10-1 © prentice hall, 2004 chapter 10: selecting the best alternative design strategy plus project...

Post on 01-Apr-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

10-1 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Chapter 10:Chapter 10:Selecting the Best Alternative Selecting the Best Alternative

Design StrategyDesign StrategyPlus Plus

Project Management ConceptsProject Management Concepts

10-2Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Chapter ObjectivesChapter Objectives

– Design Strategy– Types of Design Strategies– Scoring Method– Project Management Concepts

(link to Lab)

10-3Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Deliverables for Design Deliverables for Design Strategy SelectionStrategy Selection

•high-functionality high-cost solution•minimum functionality low-cost solution•middle-of-the-road solution

10-4Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Features are determined from requirements.

Constraints pertain to limitations on development efforts.

Features (Benefits) & (Constraints) Costs

10-5Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Generating a Design StrategyGenerating a Design Strategy

Design strategy = A decision on how to design a system, accounting for system features and constraints, and software and hardware solutions.

Enumerate different potential implementation environments (hardware and system software platforms)

Propose different sourcing possibilities for obtaining the necessary software

10-6Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Outsourcing StrategyOutsourcing Strategy

The practice of turning over responsibility of some or all of an organization’s information systems applications and operations to an outside firm

Can produce cost savings for the client, by leveraging the outsourcer’s economies of scale

10-7Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Request For ProposalRequest For Proposal

Request for Proposal – a document provided to vendors to ask them to propose hardware and/or software products or services that will meet the requirements of an organization’s new information system

Based on vendor bids, analyst selects best candidates

10-8Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Sourcing SoftwareSourcing Software

– Hardware & Software Manufacturers (IBM)

– Prepackaged Software Producers (Microsoft,

Enterprise System Vendors)

– Custom Software Producers (EDS, Accenture)

– In-house Development (own IS department)

10-9Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

10-10Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Many factors go into selection of off-the-shelf software, many of which are relevant for other software purchases.

Vendor support and viability are always among the most important criteria.

Prepackaged (off-the-shelf) Software

10-11Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

In-house DevelopmentIn-house Development

If sufficient system development expertise with the chosen platform exists in-house, then some or all of the system can be developed by the organization’s own staff

Can play a role also when an external consultant carries out the job (ERP)

10-12Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

10-13Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Example: Pine Valley FurnitureExample: Pine Valley Furniture

• System requirements categorized into mandatory, essential, and desired capabilities

• Constraints established

• Low-end, high-end, and moderate design strategies are generated

• Weighted approach (scoring method) used to compare alternative design strategies

10-14Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

10-15Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

10-16Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Application Server/Object Framework is the highest scoring alternative

10-17Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

3-Tier architecture is scalable, and consists of a Web server providing the interface to the Internet in the 1st tier, an application server running the business rules of the application in the 2nd tier, and the corporate databases in the 3rd tier

10-18Chapter 10 © Prentice Hall, 2004

Baseline Project Plan goes through significant update as a result of design strategy generation and selection.

The System Description section is changed the most, and all sections are refined and altered.

Cost-benefit analysis goes through significant update and revision after selecting a design strategy.

Schedule estimation goes through significant update and revision after selecting a design strategy.

top related