1 downtown resident study pittsburgh downtown partnership october 2008 prepared by: strategic...

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

Downtown Resident Study

Pittsburgh Downtown PartnershipOctober 2008

Downtown Resident Study

Pittsburgh Downtown PartnershipOctober 2008

Prepared by: STRATEGIC METRICS GROUP

www.strategicmetricsgroup.com 412.480.4332

2

Resident Sample Demographics

Decision to Move Downtown

Satisfaction with Downtown Living

Shopping Behavior

Downtown Parks & Events

Transportation Usage & Attitudes

Summary of Findings

Resident Sample Demographics

Decision to Move Downtown

Satisfaction with Downtown Living

Shopping Behavior

Downtown Parks & Events

Transportation Usage & Attitudes

Summary of Findings

3

METHODOLOGY & OVERVIEWMETHODOLOGY & OVERVIEW

2,927 paper surveys sent via mail to residents in PDP’s data base

An on-line version of survey was also available to residents on SMG website

“Reminder” postcard sent out to boost response rate

Data collected mid-August through late September

No $ incentive provided to residents

Methodology

413 surveys collected

413 out of 2,927 = 14.1% response rate

87 on-line + 326 paper = 413 total

“Reminder” postcard boosted response by almost 120 surveys (very productive)

Surveyed residents represent an even mix of Downtown’s buildings/properties

Study Results

4

PROFILE OF

RESIDENT SAMPLE

PROFILE OF

RESIDENT SAMPLE

5

BUILDING / PROPERTYBUILDING / PROPERTY

63

34 33 3230

28 27 27 26

20 1815

13 12 12 118

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Gateway T

Pennsy

lvania

n

Cork F

acto

ry

Linco

ln at

N.S.

The E

ncore

Chatha

m T

Crawfor

d Sq

Heinz

Lofts

Roos A

rms

Was

h. P

laza

P Gar

rison

625

Stanw

ix

Midto

wn T

930

Penn A

ve

May

Buil

ding

No Wall

/Small

151

FirstS

ide

900

Penn A

ve

63

34 33 3230

28 27 27 26

20 1815

13 12 12 118

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Gateway T

Pennsy

lvania

n

Cork F

acto

ry

Linco

ln at

N.S.

The E

ncore

Chatha

m T

Crawfor

d Sq

Heinz

Lofts

Roos A

rms

Was

h. P

laza

P Gar

rison

625

Stanw

ix

Midto

wn T

930

Penn A

ve

May

Buil

ding

No Wall

/Small

151

FirstS

ide

900

Penn A

ve

Residential Property

# o

f R

es

po

nd

en

ts

n = 412 (1 respondent did not want address to be known)

Current Residences of Study Respondents

All 18 buildings/properties are represented in the study

sample.

6

AGE OF RESIDENTSAGE OF RESIDENTS

35

66

36 37

2421

41

3429

26

16

31

0

20

40

60

80

35

66

36 37

2421

41

3429

26

16

31

0

20

40

60

80

# o

f R

es

po

nd

en

ts

n = 396

A broad spectrum of age ranges represented in sample

7

TOTAL ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOMETOTAL ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME

40

49

72

60

50

17

9

39

61

0

20

40

60

80

100

40

49

72

60

50

17

9

39

61

0

20

40

60

80

100

# o

f R

es

po

nd

en

ts

n = 397Source of HH income statistics for US, AGH County, and City of Pgh: 2006 American Community Survey (ACS) US Census Bureau

Downtown resident sample skews higher than national and local income levels:

% of Households over $100KUnited States = 18% City of Pittsburgh = 9%Allegheny County = 16%

Downtown Residents = 34%

8

GENDER AND RACEGENDER AND RACE

Male44%

Female56%

Asian2%

Black12%

White83%

Other3%

n = 399 n = 389

9

HOUSEHOLD SIZE & MARITAL STATUSHOUSEHOLD SIZE & MARITAL STATUS

2 or More People

42%1 Person

58%

Div / Sep / Wid20%

Married46%

Single27%

Unmarried - Living as Couple

7%

n = 398

Average Household Size = 1.4 people

Just 3% of households have children

n = 401

10

TENURE AT DOWNTOWN RESIDENCETENURE AT DOWNTOWN RESIDENCE

31%

23%

11%

6%4%

3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%1%

10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%31%

23%

11%

6%4%

3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%1%

10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

# of Years

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q1. How long have you lived at your current Downtown residence? (n = 413)

Average Tenure at Downtown Residence: 4.6 Years

Number of Years Lived at Current Residence

54% have lived at current residence 2 years or less

11

TENURE AT DOWNTOWN RESIDENCETENURE AT DOWNTOWN RESIDENCE

31%

23%

11%

6%4%

3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%1%

10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%31%

23%

11%

6%4%

3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%1%

10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

# of Years

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q1. How long have you lived at your current Downtown residence? (n = 413)

Number of Years Lived at Current Residence

Overall Average Tenure = 4.6 Years

Gateway Towers 9.0 900 Penn Ave 3.1

Midtown Towers 8.9 Lincoln at N.S. 2.7

Chatham Towers 8.6 Penn Garrison 2.4

Roosevelt Arms 7.5 Heinz Lofts 1.5

May Building 7.4 151 FirstSide 1.4

Crawford Square 5.4 The Encore 1.3

Washington Plaza 3.8 No Wall/Small 1.2

625 Stanwix St 3.6 Cork Factory 0.9

Pennsylvanian 3.5 930 Penn Ave 0.7

12

PREVIOUS RESIDENCEPREVIOUS RESIDENCE

58%

24%

8% 8%

2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Allegheny County Outside Pennsylvania Allegheny BorderCounties

Pennsylvania (outsidePgh. region)

Outside of U.S.

58%

24%

8% 8%

2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Allegheny County Outside Pennsylvania Allegheny BorderCounties

Pennsylvania (outsidePgh. region)

Outside of U.S.

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q2. Where did you last live prior to moving to your current Downtown residence? (n = 408)

66% moved from somewhere in the surrounding Pittsburgh region.

Location of Residence Prior to Moving Downtown

Butler Beaver Wash & Westmoreland

13

OWNERSHIP STATUSOWNERSHIP STATUS

Own42%

Rent58%

Q3. Which best describes your status at your prior residence? (n=404)

Own22%

Rent78%

Q33. Do you own or rent at your current residence? (n=397)

Prior Residence Current Residence (Downtown)

Drop in Ownership

A higher “renter” status accompanied the move to Downtown.“Renter” up 20 percentage points, “Owner” down 20 percentage points.

Rent versus Own

14

SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICSSUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICS

GENDER n %

Male 176 44%

Female 223 56%

Total 399 100%

MARITAL STATUS n %

Married 106 26.6%

Single 181 45.5%

Divorced/Widowed/ Separated

81 20.4%

Unmarried living as couple

30 7.5%

RACE/ETHNICITY n %

White 325 83%

Black 45 12%

Asian 8 2%

Other 11 3%

Total 389 100%

AGE n %

Less than 25 35 9%

25 – 29 66 17%

30 – 34 36 9%

35 – 39 37 9%

40 – 44 24 6%

45 – 49 21 5%

50 – 54 41 10%

55 – 59 34 9%

60 – 64 29 7%

65 – 69 26 7%

70 – 74 16 4%

75+ 31 8%

Total 396 100%

Downtown HH Size n Average

Average HH size 401 1.4 people

15

SUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICSSUMMARY OF DEMOGRAPHICS

INCOME n %

<$25K 40 10%

$25K-$50K 49 12%

$51K-$75K 72 18%

$76K-$100K 60 15%

$101K-$150K 50 13%

$151K-$200K 17 4%

$201K-$250K 9 2%

>$250K 39 10%

Prefer Not to Say 61 16%

Total 397 100%

PET OWNERSHIP n %

No Pets 295 74%

Own Dogs 50 13%

Own Cats 56 14%

Own Other Pets 8 2%

Average # of Dogs 50 1.04

Average # of Cats 56 1.46

Average # of Other Pets

8 No responses

“Other” Types of Pets Birds, Fish, Rabbit

16

DECISION TO

MOVE DOWNTOWN

DECISION TO

MOVE DOWNTOWN

17

PRIMARY REASON FOR MOVING DOWNTOWNPRIMARY REASON FOR MOVING DOWNTOWN

2%

2%

2%

1%

6%

2%

3%

4%

8%

21%

40%

9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Close to Work/School

Convenience/Accessibility

"City Lifestyle"

Appeal of Building/Property

The Cultural District/Events

Change in Marital Status

"Lively"/ "Fun"/ "Social"

Public Trnsportation

Downsizing

Lifestyle Change

Affordability

Other

2%

2%

2%

1%

6%

2%

3%

4%

8%

21%

40%

9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Close to Work/School

Convenience/Accessibility

"City Lifestyle"

Appeal of Building/Property

The Cultural District/Events

Change in Marital Status

"Lively"/ "Fun"/ "Social"

Public Trnsportation

Downsizing

Lifestyle Change

Affordability

Other

Q4. What was the primary reason you chose to live Downtown? (n=402)

Convenience of location is key driver.The “lifestyle” & the properties/units

themselves are important factors.

“Other” includes: access to rivers, amenities, access to major roads

18

OTHER LOCATIONS CONSIDEREDIN HOUSING SEARCH

OTHER LOCATIONS CONSIDEREDIN HOUSING SEARCH

8%

8%

5%

5%

3%

1%

1%

2%

9%

10%

13%

16%

31%

34%

17%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Shadyside

"Nowhere else"

South Side/Shore

North Suburbs

Squirrel Hill

Mt. Washington

North Side/Shore

South Suburbs

City East

Strip District

East Suburbs

West Suburbs

City North

City South

Other

8%

8%

5%

5%

3%

1%

1%

2%

9%

10%

13%

16%

31%

34%

17%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Shadyside

"Nowhere else"

South Side/Shore

North Suburbs

Squirrel Hill

Mt. Washington

North Side/Shore

South Suburbs

City East

Strip District

East Suburbs

West Suburbs

City North

City South

Other

Q5. Prior to moving Downtown, what communities were included in your housing search? (n=374)

Q5 is a multiple response question. 374 people provided 645 answers. The above chart reflects the % of people mentioning each location.

Shadyside is the other top city location considered before choosing Downtown

The northern & southern suburbs were the most common of the region’s suburbs

considered.

(Cranberry, Wexford, Mt. Lebanon)

Almost one-third strictly targeted Downtown in their search

19

RESOURCES USED IN HOUSING SEARCHRESOURCES USED IN HOUSING SEARCH

54%

38%

17%

8%6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Other Internet Real Estate Agency Housing Tour Relocation Consultant

54%

38%

17%

8%6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Other Internet Real Estate Agency Housing Tour Relocation Consultant

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q6. Which resources did you use to find your current property/building? (n = 404)

Q6 is a multiple response question. 404 people provided 494 answers. The above chart reflects the % of people mentioning each resource.

Top 3 Mentions in “Other”33% - Contacts / Friends / Referrals13% - Rental / Apartment Guides13% - Newspaper

Top 5 Mentions for “Internet”22% - rent.com19% - apartments.com16% - google.com14% - craigslist.com 6% - pittsburghmoves.com

20

SATISFACTION

WITH

DOWNTOWN LIVING

SATISFACTION

WITH

DOWNTOWN LIVING

21

SATISFACTION WITH DECISIONTO MOVE DOWNTOWN

SATISFACTION WITH DECISIONTO MOVE DOWNTOWN

1% 1% 1% 2% 3%

7%

15%18%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1% 1% 1% 2% 3%

7%

15%18%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

1 = Not satisfied at all; 9 = Very satisfied

Overall Average Satisfaction Score = 7.9

Satisfaction with Decision by Tenure:2 yrs. or Less = 7.7>2 to 5 yrs. = 8.0<5 to 10 yrs. = 8.3>10 yrs. = 8.3

Positive Correlation:The longer residents have lived Downtown,the more satisfied they are with their decision.

Average

7.9

Q9. How satisfied are you with your decision to live in Downtown? (n = 411)

22

SATISFACTION WITH DOWNTOWN RESIDENCESATISFACTION WITH DOWNTOWN RESIDENCE

0% 1%2% 2%

4%

7%

21%

27%

36%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0% 1%2% 2%

4%

7%

21%

27%

36%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q8. How satisfied are you with your property/building choice? (n = 410)

1 = Not satisfied at all; 9 = Very satisfied

Overall Average Satisfaction Score = 7.7

Average

7.7

23

FACTORS THAT IMPACT THE QUALITY OF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

FACTORS THAT IMPACT THE QUALITY OF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

Q10. Which aspects of Downtown living have the greatest overall impact on your quality of life (livability) as a Downtown resident? (n = 383)

Positive & Negative Factors Cited by Residents

Positive Mentions

94%

Negative Mentions

6%1,355 “quality of life" factors were cited by the Downtown residents. 1,275 or 94% of these answers were “positive” or favorable. Just 6% of the factors reference “negative” or unfavorable issues.

Positive Factors Cited Most Often (94%):- Close to work or school- Convenience / central location- Access to restaurants- Proximity to Cultural District / Events / Arts

Negative Factors Cited Most Often (6%):- Safety / Security- Lack of Grocery Stores & Retail - Nothing is open at night – need to stay open- Noise / Parking / No taxis / High costs

24

POSITIVE FACTORS IMPACTING THE QUALITY OF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

POSITIVE FACTORS IMPACTING THE QUALITY OF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

Q10. Which aspects of Downtown living have the greatest overall impact on your quality of life (livability) as a Downtown resident? (n = 1,275 responses)

13%

11%

11%

10%

9%

9%

8% 2%

13%

15%

19%

25%

30%

40%

27%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Close to Work / School

Convenience/Central Location

Access to Restaurants

Cultural District / Events

Public Transportation

Sporting Events / Stadiums

Activities / Entertainment

Access to Shopping

Bike & Walking Trails

Access to Theaters / Shows

People / Community

Parks / Green Spaces

Beautiful Views

"Walk-ability"

Night Life

13%

11%

11%

10%

9%

9%

8% 2%

13%

15%

19%

25%

30%

40%

27%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Close to Work / School

Convenience/Central Location

Access to Restaurants

Cultural District / Events

Public Transportation

Sporting Events / Stadiums

Activities / Entertainment

Access to Shopping

Bike & Walking Trails

Access to Theaters / Shows

People / Community

Parks / Green Spaces

Beautiful Views

"Walk-ability"

Night Life

Q10 is a multiple response question. 383 people provided 1,275 answers. The above chart reflects the % of people mentioning each

factor.

25

NEGATIVE FACTORS IMPACTING THE QUALITYOF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

NEGATIVE FACTORS IMPACTING THE QUALITYOF “DOWNTOWN LIVING”

Q10. Which aspects of Downtown living have the greatest overall impact on your quality of life (livability) as a Downtown resident? (n = 80 responses)

• Safety / Security (33)• Noise (3)• Costs (high) (3)• (need) more & safer bus routes from Oakland to Mellon arena area • (need) places for guests to park for free• accessibility - need to not have Pgh PD block access to apartments• businesses that stay open• cab service/parking• Develop "retail services" w/ business hours catering to a residential com• Downtown construction and congestion• DT is dead at night; everything closes• Frustrated with the smokers everywhere• full use of buildings• grocery store at reasonable pricing• Grocery Stores (and operation hours of them)• lack of weekend life• loud noise, especially at night• no shopping for food in area• not closing streets to access building• safety - I wouldn't feel safe walking around at night• shopping (limited at this time)• stuff needs to be open late and on weekends

• There is no Grocery Store!!!!• $ parking• air pollution• black on white crime• City closing the one road that leads to• Develop retail shopping for a variety of life- • styles w/ business hours catering to residents • we need a grocery store with regular prices• Game Events (added crowds/ticket sellers)• have to drive to N Hills/Fox Chap for groceries • lack of grocery shopping• lack of police patrol, especially after• more access to taxi service• Parking difficulties. It's Expensive.• Construction• garbage everywhere• state or PennDot doesn’t notify road closures • street bums, loiterers• punks & vagrants on street• coal dust• taxes• better property management

SAFETY is the primary factor.

It accounts for 33 of 80 responses.

26

SHOPPING

BEHAVIOR

SHOPPING

BEHAVIOR

27

CATEGORIES SHOPPED BY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS

CATEGORIES SHOPPED BY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS

• Restaurants / Bars• Pharmacy / Drug• Convenience Store item • Men’s Clothing• Financial Services• Personal Fitness• Movies / Theater• Groceries

• Electronics/Appliances• Home Furnishing/Furniture • Automotive• Books / Music / Video• Digital (PCs, Phones)• Medical Services• Sporting Goods / Hobby

• Beauty / Barber• Dry Cleaning• Women’s Clothing. • Beer Wine Liquor• Optical / Eyewear• Legal Service• Jewelry• Artwork

Residents asked where they shop for 23 product/service categoriesDo you shop in Downtown? (yes/no) Do you shop in suburbs? (yes/no)

28

PERCENTAGE WHO SHOP EACH CATEGORYPERCENTAGE WHO SHOP EACH CATEGORY

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = varies by product/service)

91.5%

90.9%

90.5%

88.1%

86.2%

81.1%

79.0%

78.6%

77.4%

77.3%

77.2%

66.3%

65.9%

65.8%

65.5%

64.3%

63.3%

59.9%

59.2%

51.7%

47.1%

41.7%

35.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

91.5%

90.9%

90.5%

88.1%

86.2%

81.1%

79.0%

78.6%

77.4%

77.3%

77.2%

66.3%

65.9%

65.8%

65.5%

64.3%

63.3%

59.9%

59.2%

51.7%

47.1%

41.7%

35.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Percentage of Residents

29

SHOP ONLY IN DOWNTOWN SHOP ONLY IN DOWNTOWN

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = varies by product/service )

53.9%

52.4%

46.6%

44.4%

43.4%

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

24.8%

23.3%

22.6%

18.0%

16.2%

15.8%

11.7%

11.2%

8.5%

8.0%

6.3%

3.4%

51%

16.5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Restaurants/Bars

Pharmacy/Drug

Convenience Items

Men's Clothing

Financial Services

Personal Fitness

Beauty / Barber

Dry Cleaning

Women's Clothing

Beer Wine Liquor

Medical Services

Optical/Eyewear

Legal Services

Movies/Theater

Digital (PCs/Phones)

Jewelry

Groceries

Artwork

Books Music Videos

Automotive

Electronics/Appliances

Home Furnishings

Sporting Goods/Hobby

53.9%

52.4%

46.6%

44.4%

43.4%

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

24.8%

23.3%

22.6%

18.0%

16.2%

15.8%

11.7%

11.2%

8.5%

8.0%

6.3%

3.4%

51%

16.5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Restaurants/Bars

Pharmacy/Drug

Convenience Items

Men's Clothing

Financial Services

Personal Fitness

Beauty / Barber

Dry Cleaning

Women's Clothing

Beer Wine Liquor

Medical Services

Optical/Eyewear

Legal Services

Movies/Theater

Digital (PCs/Phones)

Jewelry

Groceries

Artwork

Books Music Videos

Automotive

Electronics/Appliances

Home Furnishings

Sporting Goods/Hobby

6 Core Downtown Categories:

Restaurants / BarsPharmacy / DrugConvenience Store ItemsMen’s ClothingFinancial ServicesPersonal Fitness

The 6 Downtown categories have 40% + shares of Downtown Only shopping and low relative % shares of Suburbs Only shopping

% of Residents Who Shop Exclusively in Downtown for Category

30

SHOP ONLY IN SUBURBS SHOP ONLY IN SUBURBS

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = varies by product/service )

59.5%

54.6%

53.9%

52.4%

51.7%

47.5%

46.8%

46.6%

46.4%

36.2%

35.4%

32.7%

30.8%

30.3%

30.1%

27.2%

26.9%

21.8%

20.9%

18.9%

18.7%

14.8%

10.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Groceries

Electronics/Appliances

Home Furnishings

Automotive

Books Music Videos

Digital (PCs/Phones)

Medical Services

Sporting Goods/Hobby

Movies/Theater

Beauty / Barber

Optical/Eyewear

Women's Clothing

Dry Cleaning

Beer Wine Liquor

Men's Clothing

Pharmacy/Drug

Jewelry

Artwork

Convenience Items

Legal Services

Financial Services

Personal Fitness

Restaurants/Bars

59.5%

54.6%

53.9%

52.4%

51.7%

47.5%

46.8%

46.6%

46.4%

36.2%

35.4%

32.7%

30.8%

30.3%

30.1%

27.2%

26.9%

21.8%

20.9%

18.9%

18.7%

14.8%

10.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Groceries

Electronics/Appliances

Home Furnishings

Automotive

Books Music Videos

Digital (PCs/Phones)

Medical Services

Sporting Goods/Hobby

Movies/Theater

Beauty / Barber

Optical/Eyewear

Women's Clothing

Dry Cleaning

Beer Wine Liquor

Men's Clothing

Pharmacy/Drug

Jewelry

Artwork

Convenience Items

Legal Services

Financial Services

Personal Fitness

Restaurants/Bars

9 Core Suburban Categories:

GroceriesElectronics / AppliancesHome Furnishings/FurnitureAutomotiveBooks / Music / VideoDigital Products (PCs, Phones, etc.)Medical ServicesSporting Goods / HobbyMovies / Theater

The Suburban categories have 40% + shares of Suburban Only shopping and low relative % shares of Downtown Only shopping

% of Residents Who Shop Exclusively in Suburbs for Category

31

SHOPPING CATEGORY SUMMARYSHOPPING CATEGORY SUMMARY

CORE DOWNTOWN - 6

• Restaurants / Bars

• Pharmacy / Drug

• Convenience Store item

• Men’s Clothing

• Financial Services

• Personal Fitness

CORE SUBURBAN - 9• Groceries• Electronics/Appliances• Home Furnishing/Furniture • Automotive• Books / Music / Video• Digital (PCs, Phones)• Medical Services• Sporting Goods / Hobby• Movies / Theater

32

“CROSS-OVER” CATEGORIES“CROSS-OVER” CATEGORIES

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = varies by product/service)

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

23.3%

22.6%

15.8%

11.7%

36.2%

30.8%

32.7%

30.3%

35.4%

18.9%

26.9%

21.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Beauty / Barber

Dry Cleaning

Women's Clothing

Beer Wine Liquor

Optical/Eyewear

Legal Services

Jewelry

Artwork

Downtown Suburbs

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

23.3%

22.6%

15.8%

11.7%

36.2%

30.8%

32.7%

30.3%

35.4%

18.9%

26.9%

21.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Beauty / Barber

Dry Cleaning

Women's Clothing

Beer Wine Liquor

Optical/Eyewear

Legal Services

Jewelry

Artwork

Downtown Suburbs

8 “Cross-over” Categories:

“Cross-over” categories have similar percentages (%) of residents shopping Downtown and in Suburbs.

Categories Where Both Venues Are Equally Popular with Residents

33

SHOPPING CATEGORY SUMMARYSHOPPING CATEGORY SUMMARY

CORE DOWNTOWN – 6• Restaurants / Bars• Pharmacy / Drug• Convenience Store item • Men’s Clothing• Financial Services• Personal Fitness

CORE SUBURBAN - 9• Groceries• Electronics/Appliances• Home Furnishing/Furniture • Automotive• Books / Music / Video• Digital (PCs, Phones)• Medical Services• Sporting Goods / Hobby• Movies / Theater

“CROSS-OVER” – 8• Beauty / Barber• Dry Cleaning• Women’s Clothing. • Beer Wine Liquor• Optical / Eyewear• Legal Service• Jewelry• Artwork

34

SHOPPING/SPENDING SUMMARYSHOPPING/SPENDING SUMMARY

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = )

16.5%

46.6%

32.7%

53.9%

52.4%

42.2%

18.0%

37.6%

24.8%

32.3%

50.5%

11.2%

16.2%

8.0%

44.4%

6.3%

8.5%

43.4%

23.3%

3.4%

15.8%

22.6%

11.7%

59.5%

30.1%

32.7%

10.2%

27.2%

36.2%

46.4%

30.8%

46.8%

30.3%

20.9%

51.7%

47.5%

54.6%

18.7%

53.9%

52.4%

14.8%

35.4%

46.6%

26.9%

18.9%

21.8%

15.5%

14.2%

25.1%

24.0%

6.6%

2.7%

14.6%

10.2%

5.8%

14.7%

5.8%

3.4%

2.2%

3.2%

2.4%

4.1%

2.4%

1.7%

0.5%

1.7%

4.4%

0.2%

1.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

D'Town Only

Suburb Only

Both

16.5%

46.6%

32.7%

53.9%

52.4%

42.2%

18.0%

37.6%

24.8%

32.3%

50.5%

11.2%

16.2%

8.0%

44.4%

6.3%

8.5%

43.4%

23.3%

3.4%

15.8%

22.6%

11.7%

59.5%

30.1%

32.7%

10.2%

27.2%

36.2%

46.4%

30.8%

46.8%

30.3%

20.9%

51.7%

47.5%

54.6%

18.7%

53.9%

52.4%

14.8%

35.4%

46.6%

26.9%

18.9%

21.8%

15.5%

14.2%

25.1%

24.0%

6.6%

2.7%

14.6%

10.2%

5.8%

14.7%

5.8%

3.4%

2.2%

3.2%

2.4%

4.1%

2.4%

1.7%

0.5%

1.7%

4.4%

0.2%

1.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

D'Town Only

Suburb Only

Both

Total Percentage of Residents

35

SHOPPING/SPENDING SUMMARYSHOPPING/SPENDING SUMMARY

Q11. Where do you shop for the following goods and services? (n = )

53.9%

52.4%

50.5%

46.6%

44.4%

43.4%

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

24.8%

23.3%

22.6%

18.0%

16.2%

15.8%

16.5%

11.7%

11.2%

8.5%

8.0%

6.3%

3.4%

10.2%

27.2%

20.9%

30.1%

18.7%

14.8%

36.2%

30.8%

32.7%

30.3%

46.8%

35.4%

18.9%

46.4%

47.5%

26.9%

59.5%

21.8%

51.7%

52.4%

54.6%

53.9%

46.6%

24.0%

6.6%

5.8%

14.2%

2.4%

1.7%

2.7%

10.2%

25.1%

14.7%

5.8%

0.5%

0.2%

14.6%

2.2%

4.4%

15.5%

1.6%

3.4%

2.4%

3.2%

4.1%

1.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

D'Town Only

Suburb Only

Both

53.9%

52.4%

50.5%

46.6%

44.4%

43.4%

42.2%

37.6%

32.7%

32.3%

24.8%

23.3%

22.6%

18.0%

16.2%

15.8%

16.5%

11.7%

11.2%

8.5%

8.0%

6.3%

3.4%

10.2%

27.2%

20.9%

30.1%

18.7%

14.8%

36.2%

30.8%

32.7%

30.3%

46.8%

35.4%

18.9%

46.4%

47.5%

26.9%

59.5%

21.8%

51.7%

52.4%

54.6%

53.9%

46.6%

24.0%

6.6%

5.8%

14.2%

2.4%

1.7%

2.7%

10.2%

25.1%

14.7%

5.8%

0.5%

0.2%

14.6%

2.2%

4.4%

15.5%

1.6%

3.4%

2.4%

3.2%

4.1%

1.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

D'Town Only

Suburb Only

Both

Sorted by Downtown Only Shopping %

36

RETAILERS WANTED BY RESIDENTSRETAILERS WANTED BY RESIDENTS

7%

6%

6%

5%

4%

4%

4%

4%

8%

9%

11%

12%

18%

30%

14%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Giant Eagle

Target

Whole Foods

Grocery

Nordstrom

Barnes & Noble

Movie Theater

Best Buy

Wal Mart

Borders

Book Store

Trader Joe's

JC Penney

Nieman Marcus

Banana Republic

7%

6%

6%

5%

4%

4%

4%

4%

8%

9%

11%

12%

18%

30%

14%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Giant Eagle

Target

Whole Foods

Grocery

Nordstrom

Barnes & Noble

Movie Theater

Best Buy

Wal Mart

Borders

Book Store

Trader Joe's

JC Penney

Nieman Marcus

Banana Republic

Q12. What 3 retailers would you most like to see come into Downtown? (n = 349)

Q12 is a multiple response question. 349 people provided 854 answers. The above chart reflects the % of people mentioning each location.

Top 15 Mentions

As might be expected, most of the top 15 retailers mentioned fall into retail categories classified as “Suburban” or “Cross-over” (see previous charts).

Residents desire the kinds of stores in downtown that they currently patronize out in the suburbs.

37

RETAILERS WANTED BY RESIDENTSRETAILERS WANTED BY RESIDENTS

7%

6%

6%

5%

4%

4%

4%

4%

8%

9%

11%

12%

18%

30%

14%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Giant Eagle

Target

Whole Foods

Grocery

Nordstrom

Barnes & Noble

Movie Theater

Best Buy

Wal Mart

Borders

Book Store

Trader Joe's

JC Penney

Nieman Marcus

Banana Republic

7%

6%

6%

5%

4%

4%

4%

4%

8%

9%

11%

12%

18%

30%

14%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Giant Eagle

Target

Whole Foods

Grocery

Nordstrom

Barnes & Noble

Movie Theater

Best Buy

Wal Mart

Borders

Book Store

Trader Joe's

JC Penney

Nieman Marcus

Banana Republic

Q12. What 3 retailers would you most like to see come into Downtown? (n = 349)

Q12 is a multiple response question. 349 people provided 854 answers. The above chart reflects the % of people mentioning each location.

Top 15 Mentions

Women’s Clothing = “Cross-over”

Groceries = Core Suburban

Groceries = Core SuburbanGroceries = Core Suburban

Groceries = Core Suburban

Books Music Video = Core Suburban

Books Music Video = Core Suburban

Books Music Video = Core Suburban

Movies / Theater = Core Suburban

Electronics/Digital = Core Suburban

Women’s Clothing = “Cross-over”

Although a fair amount of Women’s Clothing shopping takes place in

Downtown, the interest in Nordstrom, Nieman Marcus, Banana Republic, and JC Penney signify an opportunity exists for more (different) Women’s clothing &

apparel retailers in Downtown.

38

MOST PATRONIZED DOWNTOWN BUSINESES

MOST PATRONIZED DOWNTOWN BUSINESES

Q11. Write in the specific Downtown store you patronize the most (measured in dollars spent)? (n = varies by store)

• Artwork: Art festivals, local galleries, Wood Street Framing

• Automotive: Goodyear, Meineke, ZipCar

• Beauty/Barber: Sally Beauty Supply, Luigi Caruso, Brett James Salon, Sognatore

• Beer Wine Liquor: State store, Wine & Spirits, Oxford Center Wine & Spirits

• Books/Music/Video: Barnes & Noble, Library, The Exchange

• Men’s Clothing: Macy’s, Saks, Burlington, Brooks Bros.

• Women’s Clothing: Macy’s, Saks, Burlington

• Convenience Items: CVS, 7-Eleven, Rite Aid, Rosebud

• Digital Products: Radio Shack, Verizon, T-Mobile, Cricket

• Dry Cleaning: Galardi’s, Chuong’s (Gateway T.), “apt. / building service”

• Electronics/Appliances: Macy’s, Radio Shack, The Exchange

• Financial Services: PNC, Citizens Bank, National City, Dollar Bank

39

Q11. Write in the specific Downtown store you patronize the most (measured in dollars spent)? (n = varies by store)

• Groceries: Rosebud, Strip District, CVS

• Home Furnishings: Macy’s, Burlington, Perlora

• Jewelry: Macy’s, Clark Building, Bailey Banks & Biddle

• Legal Services: Buchanan Ingersoll Rooney, Cohen & Grigsby, Reed Smith

• Medical Services: AGH, Mercy Hospital, UPMC Downtown

• Movies/Theater: Harris, South Side Works, Heinz Hall

• Optical Products: Gateway Eye Assoc., America’s Best, Heidi Optics

• Personal Fitness: Apartment gym, Gold’s gym, Bally’s, Rivers Club

• Pharmacy / Drug: CVS, Rite Aid, Eckerd

• Restaurant / Bar: Bossa Nova, Capital Grille, Palomino, Six Penn, Seviche, Eleven

• Sporting Goods / Hobby: Honus Wagner, stadium/arena, Station Square

MOST PATRONIZED DOWNTOWN BUSINESES

MOST PATRONIZED DOWNTOWN BUSINESES

40

PARKS

& GREEN SPACES

PARKS

& GREEN SPACES

41

DOWNTOWN’S PARKS & OUTDOOR SPACES DOWNTOWN’S PARKS & OUTDOOR SPACES

53%

53%

48%

47%

41%

38%

38%

58%

60%

64%

68%

90%

90%

79%

Point State Park

Market Square

PPG Plaza

Mellon Square

Gatew ay Center Park

Allegheny Riverfront Park

Four Gatew ay Center Plaza

PNC Firstside Park

Plaza at Oxford Center

Courtyard @ Cty Courthouse

Katz Plaza

Mellon Green

Dominion Plaza

Ft. Duq. Blvd. & 10th St. bypass

53%

53%

48%

47%

41%

38%

38%

58%

60%

64%

68%

90%

90%

79%

Point State Park

Market Square

PPG Plaza

Mellon Square

Gatew ay Center Park

Allegheny Riverfront Park

Four Gatew ay Center Plaza

PNC Firstside Park

Plaza at Oxford Center

Courtyard @ Cty Courthouse

Katz Plaza

Mellon Green

Dominion Plaza

Ft. Duq. Blvd. & 10th St. bypass

Q18. Please (a) check if you are familiar with each green space/outdoor area listed (know where it is) and (b) how many times you have visited/used each area in the past year. (n = 411)

Avg # Visits Past Year

21

40

24

5

54

26

22

12

8

6

37

9

15

12

% Familiar with Downtown Area

Familiarity and Usage

42

LIKELIHOOD TO USE DOG PARKLIKELIHOOD TO USE DOG PARK

72%

4%2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2%

13%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

72%

4%2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2%

13%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

1 = Not Likely at All; 9 = Very Likely

Not Likely At All Very Likely

Average

2.6Overall Average Score = 2.6

Residents who own dogs = 7.4Residents who do not own dogs = 1.9

Q19. If a small off-leash dog park was established near Gateway Center, how likely would you be to use it? (n = 390)

43

EVENTS

&

PROGRAMMING

EVENTS

&

PROGRAMMING

44

TYPES OF EVENTS DESIRED BY RESIDENTSTYPES OF EVENTS DESIRED BY RESIDENTS

6%

2%4% 3%

44%

7%10%

7%

17%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

6%

2%4% 3%

44%

7%10%

7%

17%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q20. Which event type is more desirable to you? (n = 378)

1 = “Resident-based”; 9 = “Event-based”

Strongly prefer

Resident-based programs Equal PreferenceStrongly prefer

Event-based programs

Average

5.8Average Score = 5.8

Majority have no strong preference for the type of Downtown events they prefer

45

EVENTS & PROGRAMS DESIREDBY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS

EVENTS & PROGRAMS DESIREDBY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS

Q21. What specific types of events programs would you like to see made available (or see more often) for you in your Downtown neighborhood? (n = 214)

Q21 is a multiple response question. 214 people provided 343 answers. Shown above the % of people mentioning each type of event.

6%

6%

5%

3%

2%

8%

9%

10%

10%

12%

36%

11%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Concerts / Live Music

Food Fairs / Wine Tasting

Arts Festivals

Movies / Movie Theater

Happy Hour

"Mixers" / Block Parties

Street Fairs

Book Club

Exercise Class / Athletics

Cooking Classes

Flea Markets

Gallery "Crawl"

6%

6%

5%

3%

2%

8%

9%

10%

10%

12%

36%

11%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Concerts / Live Music

Food Fairs / Wine Tasting

Arts Festivals

Movies / Movie Theater

Happy Hour

"Mixers" / Block Parties

Street Fairs

Book Club

Exercise Class / Athletics

Cooking Classes

Flea Markets

Gallery "Crawl"

46

DESIRE FOR MORE NEIGHBORHOODINVOLVEMENT & NEIGHBOR NETWORKING

DESIRE FOR MORE NEIGHBORHOODINVOLVEMENT & NEIGHBOR NETWORKING

No29%

Yes71%

Q22. Would you like to have more opportunities to become more ? (n = 368)

47

TRANSIT ATTITUDES

& USAGE

TRANSIT ATTITUDES

& USAGE

48

SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE PARKINGSUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE PARKING

Q24. If you consider the parking situation for Downtown residentsa problem, please share any ideas you have to improve it. (n = 170)

Q24 is a multiple response question. 170 people provided 196 answers. The above table reflects the % of people mentioning each idea to improve parking.

4%

3%

3%

5%

5%

5%

7%

13%

43%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Lower the Price/Cost

Need More Spaces/Garages

Create Assigned Spaces

Visitor Discounts

Permits for DT Residents

Reduce/Eliminate Tax

Make Parking Free

Better Security

Build Cost Into Lease/Price

Put Garages in Each Bldg.

4%

3%

3%

5%

5%

5%

7%

13%

43%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Lower the Price/Cost

Need More Spaces/Garages

Create Assigned Spaces

Visitor Discounts

Permits for DT Residents

Reduce/Eliminate Tax

Make Parking Free

Better Security

Build Cost Into Lease/Price

Put Garages in Each Bldg.

49

ADD BUS SERVICE BETWEEN RUSH HOURSADD BUS SERVICE BETWEEN RUSH HOURS

22%

5% 5%

8%

15%

9% 9%

6%

21%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

22%

5% 5%

8%

15%

9% 9%

6%

21%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q25a. Level of support for enhancing Downtown bus service by adding service between the 2 rush hour periods and after the evening rush hour peak. (n = 363 )

1 = No support at all; 9 = Very supportive

Overall Level of Support: NeutralAverage Score = 5.1

50

CHANGE BUS ROUTES TO INCREASE USAGE OF “T” SYSTEM

CHANGE BUS ROUTES TO INCREASE USAGE OF “T” SYSTEM

16%

3%4%

6%

15%

6%

11%9%

30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

16%

3%4%

6%

15%

6%

11%9%

30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q25b. Level of support for making bus routing changes that increase the usage of Downtown’s T system. (n = 356)

1 = No support at all; 9 = Very supportive

Overall Level of Support: NeutralAverage Score = 5.9

51

CREATE NEW LABELING SYSTEM FOR BUSESAND BUS ROUTES

CREATE NEW LABELING SYSTEM FOR BUSESAND BUS ROUTES

10%

2% 3%4%

11%

5%

14%12%

39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10%

2% 3%4%

11%

5%

14%12%

39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q25c. Level of support for developing and implementing a new bus “labeling” system that makes the bus system easier to comprehend than the current one. (n = 365)

1 = No support at all; 9 = Very supportive

Overall Level of Support: HighAverage Score = 6.7

52

DECREASE THE NUMBER OFBUS STOPS IN DOWNTOWN

DECREASE THE NUMBER OFBUS STOPS IN DOWNTOWN

36%

7%5% 6%

13%

2%

6% 5%

20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

36%

7%5% 6%

13%

2%

6% 5%

20%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Pe

rce

nt

of

Re

sid

en

ts

Q25d. Level of support for fewer bus stops in Downtown. (n = 358)

1 = No support at all; 9 = Very supportive

Overall Level of Support: LOWAverage Score = 4.3

53

SUMMARY OF SUPPORT FORBUS SYSTEM CHANGES

SUMMARY OF SUPPORT FORBUS SYSTEM CHANGES

6.7

5.9

5.1

4.3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

New Bus Labeling Change Bus to Increase"T" Usage

Add Bus ServiceBetween Rush

Decrease # Bus Stopsin Downtown

6.7

5.9

5.1

4.3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

New Bus Labeling Change Bus to Increase"T" Usage

Add Bus ServiceBetween Rush

Decrease # Bus Stopsin Downtown

1 = No support at all; 9 = Very supportive

54

CAR SHARINGCAR SHARING

55

CAR SHARING SUMMARYCAR SHARING SUMMARY

No27%

Yes73%

Q26. Please indicate your awareness and usage of Downtown’s car-sharing program. (n = 390)

No86%

Yes14%

Yes51%

No49%

Aware of ZipCar? If Aware, are you ZipCar Member?

If Member, has ZipCar Prompted You to Sell Car?

286 of 390 residents were aware of ZipCarIn their neighborhood

38 of 280 (those who were aware) are ZipCar members

19 of the 37 members said “Yes”

Members used ZipCar 6.5 times (on average) in the

past 6 months

56

MOTIVATION TO TRY CAR SHARINGOR USE IT MORE OFTEN

MOTIVATION TO TRY CAR SHARINGOR USE IT MORE OFTEN

Q26e. What would motivate you to try or use the ZipCar service more often? (n = 142)

• Nothing 26.8%• Cheaper rates 13.4%• I have my own car (nothing) 7.0%• Nothing - I don't drive 6.3%• Eliminate the county tax 5.6%• More availability 5.6%• Free trial 4.2%• If I had a need 4.2%• If I didn't have a car 3.5%• More information 2.8%• If it were cheaper than owning a car 2.8%• If I worked downtown 2.1%• Raise the age limit 2.1%• Need to know the system & cars are reliable 2.1%

• If my car breaks down 1.4%• when I retire 1.4%• Will use when my car lease expires 1.4%• Will use when my son is able to drive 1.4%• If gas prices go up 0.7%• If Zip Cars had tow hitches 0.7%• Longer usage times 0.7%• When my car dies 0.7%• If I could leave it at the airport 0.7%• If I didn't have indoor parking 0.7%• More help with customer service 0.7%• Increase in parking cost & decrease

usage of my car 0.7%

57

SUMMARY

COMMENTS

SUMMARY

COMMENTS

58

66% of Downtown residents lived in Allegheny County or bordering counties prior to moving Downtown. 24% previously lived outside of Pennsylvania.

22% own their Downtown residence – 78% currently rent.

A wide age range in sample - the single largest group is 25-29 yrs. old. All income levels represented in sample - however income skews

higher than comparable national, Allegheny County, or City of Pittsburgh measures.

The majority (58%) of Downtown households are 1 person – with an average overall household size of 1.4 people.

The number of married households is equal to the number of single, separated, and divorced households.

Children (<18 yrs.) are present in just 3% of Downtown households. 54% have lived in their Downtown home for 2 years or less. The

average length of time is 4.6 years.

66% of Downtown residents lived in Allegheny County or bordering counties prior to moving Downtown. 24% previously lived outside of Pennsylvania.

22% own their Downtown residence – 78% currently rent.

A wide age range in sample - the single largest group is 25-29 yrs. old. All income levels represented in sample - however income skews

higher than comparable national, Allegheny County, or City of Pittsburgh measures.

The majority (58%) of Downtown households are 1 person – with an average overall household size of 1.4 people.

The number of married households is equal to the number of single, separated, and divorced households.

Children (<18 yrs.) are present in just 3% of Downtown households. 54% have lived in their Downtown home for 2 years or less. The

average length of time is 4.6 years.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGSSUMMARY OF FINDINGS

59

Proximity to work/school is the top reason cited for moving Downtown. Other frequently cited reasons include “convenience/accessibility”, “city lifestyle”, and “appeal of building/property”.

Shadyside and South Side are the neighborhoods most likely to be also considered during the housing search process. 1 in 3 respondents looked exclusively at Downtown properties.

Satisfaction with the decision to move Downtown is high: 7.9 on 9 point scale where 9 = Very Satisfied.

Satisfaction with the Downtown residence (the building) is also high, with an average score of 7.7 on a 9 point scale.

Downtown is shopped/patronized most heavily for: 1. Restaurants/Bars, 2. Pharmacy/Drug 3. Convenience items 4. Men’s Clothing 5. Financial Services 6. Personal Fitness

3 of top 4 stores residents want in Downtown are grocery-related. There is also a need for more/different women’s clothing stores.

Proximity to work/school is the top reason cited for moving Downtown. Other frequently cited reasons include “convenience/accessibility”, “city lifestyle”, and “appeal of building/property”.

Shadyside and South Side are the neighborhoods most likely to be also considered during the housing search process. 1 in 3 respondents looked exclusively at Downtown properties.

Satisfaction with the decision to move Downtown is high: 7.9 on 9 point scale where 9 = Very Satisfied.

Satisfaction with the Downtown residence (the building) is also high, with an average score of 7.7 on a 9 point scale.

Downtown is shopped/patronized most heavily for: 1. Restaurants/Bars, 2. Pharmacy/Drug 3. Convenience items 4. Men’s Clothing 5. Financial Services 6. Personal Fitness

3 of top 4 stores residents want in Downtown are grocery-related. There is also a need for more/different women’s clothing stores.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGSSUMMARY OF FINDINGS

60

Saturday is the alternative or “other" day most residents would like to see the Farmer’s Market open. Produce, Meat/Seafood, and Dairy products are the goods most wish they could find at the market.

Familiarity with Downtown parks ranges from a high of 90% (Point Park) to a low of 38% (Mellon Green). Number of visits to 14 parks varies greatly by park.

7 of 10 residents do want more opportunities to get involved with their Downtown neighbors and community.

The most desired type of event (to be held in Downtown) is live music/concerts.

A new bus “labeling” system is supported by Downtown residents, while fewer bus stops in Downtown is not.

73% aware of ZipCar - 14% are members – Average 1 use per month. Residents’ top 3 suggestions to improve parking situation:

Lower the cost Create more spaces/garages Create assigned spaces

Saturday is the alternative or “other" day most residents would like to see the Farmer’s Market open. Produce, Meat/Seafood, and Dairy products are the goods most wish they could find at the market.

Familiarity with Downtown parks ranges from a high of 90% (Point Park) to a low of 38% (Mellon Green). Number of visits to 14 parks varies greatly by park.

7 of 10 residents do want more opportunities to get involved with their Downtown neighbors and community.

The most desired type of event (to be held in Downtown) is live music/concerts.

A new bus “labeling” system is supported by Downtown residents, while fewer bus stops in Downtown is not.

73% aware of ZipCar - 14% are members – Average 1 use per month. Residents’ top 3 suggestions to improve parking situation:

Lower the cost Create more spaces/garages Create assigned spaces

SUMMARY OF FINDINGSSUMMARY OF FINDINGS

top related