application of logic modeling processes to explore theory of change from diverse cultural...

Application of Logic Modeling Processes to Explore Theory of Change from Diverse Cultural Perspectives

Ricardo Millett, Sharon Dodson, & Cynthia PhillipsAmerican Evaluation AssociationNovember 4, 2000

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 2

Whose Logic Model …and for Whom?

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 3

Logic Models Are Subjective

“Since the measuring device has been constructed by the observer..we have to remember that what we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning” Heisenberg“We see things not as they are, but as we are….” Anais Nin

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 4

Common Issues Encountered

“too linear…”“too limited…” “…constraining”“doesn’t capture complexity…”“…nuances are lost”

“too graphic…”“needs more specific details…”“…connections are not clear enough…”“not evaluable…”

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 5

Reflection Activity 1

What are some of the distinguishing characteristics of each model?Strengths, limitations?Utility?

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 6

Model1

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 7

Model2

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 8

Model3

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 9

Model4

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 10

Ways of Showing—Logic Models

Causal(Attribution)

Non-Causal(Contribution)

Linear (Synchrony)

MODEL 1theory testing

MODEL 2idea mapping

Non-linear (Asynchrony)

MODEL 3theory testing

MODEL 4idea

mapping

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 11

Epistemic Style (Draze, 2000)Metaphor

icEclectic Rational

Theory of Action

Change Agent

Facilitator Educator

Attitude Toward Data

Intuitive,sense making,ambiguous

Pattern depends on situation and context

Logical, precise, analytic

Evaluation Focus

Process Process and outcomes

Outcomes

Theory and Practice

Theory generating

Theory mapping

Theory testing

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 12

Ways of Knowing--Epistemology

Causal(Attribution)

Non-Causal(Contribution)

Linear (Synchrony)

MODEL 1 MODEL 2

Non-linear (Asynchrony)

MODEL 3 MODEL 4

November 4, 2000 American Evaluation Association 13

Conclusion--Locus for Growth

If the audiences of evaluation were more consistently understood and the range of assumptions respected would interpretation and use of logic models change?The key is to be conscious of our theories in use and be aware of how they are influencing our observations of the world.