design automation for rf system-on-package design using ltcc

Post on 04-Oct-2021

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

Oct. 11, 2004 1

Design Automation for RF System-on-Package Design

using LTCC

• 盧信嘉 助理教授• leonardo@cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw

• 台灣大學電子工程學研究所

Oct. 11, 2004 2

Outline

• What is RF-SoP? • LTCC • Basic building elements

– Lump elements– Distributed elements

2

Oct. 11, 2004 3

Outline (cont’)

• Design flow– Automatic Component Synthesis– Design Rule Check (DRC)– Layout vs. Schematic (LVS)

• Conclusion

Oct. 11, 2004 4

A PC-card WLAN card reference design

3

Oct. 11, 2004 5

Oct. 11, 2004 6

4

Oct. 11, 2004 7

RF-SoP approaches

• Replace discrete components with embedded ones for size and area reduction.

• Addition of more functional blocks, such as an antenna or filters to the module.

• Optimize performance by replacing on-chip passives with high-Q passives embedded in package.

Oct. 11, 2004 8

5

Oct. 11, 2004 9

Oct. 11, 2004 10

LTCC

• LTCC: low temperature cofire ceramic• Multi-layer, vias, blind vias, buried resistors• Metal: Cu, Ag, Au• Passive elements, transmission lines can be

placed inside or on surface of LTCC.• Active elements on surface

6

Oct. 11, 2004 11

Oct. 11, 2004 12

Making the tape

7

Oct. 11, 2004 13

Tile manufacture

Oct. 11, 2004 14

•Highly integrated LTCC components

8

Oct. 11, 2004 15

Basic building blocks

• Lump elements: – Capacitors– Inductors

Oct. 11, 2004 16

Multilayer inductors

9

Oct. 11, 2004 17

•One-port and two-port equivalent circuits for LTCC inductors.

Oct. 11, 2004 18

10

Oct. 11, 2004 19

Oct. 11, 2004 20

11

Oct. 11, 2004 21

Multilayer capacitors

• 0.49 fF/mil square for 3.6mil substrate

Oct. 11, 2004 22

•One-port and two-port equivalent circuits for LTCC capacitors.

12

Oct. 11, 2004 23

Design flow

• Substrate selection: cost, loss, process resolution …

• Specification participation• EM simulation of building elements• Circuit simulation and iteration with EM

simulation

Oct. 11, 2004 24

13

Oct. 11, 2004 25

Design flow (cont’)

• EM tools: – 2.5D: Sonnet, Agilent ADS Momentum,

Ansoft Designer, Zeland IE3D– 3D: Ansoft HFSS, XFDTD, Zeland Fidelity

• Circuit simulator: Agilent ADS, Microwave office, Cadence Spectre RF.

• DRC (Design Rule Check), LVS (Layout versus Schematic)

Oct. 11, 2004 26

Multilayer filter: image rejection for Bluetooth

14

Oct. 11, 2004 27

Oct. 11, 2004 28

15

Oct. 11, 2004 29

D inner=30mile D outer=72mile W=8mile

Oct. 11, 2004 30

Target value of 3D inductor

16

Oct. 11, 2004 31

3D structure

Oct. 11, 2004 32

Simulation result @ 4nH

17

Oct. 11, 2004 33

Design Rule Check (DRC)Via cover pad

(V2)Via to partedge spacing

(C2&C3)Conductor topart edge

(C1)Line spacing

(C1)Line width

(V4)Via cover pad toconductor spacing

(V1)Via pitch

Ground plane

(V7)Via size

(V9)Via cover paddiameter(cofired)

(C5)Via pass through largh area plane

Top view layout of LTCC design

Oct. 11, 2004 34

Design Rule Check (DRC)

Cross-Section of LTCC design

18

Oct. 11, 2004 35

Design Rule Check (DRC)

• Use the engine in Calibre or other IC DRC tools

• Rewrite the rule for LTCC process

Oct. 11, 2004 36

Layout vs. Schematic (LVS)

• Complex 3D structure• The designer have to modify the layout to

tune the performance.• It is highly possible to miss place vias or miss

some conductors in modification process.• The LVS checker must be able to correctly

correlate the modified physical layout to schematic

19

Oct. 11, 2004 37

Conclusion

• Design automation tool to reduce design time and human effort.

• Verification tool to increase yield and prevent design errors.

• Some EM feeling is required, but you do not have to solve Maxwell equation.

top related