comparison of single-stage and temperature-phased...
Post on 02-Jan-2021
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Comparison of single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of
sugar beet by-products
Kaoutar Aboudi*, Xiomara Gómez Quiroga, Carlos José Álvarez Gallego and Luis Isidoro Romero García
Chemical Engineering and Food Technology Department, University of Cádiz, Campus Río San Pedro, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain
*kaoutar.aboudi@uca.es
22 June 2017
5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management-ATHENS201724-27 June, 2017
Contents BACKGROUND
EXPERIMENTAL STRATEGY
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management-ATHENS201724-27 June, 2017
Lignocellulosic biomass
20 Mt of dry SBP
1 tonne of Sugar beet processed 70 kg of exhausted dried pulp ≈ 250 kg of exhausted pressed pulp Total global production in 2014
267 Mt
Animal feedstock supplement
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
Lignocellulosic biomass
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
Bioenergy = Anaerobic digestion technology
METHANOGENESIS
CH4CO2
ACIDOGENESIS
Volatile fatty acidsAlcohols
ACETOGENESIS
H2CO2
Aceticacid
Complexbiopolymers
CarbohydratesProteinsFat/oil
Simple monomers
HIDROLYSIS
SugarsAminoacids
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION = BIOLOGICAL PROCESS
METHANOGENESIS
CH4CO2
ACIDOGENESIS
Volatile fatty acidsAlcohols
ACETOGENESIS
H2CO2
Aceticacid
Complexbiopolymers
CarbohydratesProteinsFat/oil
Simple monomers
HIDROLYSIS
SugarsAminoacids
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
SINGLE STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS
METHANOGENESIS
CH4CO2
ACIDOGENESIS
Volatile fatty acids
ACETOGENESIS
H2CO2
Aceticacid
Complexbiopolymers
CarbohydratesProteinsFat/oil
Simple monomers
HIDROLYSIS
SugarsAminoacids
H2CO2
DARK FERMENTATION METHANOGENESIS
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
TWO PHASED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS
METHANOGENESIS
CH4CO2
ACIDOGENESIS
Volatile fatty acids
ACETOGENESIS
H2CO2
Aceticacid
Complexbiopolymers
CarbohydratesProteinsFat/oil
HIDROLYSIS
Simple monomers
SugarsAminoacids
H2CO2
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
TWO PHASED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS
DARK FERMENTATION METHANOGENESIS
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
OBJETIVESINGLE STAGE VS TWO-PHASED
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SUGAR BEET BY-PRODUCTS
Experimental design
Run ISingle stage
Run IITPAD
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
Acidogenic Methanogenic
HRT = 10 daysOLR = 6.6 ± 0.4 (gVS/Lr*d)
HRT = 20 daysOLR = 2.5 ± 0.2 (gVS/Lr*d)
35°C55°C
HRT = 20 daysOLR = 3.4 ± 0.2 (gVS/Lr*d)35°C 55°C
65°C 35°C
Experimental design
Run ISingle stage
Run IITPAD
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
Acidogenic Methanogenic
HRT = 10 daysOLR = 6.6 ± 0.4 (gVS/Lr*d)
HRT = 20 daysOLR = 2.5 ± 0.2 (gVS/Lr*d)
35°C55°C
HRT = 20 daysOLR = 3.4 ± 0.2 (gVS/Lr*d)35°C 55°C
65°C 35°C
Background Experimental strategy Results & Discussion Conclusions
Semi‐continuous stirred tank digesters
2 L
Biogas collection
Mixing system
Temperature monitoring
Feeding/Effluent
Heater plate
0
100
200
300
0 50 100 150 200 250
Accumulated
methane
(L)
Time (Days)
Mesophilic Thermophilic
45 %
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Single stage anaerobic digestion assays
MPR = 0.55 LCH4/Lr*d
MPR = 0.30 LCH4/Lr*d
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Single stage anaerobic digestion assays
pH = 7 ‐ 7.8VS removal (%) = 83 %
pH = 7.5 ‐ 8VS removal (%) = 66%
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Combination 1: Thermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
HPR= 0.45 (LH2/Lr*d) MPR= 0.19 LCH4/Lr*d
pH = 5.5 ‐ 6VS removal (%) = 46 %
pH = 7.5 ‐ 8VS removal (%) = 70 %
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Combination 1: Thermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Acidogenic digester Methanogenic digester
pH = 5.5 ‐ 6VS removal (%) = 46 %
pH = 7.5 ‐ 8VS removal (%) = 70 %
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Combination 1: Thermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Acetoclasticmethanogensinhibition
Acidogenic digester Methanogenic digester
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Combination 2: Hyperthermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
HPR= 0.11 LH2/Lr*d MPR= 0.09 LCH4/Lr*d
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Combination 2: Hyperthermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
pH = 5.5 ‐ 6.5VS removal (%) = 23 %
pH = 7.5 ‐ 8.5VS removal (%) = 72 %
Acidogenic digester Methanogenic digester
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Combination 2: Hyperthermophilic acidogenic ‐mesophilic methanogenic
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
pH = 5.5 ‐ 6.5VS removal (%) = 23 %
pH = 7.5 ‐ 8.5VS removal (%) = 72 %
Acetoclasticmethanogensinhibition
Acidogenic digester Methanogenic digester
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Two‐phased anaerobic digestion assays
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Palmitate
Lignocerate
Background Experimental procedure Results & Discussion Conclusions
Co‐digestion:Including a livestock co‐substrate in the TPAD assays (pig slurry and
cow manure)
Next step
Single stage
Is the TPAD suitable for sugar beet by-products??
Thank you for your attention
top related