhancing FSO Link Performance in Adverse Conditions using a Fiber-

Bundle Based Receiver Design.

Nathan HutchinsDr. Peter LoPresti

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Welcome Thanks Nathan Hutchins

Outline

• Introduction• Background

• Basic Optics• The Problem With Turbulence• Kolmogorov, Rytov, and Cn

2

• Bundle-Based Design

• Experimentation• Data Analysis• Conclusions• Future Work

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What we are going to see.

Introduction

• Goal• Design a receiver that reduces the

effect of turbulence on an FSO signal while maintaining a small SWaP requirement.

• FSO• Free-Space Optics

• SWaP• Size, Weight, and Power

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Strictly defined goal. FSO, SWaP.

BackgroundStandard Receiver

• Field of View (FOV)• FOV <0.1⁰ without Alignment device.• FOV ±0.5-1⁰with Alignment device.

• Alignment/Beam Steering Device• Mechanical Device

• Vibrations, Power, Cost, Weight, Reliability, Durability

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Extremely small point of view. Alignment Device increase SWaP.

BackgroundMisalignment

If the angle of incidence of the incoming beam is too steep the beam can miss the detector.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fatal Error!

BackgroundTurbulenceWhat is Turbulence?• change of refractive index

• heat • movement• particulate dispersion in the air

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Turbulence can be defined as the change of refractive index of a material due to heat, movement, and particulate dispersion in the air. Index-of-refraction structure constant, 𝐶 𝑛 2 , the numerical value of the amount of energy the turbulence in the air has, m-2/3 Red line is high turbulence, blue line is low turbulence

The Problem

Turbulence

Turbulence can cause the incoming beam to be erratic and miss the detector as well as causing ‘hot spots’.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How Turbulence effects everything.

The ProblemKolmogorov, Rytov, and Cn

2

• Kolmogorov Power Spectrum• 𝛷𝛷𝑛𝑛 𝜅𝜅 = 0.033𝐶𝐶𝑛𝑛2𝜅𝜅 ⁄−11 3

• Power Law for Propagation Distance

• 𝛷𝛷𝑛𝑛 𝜅𝜅, 𝑧𝑧 = 0.033𝐶𝐶𝑛𝑛2(𝑧𝑧)𝜅𝜅 ⁄−11 3

• Wave Equation• 𝛻𝛻2𝐸𝐸 + 𝑘𝑘2𝑛𝑛2 𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸 + 2𝛻𝛻 𝐸𝐸 � 𝛻𝛻 log𝑛𝑛 𝑅𝑅 = 0

• Rytov Variance • 𝜎𝜎𝑅𝑅2 = 1.23𝐶𝐶𝑛𝑛2𝑘𝑘 ⁄7 6𝐿𝐿 ⁄11

6

• Assumptions• Wave backscattering can be neglected• Depolarization effects can be

neglected• The refractive index is delta

correlated in the direction of propagation

• The paraxial approximation will hold• Limit the data analyses to weak

turbulence cases

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Why we can use the Rytov Variance

The DesignTransmitter

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We only used the middle fibers. A switch can be inserted between the optical amplifier and the fiber ribbon that will select which fiber in the ribbon is transmitting. By moving off of the optical axis of the telescope, the beam is effectively steered to one side or the other, allowing for tracking without moving parts.

Bundle-Based DesignReceiver

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Basic Ray diagram of the optical path

Graded-IndexLenses

Parabolic Lens(Aspheric)

Focal Length: 3mm

400 μm Fiber

Bundle-Based ReceiverRay Diagram

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Diagram showing ray paths. Light in->focused into fiber-> column by GILs->Focused by parabolic

Bundle-Based ReceiverCapturing LensesFocal Length: 3mmTarget Width: 400µm

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Extremely strong lens to channel signal into fiber

What Improvements Come with our Design?

• Larger FOV• Mobile Enabled

• Greater chance of receiving light sent through increased turbulence areas.

• Less sensitive to changes in wavelength.

• Multi-User is Possible.• Off-Axis Signal Collection

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Why it is better. Mobile, duh. Increased performance in turbulence Multiplexed wavelengths Off-axis signal Correction

Performance in Turbulent Media

• The Goal• To Quantify/Model this

performance and verify results

• How?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How do we test

ExperimentsThe Setup

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Test 2 recievers, Basic and Bundle. Test 3 wavelengths Test at 4 different turbulence settings Refrance records all!

ExperimentsData Collection

Presenter
Presentation Notes
National Instruments Machine and O-Scope ouput example

ExperimentsData Collection

Standard Receiver

Bundle Receiver

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Raw data viewed in MATLAB. Bundle receiver is much cleaner and larger.

ExperimentsData Collection

• Rearranged Rytov Variance• 𝐶𝐶𝑛𝑛2 = 𝜎𝜎2

1.23∗𝑘𝑘 �7 6∗𝑙𝑙 �116

• Procedure• Using MATLAB

• Analyze Data input for 1’s/0’s• Take The Variance of the 1’s/0’s

• Plug Variance (σ) in to the Rearranged Rytov Variance Equation.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Choose one or zero, Take the variance, Plug variance into Rytov to get C_n^2

ExperimentsCollected Data Example

sigma_0 sigma_1 Sigma^2_0 Sigma^2_1 Lambda L K Cn^2_0 Cn^2_1 Avg Avg1550 Box 1.48021E-03 1.87880E-03 2.19102E-06 3.5299E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.34437E-14 2.16588E-14 1.46641E-14 2.05905E-141550 Box 2 1.51302E-03 1.76703E-03 2.28924E-06 3.12239E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.40463E-14 1.91584E-141550 Box 3 1.56786E-03 1.64177E-03 2.45818E-06 2.69542E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.50829E-14 1.65386E-141550 Box 4 1.57003E-03 1.76240E-03 2.465E-06 3.10604E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.51247E-14 1.90581E-141550 Box 5 1.57394E-03 1.84693E-03 2.4773E-06 3.41113E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.52002E-14 2.09301E-141550 Box 6 1.56806E-03 2.06636E-03 2.4588E-06 4.26986E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.50867E-14 2.61991E-141550 Low 1.45155E-03 1.97636E-03 2.10701E-06 3.90601E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.29282E-14 2.39665E-14 1.30963E-14 3.13108E-141550 Low 2 1.47475E-03 2.19843E-03 2.17488E-06 4.83312E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.33446E-14 2.96551E-141550 Low 3 1.46706E-03 2.24288E-03 2.15225E-06 5.03053E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.32058E-14 3.08664E-141550 Low 4 1.47316E-03 2.32184E-03 2.1702E-06 5.39093E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.33159E-14 3.30777E-141550 Low 5 1.46010E-03 2.39198E-03 2.13189E-06 5.72156E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.30808E-14 3.51064E-141550 Low 6 1.43883E-03 2.39492E-03 2.07022E-06 5.73564E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.27025E-14 3.51928E-141550 med 1.39020E-03 2.30054E-03 1.93265E-06 5.2925E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.18583E-14 3.24738E-14 1.1481E-14 3.23307E-141550 med 2 1.36573E-03 2.27473E-03 1.86522E-06 5.17438E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.14446E-14 3.1749E-141550 med 3 1.35436E-03 2.34360E-03 1.83429E-06 5.49246E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.12548E-14 3.37007E-141550 med 4 1.37463E-03 2.31476E-03 1.88961E-06 5.35813E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.15943E-14 3.28764E-141550 med 5 1.37300E-03 2.30269E-03 1.88513E-06 5.30238E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.15668E-14 3.25344E-141550 med 6 1.34907E-03 2.23500E-03 1.82E-06 4.99522E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.11672E-14 3.06497E-141550 High 1.38441E-03 2.00649E-03 1.9166E-06 4.02599E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.17599E-14 2.47027E-14 1.16966E-14 2.38777E-141550 high 2 1.40042E-03 1.97132E-03 1.96119E-06 3.8861E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.20335E-14 2.38443E-141550 High 3 1.38221E-03 1.96113E-03 1.91051E-06 3.84601E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.17225E-14 2.35984E-141550 high 4 1.35359E-03 1.93409E-03 1.83221E-06 3.74071E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.12421E-14 2.29523E-141550 High 5 1.39842E-03 1.94269E-03 1.95559E-06 3.77405E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.19991E-14 2.31568E-141550 high 6 1.36442E-03 2.01899E-03 1.86163E-06 4.07633E-06 1.55E-06 1.68 4.05E+06 1.14226E-14 2.50116E-14

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Example Excel sheet of data. 4 Temperatures 1 Wavelength (1550) Each temperature has 6 runs that are averaged

ExperimentsData Analysis 850nm

5.5E-16

5.7E-16

5.9E-16

6.1E-16

6.3E-16

6.5E-16

6.7E-16

6.9E-16

7.1E-16

7.3E-16

0 2E-14 4E-14 6E-14 8E-146.9E-16

6.95E-16

7E-16

7.05E-16

7.1E-16

7.15E-16

7.2E-16

7.25E-16

7.3E-16

7.35E-16

Cn^2

Sta

ndar

d Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

850nm Cn^2 Ones

Cn^2_1 Cn^2_1_STD

5.6E-16

5.8E-16

6E-16

6.2E-16

6.4E-16

6.6E-16

6.8E-16

7E-16

6.6E-16

6.65E-16

6.7E-16

6.75E-16

6.8E-16

6.85E-16

6.9E-16

6.95E-16

7E-16

0 1E-14 2E-14 3E-14 4E-14 5E-14 6E-14 7E-14 8E-14

Cn^2

Sta

ndar

d Rx

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

850nm Cn^2 Zeros

Cn^2_0 Cn^2_0_STD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Ones graph end behavior, Very close in power since there was not amplifier for 850nm

ExperimentsData Analysis 1310nm

1.5E-13

1.9E-13

2.3E-13

2.7E-13

3.1E-13

3.5E-13

3.9E-13

4.3E-13

02E-144E-146E-148E-141E-13

1.2E-131.4E-131.6E-131.8E-13

-1E-14 1E-14 3E-14 5E-14 7E-14 9E-14 1.1E-13 1.3E-13

Cn^2

Tra

ditio

nal R

x

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

1310nm Cn^2 Ones

Cn^2_1 Cn^2_1_STD

1.2E-131.3E-131.4E-131.5E-131.6E-131.7E-131.8E-131.9E-132E-132.1E-132.2E-132.3E-13

1.1E-131.12E-131.14E-131.16E-131.18E-13

1.2E-131.22E-131.24E-131.26E-131.28E-13

3E-15 2.3E-14 4.3E-14 6.3E-14 8.3E-14 1.03E-13 1.23E-13

Cn^2

Tra

ditio

nal R

x

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

1310nm Cn^2 Zeros

Cn^2_0 Cn^2_0_STD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Similar results around 2 times better than standard End behavior,

ExperimentsData Analysis 1550nm

1.7E-13

1.72E-13

1.74E-13

1.76E-13

1.78E-13

1.8E-13

1.82E-13

1.84E-13

1.86E-13

1.88E-13

1.8E-14

2E-14

2.2E-14

2.4E-14

2.6E-14

2.8E-14

3E-14

3.2E-14

3.4E-14

0 5E-14 1E-13 1.5E-13 2E-13 2.5E-13 3E-13

Cn^2

Tra

ditio

nal R

x

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

1550nm Cn^2 Ones

Cn^2_1 Cn^2_1_STD

3.2E-14

3.3E-14

3.4E-14

3.5E-14

3.6E-14

3.7E-14

3.8E-14

3.9E-14

1.1E-14

1.15E-14

1.2E-14

1.25E-14

1.3E-14

1.35E-14

1.4E-14

1.45E-14

1.5E-14

0 5E-14 1E-13 1.5E-13 2E-13 2.5E-13 3E-13

Cn^2

Tra

ditio

nal R

x

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

1550nm Cn^2 Zeros

Cn^2_0 Cn^2_0_STD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Ones end behavior! Around 10 times better signal

ExperimentsData Analysis Cont.

Cn2 of Standard receiver

(Orange) is 10 times larger than Bundle Receiver (Blue)

0

2E-14

4E-14

6E-14

8E-14

1E-13

1.2E-13

1.4E-13

1.6E-13

1.8E-13

2E-13

2.2E-13

0 5E-14 1E-13 1.5E-13 2E-13 2.5E-13 3E-13

Cn^2

Bun

dle

Rx

Cn^2 Of The Lab

1550nm Cn^2 Ones

Cn^2_1 Cn^2_1_STD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
10 Times!

Conclusion

Bundle-based receiver improves signal strength and reliability by counteracting the effects of turbulence, thereby making the effective Cn

2 as seen by the receiver to be smaller than the actual value of Cn

2

Future WorkTurbulence Simulations

• Model Turbulence in MATLAB• Model Bundle Receiver In MATLAB• Model How Well Bundle Receiver works

Future WorkIncreased Fiber Dimensions

Increase Fiber Dimensions from 400μm to 600μm

Future WorkOptical Tracking with Transmitter

Insert Switch Here

Thank You,Questions?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Thank You all for coming!

Bonus SlideThe Turbulence Box

Bonus SlideLiner Fiber Array Transmitter

top related