cv profile scoring and assessment james c. huhta, m.d. perinatal cardiology jhm-all children’s...

CV Profile Scoring and Assessment

James C. Huhta, M.D.Perinatal Cardiology

JHM-All Children’s Hospital

5th Phoenix Fetal Cardiology Symposium

Wed. April 23, 2014, 1:30-2:00 PM

Perinatal CardiologyCardiology for the fetus, child, and mother

Faculty Disclosure Information

In the past 12 months, I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services discussed in this CME activity. I serve as co-PI of a study of Edoxaban for Daiichi-Sankyo.

I do not intend to discuss an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device in my presentation.

Fetal congestive heart failure CV profile Score

1. Hydrops-– a measure of capillary permeability and/or elevated capillary venous pressure and/or hypoproteinemia

2. Venous Doppler-– a measure of central venous pressure, and/or RV diastolic function

3. Heart size-– a measure of remodeling of the heart in response to increased preload, afterload or anemia

4. Heart function - heterogenous measure of afterload and/or anular dilation (tricuspid valve regurgitation), (ventricular shortening), extreme diastolic filling abnormality (monophasic filling), and dP/dt estimate

5. Arterial Doppler-a measure of placental resistance and/or combined cardiac stroke volume at falling outputs

CV Profile10-point score

NORMAL -1 POINT -2 POINTS

Hydrops None(2 pts)

Ascites or Pleural effusion orPericardial effusion

Skin edema

Venous Doppler (Umbilical Vein) (Ductus Venosus)

DV (2 pts)

UV

DV UV pulsations

Heart Size (Heart/Chest Area)

< 0.35(2 pts)

0.35 - 0.50 >0.50 or <0.20

Cardiac Function

Normal TV & MVRV/LV S.F. > 0.28Biphasic diastolic filling (2 pts)

Holosystolic TR orRV/LV S.F. < 0.28

Holosystolic MR orTR dP/dt < 400 orMonophasic filling

Arterial Doppler (Umbilical artery)

UA (Normal) (2 pts)

UA (AEDV)

UA (REDV)

Future Research

• Disease – specific CVP Score

• Prospective trial of digoxin in fetal CHF

• Comparison with Biophysical Profile Score

• First Trimester CVP Score

• Mouse embryo CVP Score

Future Research

• Disease – specific CVP Score

• Prospective trial of digoxin in fetal CHF

• Comparison with Biophysical Profile Score

• First Trimester CVP Score

• Mouse embryo CVP Score

Heart to chest area ratio

Valve regurgitation

Hofstaetter C, Hansmann M, Eik-Nes SH, Huhta JC, Luther SL, A cardiovascular profile score in the surveillance of fetal hydrops, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2006, 19(7):407-13

100 hydropic fetuses

CVP score range-last exam 3-10

6 died-Median CVP score 6 versus 7

Detection of CHD-Disproportion

Fetal Congestive Heart Failure Abnormal Venous Doppler

Gudmundsson S, Huhta JC, Wood DC, Tulzer G, Cohen

AW, Weiner S: Venous Doppler ultrasonography in the fetus with non-immune

hydrops. Am J Ob Gyn 164:33-37, 1991

Perinatal ManagementSalvage of HLHS

RA

LA

Perinatal Management Cardiomyopathy

Fetal Valve Regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation dP/dt

50

100

150

200

250

300 dt

0

50

cm/sec

TRdP

32100

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

Survivors

Non-Survivors

Doppler-Derived Right Ventricular dP/dt

dP/dt(mmHg/s)

Ductal Constriction NIHF

Perinatal Management Cardiomyopathy

MyocarditisGenetic syndromesInherited defects

Consider transplantationas a neonate

Fetal CHF with CHDExamples

CHD with increasing heart size in utero

Tet absent valve syndrome

Pulmonary atresia with collaterals

Ebstein’s malformation

Critical AS

L isomerism with CHB

Fetal CVP Score - 146 fetusesCongenital Heart Disease Perinatal Mortality

16%12%

17%

67%

100% 100%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

10 (n=95) 9 (n=25) 8 (n=18) 7 (n=3) 6 (n=1) 5 (n=4)

Wieczorek A, Hernandez-Robles J, Ewing L, Leshko J. Luther S, Huhta J. Prediction of outcome of fetal congenital heart disease using a cardiovascular

profile score. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb 5 31(3):284-288.

Sensitivity Specificity PPV

For Mortality

0.25 0.98 0.88

Sensitivity Specificity PPV

For 5 minute Apgar score <=6

0.22 0.98 0.75

33 weeks

33 weeks gestation

Diagnosis of Fetal CHF in IUGR

IUGR – longitudinal observations (≤ 32 weeks)

0-7-14-21-28-35

Days before delivery

Sta

nd

ard

de

via

tio

n

0

6

-6

Ductus venosus

Hecher, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:564-70

Middle cerebral a.

Umbilical artery

Short term variation

Validation of CVP scoreIUGR-Makikallio et al.

• Eight out of 75 neonates died before discharge or had severe CP (n=2)

• Delivery at earlier gestational age 28 (range 24-35) weeks vs. 35 (range 26-40) weeks, p<0.001

• Lower fetal CVP scores 4 (range 2-6) vs. 9 (range 5-10), p<0.001)

• All fetal subset scores of CVP except umbilical artery evaluation were lower (p<0.001) in the group with neonatal death.

Validation of CVP score-IUGR

• Neonates with 5-minute Apgar scores < 7 had lower CVP scores than with scores > 7 (6 (2-10) vs. 9 (5-10), p<0.001)

• Umbilical artery NT-proANP levels of newborns with CVP score < 6 were greater (5208 (2850-16030) pmol/L) than the levels of neonates with CVP exceeding 6 (1626 (402- 9574) pmol/L), p=0.0001).

• All NT-proANP values of newborns with CVP score <6 were above the 95th percentile NT-proANP value in normal pregnancies, while 42 out of 67 (63%) fetuses with CVP > 6 showed NT-proANP concentrations exceeding the 95th percentile value in normal pregnancies

• Umbilical artery NT-proANP values correlated inversely and significantly with CVP score values

Validation of CVP score-Complete AV Block

• We have implemented a strategy that includes the biophysical profile, which assesses fetal well-being, in combination with the cardiovascular profile that assesses cardiac function and the circulation.

• Two cases of fetal complete heart block in which early delivery was recommended due to worsening cardiovascular profile scores. Biophysical profile scores were normal. Both babies were successfully treated, despite having risk factors that predicted poor outcomes. We hypothesize that our management protocol initiated intervention before fetal compromise, hydrops, and myocardial damage occurred.

• We recommend an evaluation of heart function in addition to an assessment of fetal well-being in fetuses with complete heart block. Early delivery should be considered if there is evidence of distress and/or deteriorating cardiac function.

• Donofrio MT, Gullquist SD, Mehta ID, Moskowitz WB.Congenital complete heart block: fetal management protocol, review of the literature, and report of the smallest successful pacemaker implantation. J Perinatol. 2004 Feb;24(2):112-7.

Validation of CVP score-T-T Transfusion