coppin state university · lux 1.5:1 560 lux 2.65:1 space standard 90.1 2010 allowable watts design...
Post on 25-Jun-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
U|R|B University Research Building
Liz Kimble | Final Thesis Presentation Lighting/Electrical |
Building Stats
Building Name: University Research Building
Location: Mid-Atlantic United States
Occupant: Confidential
Size: 69,000 S.F.
Levels: 4 + mechanical penthouse
Project Team
Owner: Confidential
Construction Manager: The Whiting Turner Contracting Company
Architect, Landscape Arch, Structural: The S|L|A|M Collaborative
Civil Engineer: Rumel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
MEP: James Posey Associates
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Commons Areas
Research Lab
Rendering Courtesy of S|L|A|M Collaborative
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Daylighting Analysis
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Existing Curtain Wall
aSE1000 lux, 250 hr
LEED v4 Recommends:
aSE1000 lux, 250 hr < 10%
Curtain Wall:
aSE1000 lux, 250 hr = 34.3%
275.0
220.0
165.0
110.0
55.0
0.0
Case Study Examples
[Rawn Architects]
Cambridge Public Library 1 Bligh Street, Sydney
[1bligh.com.au] [Horiso]
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Double Skin Façade Design 2.5’ Cavity Depth
4.6” Blind
Spacing
6” Blind
Depth
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Double Skin Façade
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
sDA300 lux, 50%
LEED v4 Recommends:
sDA300 lux, 50% = 55-75%
DSF Achieves:
sDA300 lux, 50% = 100%
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Double Skin Façade
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
sDA300 lux, 50%
53%
23%
10%
11%
3%
Sales Shade Setting Frequency
Blinds Raised
0° - horizontal
15°
30°
45°
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Mechanical Analysis
0
50
100
150
200
Cooling Heating Lighting Total
kWh
/m2
Original Curtainwall
DSF
MIT Design Advisor
vs.
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
DesignBuilder & EnergyPlus
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
Cooling Heating Electricity Total
kBTU
Original Curtain Wall
Double Skin Façade
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Study
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Architectural Context Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Photovoltaic Analysis
= 0.1 acres available roof area
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Building Stats
Building Name: University Research Building
Location: Mid-Atlantic United States
Occupant: Confidential
Size: 69,000 S.F.
Levels: 4 + mechanical penthouse
Project Team
Owner: Confidential
Construction Manager: The Whiting Turner Contracting Company
Architect, Landscape Arch, Structural: The S|L|A|M Collaborative
Civil Engineer: Rumel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
MEP: James Posey Associates
0
30
60
90
-150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150
Sola
r A
ltitude A
ngle
Solar Azimuth Angle
Solar Position
Dec
Jan/Nov
Feb/Oct
Mar/Sept
Apr/Aug
Jun
27°
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Building Stats
Building Name: University Research Building
Location: Mid-Atlantic United States
Occupant: Confidential
Size: 69,000 S.F.
Levels: 4 + mechanical penthouse
Project Team
Owner: Confidential
Construction Manager: The Whiting Turner Contracting Company
Architect, Landscape Arch, Structural: The S|L|A|M Collaborative
Civil Engineer: Rumel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
MEP: James Posey Associates
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Ou
tpu
t (k
WH
)
Monthly Output
0 5 10 15 20 25
Year
$
-16,000
-14,000
-12,000
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
-4,000
After Tax Cashflow
Payback Period
13.04 years Net Present Value
$2,020
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Lighting Redesign
Individualized Health
Initiative
Extreme Materials Institute
Systems Institute Computer Science
Department
Lighting Inspiration Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Sta
te-o
f-the-a
rt
Pioneer
Collaborative
Na
tiona
l Secu
rity
Global Sustainability
Individual Health Care
johnkapeleris.com mtu.edu
Neutrix Setsiri Silapasuwanchai
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Reception 150 lux 1.5:1 180 lux 3.95:1
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Office – Open & Corridor 3228 2551
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Open Office Desks
300-500 lux
1.5:1 560 lux 2.65:1
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Office – Open & Corridor 3228 2551
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Upper Commons
Lower Commons
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Lower Commons
Upper Commons Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Lower Commons
Upper Commons Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Lower Commons
Upper Commons
C
J L
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Social Lounge 100 lux 3:1 170 3
Reading Area 200 lux 3:1 313 1.88
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Lounge 1714 1504
Lower Commons Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Social Lounge 100 lux 3:1 170 3
Reading Area 200 lux 3:1 313 1.88
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Lounge 1714 1504
Lower Commons Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Social Lounge 100 lux 3:1 170 3
Reading Area 200 lux 3:1 313 1.88
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Lounge 1714 1504
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Space Target Eavg Target Avg:Min Design Eavg Design Avg:Min
Social Lounge 100 lux 3:1 170 3
Reading Area 200 lux 3:1 313 1.88
Space Standard 90.1 2010 Allowable Watts
Design Watts
Lounge 1714 1504
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Façade Redesign
Daylighting
Mechanical Energy Analysis
Architectural Implications
Photovoltaic Analysis
Lighting Redesign
Research Lab
Commons Areas
Conclusion
Summary
Façade redesigned for improved daylighting performance with less direct
sunlight penetration.
Mechanical analysis showed energy savings with double skin façade
implementation. Architectural analysis deemed architectural impacts of
façade change to be acceptable.
Photovoltaic analysis indicated payback period and net present cost do
not advise purchase of PV arrays by the University.
Lighting redesign embraced both the individual identities of the
specialized labs while creating an atmosphere for collaboration.
Acknowledgements
James Posey Associates
S|L|A|M Collaborative
Dr. Kevin Houser Thesis Adviser
Dr. Richard Mistrick Honors Thesis Advisor
Leslie Beahm Electrical Advisor
Craig Casey Lighting PhD Candidate
Luke Late Night Dunkin Staff
My family and friends for all of their continued support.
Questions?
Appendix
Appendix
top related