1 george mason school of law contracts ii fraud f.h. buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Fraud

F.H. Buckley

fbuckley@gmu.edu

Fraus omnia corrumpit

I met Murder on the way – He had a mask like Castlereagh – Very smooth he looked, yet grim; Seven blood-hounds followed him:

Next came Fraud, and he had on, Like Eldon, an ermined gown;His big tears, for he wept wellTurned to mill-stones as they fell

2

Shelly, The Mask of Anarchy

Lord Eldon ordered that Shelley’s children be taken from him

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation

Restatement § 159

3

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation

Which the Δ knows to be false. Restatement § 162(1)(a)

4

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false.

Made with the intention to induce the Π to enter into the contract. Restatement § 162(1)

5

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract.

On which the Π relies. Restatement § 164

6

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2)

7

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2) Does § 164(1) dispense with materiality, if the

representation is fraudulent?

8

The Elements of Fraud A False Representation Which the Δ knows to be false. Made with the intention to induce Π’s to

enter into the contract. On which Π relies.

And which is material Restatement §§ 164(1), 162(2) What does “upon which the recipient is justified in relying”

mean?

9

The Elements of Fraud Does the Restatement water down

materiality? “the maker knows it would be likely to induce

the recipient.” § 162(2) “a fraudulent … representation … upon which

the recipient is justified in relying.” § 164

What does § 164 do to the fraud requirement? Innocent material misrepresentations

10

The Elements of FraudBut none of this is cut-and-dried

A False Representation

Which the Δ knows to be false.

Made with the intention to induce Π’s to enter into the contract.

On which Π relies.

And which is material

11

The Elements of FraudThe Restatement on Reliance

A False Assertion. § 159

Which the Δ knows to be false. § 162(1)(a)

Made with the intention to induce Π’s to enter into the contract. § 162(1)

On which Π relies. § 164

And which is material. §§ 164(1), 162(2)

12

The Elements of Fraud

What is an assertion? Restatement §§ 159

13

The Elements of Fraud

Restatement § 159: What is an assertion?What aren’t assertions?

14

What is an Assertion?“It works”: You got a problem with that?

15

Mere puffs are not assertionsSimplex commendatio non obligat

16

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

17

What were the alleged representations?

Lake McFarland

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

18

What if the Δs had said “You can make good money out of the resort”?

Or “I believe you can make good money out of it”?

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

19

Qu. “We are making good money out of the resort.”

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

20

Qu. “We are making good money out of the resort.” What is the optimal profit to make where

there is double taxation of dividends? Cf. Gallagher’s dissent

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

21

“We are making good money out of the resort.” What if they had provided the financials?

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

22

“We are making good money out of the resort.” What if they had provided the financials? What do you conclude from the buyers’

willingness to do the deal even though the financials were not provided

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

23

“We are making good money out of the resort.”What if they had provided the financials?

Restatement § 172A subjective or an objective test?

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

24

“We are making good money out of the resort.” Suppose the seller had omitted to say

anything about past earnings?

Mere puffsSpeiss v. Brandt

25

“We are making good money out of the resort.” Suppose the seller had omitted to say

anything about past earnings?Fraudulent concealment? Restatement § 161?

How is the reliance requirement treated in Ziff-Davis?

26

How is the reliance requirement treated in Ziff-Davis?

Distinguish the action in fraud from the action for breach of warranty

Suing in tort: Punitive damages

28

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Fraud

F.H. Buckley

fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Merger Clause in Danann

What is it and why did the parties agree to it?

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result?

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply.

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply. Did the Δs misrepresent their financials?

The Merger Clause in Danann

Absent the merger clause, what result? The representations would ordinarily be

excluded by the Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the

Parole Evidence Rule would apply. Did the Δs misrepresent their financials? Does the sophistication of the parties

matter?

Signing a ContractMerit Music

34

Bar, 601 South Monroe St.Baltimore MD

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?

35

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?120 plays of the pinball machine @

week48 plays of the juke box @ week

36

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

37

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

Were the Sonneborns inexperienced?

38

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Who was in the best position to

determine the revenue from the machines?

Were the Sonneborns inexperienced?Did they have any reason to think that

what they signed was not a contract?

39

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Have you ever signed a contract without reading it? What effect did you think the printed language had? Restatement § 211(1)

40

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Does that matter?

41

Signing a ContractMerit Music

Were the terms harsh?Does that matter?Should Restatement § 211(3) have

been triggered?

42

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms benign?

43

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms benign? Is that irrelevant?

44

Standard Form ContractsBirmingham TV v. Water Works

Were the terms harsh?

How would you expect bailees to react to the decision?

45

Standard Form Contracts

Were the terms harsh? Does that matter?

How would you expect bailees to react to the decision?Is the world now a better place?

46

Thank God for proper warning signs

Thank God for proper warning signs

Thank God for proper warning signs

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

50

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

51

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

52

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

Economize on litigation

53

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Economize on negotiations

Police consumer fraud

Economize on litigation

Police agency costs of merchant

54

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose the consumer is illiterate or can’t speak English

55Elbonians

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose that most non-lawyers would have a hard time understanding the language? You mean we let such people enter into

contracts!?!?

56

Why Employ Standard Form Contracts?

Suppose that most non-lawyers would have a hard time understanding the language? Cf. Pirkle v. Gurr, 438-39

57

Non-disclosure

What happened in Laidlaw? P. 451

58

Treaty of Ghent

59

Rational Choice: Six Assumptions

Full Information No mistakes No misrepresentations And no informational asymmetries

Non-disclosure

“I’ll pay $500 for the rug” [but will go as high as $1,000].

60

Non-disclosure

Coca-Cola sells Coke but refuses to disclose the secret formula it uses to make it.

61

Non-disclosureCicero, Offices III

A corn-merchant arrives at the famine-stricken city of Rhodes, before a great number of other vessels loaded with corn; and offers his corn for sale. Is he obliged to inform the buyers that there are a great number of other vessels about to arrive, laden with food?

Diogenes thought not. But Cicero thought, on the contrary, that this dissimulation was against good faith. There ought to exist among men a concord and affection which cannot permit us to prefer our private interest to the interest of our neighbor.

62

Non-disclosureAquinas, Summa Theologica

If one were bound to tell the faults of what one offers for sale, this would only be in order to lower the price. Now sometimes the price would be lowered for some other reason, without any defect in the thing sold: for instance, if the seller carry wheat to a place where wheat fetches a high price, knowing that many will come after him carrying wheat; because if the buyers knew this they would give a lower price. But apparently the seller need not give the buyer this information. Therefore, in like manner, neither need he tell him the faults of the goods he is selling.

ST 1.2.94.2, obj. 4

63

Non-disclosureAquinas, Summa Theologica

If one were bound to tell the faults of what one offers for sale, this would only be in order to lower the price. Now sometimes the price would be lowered for some other reason, without any defect in the thing sold: for instance, if the seller carry wheat to a place where wheat fetches a high price, knowing that many will come after him carrying wheat; because if the buyers knew this they would give a lower price. But apparently the seller need not give the buyer this information. Therefore, in like manner, neither need he tell him the faults of the goods he is selling.

Under which rule is the famine soonest over?

64

Non-disclosure

What should the buyer have concluded from the seller’s silence about changed market conditions?

65

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw?

66

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw? The incentive to acquire information

67

Non-disclosure

Which rule better promotes efficiency in Laidlaw? The incentive to acquire information Litigation over nondisclosures

68

Non-disclosure

An industry analyst discovers that a public firm has fraudulently inflated its profits, and shorts its stock without disclosing his find.

69

Non-disclosure

An industry analyst discovers that a public firm has fraudulently inflated its profits, and shorts its stock without disclosing his find. If this were illegal, what would happen to

his incentive to discover the information?

70

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure. Same result?

71

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure.Kronman: was there a cost to production

of the information?

72

Non-disclosure

A company executive in the same firm sells his stock without making disclosure.Kronman: was the a cost to production of

the information?Under which rule is the information

processed in the market most quickly?

73

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? And these were?

74Termites

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? Does it matter that this was an

apartment house? Does it matter that it was termites? Does it matter that the seller made the

defect harder to discover?

75

Non-disclosure

Should Obde be confined to its special facts? Does it matter that this was an

apartment house? Does it matter that it was termites? Does it matter that the seller made the

defect harder to discover?Restatement §§ 160, 161(b)

76

Restatement § 160In some states, bondo is a primary color

77

Reed v. King

78

O.J.’s House

79

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Unconscionability

F.H. Buckley

fbuckley@gmu.edu

top related