developing teamwork competencies using teamstepps® and …€¦ · ohio consortium of nursing...
Post on 27-Sep-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
DEVELOPING INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAMWORK COMPETENCIES USING TEAMSTEPPS® AND SIMULATION
Ohio Consortium of Nursing Learning Labs 2016
OUR INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAM
Dr. Rami Ahmed– Medicine Diane Brown – Nursing Diane Christensen – Nursing Dr. Connie Chronister – Nursing Kelli Chronister – Respiratory Therapy Marc Haas – Respiratory Therapy Martha Conrad – Director of IP Simulation
OCONLL 2016
WHERE OUR JOURNEY BEGAN …..
OCONLL 2016
FINDING COMMON LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES
OCONLL 2016
Teamwork
OCONLL 2016
MAKING A
• Learning objectives
• Simulation design• Critical care
context
• Debriefing• Evaluation
OCONLL 2016
TEAMWORK
Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Focus on
Communication Situation
Monitoring
OCONLL 2016
PLAN FOR PRE-BRIEF LEARNING
Students from different programs
Asynchronous online delivery TeamSTEPPS® video
recording link on YouTube
Clinical resources: articles, algorithms.
OCONLL 2016
SIMULATION DESIGN
• High-risk, low-frequency events
• Design using INACSL standards
• Embed cues to trigger student behaviors
OCONLL 2016
DEBRIEFING PLAN
StructuredFocused
on learning objectives“Good
judgment”
OCONLL 2016
EVALUATION OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Satisfaction with learning and facilities
Evaluation of debriefing experience: DASH
OCONLL 2016
SUPPORTIVE PLANNING DETAILS
Tech support plan Patient charts Observer checklists Certificates Logistics Communicate
details to students
OCONLL 2016
SIMULATION TECH SUPPORT
Plan a meeting Make it real Keep track of details Review for changes
after an event
OCONLL 2016
CREATE A HEALTH RECORD
Paper or electronic?
OCONLL 2016
CREATE AN OBSERVER CHECKLIST
Actively engage observers
Useful during peer-peer debriefing
Learning occurs during observation.
OCONLL 2016
CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
OCONLL 2016
DESIGN A STUDENT ROTATION SCHEDULE
Provide rotation schedules for students.
Assign to teams: Ad hocSeat together during
orientation to facilitate socialization.
Balance teams by profession
May serve as a sign in sheet on event day
OCONLL 2016
LOGISTICS
Educator assignments
Balance assignments by profession
OCONLL 2016
STUDENT COMMUNICATION
Email students with details including: Who: will be there What: to bring, wear When: Date and time Where: Address and Parking Why: Learning objectives How: to prepare, resources, pre-
learning
OCONLL 2016
SIMULATION DAY
Orientation to facility and equipment
OCONLL 2016
INTERPROFESSIONAL SIMULATION DAY
Pre Pre-brief
OCONLL 2016
MOCK CODE SIMULATION
OCONLL 2016
DEBRIEFING
video…
Live
rapid cycle
OCONLL 2016
EVALUATION OF PROGRAM
Experience Learning Instruction Facility Recommendo Experienceo Facility
OCONLL 2016
SATISFACTION RESULTS
On a 0-4 point scale, 0= Very poor, 4=Excellent All items were rated very high
Mean score range 3.7-3.9.
The overall rating (all 4 items) Mean score 15 out of 16.
Recommend experience and facility: 100% of students recommend for future learning.
OCONLL 2016
QUALITATIVE COMMENTS: SATISFACTION
Student comments on evaluations Majority were positive with common themes:
Would like more opportunities Contributed to learning about other professions Good for learning teamwork
Specific to debriefing methods: few reported preference for live debriefing compared to tele-debriefing.
OCONLL 2016
INTERPRETATION OF SATISFACTION DATA
Interprofessional Learning was valued and recommended for future inclusion in their education.
OCONLL 2016
DEBRIEFING EVALUATION: DASH
Debriefing is the most important part of any simulation experience
Currently the most validated debriefing evaluation available
Several versions Easy to use Quick
OCONLL 2016
Should take 1-3 mins to complete-6 questions
-All on a 1-7 scale
DATE: ___________________ CIRCLE: MEDICAL STUDENT NURSING STUDENT RESP. THER. STUDENT FACULTY: ________________ INSTRUCTIONS: PLEASE EVALUATE THE FACULTY’S DEBRIEFING UTILIZING THE DASH ELEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS CRITERIA. DASH ELEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS • THE INSTRUCTOR SET THE STAGE FOR AN ENGAGING LEARNING
EXPERIENCE o The instructor introduced him/herself, described the simulation environment,
what would be expected during the activity, and introduced the learning objectives.
o The instructor explained the strengths and weaknesses of the simulation and what I could do to get the most out of simulated clinical experiences.
o The instructor attended to logistical details as necessary such as toilet location, food availability, schedule.
o The instructor made me feel stimulated to share my thoughts and questions about the upcoming simulation and debriefing and reassured me that I wouldn’t be shamed or humiliated in the process.
• THE INSTRUCTOR MAINTAINED AN ENGAGING CONTEXT FOR LEARNING o The instructor clarified the purpose of the debriefing, what was expected of me,
and the instructor’s role in the debriefing. o The instructor acknowledged concerns about realism and helped me learn even
thought the case(s) were simulated. o I felt that the instructor respected participants. o The focus was on learning and not on making people feel bad about making
mistakes. o Participants could share thoughts and emotions without fear of being shamed or
humiliated. • THE INSTRUCTOR STRUCTURED THE DEBRIEFING IN AN ORGANIZED WAY
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DASH RESULTS
Debrief N Mean SD Sig.Live 55 34.5 4.8 p = .001Tele-remote 24 29.7 5.8
Live debriefing was rated statistically higher than Tele-debriefing
OCONLL 2016
RESULTS: SINGLE VS. MULTI-PROFESSIONAL
Debrief N Mean SD Sig.
Single profession 175 33.0 5.1 p = .74Multi-profession 62 32.8 5.3
No significant difference between single and multi-professional debriefing.
OCONLL 2016
LESSONS LEARNED
Schedule time to move students: have timekeepers, cushion, and think ahead.
Observer checklists add purpose Match complexity to student ability and time. Plan for alternative student decisions in the sim Run through simulations in advance Debriefing lessons: Faculty training
allow time & focus on learning objectives, video takes time, tele debrief depends on tech, Consider rapid cycle deliberate practice alternative
OCONLL 2016
KEY POINTS
Look for opportunities for collaboration Make a good plan: Work out logistics! Plan pre-sim learning Design simulations well and be open to revision Choose debrief structure and evaluation Plan to share your experience and findings
OCONLL 2016
REFERENCES
Ahmed R, King Gardner A, Atkinson SS, Gable B. (2014) Teledebriefing: connecting learners to faculty members. Clinical Teacher., 11(4):270-3.
Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, Simon R: (2012). Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: Development and psychometric properties. Simulation in Healthcare, 7(5), 288-294.
Dreifuerst KT. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education; 51(6):326-333.
Fernandez, R., Kozlowski, S., Shapiro, M., & Salas, E. (2008). Toward a definition of teamwork in emergency medicine. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1104-1112.
Raemer D, Anderson M, Cheng A, Fanning R, Nadkarni V, Savoldelli G. (2011). Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process. Simulation in Healthcare, S52-57.
TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide 2.0. (2014). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from www.ahrq.gov
World Health Organization (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
OCONLL 2016
top related