airled status quo peer review workshop wrap-up and conclusions

1

airLED Status Quo Peer Review Workshop

Wrap-up and Conclusions

2

HUHU ITIT PLPL SISI

ASG: ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT GROUP

STEERING GROUP:PARTNERS' PROJECT AND FINANCIAL MANAGERSSTEERING GROUP:PARTNERS' PROJECT AND FINANCIAL MANAGERS

LP's PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM

POLITICAL BOARD: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS

POLITICAL BOARD: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS

Vecsés

Vecsés SARSAR RERRER Mazo

viaMazo

via

GorenjskaGorenjska

Cerklje

Cerklje

KTIKTI IRMIRM

RDCB*

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

assessment, thematic support, quality control

Transnational thematic expert workshops, peer reviews

RDCB* RDCB* RDCB*

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

RDCB Manager

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Integrated regional polycentric development

plan

Region2:Status quo analysis

Region2:Status quo analysis

Region3:Status quo analysis

Region3:Status quo analysis

Region4:Status quo analysis

Region4:Status quo analysis

Region1:Status quo analysis

Region1:Status quo analysis

EU state-of-artInitial criteria for 'Airport City in CE'

EU state-of-artInitial criteria for 'Airport City in CE'

OPEN LIVING LABOPEN LIVING LABAS

GA

SG

5

RDCB 1(lead: local authority)

PEER REVIEW

1

PEER REVIEW

1

RDCB 2(lead: local authority)

RDCB 3(lead: local authority)

RDCB 4(lead: local authority)

PEER REVIEW

2

PEER REVIEW

2 PEER REVIEW

3

PEER REVIEW

3 PEER REVIEW

4

PEER REVIEW

4

EU state-of-artInitial criteria for 'Airport City in CE'

EU state-of-artInitial criteria for 'Airport City in CE'

Difficulties of SQ

Finding out details of airport management structure

Conflict of interest between regional development and airport development (what is good for the region not necessarily good for the airport)

Relationship between datasets (and justification): no explanation in methodology why do we look for certain data and what are the relationships?

Difficulties of SQ

How to get information on investments in the region?

Proposal to extend the SQ with big infrastructure overview (and impact): networks between airports and between airports and region(s)

Catchment area definition: more realistic if considered space-time than just spatial distance

Difficulties of SQ

Include an overall regional vision into the SQ analysis

Show (and analyse) stakeholder expectations

Analyse sectoral trends (longer term), make estimations and predictions of changes (%). Look at historic data and extrapolate (scenarios?): passengers, cargo, tourism, economy (also population)

Difficulties of SQ

Visualize information: use graphics, map locations and connections

Provide a view on the investment pipeline:Projects operatingProjects under constructionProjects planned

permitszoning plans

What do we aim for?

1. Analyse (compare) and disseminate information

2. Evaluate and comment (strenghts, weaknesses):Create input for development plan

3. Airport masterplan: does it follow municpal/regional plans, or it is in conflict?

4. General image and visionCurrent and future

What do we aim for?

Understand the links between:

- airport economy

- airport region economy

Who needs the airport, who benefits from the airport and how can airport development strengthen the development of the regional economy?

Good locationHuman resources (educated people)Good investment climateTransport system (train+bus+metro)Accessibility on all levels (macro, mezo, micro)Good marketingEffective planningMixture of urban functionsHotel systemCooperation leaderFinancingHigh density population in catchment areaBusiness ParkCulture aspectFlagship projectServices (like car rental, etc.)CompetitivenessIntermodalityPassenger traffi c more than 5 mln/yrCargo capacityGDPPublic landsShopping Centres

Economy and InvestmentsEconomy and Investments

Urban Planning, Environment and ArchitectureUrban Planning, Environment and Architecture

Compatibility of airport master plan with local, regional and national planning 14General vision 12Activities should be realistic according to location and land use 11Financially viable (realistic) activities 5Step by step development (from general to detail)Be prepared for external effects (plan A optimistic, plan B pessimistic)Activities should be realistic according to legal regulationsPublic consultations as a supportYour proposal 1… 2… 3… ComplexityPrepared for possible conflits (objectives, interests, activities)

Transport and LogisticsTransport and Logistics

Transport and LogisticsTransport and Logistics

Accessibility to/from airport 13Approppriate infrastructure 9Multimodality 8Connectivity of the regionGood insight into local needsAdded logistics services (for industry)Good added tech servicesGood fuel managementAddinitonal services for passengersGood food managementGood baggage management

Thank you and have a nice flight home!