columbia lawreview - ugent law review/nr.2 2014.pdf · columbia lawreview uurh86 columbia law ......
Post on 13-Jul-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
COLUMBIALAWREVIEW
uurH86 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW~ 2014 VOLUME 114 ISSUE 2N-o SISAC -o-o
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
o-_0- co-~ ~=----..;0- ..,--0 -o_0 0010-1958(2014)114:2;1-6 0
OU) ..,-------:: Ol- IFBR, BIB.P.017797, RBIB, 4400090139-10---::--:-w~~..,-3:
cxn
ARTICLES
CONSTITUTIO AL NONDEFENSE IN THE STATES Katherine Shaw
ELECTIONS AND ALIGNMENT Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos
NOTES
ERlE AND THE FIRST AMENOMENT: STATEANTI·SLAPP LAWSIN FEDERAL COURTAFTER SHADY GROVE Colin Quinlan
UNKNOWN ELEMENTS: THE MENS REA QUESTIONIN 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) (1) (B) (ii) 's MACHINEGUN PROVISION Stephanie Siyi Wu
ESSAY
CAN WE Do BETTER BY ORDINARY INVESTORS?A PRAGMATIC REACTION TO THEDUELING IDEOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGISTSOF CORPORATE UW Leo E. Strine, fr.
VOL. 114 MARCH 2014 NO. 2
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEWVOL. 114 MARCH 2014 NO. 2
CONTENTS
ARTICLES
CONSTITUTIONAL NONDEFENSE IN THE STATES Katherine Shaw 213
ELECTIO S AND ALIGNMENT Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos 283
NOTES
ERiEAND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: STATE ANTI-SLAPP LAws IN FEDERAL COURT AFrER SHADY
GROVE Colin Quinlan 367
UNKNOWN ELEME TS: THE MENS REA QUESTIONIN 18 U.S.c. § 924(c) (1) (B) (ii)'S MACHINEGUN PROVISION Stephanie Siyi Wu 407
ESSAY
CAN WE Do BEITER BY ÜRDINARY INVESTORS?A PRAGMATIC REACTION TO THEDUELING IDEOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGISTSOF CORPORATE LAw Leo E. Strine, Jr. 449
top related