edu 505 final project rubric

Post on 30-May-2018

222 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

8/14/2019 EDU 505 Final Project Rubric

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/edu-505-final-project-rubric 1/2

EDU 505 Final Project Rubric5 - Superior 4 - Sufficient 3 - Satisfactory 2 - Incomplete

Topic Well developed topic Topic

Lesson is age appropriate

Use of technology is minimal

Lesson is age appropriate

Well developed aboveand beyond expectation

Topic was lacking depth or consistency

Lesson Plans Lesson plans went aboveand beyond expectationwith planning, and

Lesson plans sufficientlycovered all elementsnecessary

Lesson plans wereminimal, but covered mostelements

Lesson plans were sparse or incomplete in its preparationfor the lesson

Rubric or StudentAssessment

Wonderfully detailedrubric created in thatexplains assessment of student assignment

Detailed rubric explainingassessment of studentassignment

Assessment lackedenough detail for studentto assess expectations

Sparse or incoherentexplanation of studentassessment

Element #1:Meeting Objective

Objective of lesson is metand exceeded byallowing students topursue/discuss more

Objective of lesson is meteffectively and informationis conveyed usingtechnology as a tool

Objective of lesson islacking in meeting needs of all students or meeting fullcontent of unit plan

Objective is vaguely alluded toand technology is more toythan tool

Element #1:Age Appropriate

Lesson is ageappropriate, allowing for various ability levels tomeet objectives

Lesson is mostly ageappropriate, butsometimesover/underestimates abilityof students

Lesson clearlyunder/overestimates abilities of students and needs to berevised

Element #1:Visual Interest

Product of lesson isvisually interesting andwill excite and engagestudents

Product of lesson is visuallyappealing and welldesigned

Product of lesson isvisually intact, but lacksappeal that would engagestudents

Product of lesson lacks visualinterest and/or organizationwith over or under stimulation

Element #1:Use of Technology

Use of technology showsyour growth andstretching knowledge asa teacher 

Use of technology showsproficiency of technologyused

Use of technology isminimal and more researchor depth could have beenattempted

Element #2:

Meeting Objective

Objective of lesson is met

and exceeded byallowing students topursue/discuss more

Objective of lesson is met

effectively and informationis conveyed usingtechnology as a tool

Objective of lesson is

lacking in meeting needs of all students or meeting fullcontent of unit plan

Objective is vaguely alluded to

and technology is more toythan tool

Element #2:Age Appropriate

Lesson is ageappropriate, allowing for various ability levels tomeet objectives

Lesson is mostly ageappropriate, butsometimesover/underestimates abilityof students

Lesson clearlyunder/overestimates abilities of students and needs to berevised

Element #2:Visual Interest

Product of lesson isvisually interesting andwill excite and engagestudents

Product of lesson is visuallyappealing and welldesigned

Product of lesson is mostlyvisually intact, but lacks anappeal that would engagestudents

Product of lesson lacks visualinterest and/or organizationwith over or under stimulation

8/14/2019 EDU 505 Final Project Rubric

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/edu-505-final-project-rubric 2/2

Use of technology is minimal

Lesson is age appropriate

Use of technology is minimal

Did not follow template

Narration is clear 

Presentation: Clarity

TOTAL _____/100 points

Element #2:Use of Technology

Use of technology showsyour growth andstretching knowledge asa teacher 

Use of technology showsproficiency of technologyused

Use of technology isminimal and more researchor depth could have beenattempted

Element #3:Meeting Objective

Objective of lesson is metand exceeded byallowing students topursue/discuss more

Objective of lesson is meteffectively and informationis conveyed usingtechnology as a tool

Objective of lesson islacking in meeting needs of all students or meeting fullcontent of unit plan

Objective is vaguely alluded toand technology is more toythan tool

Element #3:Age Appropriate

Lesson is ageappropriate, allowing for various ability levels tomeet objectives

Lesson is mostly ageappropriate, butsometimesover/underestimates abilityof students

Lesson clearlyunder/overestimates abilities of students and needs to berevised

Element #3:Visual Interest

Product of lesson isvisually interesting andwill excite and engagestudents

Product of lesson is visuallyappealing and welldesigned

Product of lesson is mostlyvisually intact, but lacks anappeal that would engagestudents

Product of lesson lacks visualinterest and/or organizationwith over or under stimulation

Element #3:Use of Technology

Use of technology showsyour growth andstretching knowledge asa teacher 

Use of technology showsproficiency of technologyused

Use of technology isminimal and more researchor depth could have beenattempted

Presentation: AllElments Included

Completed all elementsas per the template andalso added elements for clarity

Completed all elements asper the template

Some elements missing asper the template

Presentation: AudioNarration

Narration is crisp, clear and concise

Narration is a bit muddledor overmodulated

Narration is incomplete or missing on some slides

Presentation: VisualAppeal

Wonderful balance of textvs. graphics, shows greatcreativity

Sufficient balance of textvs. graphics

Too much text or crazygraphics

Not enough visualinterest/difference to keepaudience attention

Presentation is so clear itallows for much interestand comments frompeers

Presentation is clear andconcise in explaining finalproject

Presentation jumps arounda bit and was notsequentially presented

Presentation appears to bethrown together andhaphazardly done

Overall: Effort &Creativity

Went above and beyondexpectations to stretchknowledge and ability tointegrate technology inthe classroom

Sufficiently demonstratedknowledge and ability tointegrate technology in theclassroom

Could have stretchedability more to integratetechnology more efficientlyin the classroom

Did not reach full potential of course in integratingtechnology in the classroom

top related