09 chris liptak aapm15 penn ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/fr09...

Validation  of  a  Method  for  Characterizing  Scanner-­Specific  Bowtie  Filters  in  CT

Chris  Liptak,  Ashraf  Morgan,Frank  Dong,  Andrew  Primak,  Xiang  Li

Cleveland State UniversityCleveland Clinic

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Medical  Physics  Graduate  ProgramCleveland  State  University

&  Cleveland  Clinic

Background

2Bushberg 2011

• Compensates  for  the  attenuation  difference  between  center  and  periphery

• Provides  a  more  uniform  x-­ray  fluence  at  the  detector

• Reduces  peripheral  dose  without  loss  of  image  quality

(beam-­shaping  filter)bowtie  filter

Motivation

3

• Monte  Carlo  simulation  is  the  most  frequently  used  technique  for  patient  dose  assessment  in  CT  

• In  Monte  Carlo  simulations,  accurate  knowledge  of  a  CT  system’s  bowtie  filtration  is  essential

• Information  about  bowtie  filtration  is  often  proprietary

• Alternative:  Dose  measurements  can  be  used  to  create  a  bowtie   filter  model

Traditional Method: Step-and-Shoot

4Turner et al., Med. Phys. 36, no. 6 2154-2164 (2009)

θ

integrating dosimeter

probe

bowtie filter

stationary x-ray source

Advantages:• Single  acquisition• No  probe  repositioning

Characterization  of  bowtie  relative  attenuation  (COBRA)Boone., Med. Phys. 37, 40-48 (2010)

Recent Development

http://www.radcal.com/accu-­‐gold-­‐detail

real-­time  dosimeter

5

Purpose

To  perform  a  validation  of  the  COBRA  method   in  terms  of  the  accuracy  of  the  simulated dose  in  circular  and  elliptical  phantoms

6

www.ptw.de

Methods

Simulation of Real-Time Dose Signal

8

SOMATOM  Definition  Flash  (Siemens  Healthcare)  

Tian et al., Radiology 270, 535-547 (2014)Li et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 4525-4548 (2014)

• PENELOPE Monte Carlo program

• The program was extended to output dose as a function of time

Simulated Experimental Setup

9

CTDI100 pencil ion chamber, capable of collecting real-time dose signals

Liptak et al., Med. Phys. 42, no. 6, 3747-3747 (2015)

θ

rotatingx-ray source

real-time dosimeter

probe

Simulation of Real-Time Dose Signal

10

Simulation  parameters:• axial  scans

• 70,  80,  100,  120,  140  kVp

• 38.4  mm  collimation

• 1-­kHz  acquisition  rate

Relative  bowtie  attenuation  profiles  were  extracted  from  simulated  dose  waveforms

Relative Bowtie Attenuation

11

Relative  transmitted  dose  as  a  function  of  the  fan  beam  angle

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

∑

∑

experimental  bowtie  attenuation

theoreticalbowtie  attenuation

simulated  

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

∑

∑

material  thickness

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

∑

∑

attenuation  coefficient  of  aluminum

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

∑

∑

photon  energy  fluence(from  manufacturer)

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

∑

∑

mass  energy  absorption  coefficient  of  air

Equivalent Bowtie Model

13

aluminum

14

Equivalent Bowtie Filter

ActualBowtie Filter

Compared in terms of simulated phantom dose

Validation of Equivalent Bowtie Model

aluminumgraphite

aluminum

Validation: Phantom Dose Simulation

15

32-­cm  CTDI  phantomcustom-­designed  elliptical  phantom

Simulation  parameters:  single  axial  scans  at  70 and  120  kVp

Results

Phantom Dose at 70 kVp

17

Lateral  holes

Phantom Dose at 120 kVp

18

Conclusion

• First  attempt  to  validate  the  COBRA  method  in  terms  of  the  accuracy  of  the  simulated  phantom  dose

• The  equivalent  bowtie  filter  model  obtained  using  the  COBRA  method  compares  well  with  the  actual  bowtie  filter  in  terms  of  simulated  dose  in  acrylic  phantoms

19

Thank you