end to end learning and optimization on graphs - bryan wilder · 2021. 1. 2. · 10/27/2019 bryan...

Post on 15-Feb-2021

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • End to End Learning and Optimization on Graphs

    Bryan Wilder1, Eric Ewing2, Bistra Dilkina2, Milind Tambe11Harvard University

    2University of Southern California

    To appear at NeurIPS 2019

    110/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard)

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 2

    Data Decisions???

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 3

    Data Decisionsarg max𝑥𝑥∈𝑋𝑋 𝑓𝑓 𝑥𝑥,𝜃𝜃

    Standard two stage: predict then optimize

    Training: maximize accuracy

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 4

    Data Decisionsarg max𝑥𝑥∈𝑋𝑋 𝑓𝑓 𝑥𝑥,𝜃𝜃

    Standard two stage: predict then optimize

    Challenge: misalignment between “accuracy” and decision quality

    Training: maximize accuracy

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 5

    Data Decisions

    Pure end to end

    Training: maximize decision quality

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 6

    Data Decisions

    Pure end to end

    Challenge: optimization is hard

    Training: maximize decision quality

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 7

    Data Decisions

    Decision-focused learning: differential optimization during training

    arg max𝑥𝑥∈𝑋𝑋

    𝑓𝑓 𝑥𝑥,𝜃𝜃

    Training: maximize decision quality

  • 10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 8

    Data Decisions

    Challenge: how to make optimization differentiable?

    arg max𝑥𝑥∈𝑋𝑋

    𝑓𝑓 𝑥𝑥,𝜃𝜃

    Training: maximize decision quality

    Decision-focused learning: differential optimization during training

  • Relax + differentiate

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 9

    Forward pass: run a solver

    Backward pass: sensitivity analysis via KKT conditions

  • Relax + differentiate• Convex QPs [Amos and Kolter 2018, Donti et al 2018]• Linear and submodular programs [Wilder, Dilkina, Tambe 2019]• MAXSAT (via SDP relaxation) [Wang, Donti, Wilder, Kolter 2019]• MIPs [Ferber, Wilder, Dilkina, Tambe 2019]

    • Monday @ 11am, Room 612

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 10

  • What’s wrong with relaxations?• Some problems don’t have good ones• Slow to solve continuous optimization problem• Slower to backprop through – 𝑂𝑂(𝑛𝑛3)

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 11

  • This work• Alternative: include solver for a simpler proxy problem• Learn a representation that maps hard problem to simple one• Instantiate this idea for a class of graph optimization problems

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 12

  • Graph learning + optimization

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 13

  • Problem classes• Partition the nodes into K disjoint groups

    • Community detection, maxcut, …• Select a subset of K nodes

    • Facility location, influence maximization, vaccination, …• Methods of choice are often combinatorial/discrete

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 14

  • Approach• Observation: grouping nodes into communities is a good heuristic

    • Partitioning: correspond to well-connected subgroups• Facility location: put one facility in each community

    • Observation: graph learning approaches already embed into 𝑅𝑅𝑛𝑛

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 15

  • Approach1. Start with clustering algorithm (in 𝑅𝑅𝑛𝑛)

    • Can (approximately) differentiate very quickly 2. Train embeddings (representation) to solve the particular problem

    • Automatically learning a good continuous relaxation!

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 16

  • ClusterNet Approach

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 17

    Node embedding (GCN)

    K-means clustering Locate 1 facility in

    each community

  • Differentiable K-means

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 18

    Update cluster centers

    Softmax update to node assignments

    Forward pass

  • Differentiable K-means

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 19

    Backward pass

    • Option 1: differentiate through the fixed-point condition 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡 = 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡+1

    • Prohibitively slow, memory-intensive

  • Differentiable K-means

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 20

    Backward pass

    • Option 1: differentiate through the fixed-point condition 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡 = 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡+1

    • Prohibitively slow, memory-intensive • Option 2: unroll the entire series of updates

    • Cost scales with # iterations• Have to stick to differentiable operations

  • Differentiable K-means

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 21

    Backward pass

    • Option 1: differentiate through the fixed-point condition 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡 = 𝜇𝜇𝑡𝑡+1

    • Prohibitively slow, memory-intensive • Option 2: unroll the entire series of updates

    • Cost scales with # iterations• Have to stick to differentiable operations

    • Option 3: get the solution, then unroll one update• Do anything to solve the forward pass• Linear time/memory, implemented in vanilla pytorch

  • Differentiable K-meansTheorem [informal]: provided the clusters are sufficiently balanced and well-separated, the Option 3 approximate gradients converge exponentially quickly to the true ones.

    Idea: show that this corresponds to approximating a particular term in the analytical fixed-point gradients.

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 22

  • ClusterNet Approach

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 23

    GCN node embeddings

    K-means clustering Locate 1 facility in

    each community

  • ClusterNet Approach

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 24

    GCN node embeddings

    K-means clustering Locate 1 facility in

    each community

    Loss: quality of facility assignment

  • ClusterNet Approach

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 25

    GCN node embeddings

    K-means clustering Locate 1 facility in

    each community

    Loss: quality of facility assignment

    Differentiate through K-means

  • ClusterNet Approach

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 26

    GCN node embeddings

    K-means clustering Locate 1 facility in

    each community

    Loss: quality of facility assignment

    Differentiate through K-means

    Update GCN params

  • Experiments• Learning problem: link prediction• Optimization: community detection and facility location problems• Train GCNs as predictive component

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 27

  • Example: community detection

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 28

    Observe partial graph Predict unseen edges Find communities

    max𝑟𝑟

    12𝑚𝑚

    �𝑢𝑢,𝑣𝑣∈𝑉𝑉

    �𝑘𝑘=1

    𝐾𝐾

    𝐴𝐴𝑢𝑢,𝑣𝑣 −𝑑𝑑𝑢𝑢𝑑𝑑𝑣𝑣2𝑚𝑚

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘𝑟𝑟𝑣𝑣𝑘𝑘

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘 ∈ 0,1 ∀𝑢𝑢 ∈ 𝑉𝑉, 𝑘𝑘 = 1 …𝐾𝐾

    �𝑘𝑘=1

    𝐾𝐾

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘 = 1 ∀𝑢𝑢 ∈ 𝑉𝑉

  • Example: community detection

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 29

    max𝑟𝑟

    12𝑚𝑚

    �𝑢𝑢,𝑣𝑣∈𝑉𝑉

    �𝑘𝑘=1

    𝐾𝐾

    𝐴𝐴𝑢𝑢,𝑣𝑣 −𝑑𝑑𝑢𝑢𝑑𝑑𝑣𝑣2𝑚𝑚

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘𝑟𝑟𝑣𝑣𝑘𝑘

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘 ∈ 0,1 ∀𝑢𝑢 ∈ 𝑉𝑉, 𝑘𝑘 = 1 …𝐾𝐾

    �𝑘𝑘=1

    𝐾𝐾

    𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑢𝑘𝑘 = 1 ∀𝑢𝑢 ∈ 𝑉𝑉

    • Useful in scientific discovery (social groups, functional modules in biological networks)• In applications, two-stage approach is common

    [Yan & Gegory ’12, Burgess et al ‘16, Berlusconi et al ‘16, Tan et al ‘16, Bahulker et al ’18…]

    Observe partial graph Predict unseen edges Find communities

  • Experiments• Learning problem: link prediction• Optimization: community detection and facility location problems• Train GCNs as predictive component• Comparison

    • Two stage: GCN + expert-designed algorithm (2Stage)• Pure end to end: Deep GCN to predict optimal solution (e2e)

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 30

  • Results: single-graph link prediction

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 31

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Mod

    ular

    ityCommunity detection

    (higher is better)

    ClusterNet 2stage e2e5

    7

    9

    11

    Max

    dist

    ance

    Facility location (lower is better)

    ClusterNet 2stage e2e

    Representative example from cora, citeseer, protein interaction, facebook, adolescent health networks

  • Results: generalization across graphs

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 32

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Mod

    ular

    ityCommunity detection

    (higher is better)

    ClusterNet 2stage e2e5

    7

    9

    Max

    dist

    ance

    Facility location (lower is better)

    ClusterNet 2stage e2e

    ClusterNet learns generalizable strategies for optimization!

  • Takeaways• Good decisions require integrating learning and optimization• Pure end-to-end methods miss out on useful structure• Even simple optimization primitives provide good inductive bias

    NeurIPS’19 paper, see bryanwilder.github.io Code available at https://github.com/bwilder0/clusternet

    10/27/2019 Bryan Wilder (Harvard) 33

    https://github.com/bwilder0/clusternet

    End to End Learning and Optimization on GraphsSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Relax + differentiateRelax + differentiateWhat’s wrong with relaxations?This workGraph learning + optimizationProblem classesApproachApproachClusterNet ApproachDifferentiable K-meansDifferentiable K-meansDifferentiable K-meansDifferentiable K-meansDifferentiable K-meansClusterNet ApproachClusterNet ApproachClusterNet ApproachClusterNet ApproachExperimentsExample: community detectionExample: community detectionExperimentsResults: single-graph link predictionResults: generalization across graphsTakeaways

top related