background document for workshop: towards an isa …€¦ · the development decision-making...
Post on 13-Jul-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
BackgrounddocumentforWorkshop:TowardsanISAEnvironmentalManagementStrategyfortheArea
Berlin,March2017
Discussionpaperon"Project-specificEnvironmentalImpactAssessments”
PreparedbyMalcolmR.Clark
Background
TheLawoftheSeaConvention(UNCLOS)hasgeneralprovisionsforStatestoprotectandpreservethemarineenvironmentfromactivities(Articles145,192),andmorespecificallyArticle206statesthatwhenplannedactivitiescouldcausesignificantandharmfulchanges,thepotentialeffectsofactivitiesshould be assessed and reported. Contractors, sponsoring States and other interested States orentitiesarealsorequiredduringeitherprospectingorexplorationtocooperatewiththe ISA in theestablishmentandimplementationofprogrammesformonitoringandevaluatingtheimpactsofdeepseabedmining on themarine environment (ISA, 2013a). Best environmental practices need to befollowed fordeep-seamining activities toproceed, and theneed to assess environmental impactsrequires thedevelopmentand implementationofa robustEnvironmental ImpactAssessment (EIA)process.
WhatisanEIA?
TherearemanydefinitionsofEIA,butacommonlyusedoneisthatofTheInternationalAssociationforImpactAssessment(IAIA)(Senécaletal.,1999)whichdefinesanEIAas"theprocessofidentifying,predicting,evaluatingandmitigatingthebiophysical,social,andotherrelevanteffectsofdevelopmentproposalspriortomajordecisionsbeingtakenandcommitmentsmade."Followingonfromthis,theIAIAdescribesfourkeyobjectivesofanEIA:
• Toensurethatenvironmentalconsiderationsareexplicitlyaddressedandincorporated intothedevelopmentdecision-makingprocess;
• Toanticipateandavoid,minimizeoroffsettheadversesignificantbiophysical,socialandotherrelevanteffectsofdevelopmentproposals;
• Toprotecttheproductivityandcapacityofnaturalsystemsandtheecologicalprocesseswhichmaintaintheirfunctions;and
• To promote development that generates less destruction and optimizes resource use andmanagementopportunities.
EIAisnotasinglereport,itispartofawiderprocess,withanumberofgeneralactivitiesthatanEIAprocessshouldinclude(Senécaletal.,1999):
• Screening:todetermineifanEIAisrequired
• Scoping:identifytheissuesandimpactsforanEIA
• Examinationofalternatives:lookatseveraloptionstoachieveprojectobjectives
• Impactanalysis:identifyandpredicteffectsoftheproposal
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
2
• Mitigationandimpactmanagement:establishmeasurestomanageimpacts
• Evaluationofsignificance:whataretheresidualimpacts?
• Preparationofreport:documentalltheissuesandmeasures
• Reviewoftheassessment:whethertheEIAmeetsthecriteria
• Decisionmaking:approve,reject,ormodifyproposal
• Follow-up:ifapproved,ensurecomplianceandmonitoringofconditionsandimpacts.
However,asenvironmentalassessmentfordeep-seaminingisstilldeveloping,itisanappropriatetimetoevaluatewhatisrequiredforarobustEIAprocessandthenatureandextentofEIAsfortherangeofdeep-seamineralresourcesandenvironments.
Challenges/Problems
ThereisawealthofinternationalexperienceintheseactivitiesandreportscarryingoutEIAs(Glassonet al., 2012). However,whereas the EIA process iswell developed inmany terrestrial and coastalmarinesituations(Glassonetal.,2012;Petts,1999),andforoffshorehydrocarbonresources(HuskyOil, 2001), guidance for mineral resources is still developing (Ellis et al., 2014; Ellis et al., 2017).Although it can be tailored to specific national legislation (CEAA, 2012;USDepartment of Energy,2004),thereareanumberofgenericissues:
ProceduralissueswithEIAprocesses;
Preconditionsfor,andallstepstobetakenduring,anEIAprocesspriortopermittingminingtestsoroperations need to be defined, including the overall scope of the EIA, roles, timelines, scopingprocedures,publicparticipationandreview,aswellassettingperformancecriteriaforenvironmentalreportingandassessment.Fundingandinstitutionalmechanismsandproceduresneedtobeclarifiedin order to ensure an independent EIA. There are several models for EIA procedures in nationallegislationandinternationallaw,andtheGriffith-ISAWorkshop(ISA,2017)consideredsomeofthese.ThereshouldbeasingleprocesswhereappropriatetomakeiteasierforbothapplicantsandtheISAmanagingtheprocess.
Technicalissues
Toomuchdescription,notenoughfocusonkeyelementsofimpacts
Theeffectivenessof EIAshasbeen found tobe limitedwhen theyhave toomuch focusonoverlydescriptive baselinework andnot enough emphasis on key impacts of the activity (Glasson et al.,2012).Toooftenitisdifficulttowadethroughlong-windedaccountsoftheenvironmentthatlackagoodinterpretationoftherelevancetoimpactsfromtheproposedactivities.Inthedevelopmentofimpactassessments,keyimpactsfromoffshoreminingactivitiesshouldbestructuredby“receptor”anddepthrangetoenableanunderstandingofthesourceandnatureofimpactscausedbythevariouscomponents of the operation at the surface or seafloor, and help to focus the EIA and potentialmitigationmeasures.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
3
Insufficientaccountofapriorriskassessment
LinkedwiththeaboveissuethatEIAsareoftentoodominatedbycompilationsofeverythingknownaboutanarea,ratherthankeyimpacts,anEcologicalRiskAssessment(ERA)shouldbeanintegralpartoftheprocess.However,thisisoftennotdoneearlyenoughintheprocesstoguidedatacollectionduringexplorationthatcaninformamorerobustEIA(Clarketal.,2014;ISA,2017).
Availabledatashortcomings
MostEIAssufferfromincompletedata,orinformationthatisinadequatetofullyassesstheimpactsofactivitiesononeormorereceptors.AlonglistispossibleofissuesthatEIAscanhaveinthedeepsea,andinpracticaltermsthereislittleonecandoaboutsomeofthem-wehavetoacceptadata-limitedsituation.However,commonandavoidableproblemsrelateto:
• lackofstandardizationofdataorsamplingprocedures• poorintegrationofallavailabledata• noassessmentofwhatisanadequatebaselinedataset• inadequatebaselinesurveydesign(oftennotenoughthought)• insufficientregionalsettingforstudiesdoneatasmaller-scalesiteofinterest• insufficientassessmentofpotentialcumulativeimpacts• limitedexpressionoracknowledgementofuncertainty.
Lackofstandardmonitoringprotocols
Everylocation,resourcetype,andhabitatcanhavedifferentcharacteristics.HenceEIAshavetobeflexibletoensuretheyarefitforpurpose.However,incollectingdataduringexplorationtosupportthebaselinedefinition,andsubsequentmonitoring,thereshouldbealevelofconsistencysothatcoredeep-seaecologicalinformationdemandsaremet,andthesearecomparableandcanbecombinedbetweencontractorstoformaregionalpicture.Aspectsinclude:
• whatparametersshouldbemeasuredfromtheoutset,andhow• whatismeasuredtoacceptablestandards(accuracyandprecision)• what are the key ecological indicators that need to be assessed in transitioning from the
baselinedatatomeasuring/monitoringfuturechangesundertheEMP
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
4
• what levelofchangemightbeacceptable intermsofmitigation(againstgenericecologicallimitsandthresholds,notmanagementtargets).
Variableformatsandcontent
EIAscancomeinallshapesandsizes,asdifferentcontractors,consultantsandinstituteshavetheirownwayofdoingthings.However,adegreeofhigherlevelstructuralstandardizationcanmakethetaskofcontractorsandthereviewingregulatorybodymucheasier,becausetheformerknowwhattheyneedtoprovide,andthelatterwhattoexpect.
While an EIA essentially focuses on thebiophysical environment, increasingly EIAs are consideringeconomic,socialandculturalfactorsaswellasecologicalandphysicalcomponents.ThesocialandeconomicfactorscanbeconsideredwithinanEIAorasa separatereport,dependingonthedetailrequiredbytherelevantlegislationandregulations.
TheISAdevelopedaprovisionalEIAtemplatefordeep-seaminingactivities(ISA,2012),partlybasedonthestructureofanEnvironmentalImpactStatementpreparedforSeafloorMassiveSulphide(SMS)miningoffPapuaNewGuinea(CoffeyNaturalSystems/NautilusMineralsLtd,2008).TheISAtemplateisintendedtoguidecontractorstoachieveconsistencyinEIAinformation.TheISAtemplatehassincebeenmodifiedbySwaddling(2016),anditwasalsousedindevelopingguidelinesforEIAsthatcouldbridgetheinternationaltemplateandtherequirementsoftheEEZActinNewZealand(Clarketal.,2014;Clarketal.,2017).
Uncertainty
Therearenumeroustechnical/scientificchallengesforanydeep-seaEIA.Theunderlyingcauseofthisdifficultyisthenatureoftheenvironment.Thedeep-seaisdifficulttoaccessbecauseofitsremotenessand depth. Ecosystems are open, both horizontally and vertically, and community definition andboundariesaredifficulttoestablish.Manyecologicalprocessesareslow,andhencenaturalvariabilitycantakealongtimetomeasure.Sogiventhese,andother,issues,datawillinvariablybelimitingforanEIAincomparisonwithterrestrialormanyinshoreenvironments.Thismakestheissueofexpressinguncertaintyandconfidenceparticularlyimportant.
Therearemanykindsofuncertainty,anditcanbehelpfultodefinedifferentsourcesofuncertaintysothattheycanbebetterunderstoodandmanaged.Thesecanbedefinedinseveralgroups:
• Knowledge uncertainty arises where there is incomplete understanding of processes,interactionsorsystembehaviours
• Unpredictability arises from chaotic (often random) components of complex systems or ofhumanbehaviour
• Structuraluncertaintyarisesfrominadequatemodels,ambiguoussystemboundaries,oroversimplificationoromissionofprocessesfrommodels
• Valueuncertaintyarises frommissingor inaccuratedata, inappropriatespatialor temporalresolution,orpoorlyknownmodelparameters
• Uncertaininterpretations,arisewhenvaluesortermsareinterpreteddifferentlybydifferentusergroups.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
5
Thesetypesofuncertaintiesmayallberelevanttoassessingwhateffectanimpactmayhave.Manyofthe techniques used in preparing an EIA, such asmodels used tomake predictions, will have thepotentialfor associateduncertainty,asdomonitoringprogrammemeasurementsandinformationduetoprecisionofinstruments,orifnewandlessproventechnologiesareused.
Cumulativeimpacts
Policy and regulatory requirements in many countries include the requirement that EIAs identify,analyseandevaluatecumulativeeffects.However,although theyhave longbeen recognisedasanimportantcomponentofEIAs,theyarepoorlyassessedasarule(BurrisandCanter,1997).Therearemanystressorscausedbyanthropogenicactivitiesthatcanaffectthemarineenvironmentinanumberofways,andthereisalargebodyofliteraturedealingwiththisfieldofresearch(Glassonetal.,2012;SolanandWhiteley,2016).Resultsofnumerousstudiesindicatethatinteractionsbetweenstressorscan be variable, and hard to predict (Crain et al., 2008; Darling and Cote, 2008). Nevertheless,cumulativeeffectsshouldbeexploredasmuchaspossiblegivenavailabledata,andconsideredearlyonduringtheexplorationphasesoappropriateinformationcanbecollected.
Theassessmentofcumulativeimpactsneedstoconsiderthreekeyelements:
• Multiplesourcesofimpact(eitherdifferenttypesofminingoperation,ordifferentsectors)
• Additiveorinteractiveprocesses(repetitionleadingtoaccumulationofimpacts)
• Differenttypesofcumulativeeffects(e.g.,directphysical,indirect,natural).
Thereisnowincreasingguidanceonwhattodescribeandevaluate(Banetal.,2010;Crainetal.,2008;SmitandSpaling,1995).However, thekey to improvingEIAs lies intheability toacknowledgeandmanagetheresidual(unavoidable)uncertainty.RouseandNorton(2010)stresstheneedforgreateruse of statistical measures and probabilistic methods to estimate the likelihood of the predictedoutcomehappening.
AreviewbySadler (1996),althoughabitdatednow,stillservesasagoodexampleofsomeofthegood,thebad,andtheuglyfeaturesfoundinEIAs,thattheEIAprocessandstructurecanlearnfrom.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
6
Whatarethequestionstobediscussedandsolved?
There are a lot of potential discussionpointswith EIAs that could be considered.However, in theworkshopweproposetofocusonsomeofthekeyaspectsthataremostrelevanttodeep-seamining,andaretractablewithinacoupleofsessions.Legal/proceduralissues
• WhichspecificformofEIAprocessshouldbeinitiatedafterexploration?Orshouldtheprocessbeintegratedacrossexplorationandexploitation
• What steps (by the ISA and interested parties) are required prior to submission of anapplicationtomine,includingpublicandscientificreview?
• What is the governance framework associated with the decisions to be made on EIAssubmittedwithminingapplications?
• Whatarethebestwaystoensuresufficienttransparencyintheprocess?• Should the requirements foranEIArelated to testminingbe thesameas those relatedto
exploitationoperations?• Howdosite-specificEIAslinkwithregionaland/orstrategicenvironmentalassessments(SEA)
ormanagementplans?
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
7
AcceptanceofanagreedEIAprocessThis needs to balance existing procedures and regulations of the ISA, with accepted international“standards”.Anoptionispresentedbelow.AnissuetoconsideristhatscopingfortheEIAmustoccurasearlyintheprocessaspossible,andthescopingreportinthisschemeisperhapsbettersitedatthestartof exploration.The scoping should include apreliminary ERA (or someassessmentof risk) toensurethatdatacollectionwillsupporttheEIAinfocusingonthekeyelementsofimpact.
RoleoftheISASecretariatinreviewingEIAsTheScientificReviewandPublicConsultationstepsareclearintheoverallprocessoutlinedabove,buthowtheseareactuallyundertakenisnot.TheroleoftheISAasaninvolved,regulatory,orfacilitatorybody,needsclarification.Ithasbeensuggested(ISA,2017)thatafundamentalchangeintheISAwillbe required to undertake a greater regulatory function. This will need to include a number ofadministrative tasks ranging from defining step-by-step EIA submission procedures, through todeterminingwhetherthedetailedreviewprocessisundertakenbythe(expanded)ISASecretariat(anInspectoratesection),acontractedmultidisciplinarypanelofexpertsconvenedwhenrequiredbytheISA,ortenderedouttoanindependentreviewbody.
Roleofumbrellaassessmentsandplans
AlthoughSEAsandregionalplansarearelativelynewconsiderationinthecontextofdeep-seaminingintheArea,theyareanimportantcontextformultipleEIAsthatmayneedtobeconsideredtogether.Hence the procedural and institutional setting of these activities at different scales and involvingdifferentagenciesneedstobeclarified(linkswithbackgrounddocumentonRegionalGovernance).
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
8
Technicalaspects
Thereareanumberoftechnicalenvironmentalconditionsforenteringinto,andcarryingout,anEIAprocess.Theseincludetheneedfor:
Adequateenvironmentalbaselineinformation
Baseline data collection, and short-termmonitoring studies, are important aspects of explorationactivities,astheyunderpinthepreparationofanEIA,priortoanyapplicationforafullminingpermit.Itisexpectedthatsomeinformationwillbeavailablefromanareabeforeanyexplorationoccurs,anddesk-topstudieswillformthebasisofinitialscopingoftheactivity/project.However,availabledatawill invariably be inadequate to describe and characterise the receiving environment of any likelyminingsite.Hencebaselinesurveysandtargetedscientificstudieswillbeneededtoprovidethepre-miningstateoftheenvironment,aswellassomemonitoringofconditionsovertimetounderstandtemporal variability of key environmental factors. Such studieswill need to cover awide rangeofresearchaspects,andbecarriedoutusingcurrent“bestpractice“approachesandmethods.TheISAhaspublishedtworeportsthatdescribeandgivesomeadviceonthesortsofstudies,typeofdata,andnatureofsampling required forbothbaselinemeasurementsandongoingmonitoring.Thesecovermanganesenodule(ISA,1999),seafloormassivesulphide,andcobalt-richcrustresources(ISA,2007),withanadditionalreportonsamplingstandardisation(ISA,2002).ProtocolsandstandardshavealsobeenreviewedaspartoftheEuropeanMIDASproject(Billettetal.,2015).ThesesourceshavebeenupdatedandreworkedinanSPC-EU-NIWAreport(Swaddlingetal.,2016),andISArecommendationsarecurrentlybeingconsideredbytheLTC.
Theroleoftestmininghasalsonotyetbeentrialled.Thisisanimportantelementofthetransitionfromexplorationtoexploitation,aswithout ittherecanbeonly limitedunderstandingofthelikelynatureandextentofimpactsbecausethespatialscaleofmostpotentialminingoperationsisverylargerelativetoexploration.However,whiletestminingcanbeanimportantcontributiontounderstandingimpacts, it will not provide all the solutions to address the long-term sustainability of deep-seaecosystemsintheminedregion.Afundamentalquestioniswhetherbaselinedata,whichinthedeepsea will typically be incomplete or limited, will be adequate to support a robust EIA. Knowledgeuncertaintywillneedtoflowthroughintomeasurestobeadoptedintheenvironmentalmanagementprocess(seealso:backgrounddocumentsonPilotMiningTestsandAdaptiveManagement).
Requirementforpriorecologicalriskassessment(ERA)
Asdescribedearlier,animportantcomponentoftheEIAprocessistoensuretheEIAfocusesonthemainsourcesof impact,anddoesnotspendunduetimeonelementsof littlerisk.TherearemanyapproachesandmethodstoERA.Arealisticapproachatthebeginningoftheexplorationphase,giventheoftenlimitedamountofinformationavailable,istoconductaqualitative(Level1)assessmentinlinewithacceptedstandards(AS/NZSISO31000,2009).Thistypeofassessmentcommonlyusesanexpert panel to consider the likelihood of an impact occurring, and the consequences if it does(MacDiarmid et al., 2012). The results of this risk assessment should guide data collection duringexplorationactivities,asamorequantitativeassessmentislikelytoberequiredbeforeprogressingtoamining licenceapplicationstage.Soa level1assessment identifies themain issues,anda level2assessmentappliesamorerigorousevaluationofthoseidentifiedashighrisk.
Otheroptionsthatembedariskassessmentofsomeformincludeenvironmentalassessmentscopingreports,orenvironmentalhazardandimpactidentifications(ENVID)toidentifybothaccidentalevents
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
9
andplannedoperationalproceduresrelatedtoaminingoperationthatcanimpacttheenvironment(RecommendedPracticeDNVGL-RP-O601,2016).
DesiredformalstructureoftheEIA/EISreport
Thiscanbuildon input fromseveral reportsanddraft templates (Clarketal.,2014; ISA,2012; ISA,2017;Swaddling,2016).A reviewofexistingEIAguidancewasundertakenbyMIDAS (Billettetal.,2015).Recently,Clarketal.(2017)haveupdatedthetemplateandguidancetoalignwiththe2016Griffith-ISAworkshop,anditwillbeanaimoftheBerlinWorkshoptofinalizethisdrafttemplate.
AcceptablecontentofanEIA
TherehasbeenadevelopingtrendtowidenthescopeofEIAs,possiblyattheexpenseoftheirfocusandthequalityofeachcomponent.Thistrend is thecase, forexample, inNewZealandwheretheexpectationisthatan“ImpactAssessment“willincludea“wholeofenvironment“approach,withabalanced consideration of both biophysical and socio-economic impacts (including cultural), or atriangular“integratedassessment“(biophysical,societal,economicassessments)),plususingEIAtoidentifyenvironmentallimitsandconstraintsontheprojectratherthanjustidentifyingtheprojects‘impacts on the environment (Glasson et al., 2012). Draft templates (Clark et al., 2017; ISA, 2017;Swaddling,2016)currentlyinclude“socialimpactassessment”aswellasconsiderationofculturalandeconomicfactors,althoughthesearelessdevelopedandextensivethanenvironmentalimpacts.ThesemaybelessimportantintheAreathaninnationalsituations,butthisissomethingtheISAwillneedtoconsiderwithdevelopingexploitationregulations.
Giventhevariabilityinenvironmentalcharacteristicsbetweenresourcetypesandlocations,thereisacarefulbalancerequiredbetweenEIAguidelinesbeinghighlyprescriptive(whichmaynotfitcertainsituations)andbeingtoogeneral(whereadequatestandardsaren’tclear).Clarketal.(2017)providemore explanation on what should be included under the template headings, useful data andinformation sources, and advice on a number of general issues across EIAs (such as uncertainty,cumulativeimpacts,adaptivemanagement).IthasafocusonNewZealandlegislativerequirements,butisintendedalsotoapplymoreinternationally,andcouldbeabasedocumenttoconsider.AdoptionofproceduralcheckstoensureEIAcriteriaareacceptable
ThekeyprinciplesandcriteriaofanEIAareoftennotfulfilled,anditisrelativelystraightforwardforanapplicanttokeepinmindthebasicsofanEIA,andcheckthemoffastheyreviewtheapplication.AnEIAshouldbe:
• Purposive:beinformativefordecision-making
• Rigorous:applybestpracticablescience
• Practical:resultinusefulinformationandoutputs
• Relevant:provideuseableinformation
• Cost-effective:achieveEIAobjectiveswithinacceptableresourceandtimelimits
• Efficient:processshouldminimisecostburdens
• Focused:concentrateonsignificantissues
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
10
• Adaptive:adjustabletothespecificsituationbutnotcompromisetheprocess
• Participative:informandinvolveinterestedandaffectedparties
• Interdisciplinary:involvemultipletechniquesandexpertsacrossarangeoffields
• Credible:aprofessionalprocess,subjecttoindependentchecks/verification
• Integrated:interrelationshipsofsocial,economicandbiophysicalaspects
• Transparent:anopenandinformativeprocess
• Systematic:considerallrelevantinformationandoptions.
Need for a compulsory standard environmentalmonitoring programme during exploration, testminingandtheexploitationphase
Therearetwo“categories”ofmonitoringtoconsider:
• Operationalmonitoring: includingminingor drilling location and rate, volumesdischarged,hazardousdischargeeventsandquantityofminedmaterialremoved.
• Effects monitoring: including physical (e.g., clarity, sediment deposition), chemistry (e.g.,analytical suite of contaminants, zone of initialmixing for guideline comparisons, relevantwater and sediment quality guidelines, bioaccumulation assessment) and biologicalmonitoring(e.g.,sentinelspecies,surveyapproaches).
The second, which is focussed on environmental aspects, can build on available environmentalassessment guidance (ISA, 2013b)and more recent work. The main aspects to be included, andparameterstobemeasured,forbothbaselineandmonitoringsurveyprogrammesaredescribedintheguidelinesonscientificresearchdevelopedbytheSPC-EUDSMprojectandNIWA(Swaddlingetal.,2016).This reportcoverssurveydesign,samplingequipment,and“bestscientificpractices” fordeep-seasamplingrelevanttomarineminerals.Asummarytablefromthatreportonrecommendedscientificstudies,theirrationale,andmethods, isreproducedasAnnex2,whichprovidesastartingpointfordeterminingthestudiesthatneedtobeconductedformonitoringimpactsandenvironmentalchanges.
Recommendations,includingpotentialnextsteps
Theworkshopdiscussionswillundoubtedlyproducemanygoodideasandactionpoints.However,thesessions are short, and the focus needs to be constrained. Several things for which clearrecommendations and ways to define the issues include the points below grouped in 3 “similar”clusters:Cluster1:TheEIAprocessandstructure
• A defined/adopted EIA process that is consistent with ISA responsibilities and can beincorporated into thedeveloping exploitation regulations. Thismay include revisionof theprocesswhereitlinkswithexistingexplorationregulations(e.g.,inclusionofaninitialscopingreport,withapreliminaryriskassessment).Thiscanstartwiththeprocessschemeabove,andbecomparedwithotheroptionsgiveninISA(2017).
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
11
• AnagreedlistofpreconditionsrequiredforenteringintoanEIAprocess.ThiswouldspecifytheoutputsofworkundertakenduringexplorationthatareessentialforarobustEIAtobecarriedout(e.g.,baselinesurveys,test-miningresults).
• ClarityonwhatanEIAcontainsintermsofitsgeneral(notdetailed)scope.DoestheEIAfocuson just environmental issues, extend to include a general account of social, economic andculturalaspectswhereappropriate,orexpandfurthertoencompassalltypesofassessments.
• AgreementonanEIA/EIStemplate(tomatchdefinedscope).ThiscanbetakenfromthelatestISAreport,andsupplementedbyNIWAguidelines(Clarketal.,2017;ISA,2017).
• Clarificationofrolesofvariousend-usersandinterestedpartiesintheEIAprocess,especiallypublicengagementandreviewprocesses.ThelattercouldincludeproceduresforevaluationoftheresultsoftheEIA.
• Definition of the consequences of the evaluation of an EIA. This links with issues of howresidual risks and general scientific uncertainty are managed in the environmentalmanagementplanprocess.Itisalargeissue,andbeyondthescopeofthisworkshop.However,aplan forward toaddress the issuecouldbediscussed,andpotentially termsof referencescopedoutforaspecificworkshop.
Cluster2:Environmentalmonitoring
• Definitionofthegeneralnatureofbaselinedatarequiredduringexplorationthatwillsupportthe EIA. This can draw on recommendations from ISA, SPC-NIWA, andMIDAS reports. Animportantaspectistheimportanceoftemporalchanges,astheseareascriticalasdescriptionofthespatialcharacteristicsoffaunalcommunities.
• Specificationofthegeneralnatureofastandardmonitoringprogrammefortestminingandexploitation phases. This aspect links with baseline data requirements, and defining keyenvironmentalindicatorstomeasure,togetherwithconsiderationoffrequencyandduration.This will be site specific, but general principles and approaches (e.g., BACI-before-after-control-impact)canbedetermined.RelevanttothisisaspartofareviewoftheCCZEMP,aworkshop was recommended by the LTC to investigate the survey design and samplingrequirementsforImpactReferenceZonesandPreservationReferenceZones.
Both these are unlikely to be resolved in detail during theworkshop, and could require a furtherworkshop/s to consider the development of standard baseline and environmental monitoringschemes.Takingthisforwardwillalsorequireconsiderationofhowmuchdataarerequiredtosupportafull“ecosystemapproach”andmovemoretowardsecosystemstructureandfunctionthanpartialcommunitydescriptions.
Cluster3:Developmentoftermsofreferenceforexpertworkinggroupstoconsider:
• Toolstobeusedforenvironmentalassessment.Howmuchcanwestandardisethecollectionfield data (survey design, sampling gear) as well as modelling approaches (e.g., speciesdistributionmodels,hydrodynamicoceanographicmodels), aspromotedby ISA (2002)andSwaddlingetal.(2016).
• Cankeyenvironmentalindicatorsofimpactsbedefined,togetherwithcriteriaforidentifyingthem, thresholds of acceptable levels of change, and how to recognize and measurecumulativeimpacts.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
12
• How to determine best environmental practice and best available technologies. Incombinationwiththeprecedingaspects,canexistingbaselinedatareportsprovidesufficientguidanceoncurrentbestpractice?
• What are appropriate impactminimization strategies, howmuch can be reduced byminedesignandtechnologyversusoptionsofspatialmanagement,howdoresponseexpectationsgetincorporatedintoadaptivemanagementandenvironmentalmanagementplans?
• Managinguncertainty intheEIAandsubsequentEMPdesign isacritical issuefordeep-seaenvironmentswheredatalimitationswillalwaysexist.Linkedwithsessionsonenvironmentalstandardsandadaptivegovernance,optionsoffunctionalecosystemrole(ratherthanspecies-levelbiodiversity),speciesdistributionmodelling,riskassessment,andadaptivemanagementcanbedeveloped.
• Developmentofastandardenvironmentalassessmentandmonitoringscheme,linkedtosomeoftheconsiderationsaboveinCluster2,andaddressingdefiningvalidbaselines,identifyingappropriatemonitoring indicators, guidelines for adaptivemanagement indecisionmakingduringmonitoring,andperformancecriteria.
Theabovebulletpointscanrapidlybecomealongwish-listofthingsthatshouldbedonetosatisfydatarequirementsunderafullecosystemapproach.Theworkshopcanhopefullykeepsomeoftheseissuesinmindanddeveloparoad-mapforgovernmentsandtheISAtoconsiderinprogressingalonga practical path that uses the suite of tools under ERA, EIA and EMP options to develop a robustassessmentprocess.
References
AS/NZS ISO 31000. (2009) Riskmanagement – principles and guidelines on implementation Standards NewZealand.
BanN.C.,AlidinaH.M.,ArdronJ.A.(2010)Cumulativeimpactmapping:Advances,relevanceandlimitationstomarinemanagementandconservation,usingCanada'sPacificwatersasa case study.MarinePolicy34:876-886.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.010.
BillettD.,JonesD.,MurphyK.,GjerdeK.,CalacoA.,MoratoT.,CuvelierD.,VercruijsseP.,RolinJ.F.,OrtegaA.(2015)Reviewofexistingprotocolsandstandardsapplicabletotheexploitationofdeep-seamineralresources.Deliverable8.2ofMIDSproject.pp.148p.
BurrisR.K.,CanterL.W.(1997)Cumulativeimpactsarenotproperlyaddressedinenvironmentalassessments.Environmental Impact Assessment Review 17:5-18. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00082-0.
CEAA.(2012)CanadianEnvironmentalAssessmentAct.
ClarkM.R.,RouseH.L., LamarcheG.,Ellis J.I.,HickeyC. (2014)PreparingEnvironmental ImpactAssessments:provisionalguidelinesforoffshoremininganddrillinginNewZealand,NIWAClientReportpp.86.
ClarkM.R.,RouseH.L., LamarcheG.,Ellis J.I.,HickeyC. (2017)PreparingEnvironmental ImpactAssessments:General guidelines for offshoremining anddrillingwithparticular reference toNewZealand,NIWAScience and Technology Series [https://www.niwa.co.nz/coasts-and-oceans/research-projects/enabling-management-of-offshore-mining].pp.107.
Coffey Natural Systems/Nautilus Minerals Ltd. (2008) Environmental Impact Statement. Solwara 1 Project.VolumeA.Mainreport.pp.226.
CrainC.M.,KroekerK.,HalpernB.S. (2008) Interactiveandcumulativeeffectsofmultiplehumanstressors inmarinesystems.EcologyLetters11:1304-1315.DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01253.x.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
13
DarlingE.S.,CoteI.M.(2008)Quantifyingtheevidenceforecologicalsynergies.EcologyLetters11:1278–86.
EllisJ.,ClarkM.R.,RouseH.,LamarcheG.,BrittonR.(2014)Enablingmanagementofoffshoreminingliteraturereviewofenvironmentalmanagementframeworks,NIWAclientreport.pp.89.
EllisJ.I.,ClarkM.R.,RouseH.L.,LamarcheG.(2017)Environmentalmanagementframeworksforoffshoremining:insightsfromexperienceinNewZealand’sExclusiveEconomicZone.MarinePolicyinpress.
Glasson J., Therivel R., Chadwick A. (2012) Introduction to environmental impact assessmentUCL Press Ltd,UniversityCollege,London.
HuskyOil.(2001)WhiteRoseOilfieldComprehensiveStudyReport,HuskyOilOperationsLtd.pp.94.
ISA.(1999)Deep-SeabedPolymetallicNoduleExploration:DevelopmentofEnvironmentalGuidelines,ReportofanInternationalSeabedAuthorityworkshop.pp.289.
ISA.(2002)Standardizationofenvironmentaldataandinformation-developmentofguidelines.ProceedingsoftheISA’sworkshop,Kingston,Jamaica,25–29June2001,ISA,Kingston,Jamaica.
ISA. (2007) Polymetallic sulphides and cobalt-rich ferromanganese crust deposits: Establishment ofenvironmental baselines and an associatedmonitoring programme during exploration InternationalSeabedAuthority;(http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/publications),Kingston,Jamaica..
ISA. (2012) Regulations on prospecting and exploration for cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts in the Area.InternationalSeabedAuthority,Kingston,Jamaica.
ISA. (2013a) Decision of the Council of the International Seabed Authority relating to amendments to theRegulationsonProspectingandExplorationforPolymetallicNodulesintheAreaandrelatedmatters.
ISA.(2013b)RecommendationsfortheguidanceofcontractorsfortheassessmentofthepossibleenvironmentalimpactsarisingfromexplorationformarinemineralsintheAreaISA.
ISA.(2017)EnvironmentalassessmentandmanagementforexploitationofmineralsintheArea.ISATechnicalStudyNo16:66.
MacDiarmidA.,BeaumontJ.,BostockH.,BowdenD.,ClarkM.,HadfieldM.,HeathP.,LamarcheG.,NodderS.,OrpinA.,StevensC.,ThompsonD.,TorresL.,WysoczanskiR.(2012)ExpertRiskAssessmentofActivitiesintheNewZealandExclusiveEconomicZoneandExtendedContinentalShelf,NIWAClientreport.pp.106.
PettsJ.(1999)HandbookofenvironmentalimpactassessmentWiley-Blackwell,Oxford,UK.
RouseH.L.,NortonN.(2010)ManagingscientificuncertaintyforresourcemanagementplanninginNewZealand.AustralasianJournalofEnvironmentalManagement17:66-76.
SadlerB.(1996)Environmentalassessment inachangingworld:evaluatingpracticeto improveperformance,finalreportoftheinternationalstudyoftheeffectivenessofenvironmentalassessment.
SenécalP.,GoldsmithB.,ConoverS.(1999)PrincipleofEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentBestPractice.pp.4.
SmitB.,SpalingH.(1995)Methodsforcumulativeeffectsassessment.EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview15:81-106.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(94)00027-X.
SolanM.,WhiteleyN.M.(2016)StressorsintheMarineEnvironmentOxfordUniversityPress,Oxford,UK.
SwaddlingA.(2016)Pacific-ACPStatesregionalenvironmentalmanagementframeworkfordeepseamineralsexplorationandexploitation,Noumea.pp.100.
SwaddlingA.,ClarkM.R.,BourrelM.,LilyH.,LamarcheG.,HickeyC.,RouseH.,NodderS.,RickardG.,SuttonP.,WysoczanskiR.(2016)Pacific-ACPStatesregionalscientificresearchguidelinesfordeepseaminerals,Noumea.pp.123.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
14
USDepartment of Energy. (2004) Recommendations for the preparation of Environmental Assessments andEnvironmentalImpactStatements.
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
15
Annex1:
Tab.1:Summarytableofrecommendedscientificmethodologies,includingtheaspecttobecoveredduringthesurveyprogramme,parameterstobemeasured,andappropriatemethodstoconsidergiventhelocalenvironmentalconditions(Swaddlingetal.,2016)
Aspect Reason MainParameters Sampling
Geolog
y
Topography Seabed characteristics, classification ofhabitats for assessment, surveystratification, selection of test and controlareas
Bathymetry,morphometry,seafloortype Shipboard/towed acousticsystems,opticalsensors,dredges,box-corer,drillingequipment
Backscatter Seabed characteristics, classification ofhabitats for assessment, surveystratification, selection of test and controlareas
Acousticreflectivity Shipboard/towed acousticsystems; sidescan sonar,hyperspectralimaging
Sub-seafloor Petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogyforresourcecharacterisation
Penetration layers, rock properties, mineral andchemicalcomposition
Seismic, drilling, rock sampling(dredges,coring)
Sedimen
tcha
racteristics
Sedimentproperties
Sedimentplumedynamics,classificationofhabitats
Substrate type, sediment and pore watermeasurements:watercontent,grainsize,specificgravity, porosity, depth of oxic layer, carboncontent, chemical composition (trace and heavymetals)
Sediment cores (box corer ormulitcorer)
Bioturbationrates
Naturalmixingofsediments Bioturbation depth, faunal zonation, Pb210activity
Sediment cores (box corer ormulitcorer)
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
16
Sedimentationrates
Distribution and concentration of naturalsuspension,settlementrates
Particle flux, suspended particle concentrations,settlementrates
Mooringsandsedimenttraps
Pelagicc
ommun
ity
Deepwaterpelagic(plankton andnekton)
Impactsofsedimentplumeanddischargeson midwater communities, verticalmigrators,andnear-bottomhyper-benthos
Species composition, distribution, abundance.Biological characteristics (sensitivity,recoverabilityparameters)
Opening/closingnetsforplankton(Remotely Operated Vehicle(ROV) also possible). Pelagictrawls/commercial records forfish
Surfacefauna Effects of surface discharges, presence ofvesselsandequipment
Species composition, distribution, abundance.Biological characteristics (sensitivity,recoverabilityparameters)
Opening/closing nets, surfaceplankton nets, remote-senseddata
Marinemammals/seabirds
Effects of surface discharges, presence ofvesselsandequipment
Species composition, distribution, abundance.Biological characteristics (sensitivity,recoverabilityparameters)
Marine Mammal Observerprotocols
Seafloorco
mmun
ity
Megafauna Impactsonbenthiccommunities Species composition, distribution, abundance.Biological characteristics (sensitivity,recoverabilityparameters)
Photographic surveys fromROV/towed camera; directsampling fromdredge/sled/trawl/ROV
Macrofauna Impactsonbenthiccommunities Species composition, distribution, abundance.Biological characteristics (sensitivity,recoverabilityparameters)
Muliticorer or box corer, andepibenthic sled; photographicsurveysfromROV/towedcamera;direct sampling fromdredge/sled/trawl/ROV
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
17
Meiofauna Impactsonbenthiccommunities Biodiversity,distribution,abundance Multicorer or box corer; directsampling fromdredge/sled/trawl/ROV
Microfauna Impactsonbenthiccommunities Biodiversity,distribution,abundance Sediment cores (box corer ormulitcorer)
Specificresourcefauna
Endemicspeciesorcommunities, sensitivehabitats(includingbiogenichabitats)
Speciescomposition,distribution,abundance ROV/towed camera, epibenthicsled;directsamplingbyROV,boxcorerfornoduleenvironments
Scavenger/demersalfish
Impactsonbenthiccommunities Speciescomposition,distribution,abundance Baited lander, fish trawls, traps,ROVobservations
Ecotoxicity Impacts of heavymetals/contaminants onbenthic communities, accumulationthroughfoodchainpotential
Tissuesamplesfromrepresentativeandabundantfauna
Various direct samplingmethods(asabove)
Physicalocean
ograph
y
Currents Dispersalofimpacts,biologicalconnectivity Current speed, direction, depth variation, tidaldynamics, Sea Surface Temperature (SST), SeaSurfaceHeight(SSH),oceancolour
Conductivity Temperature Depthprofiler (CTD), current meters,AcousticDopplerCurrentProfiler(ADCP), remote-sensed data,profilingmoorings
Hydrodynamicmodelling
Dispersal of impacts, sediment plumedynamics,biologicalconnectivity
Oceanographicparameters(temperature,salinity,currentflowanddirection),turbulence,turbidity,bathymetry
Various models applicable: e.g.RegionalOceanModellingSystem(ROMS),HybridCoordinateOceanModel (HYCOM), CORMIX(discharges)
Background:EnvironmentalImpactAssessments
TowardsanEnvironmentalStrategy,
Berlin,March2017
18
Chem
icalocean
ograph
y
Waterquality Effectsofdischarges,sedimentplume Chemicalcomposition(includingheavymetalsandtoxic contaminants), turbidity, suspendedsediment,dissolvedoxygen,pH
Water samples (from CTD),surfaceremote-senseddata,coresamples, nephelometer,transmissiometer, opticalbackscattersensors
Visualcharacteristics
Effectsofdischarges,sedimentplume Optical backscatter, light attenuation, black discdistance
Transmissiometer, opticalbackscatter sensors, remotesensing
Bottom waterchemistry
Effects of sediment/rock disturbance,releaseofchemicals,effluentdischarge
Elutriation for chemical and toxicity testing, pH,trace and heavymetal concentrations, dissolvedoxygen
Water samplers (CTD-Niskinbottles),coresamples
Water columnchemistry
Effects on chemical characteristics due tosedimentplumeanddischarges
Nutrients(P,N,Si,C),dissolvedoxygen,traceandheavymetalconcentrations
Water samplers (CTD-Niskinbottles)
top related