accuracy of poc resources to answer clinical questions

Post on 11-Jan-2016

26 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Accuracy of PoC Resources to Answer Clinical Questions. Ann McKibbon MLS PhD Associate Professor Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics McMaster University mckib@mcmaster.ca. POC Information Resources. Tremendous need for them Already used heavily Traditionally thought of as being - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Accuracy of PoC Resources to Answer Clinical Questions

Ann McKibbon MLS PhDAssociate ProfessorClinical Epidemiology & BiostatisticsMcMaster Universitymckib@mcmaster.ca

POC Information Resources

Tremendous need for themAlready used heavily Traditionally thought of as being

– Positive– Neutral

Problems with content (itself or its application)Problems with use (system or user)

We need to address the challenges – Complexities – Their possible dark side

Information Needs in Practice

External information is vital in healthcare Numbers consistent over time, countries, disciplines, settings,

training levels

Clinic setting– Covell et al 1985 0.7 need/patient– Ramos et al 2003 0.8 need/patient

Hospital setting– Osheroff et al 1991 15/patient/day– Currie et al 2003 11/hour with EMRs

(range 1 – 25)

• Clinicians use electronic resources during patient care time• 89% of them believe that electronic systems improve care• 75% of questions were answered

Problems with Information

Finding Time Recognizing needs Complexities

– Resources– Marketing/packaging

Systems– Move to simpler ones

Inability of resources to provide answers

Trust of producers & systems

Interpreting Time Recognizing needs Formulating questions Synthesizing evidence Coming up with the answer

– Matching evidence with clinical situation and patient

Application Trust of producers & systems

Seeking Information

Most use external resources– People/peers– Electronic information resources– Non electronic resources

Half of questions are pursued– 40% evidence found easily– 30% evidence found with difficulty– 30% evidence not found

Time to Find

MEDLINE Use Times per Search

43 minutes in Oregon 24 minutes in Iowa 23 minutes in Hamilton

Non MEDLINE times (e.g., PIER, UptoDate, CE, Google) range of 3 to 7 minutes

Sackett and Straus: On wards, resources will not be used if search time is > 30 seconds

Complexities of Systems

Size– MEDLINE 17,000,000

Version control– Cochrane reviews– Clinical practice guidelines

Multiplicity of resources– Numbers and kinds

Packaging of systems Data itself

Complexity of Systems

Clinicians often use systems poorly:

Scenario: Is PSA (prostate-specific antigen) a better biochemical predictor than alkaline phosphatase for detecting recurrent prostate cancer?

Approach: OVID MEDLINEprostate cancer (18K citations)reads for 5 minutesquitsprovides answer

Packaging—Cochrane Reviews

Whole content Cochrane Collaboration Database vendor (Wiley) PUBMED OVID

– MEDLINE– EBMR Cochrane Library– EBMR Full Text– EBMR All

InfoRetriever Google Scholar

Partial content ACP Journal Club Evidence Based Medicine Evidence Based Nursing InfoPOEMs OVID—EBMR ACP J Club Clinical Evidence Google Evidence-Based Guidelines …

Abstracts or full text? Free or pay?

Inability to Get Correct Answers

From Peers

Dutch study (Schaffsma) of 14 physicians Asked peers for answers to 12 questions 47% correct

Inability to Get Correct Answers

From Peers

Dutch study (Schaffsma) of 14 physicians Asked peers for answers to 12 questions 47% correct

– If evidence provided 83% correct– If evidence not available 35% correct

Inability to Get Correct Answers

From Electronic Information Resources

Medical, NP students: 45% right to 77% right

Australian GPs: 29% right to 50% right

McKibbon study: 39% right to 42% right

Inability to Get Correct Answers

From Electronic Information Resources

Medical, NP students: 45% to 77% 12% right wrong

Australian GPs: 29% to 50% 7% right wrong

McKibbon Study: 39% to 42% 11% right wrong

Providing Answers—EKGs

Electrocardiogram with computer interpretation

30 Internal Medicine residents (year 2 or 3)

Accuracy Without e-interpretation of data 48.9% With e-interpretation of data 55.4%

Providing Answers—EKGs

Electrocardiogram with computer interpretation30 Internal Medicine Residents (year 2 or 3)

Accuracy Without e-interpretation of data 48.9% With e-interpretation of data 55.4%

– If e-interpretration correct 68.1%– If e-interpretation wrong 48.3%

Trust

Producers of information trusted– WHO technical document

Trust of technology– Social conformity– Less vigilance – Diffusion of responsibility – Belief in infallibility

of technology

Summary

Good systems exist although…

…systems that provide– right answer – to right question– at the right time– in the right format– with little or no effort

May not be here yet But we are getting closer…

top related