capstone final presentation

FINAL DESIGN PRESENTATIONTEAM 2-6

CHRIS SCHULTZDAVID LANE

MARLA WATSONJAMIE FULLER

STRUCTURALSCHEDULING/ COST ESTIMATIONSITE & TRANSPORTATIONHYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS

Objective

• To provide Capstone Developers with a final design of The Hangout

• To provide Clemson with an entertainment facility

• To provide Clemson’s campus with a late night dining option

• To further draw potential students to Clemson

Project Summary

• The Hangout is a movie theater, restaurant, and meeting facility

• Located on undeveloped land on Perimeter Road

• Two story, 25,943 sq. ft.

• Steel Frame Structure

Architecture & Structural Design

Design Expert: Chris Schultz

Design Procedure

1. Architectural

2. Framing

3. Foundation

4. Lateral Bracing

5. Computer Design and Check

Architecture

• Multi-use building under 3 assembly groups:

• Movie Theater, Restaurant, and Educational

• Two 80-seat theaters with stadium seating

• Concession/Lobby/Arcade

• Restaurant

• 2 Meeting Rooms and 2 Conference Rooms

Architecture

Ground Floor

Second Floor

Architecture

Structural Design

• Roof

• 1.5F22 steel deck

• Steel joists system

• ¼”/ft. slope with interior drainage

• Floor

• 1.5C22 steel deck with 4.5” concrete slab

• Steel W-flange beam system

• CMU Wall

Roof Framing Plan

Minimum Roof Live:20 PSF

Dead:28 PSF

Floor Framing Plan

EDUCATIONAL40 PSF

ASSEMBLY: 100 PSF

Dead Load: 70 PSF

Columns and Foundation Design

• Columns

• W-Flange beams

• Span both floors (30 ft.)

• Footings

• Steel reinforced square footings

• CMU wall footing

• 5” Concrete Slab on Grade

Foundation Design

W8x24

W8x31

CMU Wall System

• 8” CMU Wall

• 2” Air Space

• 4” Brick Veneer

• #4@24” Rebar

Hydrology & Hydraulics

Design Expert: Jamie Fuller

Hydrology & Hydraulics Overview

Pre & Post Development Conditions

• Site Description• Sub-Basin Delineation

• Flow Description• Hydrograph Generation

Storm water Design Methodology

• Storm water Management

• Computer Model Description

Storm water Design Analysis

Pre & Post Development Site Conditions

*Post-development flow must be less than or equal to the Pre-development flow.*

Post-Development

• Grass cover & Asphalt cover • 11 Pervious Sub-Basins• 19 Impervious Sub-Basins• 1 Catch Basin• 1 Storm water Pond

(Detention)• 19 Inlet Structures• 24 Pipe Structures• Internal Roof Drainage

Pre-Development

• Residual Grass Cover• 3 Pervious Sub-Basins• 0 Impervious Sub-Basins• 1 Catch Basin

Pre-Developed Site

EXISTING CATCHBASIN

EXISTING DITCHALONG PERIMETER

ROAD

Pre-Development Sub-Basin Delineation

Sub-Basin

Area [acres]

Time of Conc. [hr]

A 0.282 0.070

B 3.065 0.191

C 1.137 0.104

A

CB

Pre-Development Water Flow

A

BC

Post-Development Sub-Basin Delineation

Table HT2: Post-Development Sub-Basin Summary

Sub-Basin Area Area Length

 Slope Time of

Concentration (2-Year)

Time of Concentration (10-Year)

 Curve

Number

  [ft2] [acre] [ft] 

[ft/ft] [hr] [hr] 

19,953.3

6 0.228 110.370.018

1 0.082 0.06871

26,581.4

3 0.151 121.420.107

0 0.043 0.03671

38,427.0

0 0.193 121.700.082

1 0.048 0.04071

414,041.

94 0.322 149.830.080

0 0.057 0.04771

55,000.2

7 0.114 119.450.020

0 0.021 0.01798

611,468.

20 0.263 152.650.045

9 0.152 0.12671

710,844.

39 0.248 146.750.027

2 0.087 0.07271

87,942.0

3 0.182 181.250.049

6 0.082 0.06771

95,775.2

0 0.132 178.200.020

0 0.029 0.02498

108,015.3

7 0.184 131.730.045

5 0.065 0.05471

112,393.7

4 0.054 152.900.020

0 0.026 0.02198

124,338.3

9 0.099 135.400.020

0 0.023 0.01998

133,144.8

2 0.072 76.910.020

0 0.015 0.01298

143,102.5

4 0.071 77.150.020

0 0.015 0.01298

153,015.3

8 0.069 77.630.020

0 0.015 0.01298

164,448.0

2 0.102 21.420.020

0 0.005 0.00498

179,533.9

9 0.218 155.650.020

0 0.026 0.02298

186,087.1

5 0.139 154.640.020

0 0.026 0.02298

198,338.6

7 0.191 63.930.020

0 0.013 0.01098

2011,914.

80 0.273 219.470.031

8 0.113 0.09471

213,879.6

3 0.089 80.630.020

0 0.015 0.01398

223,562.0

9 0.081 93.520.032

0 0.057 0.04771

235,681.2

8 0.130 187.900.031

9 0.100 0.08271

244,285.1

5 0.098 30.660.020

0 0.007 0.00698

255,294.8

8 0.121 42.310.020

0 0.009 0.00798

2616,978.

62 0.389 102.000.020

0 0.019 0.01598

272,754.8

9 0.063 76.480.020

0 0.015 0.01298

283,296.3

0 0.075 82.050.020

0 0.016 0.01398

293,845.5

9 0.088 88.300.020

0 0.017 0.01498

303,725.4

0 0.085 178.300.020

0 0.029 0.02498

Post-Development Water Flow

Post-Development Pipe Layout (Drainage System)

DETENTION POND

CULVERT

INLET

Stormwater Management – Pipe Structures

Table HT4: Pipe Properties Summary TableName Diamete

rLength Slope Invert

Elevation OUT

Invert Elevation IN

Material

[in] [ft] [ft/ft] [ft] [ft]1 9 266 0.011 802.0 799.0 PVC2 12 210 0.009 793.0 791.0 PVC3 11 257 0.015 790.0 786.0 PVC4 8 22 0.022 791.0 790.5 PVC5 10 62 0.064 786.0 782.0 PVC6 10 60 0.029 783.75 782.0 PVC7 10 55 0.031 787.75 784.0 PVC8 12 55 0.027 787.5 786.0 PVC9 12 54 0.018 789.0 788.0 PVC

10 12 55 0.054 785.0 782.0 Concrete11 12 87 0.040 793.5 790.0 PVC12 15 212 0.021 798.5 794.0 PVC13 15 167 0.050 802.5 794.0 PVC14 10 58 0.043 796.5 794.0 PVC15 8 54 0.037 793.0 791.0 PVC16 12 54 0.018 790.0 789.0 PVC17 10 23 0.086 789.0 787.0 PVC18 11 150 0.013 785.0 783.0 Concrete19 8 20 0.075 782.0 780.5 PVC20 4 27 Vertical Vertical Vertica

lPVC

21 6 27 Vertical Vertical Vertical

PVC

22 8 27 Vertical Vertical Vertical

PVC

23 8 27 Vertical Vertical Vertical

PVC

24 8 27 Vertical Vertical Vertical

PVC

Stormwater Management – Inlet Structures

Table HT3: Drainage Inlet and Gutter Summary TableInlets Gutters

Name Type Location Length Throat Grate Width Grate Length

RIMElevation

CurbHeight

Slope Width Pavement Slope

Longitudinal Slope

[ft] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft] [in] [ft/ft] [ft] [ft/ft] [ft/ft]1 Combinatio

nOn

Grade3 4 3 3 804.5 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

2 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 800.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

3 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 793.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

4 Slotted On Grade

3 4 3 3 787.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

5 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 793.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

6 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 798.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

7 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 795.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

8 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 792.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

9 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 791.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

10 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 788.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

11 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 783.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

12 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 785.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

13 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 787.5 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

14 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 789.7 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

15 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 791.4 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

16 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 805.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

17 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 800.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

18 Combination

On Grade

3 4 3 3 796.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

19 Slotted On Grade

3 4 3 3 787.0 6 0.02 3 0.02 0.01

 Name

 Type

 Location

Width Length Grate Width Grate Length

RIM Elevation

  Width Pavement Slope

Longitudinal Slope

[in] [in] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft] [ft]Existing Catch Basin

 Grate

 On sag

 1

 6

 3

 5

 775.73

 3

 0.02

 0.02

Computer Model

I-INLETO-

OUTFALL

DETENTION POND

PERVIOUS AREA

IMPERVIOUS AREA

UNITS ARE CONNECTED BY NON-ROUTED CONNECTORS,

CIRCULAR CONDUIT, AND PIPE STRUCTURES.

2-YR 24-HR Hydrology & Hydraulics Analysis

Pre-Development

Post-Development

w/o Pond

Post-Development

w/Pond

10-YR 24-HR Hydrology & Hydraulics Analysis

Pre-Development Post-

Development w/o Pond

Post-Development

w/Pond

100-YR Rainfall Event Hydrograph

Peak Runoff Discharges

Table HT5: Hydrograph Essential Data

Storm Event Peak Discharge Runoff Volume[YR] [cfs] [acre-ft]

Pre-Development 2-Year 1.953 0.253110-Year 6.606 0.6585

Post-Development Without Pond

2-Year 9.691 0.841410-Year 12.50 1.3333

Post-Development With Pond

2-Year 2.574 0.186910-Year 5.601 0.3649

100-Year 11.81 0.8008

Storm water Pond Elevation View

Maximum stage during 100-YR storm: 7.90 feet (freeboard not used)

Top Elevation: 787 feet

Bottom Elevation: 777 feet

Site and Transportation

Design Expert: Marla Watson

Site & Transportation Overview

• Site Layout & Setbacks• Site Grading Plan• Site Traffic Plan• Access Road Cross Section• Site Lighting Plan

Site Layout and Setbacks

15’X15’ DUMPSTER PAD

TYPICAL SETBACKS

ACCESS ROADS

Site Grading Plan

DETENTION POND787’ SURFACE777’ FLOOR

1680 CY VOLUME

805’ BUILDING

PERMANENT SLOPE4:1

Site Traffic Plan

PARKING LOT 2-WAY ACCESS

AISLES

1-WAY DELIVERY TRUCK ACCESS ROAD

75 REGULAR SPACES

CAT BUS STOP

BICYCLE RACK

Access Road Cross Section

Site Lighting Plan

SITE LIGHTING

DOUBLE ARM PARKING LOT30’ HIGH WITH 14” ARMS

1.0 FOOTCANDLE

Construction Scheduling and Cost Estimation

Design Expert: David Lane

Schedule

Durations

Sequencing

Define workdays

Schedule

TASK COST ACCOUNT CODE

TASK CODE ACCOUNT NAME UNIT OF MEASURE

QTY NO. OF CREWS

CREW PROD.

DURATION WEATHER ADJ.

Total Duration

03 30 53.40 3150 (P.68 IN BCCD)

REGULAR CONCRETE, 4000 PSI, 4"

SF 2100 1 C-8 2613 0.1 1

03 30 53.40 3580 (P. 68 IN BCCD)

EQUIPMENT PAD 8'X8'X 10"

EACH 1 1 C-8 8 0.1 103 30 53.40 3940 (P. 69 IN BCCD)

FOOTING, STRIP 3000 PSI 24" X 12", REINFORCED CY 38 1 C-14L 48 0.1 1

03 - CONCRETE

Schedule

Schedule

Mobilization Date: January

9, 2012

154 eight-hour workdays

Completion Date: August

13, 2012

Cost Estimate

WBS

Line Item

Division Breakdown

Adjustment Factors

Cost Estimate

TASK COST ACCOUNT CODE

TASK CODE ACCOUNT NAME

UNIT OF MEASURE

QTY UNIT COST

CREW INCREASE COST

TOTAL COST

04- MASONRY

04 21 13.13 2000 (P. 89 IN BCCD)

STANDARD BRICK VANEER SF 15820 14.35$ 218,316$ 445,333$

04 22 10.24 0200 (P.96 IN BCCD)

REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK EXT. 8"X8"X16" SF 15820 10.25$ 139,849$ 302,004$

Cost Estimate

Cost of Site Features

Design Feature Estimated Total Cost Percent of Total Project Cost

Hydrology and Hydraulic Features $ 92,000 2%

Site and Transportation Features $ 900,000 21%

Structural and Architectural Features $ 1,100,000 25%

Cost Estimate

DIVISION TOTAL 4,838,253$ 186$ LOCATION MODIFICATION [.76] 3,677,072$ GENERAL CONDITIONS [+10%] 367,707$ CONTINGENCY [+5%] 183,854$ TOTAL PROJECT COST 4,228,633$ 163$

DIVISION COST COST PER SF

Conclusion

• 25,943 sq. ft. multiuse facility

• 2 stadium seating theaters

• 81 parking spaces + CAT access

• 154 eight-hour workdays, August 13, 2012.

• $4.2 Million, $163/SF

QUESTIONS?