canddi bo wandschneider capdu/dli april 13, 2005 queen’s university

Post on 08-Jan-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

CANDDI – what has happened Several discussion around DDI, Metadata. Nesstar were happening in the community Chuck proposed rolling this into a discussion forum in early early 2004 Yahoo Group created

TRANSCRIPT

CANDDI

Bo WandschneiderCAPDU/DLI April 13, 2005Queen’s University

CANDDI

Rome wasn’t built in a day These types of collaborations are slow to

develop – especially with… no funding no formal governance structure

We have made progress Lots more to do

…recap

CANDDI – what has happened

Several discussion around DDI, Metadata. Nesstar were happening in the community

Chuck proposed rolling this into a discussion forum in early early 2004

Yahoo Group created

CANDDI – what has happened

Face to face meetings held in:Montreal – Train the trainers (March)Kingston - DLI (April)Wisconsin - IASSIST (May)

RDC’s partner to look at DDI and Nesstar Looking at integrating metadata during

creation of survey vs. retro-fiting

CANDDI - Wisconsin On Friday, May 28, 2004 the members of

CANDDI who attended IASSIST met to discuss next steps in implementing a Canadian DDI solution.

Nineteen of the current list of CANDDI members were in attendance.

A healthy discussion led to the recommendation to create five working groups.

CANDDI –working group 1 Logistics / Coordinating-Steering Group:

identify parallel activities occurring in the implementation of DDI in Canada; from a project management standpoint

identify ways of coordinating parallel DDI projects responsible for coordinating the activities of the other

four working groups recommend to the CANDDI membership a more formal

organizational model for CANDDI and its relationships with other organizations, for example, the DLI EAC.

CANDDI – working group 2

The Canadian DDI Tag Working Group: responsible for selecting an appropriate set of

DDI tags for Canadian data produce a document describing these tags and

annotating their use recommend this document to the CANDDI

membership for comment and revision responsible for the care of this document.

CANDDI – working group 3

Control Vocabulary / Thesaurus Coordination Working Group: responsible for identifying and recommending control

vocabularies including appropriate labels for variable groupings vet their findings with the CANDDI membership responsible for the care of the control vocabularies

CANDDI- working group 4

Quality Control: responsible for articulating best practices and

processes involved in the production of accurate and consistent DDI-compliant documentation

responsible for the care of the documentation of these practices and processes.

CANDDI – working group 5

Education / Training: responsible for training programs for creators

of data documentation, users of DDI-compliant documentation, and intermediaries supporting end-users

promoting their training program for use with existing training conducted by DLI and other appropriateorganizations.

CANDDI - what happened next Discussions happened on-line and off-line Some expressions of interest were made Still some concerns being raised about fully

understanding what DDI was People couldn’t – see it, touch it, play with it… How does it work with our data Maybe we need something more concrete

before we move forward…

CANDDI – getting dirty

People were already playing with markup Maybe we start with a subset of working

group 2The Canadian DDI Tag Working GroupGet something on paperSomething people can see, touch and play

withHas value that we can build on

CANDDI – getting dirty

DINO put a group together in December Meeting in Ottawa Shared knowledge Discussed coordination

CANNDI – getting dirty

Tag details: ID - <docDscr> - institution unique identifier – UG

example: cchs2003 ID - <stdyDscr> - Stats Can Catalogue number

followed by year. Example: 82M0013-2003

CANDDI – getting dirty

File priority: DLI – Labour Force Survey & General Social

Surveys UG – focus on files in collection

CANDDI – getting dirty

Sharing Files Should we track? If so, how and where in the codebook? Who’s doing what?

CANDDI – what’s next Publish the suggested set of tags Get some feedback Education? Put in the Steering group?

Should this be formal? Budget?

Start establishing the working groups Set timelines?

CANDDI

DISCUSSION

top related