2004 legal seminar
Post on 08-Jan-2016
26 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
2004 Legal Seminar
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
When is a Contract Not a Contract?
More lessons from California . . . .
Meg Meiser, William Huang, and Larissa Shamraj
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
A Tale of Two ISOs
California and the Midwest: Pre-restructuring transmission arrangements and the transition to restructured electricity markets.
Competing factors Sanctity of contract
Pre-existing transmission contracts as obstacles to effective restructuring
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Overview
Recent California cases on Existing Contracts
Recent Midwest ISO cases on Grandfathered Agreements
Implications for the future
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
40 Ways (Minus 36) to Leave Existing Contracts
Abrogation or reformation
Renegotiation by parties
Unilateral modification under FPA §205 or §206
“New service”
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
The “New Service” Approach
Existing contract, which previously provided everything necessary for deliveries, no longer adequate
Additional services or products necessary
TO may charge for “new service” on top of existing contract rate
Mobile-Sierra; cost support requirements
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Existing Contracts in the California ISO
1996 – AB1890; 1998, the California ISO began operations
Existing Contracts would continue to be honored. “To the extent that Transmission Losses or Ancillary
Service requirements associated with Existing Rights are not the same as those under the ISO’s rules and protocols, the ISO will not charge or credit the Participating TO for any cost differences between the two.” CalISO Tariff §2.4.4.4.4.5
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
TO Tariff Initial Decision
Transmission Owner Tariff Costs to be charged and windfalls credited to TO
Tariff Customers
TO Tariff Initial Decision denied TOs recovery of these charges from TO Tariff Customers
Recovery, if at all, by amending the Existing Contracts
TOs to shoulder costs if they lack rights to amend the contracts
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
SCS Tariff Filing
PG&E proposed to recover costs from Existing Contract holders (mostly municipals)
New Service; in the alternative, amendment to Existing Contracts
Filed November 12, 1999; requested retroactive Effective Date: start of Cal ISO operations (March 31, 1998)
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
SCS Tariff - Abeyance
Rate conditionally effective March 31, 1998
Abeyance until 2002 Charges continued to accrue
No information provided by PG&E
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Reliability Services Tariff Filing
Reliability Must-Run and Local Out-of-Market Calls PG&E characterized these costs as “Reliability
Services” According to PG&E, the firm transmission service
provided under Existing Contracts did not include Reliability Services
Therefore, PG&E should be allowed to charge for Reliability Services as a new service
Alternatively, amend Existing Contracts
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
RS Tariff Decision
The Initial Decision rejected the new service theory According to ALJ, Reliability Services “were not a
gleam in PG&E’s eyes when these contracts were executed.”
Nevertheless, so-called Reliability Services were inherently included in the pre-restructuring firm transmission service
PG&E could seek to amend the Existing Contracts if no Mobile-Sierra protection
FERC affirmed the Initial Decision
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Grid Management Charge Pass-Through Tariff Filing
Sought to pass-through Cal ISO’s GMC
“New service” theory
Partial success at ALJ level: Approximately half of GMC Pass-through
charges treated as a “new service”
Approximately half of GMC Pass-through charges were for functions already covered by Existing Contracts
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
GMC Pass-Through Tariff
Commission overturns Initial Decision in part – all administrative costs of ISO new
Existing Contract customers “fail to come to grips with the fundamentally new and different roles that now exist under the California ISO regime.”
Existing Contract Holders not “immune from all change brought about by restructuring”
ISOs/RTOs benefit all
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Other cases in California
Edison is authorized to pass on whole passel of ISO costs to a group of municipals as a contract amendment
Little detailed scrutiny of underlying contract, but Commission goes through the steps of a pro forma analysis
Edison seeks to pass on whole passel of ISO costs as new service for an exchange agreement with LADWP
Commission puts on hold pending “guidance” from GMC rehearing
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
GMC Rehearing Order (Opinion No. 463-A)
Retained status quo: GMC costs are costs a new service
Distinguished MISO: Retention of historical control areas
Continued to chastise municipals for failing to come to grips with change
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
GMC Rehearing Guidance?
Ammunition for both sides of the argument
Kelliher dissent: policy goal of preventing trapped costs does not justify new service ruling
Case on hold pending guidance still on hold
Reading tea leaves all that was left
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
SCS Tariff revived: Initial Decision
Initial decision in SCS Tariff case Phase I Among the issues:
is the SCS Tariff a new service?
Should the SCS Tariff have an effective date of Day 1 of ISO start-up, though it was filed almost 20 months later
Presiding Judge says:
Yes
Yes
No need to look at Mobile-Sierra protections
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Opinion No. 477: The other shoe
October 28, 2004: the Commission affirms the ID in whole on the new service
PG&E’s function as SC for ETCs was not required in contracts and was a new service
Charges can be passed on to ETC holders as costs of a new service
Mobile-Sierra irrelevant Overrules ID on retroactive application: still
an obligation to have tariff on file
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Different standards?
“While it may be true that there has not been a change in the physical characteristics of the ancillary services provided under the Control Area Agreements, it is nonetheless a fact that an entity such as the CAISO will operate under different standards than did PG&E with regard to ancillary services requirements, since it is operating a grid which comprises what were previously three separate control areas.”
Opinion No. 477
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Benefits of Restructuring?
“As a Commission staff witness observed, with the formation of the ISO in California, there have been “massive” and “fundamental changes” in the manner in which electricity is sold and distributed there, so that “the complexities of operating the transmission system have increased exponentially.”
Opinion No. 477 (citing Opinion No. 463-A)
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Competitive Markets?
“Additionally, it is highly significant that the CAISO has established competitive markets for ancillary services and imbalance energy. Thus, the situation is fundamentally different from that in which PG&E procured ancillary services in a non-competitive environment.”
Opinion No. 477
“PG&E hydro units play a key role in the ISO ancillary service markets supplying approximately 70% of the total ancillary services requirement in Northern California, and approximately 85% of the regulation services in Northern California.”
Testimony of Anjali Sheffrin, CAISO Director of Market
Analysis, in PG&E hydro divestiture proceedings
before the CPUC in 2000.
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
What’s the real difference? Gleam vs. Twinkle
Contract Amendment: Gleam
“RMR and OOM dispatch calls were not a gleam in PG&E's eyes when these contracts were executed.”
Initial Decision (finding that Reliability Services were nonetheless included in the firm transmission service provided under the ETCs)
New Service: Twinkle
“It is self-evident that PG&E did not obligate itself to perform as a CAISO Scheduling Coordinator under its existing contracts, as the role itself and the responsibilities and obligations that it entails did not exist at the time these contracts were entered into, when the CAISO was not yet a twinkle in the California legislature’s eye.”
Opinion No. 477
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
SCS Tariff: How bad is it?
The bad news: All “CAISO-created”
charges are up for grabs Complexity of running
grid increased “exponentially”
Ancillary service standards of CAISO may not be the same as PTOs’ pre-ISO standards; costs can be passed along
Municipals still not coming to grips with restructuring
The less bad news: Many municipals have
left their ETCs behind Can PTO recover for
anything but “incremental” amounts?
Commission declines to make SCS Tariff retroactive: the filed rate doctrine remains binding
Credits must be given for things that were provided under ETCs
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
In MISO: A different story?
Imposition of any MISO administrative costs must be done as a contract amendment
Commission: Transmission Owners retain historical control areas
Other possibilities:
Gradual process towards markets, not there yet
Designated Transition Period ending on 1/31/08
Broader group of entities involved in MISO process, including non-jurisdictionals
California a lesson in what not to do
Most costs associated with GFAs don’t flow through Tariff
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Between a rock and a hard place
“A few months ago in the Spring, it looked like we had two star[k] choices, either abrogate 300 contracts o[r] cripple MISO’s energy and transmission markets, and they were pretty unpleasant choices.”
Commissioner KelliherSeptember 16, 2004
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
MISO Expedited Hearing & Settlement Process
Carrots, sticks, and a “timeline from hell” Carrots:
Settle if you want the option that comes close to holding you harmless
Sticks:
Extremely expedited timeline
Litigation risk
New service threat
Non-jurisdictionals optional, but what happens if you opt out?
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
GFA Resolution
Carve-out does not harm MISO: Between settlements and hearings, amount of GFAs “carved
out” of MISO Day 2 markets only 9.6 percent of peak load
Issues Resolved for GFAs in MISO How does the GFA integrate into the market?
Who is the “Responsible entity”?
What is the standard of review?
How are Schedule 16 and 17 costs passed on?
But what does it really mean? How binding is the resolution on future activities? What happens after 1/31/08?
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Pre-emptive Resolutions: Proactive Commission or Strong-Arm tactics?
GFA expedited proceedings
Sellers Choice Contract settlement negotiations: marketwide attempt to address LMP and conflicts with existing power purchase contracts
FERC-brokered resolutions in termination dockets
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Conflicts between pre-existing (or even recently negotiated) contracts and changing market structure inevitable
Can California’s quarantine hold? No major market blips Enough entities playing the game
New service requires change, but change is easy to find
Are your contracts worth the paper they’re written on?
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Risks of opting out
Loss of control and diminished ability to: Mitigate financial impacts Understand market complexities Participate in market redesign Dispute what’s going on
Retention of all old obligations, potential to add costs of new markets
Hedge can become cost plus (cost under ETC plus various “ISO-created” charges) anyway
Commission losing patience with those who are stuck in the past
SPIEGEL &MCDIARMID
Sanctity of Contract: Yes or No?“Complainants became dissatisfied with their bargains and sought contract modification. The law is quite clear on that point. The fact that a contract becomes uneconomic over time does not render it contrary to the public interest.”
Commission decision in Nevada Power
upholding high-cost power purchase agreements from Western meltdown
“Through these existing transmission contracts, PG&E is obligated to provide firm transmission service. The creation of the CAISO did not relieve PG&E of that obligation…. I would reverse the Initial Decision determination that PG&E is providing a new service and grant the exceptions on this issue.”
Kelliher Dissent in Opinion No. 477
top related