caught in the network

Post on 22-May-2015

214 Views

Category:

Design

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Caught in the Network

A research on the effects of the contemporary economic centrality in Am-sterdam North on its adjacent residential neighbourhoods

Robin Boelsums1275267

4 Nov 2011P1 - Complex Cities

Mentor: R.Rocco

Caught in the Network

Sources: Butler, 2010

Sections

Trends

Problem Statement

Location

Methodology Methodology

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Methods

Deliverables

Time schedule

First steps

Examples

Project location

Future plans

main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Aim + RQ

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Next steps

Location

Methodology Methodology

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Methods

Deliverables

Time schedule

First steps

Project location

Future plans

Aim + RQ

Next steps

Problem Statement main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

In practice

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Trends

Source: Globe 2008 Source: Wikipedia 2008 Source: author 2011 Source: author 2011

GlobalTrends

Globalisation + Neoliberalism

Network society/cityGlobal & regional

connections

Local disconnectedness

Global businesses cluster in nodes in metropolitan areas

??

?

??

?

?

€ €€€€

€ € €

€€€

€€

€ €

??

?

??

?

?

Local

Source: Skifter Andersen 2004 Source: Rijksoverheid 2007

Trends

Social inequality

Exclusion of people

Segregation

Concentrationof poverty

Spatialinequality

Exclusionof places

Deprived areas

500 deprived social housing estates18 criteria (NL)

1. Income2. Job3. Education4. Small dwellings5. Old dwellings6. Cheap dwellings7. Vandalism8. Vandalism9. Social nuisance10. Social nuisance11. Unsafety12. Satisfaction dwelling13. Satisfaction neigh-bourhood14. Moving tendency15. Sound nuisance16. Waste17. Traffic18. Safety

Less attractive for investments Less attractive for house huntersReduces private and public servicesDecline of physical environmentIncreases crime

Economic problems for estate ownersSocial stigmatisationInsecurityIncreases social expenses for local authorities

Trends Global vs. Local

Social inequality

Exclusion of people

Segregation

Concentrationof poverty

Spatialinequality

Exclusionof places

Globalisation

Establishment of economic cen-

tralities

Strong regional infrastructural net-

work

Source: Skifter Andersen 2004

In practiceTrends

Source: www.som.com Source: MapstubeBird’s eye view Deprived areas + Canary Wharf

Canary Wharf, London

Source: Google maps 2008 Source: Google maps 2008

In practiceTrends

Zuidas Amsterdam

Segregation Inequality

Trends

Methodology Methodology

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Methods

Deliverables

Time schedule

First steps

In practice

Aim + RQ

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Next steps

Project location

Future plans

main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Problem Statement

Location

Source: author 2011

Project locationLocation

Amsterdam

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

Sources: Randstad 2040 (2007)

Sources: Randstad 2040 (2007)

Project locationLocation

Source: Bruijne et al 2010

CentralitiesLocation

Utrecht

1960s - Amsterdam ArenA

Ideas 1960s

Industry and offices Monofunctional

Seperated from residential neigh-bourhoods by train tracks

Critique

Slowly becomes multifunctional

Still excluded from adjacent problem area

Together with Schiphol and Zui-das it forms the ‘economic motor’ of Amsterdam

Sources: Jolles et al 2003

CentralitiesLocation

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

1982 - Sloterdijk Teleport

Ideas 1982

Large, attractive business district

Bank offices

Critique

Not many invest-ments

District remained small

Good connections, potential for devel-opment

Sources: Salet, Majoor 2005

CentralitiesLocation

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

1998 - Zuidas

Ideas 1998

Demand from mar-ket (ABN Amro)

Highrise

International attrac-tion

Multifunctional

Programme:650,000 m2 offices1450 dwellings(400 in 2010)

Critique

Inflexible

Too long time hori-zon

Too monofunctional

Programme:1,100,000 m2 offices9000 dwellings

Centralities

Sources: Gemeente Amsterdam

Location

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

2005 - Amsterdam North

Ideas 2005

Multifunctional working, living

High rise office buil-gins

Social housing 20 %

Development of IJ banks

Programme:2200 dwellingsWork 60,000m2Facilities 20,000m2

Critique

That’s the question

Project locationLocation

Source: TU Delft maps 2011 Source: author 2011

Volewijck

Prewar garden village

Deprived neighbourhood - high unsafety rate - high % low income - 73% social housing

Source: TU Delft maps 2011 Source: author 2011

Project locationLocation

Overhoeks

Economic centralitySince 2005

Programme: - 2200 dwellings - facilities 20,000 m2 - work 80,000 m2

Future plansLocation

Source: Overhoeks 2007

Future plansLocation

Source: Gemeente Amsterdam 2011

Source: TU Delft maps 2011; Gemeente Amsterdam 2011

Noord-Zuidlijn

Trends

Problem Statement

Location

Methodology Methodology

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Methods

Deliverables

Time schedule

First steps

In practice

Project location

Future plans

main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Aim + RQ

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Next steps

Main problemsProblem statement

Inequality Spatial disconnectedness

Local segregation (author, 2011)

Segregation scheme (Skifter Andersen, 2004)

??

?

??

?

?

€ €€€€

€ € €

€€€

€€

€ €

Social inequality

Exclusion of people

Segregation

Concentrationof poverty

Spatialinequality

Exclusionof places

Main problems

Source: Author 2011

Problem Statement

??

?

??

?

?

Weakness: neighbourhood cannot benefit from adjacent opportunities

Threat: this may increase inequality

Visible in segregation, but also in pro-gramme.

Lack of opportunities

“There is no straitforward link between city and neighbourhood fortunes”

(Mumford, Lupton 1999:30)

Main problems

Source: Author 2011

Problem Statement

??

?

??

?

???

?

??

?

?

Lack of opportunities

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Source: author 2011

**

Problem statement Segregation

O V E R H O E K S

Source: Shell 2006

**

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C KSource: author 2011

Source: author 2011

Problem statement Segregation

Spatial inequality

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Source: author 2011

Problem statement Segregation

Spatial inequality

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Source: Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek 2011

Economic inequality

High % construction workers & industry

Work sectors

Workers in own district or elsewhere

0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0

C industrie

D energiebedrijven

E waterwinning en afvalverwerking

F bouwnijverheid

G handel

H transport en logistiek

I horeca

J informatie en communicatie

K financiële instellingen

L handel, verhuur onroerend goed

M advisering en onderzoek

N overige zakelijke dienstverlening

O overheid

P onderwijs

Q gezondheids- en welzijnszorg

Amsterdam

Noord

20% social housing80% rent + owner occupied

73% social housing4% rent23% owner occupied

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Economic inequality

Income 2007

Economic activities concentrated in Overhoeks

Source: Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek 2007

Source: Palmbout 2005

Rent prices:€900-2400/month

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Social inequality

Source: Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek (2011)

Unsafety

Source: Palmbout 2005

Safety

Problem statement Segregation

V O L E W I J C K

O V E R H O E K S

Source: author 2011, Dienst Onderzoek & Statistiek 2007

Social inequalitySuriname

6%

Antillianen1%

Turks5%

Maroccans7%

Not-Western8%

Western27%

Netherlands53%

Origin

Source: author 2011; gemeente Amsterdam 2011 Source: TU Delft maps 2011

Problem Statement

Spatial disconnectedness

Segregation

Source: author 2011

Lack of opportunitiesProblem statement

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

Focus on other centralities and cities in the region

Trends

Location

Methodology Methodology

Methods

Deliverables

Time schedule

First steps

In practice

Project location

Future plans

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Next steps

Problem Statement main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Aim + RQ

Aim Aim

Social inequality

Exclusion of people

Segregation

Concentrationof poverty

Spatialinequality

Exclusionof places

Volewijck

Create an economic sustain-able residential neighbour-hood that benefits from the adjacent economic develop-ment; prevent it from being gentrified.

Aim Aim

1

Overhoeks

Retain the economic vitality, image and attraction.

Create an easy scale jump, from the global to the re-gional to the local scale.

On what aspects should the areas be equal and in-equal?

Main RQAim

??

?

??

?

?

How can the residential neighbourhoods benefit from the adjacent contemporary economic centrality in ‘Overhoeks’ Amsterdam North?

Main RQAim

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

Utrecht

Haarlem

Bloemendaal

HoofddorpHillegom

Nieuw-Vennep

Lisse

Amstelveen

Zaandam

Zaanstad

PurmerendVolendam

Monnickendam

Diemen

Weesp

Bussum

Naarden

Laren

Beverwijk

IJmuiden

Uithoorn

Schiphol

Almere

How can the residential neighbourhoods benefit from the adjacent contemporary economic centrality in ‘Overhoeks’ Amsterdam North?

Trends

Location

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Time schedule

First steps

In practice

Project location

Future plans

Aim + RQ

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Next steps

Problem Statement main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Methodology

Methods

Deliverables

Methodology

Strategy- general

Vision- Amsterdam North

Design- Key location

Relevance

Problem Statement

ResearchQuestions

Inequality

Disconnected-ness

Lack of opportunities

RESEARCH

DESIGNCONTEXT Amsterdam

Case studies

Literature

I II III

Inequality between Overhoeks and VolewijckExclusion of Volewijck caused by Overhoeks

Process of Overhoeks and its e�ects

Inequality between cent- rality and neighbourhoodExclusion of neighbour-hood by centrality

Process of centrality and its e�ects

Causes and e�ects of inequalityCauses and e�ects of exclusion

Process of centrality

Methodology

Methodology

Source: author 2011

Methods

Research Questions Mp SO DR SS GIS RD LitHow can the surrounding residential neighbourhoods benefit from the contemporary economic centrality in ‘Overhoeks’ Amsterdam North?

What forms the inequality between the Volewijck and Overhoeks?

What causes the disconnectedness between the Volewijck and the centrality?

What opportunities could residents have in the centrality and what makes that they cannot benefit from it?

What effect does inequality have on residential areas adjacent to cen-tralities?

How can the contemporary economic centrality be spatially, socio-spa-tially and economically connected to its residential neighbourhoods?

How can residential neighbourhoods benefit from an adjacent eco-nomic centrality?

What effect does inequality have on the deprivation of residential ar-eas?

What effect does disconnectedness have on the deprivation of resi-dential areas?

How can residential neighbourhoods benefit from an adjacent eco-nomic centrality?

CS = Case Studies DR = Data Research GIS = GIS Research RD = Research by DesignMp = Maps SO = Site Observation SS = Space Syntax Lit = Literature

Main method

Submethod

Am

ster

dam

Case

stu

dies

Lite

ratu

re

Trends

Location

Methodology Methodology

Aim

Main research question

Sub research questions

Methods

Deliverables

In practice

Project location

Future plans

Aim + RQ

Global

Local

Global vs. Local

Problem Statement main problems

Segregation

Lack of opportunities

Time schedule

First stepsNext steps

Source: author 2011

Time scheduleNext steps

Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40Onderdeel Sep Oct P1 Nov Dec Jan P2 Feb Mar Apr P3 May P4 June P5CONTEXTDefine context+structureANALYSIS+RESEARCHAnalysis A'damResearch on locationLITERATURELiterature studyWrite paperCASE STUDIESResearch+analysisDraw conclusionsDELIVERABLESDevelop strategyDevelop visionDevelop designWrite thesisMake presentation

First stepsNext steps

Amsterdam

Continue analysis

Case studies

Define cases studies based on criteria

Literature

Continue literature study

Robin Boelsums1275267

4 Nov 2011P1 - Complex Cities

Mentor: R.Rocco

Thank you!

Questions?

top related