cervical spine trauma aaron b. welk, dc resident, department of radiology logan college of...

Cervical Spine Trauma

Aaron B. Welk, DCResident, Department of Radiology

Logan College of Chiropractic

Three Column Model

• Anterior– ALL– Anterior half of vertebral body, disc, and supporting soft tissues

• Middle– PLL– Posterior half of vertebral body, disc, and supporting soft

tissues• Posterior

– Posterior elements– Facet joints– Associated soft tissues

Three Column Model

• Disruption of only one column is generally stable

• Disruption of 2 or 3 columns implies instability• Flexion and extension films may highlight

instability that is not evident on neutral lateral.

Evaluation Of Alignment-Instability may be subtle.

-Disruption of any one of the anatomical lines may indicate injury.

-Evaluation of 4 lines must be done on all lateral films.

-Anterior body line (A)-Posterior body line (B)-Spinolaminar line (C)-Posterior spinous line

Flexion Injury • Unilateral Locked Facet

– Flexion with rotation– Most common location is C4/5 and C5/6– Little or no body displacement– Bow-tie Sign

• Bilateral Locked Facet– Flexion with enough force to distract facets– 50% anterolisthesis on lower segment

Unilateral Locked Facet

Bilateral Locked Facet

Bilateral Locked Facet

Left Right

Bilateral Locked Facet

Sag T2 FSE Sag STIR

Spinal Cord Contusion

• Non-Hemorrhagic bruising of spinal cord

• MRI Appearance:– T1: Low signal intensity– T2: High signal intensity

Spinal Cord Contusion

Spinal Cord Hemorrhage• Hyperacute:

– T1: isointense– T2: high signal intensity

• Acute:– T1: Low signal intensity– T2: Low signal intensity

• Subacute (early):– T1: high signal intensity– T2: low signal intensity

• Subacute (late):– T1: high signal intensity– T2: high signal intensity

• Chronic:– T1: isointense– T2: high signal intensity

Spinal Cord Hemorrhage

T1 T2

Flexion Injury• Anterior Wedge Compression

– Usually Stable unless posterior ligaments are disrupted– Disrupted posterior elements may appear stable initially due to muscle spasm

• Teardrop Burst– Most severe injury compatible with life.– 80% with neurologic injury– Posterior body is displaced into neural canal

Teardrop Burst Fracture

Teardrop Burst Fracture

Teardrop Burst Fracture

Clay-Shoveler’s Fracture

• Oblique Fracture through the spinous process of C6-T3 (C6 and C7 are most common)

• The name is derived from the common occurrence of this fracture in Australian clay miners.

• Usually caused by hyperflexion, although a direct blow can also cause this injury

Clay-Shoveler’s fracture

Clay-Shoveler’s Fracture

Extension Injury

• Extension Teardrop– Avulsion of ALL from inferior corner of vertebral body– Usually at C2 or C3

• Hangman’s Fracture– Fracture of the neural arch of C2 with varying degrees of C2/3 disk

involvement– Type I- Fracture of neural arch w/o disk involvement– Type II- >3mm displacement or 15˚ angulation at C2/3– Type III- Anterior displacement of C2 due to unilateral or bilateral

facet dislocation. • Pillar/Facet Fracture

– Extension injury while head is rotated

Extension Teardrop

Extension Teardrop

Hangman’s Fracture- Type I

Hangman’s Fracture- Type II

Hangman’s Fracture- Type III

Pillar Fracture

Pillar Fracture

Odontoid Fractures

• Mechanism of injury is not fully understood and experimental attempts to recreate have been unsuccessful.

• Injury is result of major force and usually results from MVA or falls.

• 3 Classifications:– Type I- Fracture of upper portion of dens (Stable)– Type II- Fracture at base of dens at C2 body junction

(Unstable)– Type III- Fracture into C2 body (Stable)*

Type I Odontoid Fracture

Type II Odontoid Fracture

Type III Odontoid Fracture

Jefferson’s (Burst) Fracture

• Ring fracture of C1 due to axial loading• Lateral displacement of lateral masses• May have little or no neurologic deficit unless

transverse ligament is ruptured

Jefferson’s Fracture

References

• Musculoskeletal Imaging: The Requisites, 3rd ed. B.J. Manaster, David G. Disler, David A. May, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007. pp 164-174

• Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders. 4th ed. Donald Resnick. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002. pp 2958-2981

Images• http://thejns.org• http://radiographics.rsna.org• http://download.imaging.consult.com• www.medcyclopedia.com• http://emedicine.medscape.com• http://handbook.muh.ie• http://int.prop.if2.cuni.cz• http://radiologyinthai.blogspot.com• www.aafp.org• www.learningradiology.com• http://img.orthobullets.com• http://img04.webshots.com• www.mypacs.net• www.medifax.com• www.medscape.com• http://gentili.us• www.med.wayne.edu• www.radiologyassistant.nl