defining loading criteria for proof loading
Post on 15-Apr-2017
977 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Challenge the future
DelftUniversity ofTechnology
Defining loading criteria for proof loading
Rutger Koekkoek, Eva Lantsoght, Yuguang Yang, Ane de Boer, Dick Hordijk
of existing reinforced concrete bridges
2
Overview• Introduction• Why proof loading?• Stop criteria?
• Overview of existing guidelines• Past proof load tests by TU Delft• Recommendations• Preparation of proof load tests• Execution of proof load tests
• Summary and conclusions Slab shear experiments, TU Delft
3
Why load testing? (1)Bridges from 60s and 70s
The Hague in 1959
Increased live loads
common heavy and long truck (600 kN)
End of service life + larger loads
4
Why load testing? (2)
5
Stop criteria
• Safety philosophy• Stop criteria:• Further loading not permitted• Failure near• Irreversible damage near
MSc Thesis W. Vos
6
Proof load testing of bridges
• Apply predetermined load to bridge• Information lacking• Damage due to ASR, …
• Proof load testing• Immediate approval of
bridge• Recalculate updated β
7
Existing Guidelines for proof loading
• Europe: DAfStB Richtlinie• Stop criteria• Concrete strain• Steel strain• Crack width and residual
crack width (new & existing cracks)• Residual deflection
• For flexure• Structures with large
existing cracking?
8
Existing Guidelines for proof loading
• North America: • Buildings: ACI 437.2M-
13• Bridges: Manual of
Bridge Rating Through Load Testing (1998)
• ACI 437.2M-13 stop criteria:• Residual deflection• Permanency ratio• Deviation from Linearity
Index
9
Research need
• Guideline for proof loading of existing bridges for the Netherlands
• Flexure + shear• Stop criteria?
10
TU Delft Proof Load Tests
• Proof load tests:• Heidijk 2007• Medemblik 2009• Vlijmen-Oost 2013• Halvemaans Bridge 2014• Ruytenschildt Bridge 2014• Viaduct in the Zijlweg 2015• Viaduct De Beek 2015
Load test to failure of Ruytenschildt Bridge, summer 2014
11
Preparation steps (1)
• Determination of dimensions
• Live load: EN 1991-2:2003
• RBK load levels• Different β• Different load factors
• In FEM model• mx over 3 m• v over 4d
12
Preparation steps (2)
• Critical position• Bending moment: largest
moment• Shear: 2.5d from support
• Required proof load• Same shear or bending
moment as with load combination• Value → considered
safety level
13
Execution steps
• Cyclic loading scheme• Acoustic emission measurements• Check linearity and reproducibility of measurements• Check residual deformations
• Stop criteria• Evaluated during tests• Research in progress• Criteria for shear failure need to be developed
14
Summary and conclusions
• Proof loading to approve existing bridges
• Existing guidelines: • Only flexure• Cracked structures?
• Determination of maximum proof load• LFEA• Different safety levels
• Execution• Cyclic loading protocol• Safely applying large loads
Viaduct Zijlweg, tested in summer 2015
15
Contact:Eva LantsoghtE.O.L.Lantsoght@tudelft.nl // elantsoght@usfq.edu.ec+31(0)152787449
top related