achieving best evidence: special measures & the role of the intermediary with the vulnerable...
Post on 18-Jan-2016
223 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Brendan O’Mahony Registered Intermediary
8th International Conference on the Care & Treatment of offenders with a Learning
Disability
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Contents
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Registered Intermediary
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Vulnerable Witnesses
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Learning Disability
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Special Measures
What measures will help this
witness?
Intermediary?Video-recorded
evidence in chief?
UCLAN 17th April 2009
The Research so far….(Plotnikoff & Woolfson, 2007)
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Why should vulnerable suspects & defendants qualify for intermediaries?
UCLAN 17th April 2009
My research to date has explored
UCLAN 17th April 2009
What is the process with a defendant?
Report writtenRecommending how to support defendant’s communication
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Research MethodUnstructured Interviews x 5 - Qualitative Data(Exploratory) followed byQuestionnaire x 30 – Quantitative Data analysed using SPSS
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Interviews (qualitative study)-emerging themes
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Quantitative study- example question
UCLAN 17th April 2009
The good points emerging
UCLAN 17th April 2009
And the issues to study…
UCLAN 17th April 2009
In summary: What the intermediaries say
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Planned Research
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Case Study
UCLAN 17th April 2009
Further readingFurther reading• Jacobson, J. (2008). No-one Knows; Police responses to suspects
with learning disabilities and learning difficulties: a review of policy and practice. Prison Reform Trust
• Ministry of Justice (2007). Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and using Special Measures. Criminal Justice System / Crown Prosecution Service
• Office for Criminal Justice Reform. (2005). Intermediary Procedural Guidance Manual. London: Criminal Justice System.
• Plotnikoff, J. & Woolfson, R. (2007). The “Go-Between”: evaluation of intermediary pathfinder projects. Research Summary 1. Ministry of Justice
• Jacobson, J. (2008). No-one Knows; Police responses to suspects with learning disabilities and learning difficulties: a review of policy and practice. Prison Reform Trust
• Ministry of Justice (2007). Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and using Special Measures. Criminal Justice System / Crown Prosecution Service
• Office for Criminal Justice Reform. (2005). Intermediary Procedural Guidance Manual. London: Criminal Justice System.
• Plotnikoff, J. & Woolfson, R. (2007). The “Go-Between”: evaluation of intermediary pathfinder projects. Research Summary 1. Ministry of Justice
UCLAN 17th April 2009
top related