directorate banking regulation coordination or integration of bank insolvency in the eu? an holistic...

Post on 27-Mar-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Directorate Banking Regulation

Coordination or Integration of Bank Insolvency in the EU? An Holistic Approach

Maria J. Nieto

Building a Crisis Management Framework for the Internal Market European Commission19 March, 2010

Directorate Banking Regulation

Coordination or Integration of Bank Insolvency in the EU? An Holistic Approach

Maria J. Nieto

Building a Crisis Management Framework for the Internal Market European Commission19 March, 2010

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

These views do not necessarily represent

those of Banco de España

3

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OUTLINE

4

• Bank resolution as the fourth arm of the safety net

• Importance of incentive compatible safety net encompassing resolution/insolvency structures

• Optimal design resolution/liquidation policies in the EU

• Conclusions

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

BANK RESOLUTION AS THE FOURTH ARM OF THE SAFETY NET

• Public policy objective of resolving failed banks should be to permit free entry and exit of failed banks at minimal cost to society

• Laws and procedures for bank resolution importantly influence the safety net´s ability to succeed

5

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OUTLINE

6

• Bank resolution as the fourth arm of the safety net

• Importance of incentive compatible safety net encompassing resolution/insolvency structures

• Optimal design resolution/liquidation policies in the EU

• Conclusions

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

IMPORTANCE OF INCENTIVE COMPATIBLE SAFETY NET ENCOMPASSING RESOLUTION / INSOLVENCY STRUCTURES

• If failed banks can be provided liquidity and resolved at no cost, there may be few negative externalities that provide a justification for extensive prudential supervision

7

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

IMPORTANCE OF INCENTIVE COMPATIBLE SAFETY NET THAT ENCOMPASSING RESOLUTION / INSOLVENCY STRUCTURES

• Resolution rarely starts sufficiently promptly while the bank still has a positive net worth

• Poorly designed deposit insurance imposes losses on depositors

• Bank resolution procedures not particularly aimed at preserving financial stability

8

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OUTLINE

• Bank resolution as the fourth arm of the safety net

• Importance of incentive compatible safety net that encompassing resolution/insolvency structures

• Optimal design resolution/liquidation policies in the EU

• Conclusions

9

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF RESOLUTION/LIQUIDATION POLICIES IN THE EU

10

Approach

Safety Net

Centralized Explicit cross country coordination arrangements

DecentralizedImplicit coordination mechanisms

(harmonization)

PrudentialRegulation

- o Lamfalussy architectureoMore homogeneous secondary legislation

oNational legislation subject to therestriction of minimumharmonization

Prudential Supervision

- o European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS)oCoordination via MoU(PS+LOLR); (PS+LOLR+MF)

o National on site and off sitesupervision

LOLR(Emergency Liquidity)

- o Explicit coordination via MoU (PS+LOLR); (PS+LOLR+MF)o ECB Governing Council

o Implicitly decentralized NCBs

Deposit Insurance - oNational DIsoMinimum harmonization

Reorganization andWinding-Up

- oNational Resolution AuthoritiesoMinimum harmonization (coordination of procedures based on pples home country control, unity and universality)

Living Wills?

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF RESOLUTION/LIQUIDATION POLICIES IN THE EU

• Full internalization:

•Centralization of the EU safety net

Absence of a single fiscal authority

11

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF RESOLUTION/LIQUIDATION POLICIES IN THE EU• Partial internalization:– Strengthening “implicit mechanisms” of coordination

• Further harmonization of the national resolution frameworks» Special Resolution Regime for banking groups

– Strengthening “explicit mechanisms” of coordination• Info sharing PS – Resolution authorities (MoU)• Colleges (administrative or judicial) resolution authorities:

joint resolution measures for the benefit of the group (Mayes, Nieto, Wall, 2008)

• Delegation» CRD (Art 131) "[u]nder these arrangements additional tasks may be entrusted to the

competent authority responsible for supervision on a consolidated basis

» Ex ante agreement to make the process of restructuring less cumbersome

12

-

+

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF RESOLUTION/LIQUIDATION POLICIES IN THE EU

13

Decentralized Centralized Authority Resolution Colleges

(“lead administrator/liquidator”)

Delegation in the

Home country (“Ad hoc”

centralization)

Resolution Authority

Legal Changes Harmonization (min set of harmonized resolution rules –including closure

rules-)

New Charter (contractual agreement)

EU Special Resolution Regime for

resolving cross border banks

Implementation Easy

Relatively easy (relicensing)

Slow

(launching resolution

authority; special charter)

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF RESOLUTION/LIQUIDATION POLICIES IN THE EU

• Partial internalization (Cont.) - Strengthening “explicit mechanisms” of coordination

– Coordination with prudential supervision (Hardy and Nieto,2009): » First best approach: Highly coordinated PS and

Resolution/Liquidation» If Resolution/Liquidation is centralized and not PS, benefits would

be limited by PS forbearance » Strengthening “explicit mechanism” of coordination amongst PS

is valuable and reduces the cost of financial crisis ...even if coordination amongst resolution/liquidation authorities is limited

14

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

CONCLUSIONS

• Failed bank resolution processes influence the safety net´s ability to succeed

• Reforms should aim at strengthening the tools and coordination - Prudential Supervision and Reorganization and Winding up - Deposit Insurance and Reorganization and Winding up

• Coordination failures may result in negative externalities• Lack of centralization of PS and Resolution/Liquidation in an

integrated market such as the EU increases forbearance Larger losses of failed banks

• Centralization of Resolution/Liquidation w/o centralization of PS would limited benefits due to PS forbearance

• ...Further complicating the cost burden sharing: - Private vs Public and Domestic vs Foreign

15

DIRECTORATE BANKING REGULATION

Thank you!

16

top related